Wednesday, November 18, 2009

AP Dissecting Palin Autobiography To Try To Discredit Her

Hey, did the AP dig for dirt in Obama's ghostwritten autobiography Dreams from my Father? I betcha not! This even though the book's full of questionable claims.

But the AP, which is connected to George Soros via Soros-funded Left-wing organizations, is apparently doing it with Sarah Palin's Going Rouge.

(AP-George Soros connection here. It actually popped up on top of Google following a search based on the string ap george soros. My post. Cooool. Oh, and I also happened to find this piece about an AP study that was funded by... George Soros. Hmmmmmmmmm.)
When the former Republican vice presidential candidate and former Alaska governor wrote her autobiography, the AP found a copy before its release date and assigned 11 people to fact check all 432 pages.
Wow... what a big project, as if they considered it of the utmost urgency that they do so... did they do this for Obama's autobio? Surely they ought to, as the guy's the frickin' supposed President, fofecksake! Didn't the AP vet Obama? Why don't they want to see his REAL birth certificate, by the way? Why don't they dissect everything that has to do with Obama? Why not?!
Reviewing books and holding public figures accountable is at the core of good journalism, but the treatment Palin's book received appears to be something new for the AP. The organization did not review for accuracy recent books by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, then-Sen. Joe Biden, either book by Barack Obama released before he was president or autobiographies by Bill or Hillary Clinton. The AP did more traditional news stories on those books.
Why the gosh-darned double standard? What the hell is the AP's game? Who controls the AP? Who's directing them to dig for dirt on Palin?

This doesn't smell right. Why is it that the AP doesn't care that Obama actually might not be the President, as he actually has NOT complied with the Constitution's eligibility requirement that he be born on American soil? Why hasn't the AP put eleven employees onto that issue? Why just assume that everything that had to be done must necessarily have been done? Assumption isn't worth feck-all, dammit! Why are people so damn stupid? Just because we're condescendingly, arrogantly, snootily told over and over and over again that the question of Obama's eligibility to be President is an invalid question that doesn't warrant an answer, we're supposed to accept that position without being given any proof? Yeah, right. Suuuuure. Not me!

Obviously the AP wants to, like Newsweek, discredit Sarah Palin. They're all "Me too, I wanna serve the Fuhrer!"

Ms. Palin herself has the following to say about the AP's bizarre, unbecoming, obsessive behavior:
"Imagine that," the post read. "11 AP reporters dedicating time and resources to tearing up the book, instead of using the time and resources to 'fact check' what's going on with Sheik Mohammed's trial, Pelosi's health care takeover costs, Hasan's associations, etc. Amazing."
A Palin supporter says:
"They're obsessed with trying to discredit her," said Adrienne Ross, New York state organizer for the 2012 Draft Sarah Committee. "Because she's a conservative woman, they make fun of her accent, comment about her looks. She doesn't come in the package they want her to come in."
And that "package" would be left-wing and politically-correct. It would be whatever the Powers that Be deem acceptable.

Ah, to hell with them!

So... how about the "package" that the American People want? After all, it's the American People who actually matter, and what they want that matters, not a behind-the-curtain bunch of filthy-rich, greedy, corrupt, unscrupulous, evil, unethical, immoral folks who think they can direct the world and its people as if conducting a massive, elaborate puppet show! Like, what do they think they are, gods or something?