Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Gay Duke U Official Pimps 5 Yr Old Adopted Son For Sex; Big Media Ignores

Police: Lombard said he sexually molested adopted black five year old son

Horrific story here

How about that. A homosexual pedophile sex slave trader. His name is Frank Lombard. He is gay. He has an adopted (with another guy) five year old black son. He tried to pimp him out online for sex.

Not sensational enough for the Big Old Democrat Party Controlled Media to make a big stink over?

In nearly a week since Lombard was arrested, not one national broadcast or cable television news show has picked up the story. Compare this to the weeks on end of sensational coverage of the white male lacrosse players of the same university charged with rape several years ago.

At the time of this post not one television show has reported the story and only 17 newspapers in the United States featured it - a majority of which are only small local newspapers.


Frank Lombard, the school's associate director of the Center for Health Policy, was arrested after an Internet sting, according to the FBI's Washington field office and the city's police department.
The detective's affidavit charges Lombard identified himself online as "perv dad for fun," and says that in an online chat with the detective, Lombard said he had sexually molested his son, whom he adopted as an infant.
(Emphasis mine)

If the depraved, sick, gay pedophile sex slave trader was a Republican, you just KNOW the Big Media would be all over it 24 hours a day for an infinite period of time! Since the Big Media refuses to say anything, this is how you know he's not a Republican. Right?

Yes, gay people can be horrible scumbags, too.

If Lombard gets a judicial-activist judge like, say, Sonia Sotomayor, don't be surprised if he gets a very light sentence, if any at all, if he's even convicted at all, just because he's gay. Even if he gets a long sentence, well, he likes grown-up guys, too, so maybe it won't be so bad to go to prison, as far as he's concerned... so I say put him in a womens' prison so he won't have any "fun". Otherwise, it won't be punishment.

Pat Boone Wants To See Obama's Real Birth Certificate

Pat Boone

More and more Americans are becoming aware about the Obama Constitutional eligibility/real birth certificate issue.

Including Pat Boone. Yep, that famous Pat Boone. Used to work with Elvis, actually. See?


I suppose the Left will call him a lunatic now, or a "right-wing extremist" or a "teabagger" or something like that. After all, anyone who dares speak the obvious truth, which is that Obama's Constitutional eligibility for being President simply has NOT been verified, is some kind of nutcase or crackpot, right? Must be, if Obama's top media spokesperson and the Big Old Media pretend to laugh at any and all questions about the Birth Certificate...

Seriously, folks. Has anyone ever proven that Obama was born inside American borders?

Ok, I'll let Mr. Boone himself tell you in his own words what's on his mind about Obama.

I know; this suspicion, this question about whether Barack Hussein Barry Soetoro Obama was actually born in the United States — as the Constitution explicitly demands — has been circulating for months, since before he won the election last November. He, or somebody in his confidence, posted a supposed copy of a Hawaiian "Certification of Live Birth," or COLB, on his presidential campaign Web site — even though a COLB, under Hawaiian rules, does not necessarily prove in-state birth. Some found the document, which does not list the hospital of birth or attending physician, to be fake.


Because of the furor and allegations, and because candidate Obama wouldn’t or couldn’t produce a valid U.S. birth certificate, an official or two were dispatched from Washington to see if one existed in Hawaii. After a brief huddled conference with a local data and statistic keeper, from which no press statements were released, there was a brief and quiet announcement that the matter was “resolved.” What does that mean?


If I have to produce my passport, my driver’s license, my birth certificate, for things like leaving the country and returning, buying and selling and leasing and renting — all the things ordinary citizens are required to do all the time — why then, in the name of decency and equality, and, in the “open” and “transparent” approach to government Obama promised, should our elected leader not do the same?

One thing for sure: This is not going away. More and more people are determined to get the truth, and will press to get it. Why should the president and his team stonewall this legitimate and proper request. Is there indeed something devastating to keep hidden?

The voices are only going to grow louder and more numerous.

Don't think so? Ok, go ahead and delude yourself. Be a good little "progressive" and let the Big Old Media and the White House Bully Pulpit tell you what's what and what's not. You're free to not think for yourself, to not be patriotic and not question the "President". As far as you're concerned, anyone can just come in and come from nowhere to take over your country. What do you care, as long as the Big Old Media isn't saying anything bad about the guy?

If anyone's a patriot, it's Pat Boone. He's made some cool patriotic music and narrated a documentary about the history of the National Guard. See?

Monday, June 29, 2009

Expert: Obama Must 'Bring Down' Iran Regime

Story here.

"They've said as soon as they get a nuclear weapon they're going to test it on Israel, so that's a pretty big threat," Ledeen said, adding, "I expect the Israelis to eventually attack the Iranian nuclear facilities if the rest of the world doesn't find some other way to do it. Whether they will bomb it or not, I can't tell. There are a lot of ways to do it."


"They've killed hundreds by now, and thousands of people are in prison. It does seem like the people are so furious, so angry, both with the electoral fraud and now with the repression, that it's hard to imagine this going away any time in the near future.


"Support the Iranian people. Say publicly that all these people have not died in vain and that Iran must be free, and then support them. Bring down the Iranian regime."


"He hasn't done anything to help the Iranian people. He's been dragged kicking and screaming to the point where he's finally condemned the repression, but that's it."

Of course, we must realize that if we wait until Iran acquires a nuclear-armed warhead and "tests" it on Israel, she will, if she hasn't taken out Iran's nuclear and military capabilities, indubitably retaliate with absolutely equivalent force, and, after that, who knows? Like, hey, Barry-O, damned if ya do, damned if ya don't, man!

Perhaps it's better to take out Iran's offensive capabilities pre-emptively.

Obama has the power to do it.

But know what?

I speculate that, as we speak, his people are already developing plans to invade Honduras to remove the military coup-installed President there. Much easier than taking on Iran; pick on the little weakling instead. And say you're too busy restoring democracy there to worry about Iran. Or something like that. Some kind of diversion, Obama must be seeking. And Honduras is opportunity knocking. Don't expect the Left and the Big Old Media to oppose Obama starting a war against Honduras. After all, it's not bad when the Left starts wars. It's not bad when the Left commits coups against governments. And isn't it lovely that the socialist Obama is on the same side as the socialist Fidel Castro (Hey, didn't that guy come to power illegitimately via a military coup or something? What a hypocrite Castro is to denounce the Honduran coup!) and the socialist Hugo Chavez?

Of course, I know nothing about the political situation in Honduras. But I bet that the guy who was removed via coup was a socialist. Hence the anger amongst socialists...

Racial Tensions Arise Within US Democrat Party

Well, we shouldn't be surprised, considering the reality of the Democrats' racist past.

The infighting. Oh, my. Wonder why this is happening?

Funny how the FOX News report fails to mention the Democrats' responsibility for the Ku Klux Klan, or the fact that there's a former KKKer currently sitting as a Democratic Senator.

Odd also that the FOX News report fails to mention that it's the Democrats' fault, the terrible Jim Crow segregation laws.

It's the Democrats' fault. This should be made clear to the American People and to the world.

Oh, and the failure of FOX News to make this clear, well this proves that when the Democrats accuse FOX of being dedicated to attacking the Democrats, the Democrats are plainly wrong.

Come on, FOX News, grow some balls and tell the truth, which is that the Democrats must admit their responsibility for slavery and segregation and must apologize for it, for their party's having made it happen and having fought to keep it happening.

As long as they continue to pretend they have no responsibility, they'll continue to have infighting problems.

Who knows how many racists are in the Democrat Party today? Hmm?

Hard to tell, as the Big Old Media, the Democrats' propaganda arm, certainly won't say!

It's sickening that the truth about the Democrats' awful racist heritage is being covered up, swept under the rug, hidden from light of day. Why is this the case?

Supreme Court Trashes Racist Ruling Of Obama Nominee

...and rightly so.

Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court of the US, Sonia Sotomayor, has had a racist ruling of hers overturned.

Geez... you know, if Sotomayor was a Republican nominee of Bush, and had been caught uttering racist-sounding things and had just had a racist ruling of hers overturned by the Supreme Court, do we think that the entire Left, including the Democrats, Obama, the Big Old Media, Hollyweird et al, wouldn't be making a big, huge stink about it, saying that she can't be a SCOTUS judge because she threatens Americans' civil rights?

Well, it's obvious that she does threaten Americans' civil rights, at least to me.

Obama, come on, pick someone else. Someone acceptable to the mainstream of America, ie. people who believe in the Bill of Rights and in equality and in promotion on the basis of demonstrated merit, not on the basis of race.

Racism is always wrong, no matter who's practicing it, no matter how they attempt to rationalize it, even with the fanciest of rhetorical sophistry.

No racists shall be appointed to the Supreme Court.

If Obama gets Sotomayor confirmed to the SCOTUS, it will set a very dangerous precedent. It will send the message that racism is ok, even though Americans clearly say it isn't. So what does this say about Obama and the Democrats? Well, the Democrats, they're the party who brought forth the Ku Klux Klan... Oh, look! Isn't that Robert Byrd, Democratic Senator and former KKK Grand Kleagle, sitting with today's Democratic Senators? WTF?! Are we in the Twilight Zone or the Bizarro World or what? What on earth is going on here?

Oh, well, I'll be sitting back and watching what happens...

Inviting Prejudiced Janeane To The Party

Janeane Garofalo, out for a stroll


Michelle Malkin reporting...

You remember Katrina Pierson. She was the feisty speaker who rocked the Dallas Tea Party on Tax Day. Katrina has issued an invitation to race-baiting actress Janeane Garofalo to attend the next Dallas Tea Party on Independence Day. I’m delighted to let you know that I’ll be joining Katrina and thousands of others at the Southfork Ranch.

Michelle Malkin does another invite to make sure Prejudiced Janeane gets the message to come and see for herself just exactly who the Tea Party People really are...

Katrina and friends (yours truly included) have issued one more invite to the shindig in the spirit of outreach and education. Come on down, Janeane. What are you afraid of?

Is Prejudiced Jane afraid of "visible minority" American patriots who simply care about their country, their Constitution and their rights and freedoms?

Come on, Janeane, come join the party! What's so frightening about these people? Is your problem that they look "different"? Does that make you uncomfortable? Is that why you try to make people think that all those people are just a bunch of "white racists"? Well, everyone and you know that they aren't, that there's no racism there, that it's a diverse bunch of Americans, and that you should be open-minded to what they have to say, rather than so stubbornly, phobically closed-minded. Hey, did you actually tell yourself that the black fellow in the video "hates the fact that there's a black man in the White House"? Really, Janeane!

There is nothing to fear but your own prejudices, Janeane.

Come on, Janeane. You're not really afraid of people who simply look different, who have a "better tan" than you, etc.? Come on. Join the party!

Montreal Gazette: 'Human Rights' Commissions Threaten Rights, Freedoms

Story here.

ht: NNW

The Canadian Human Rights Commission appears to have learned little from its adventures of the last few years. In its latest report to Parliament it stubbornly defends its authority to police the Internet - or any other electronic medium - for opinions that are "likely to" expose people to hatred or contempt.

This is, as we have said previously in this space, an unacceptable assault on free speech.

With frightening eagerness to rein in Canadians' free expression, the commission finds the authority to restrict honest opinion in Section 13 of the Human Rights Act, a notoriously vague bit of legal writing that forbids transmissions "likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt." The subjective power of that "likely to" makes everyone vulnerable to bureaucratic whim, malice, or distemper.


(...) far better for Parliament simply to repeal Section 13, and leave the question of hate speech to the criminal courts where it belongs - if it belongs anywhere. If a citizen's liberties are to be threatened, that citizen deserves the full protection of the law.

I'd go further. Get rid of those worthless, wastefully expensive, arrogant, stupid, fascist kangaroo courts which are run by brainwashed, ideologically extreme, foolish idiots.

We're massively in deficit now. Getting rid of that colossal waste of tax dollars is one way to help eliminate the deficit, which the Left forced, via blackmail, the government to run up.

Health Canada Issues Warning About CFLs

Story here.

ht: NNW

OTTAWA — Compact fluorescent lightbulbs may be energy efficient but their potential hazards have prompted Health Canada to warn of effects ranging from too much UV exposure to possible mercury poisoning.

The department is already studying both ultraviolet radiation and electrical and magnetic field emissions from the bulbs, and says it will take “corrective measures” with manufacturers “if necessary.”

n the latest “It’s Your Health” newsletter, Health Canada also offers almost two pages of detailed cleanup instructions in the event a bulb, which contains a tiny daub of mercury, is broken.

Several countries have moved to ban traditional, energy-guzzling incandescent lights by 2012, prompting their replacement with the compact fluorescents — or CFLs. Often shaped like a spiral, CFLs are a modern variant of tube-style fluorescent lights.

The ultraviolet radiation CFLs emit isn’t hazardous to most people, Health Canada says. However “some people are extremely sensitive to UV and may be affected by the amount of UV produced,” says its newsletter. That could include people with Lupus, other autoimmune diseases, or sensitive skin.

Perhaps they should be banned to prevent health hazards. Like fragrances are banned in public places. Like smoking is banned in many public places. Really, we shouldn't use them. Besides, they're expensive to manufacture and buy, and they're environmentally hazardous to throw away, with the mercury content! They're also known to be much more likely to catch fire than incandescents.

There are no known health hazards with incandescent bulbs, and, really, they don't use all that much energy. I can tell by looking at my power bill that their energy consumption is very, very small relative to things like using the stove/oven, home heating and hot water.

Another Court Victory Against Islamofascists

Story here.

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Joe Kaufman, the Chairman of Americans Against Hate and the founder of CAIR Watch.

Joe Kaufman, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

The Texas Court of Appeals has just dismissed the case that was brought against you. Congratulations.

Tell us what this case was about.

Kaufman: Yes, it was an important victory, for both the War on Terrorism and Freedom of Speech. Thank you for allowing me this forum to speak about it.

Seven radical Muslim organizations, including the Muslim American Society (MAS) and three Islamic centers owned by the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), filed a lawsuit against me for the simple reason that they wanted to punish me financially for writing about the terrorist ties of their friends. They claimed that I wrote an article which libeled them. Yet not one of the organizations suing me was mentioned in the piece. They filed a restraining order against me, claiming that I was a threat to them, but I have never threatened anyone. With regard to this case, it was only I that received a threat. The case against me was frivolous the moment it was filed, and thankfully that’s how the court found it, albeit a year and a half and nearly $100,000 later.

FP: How were our freedoms threatened by this lawsuit brought against you?

Kaufman: The fear is that, if one writes something that is disagreeable to Islamist groups – even if it’s based entirely on fact, which my article was – he/she will be sued. And in my case, I was sued for writing about groups more than half of which I had never heard of. The chilling effect is real, and the intimidation is real. Indeed, when my lawyers and I walked into the courtroom in October 2007 for a hearing on the case, the courthouse was packed with what seemed to be the entire Dallas-area Muslim community. I was rubbing shoulders with people that were eyeing me like they yearned for my death. No judge wanted to hear the case. When we finally found a judge, four hours later, the courtroom was standing room only with people that considered me an enemy. Who knows how many writers in the past have been frightened off by this intimidation? Here in America, we have our freedoms, but they can easily be abused, as can the legal system.

Mr. Kaufman warns that it was just a "test case" for future nuisance Islamic "libel chill" suits.

It's clear that Islamofacists conspire to silence those who dare to tell, to expose to the Public, the truth about the radical extremism and dangerously threatening behavior of specific Islamic individuals and groups.

It's a lot like how Muslims have hauled writers and publishers to the "Human Rights" Commissions in Canada. Those complaints were the first-ever to be dismissed by the HRCs, as the HRCs backed down under pressure of the very real probability that they would be forced to face the Supreme Court on questions regarding their maliciously criminally illegal, unconstitutional, rights-violating actions. Of course, one Muslim fascist backed down from his complaint (against writer-publisher Ezra Levant) after massive public outrage and condemnation was brought against him for it.

It's all part of the whole "quiet jihad" plot by radical Islamic supremacists to silence those who expose their nefarious doings and plottings, so as to more easily carry out their Islamization agenda for the Free World.

Financial Times: Obama Weak, His Policies Bad

The Financial Times isn't impressed with either Obama or his policies.

I think the FT is being too kind, actually, and is needlessly politely holding back on critically needed, serious criticism of both.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Palin Returns Kerry Insult With Way Better One

Story here. Includes video footage of Palin remarks.

Today, while speaking to Alaska National Guard troops in Kosovo, Palin joked that she actually felt bad for Kerry as she watched his attempt at humor.

"Then Senator John Kerry makes this joke — I don't know if you saw this, but he makes this joke saying, 'Aw shoot, of all the governors in the nation who disappeared, too bad it couldn't have been that governor from Alaska . . .'"

"But the way he said it, he looked quite frustrated and he looked so sad. I just wanted to reach out to the TV and say, 'John Kerry, why the long face?'"

Well, John Kerry does have a long face...

Click to view full size image
Click to view full size image

Nah, that ain't him. It's Lurch.

Kinda looks like Michael Ignatieff, too...

Obsessed Leftist Spotlight: Defaces Baby Trig Palin Photo

Linda Kellen Biegel, the Left-Wing Extremist who hatefully defaced a photograph of baby Trig Palin

Will the Left's irrational, unprovoked, insane, mean-spirited, white-hot anti-Palin hatemongering ever come to an end?

Or will it only get even worse, hitting the most vulnerable Palin family members as well as Mrs. Palin?

What a despicable scumbag, the Hard-Leftist blogger who attacked a baby who has Down Syndrome.

That's something one expects from a Nazi, a hardcore communist or an Al Qaeda activist.

“Recently we learned of a malicious desecration of a photo of the governor and baby Trig that has become an iconic representation of a mother’s love for a special needs child,” Palin spokeswoman Meghan Stapelton told CNN. “The mere idea of someone doctoring the photo of a special needs baby is appalling.”

“Babies and children are off limits,” she added. “It is past time to restore decency in politics and real tolerance for all Americans. The Obama administration sets the moral compass for its party. We ask that special needs children be loved, respected and accepted and that this type of degeneracy be condemned.”

I don't see any condemnation coming from the Left. Probably because the Left condones such a thing, as long as it's done to the children of people whom they hate for not being Leftists.

The very same blogger, Linda Biegel (might as well be named "Linda Bigot"), has also previously attacked Mrs. Palin, which may lead one to speculate that she has a raging hate-on for the Governor and may end up being arrested and charged for stalking and harrassment.

Biegel recently lodged an ethics complaint against Palin for sporting a jacket to a public event – a garment made by a company that sponsors her snow mobile-racing husband.

That complaint was dismissed, as have been all other bogus complaints lodged by obsessive, overzealous Left-wing anti-Palin extremists.


In another ongoing dispute, Biegel has monitored Burke's treatment of Andree McLeod, who has consistently criticized Palin. Biegel suspected that the governor's office had added and abetted what she styled Burke’s “smear campaign” against McLeod.

Biegel requested that the Office of the Governor provide her with any relevant e-mails between the concerned parties – but was informed that copies of the e-mails could only be released after she paid administrative fees of $5,552.64.

The police ought to have a nice sit-down-and-chat session with Linda Bigot. Oops, Biegel. And explain to her what constitutes criminal harrassment and hate crimes (one could consider the public defacement of a photograph of a baby with Down Syndrome to be a hate crime) so that she understands how far she must not go...

Wonder what would happen to people who would "go after" the Obamas like this?

I note from her facebook page that she's a big Obama fan and loves to watch David "Sick, Hateful Pervert" Letterman. Oh, and she's a Democrat...

Nationwide Anti-Cap-'n'-Trade Protest Being Planned

Story here. Read it all for yourself.

So, here is reality. Cap and Trade is about money and power for the US’ now-ruling elite; a power elite class that has Dictator Obama-the-Usurper at the helm of a fast-sinking US ship. If passed by the Senate, Cap and Trade will remove our rights as US citizens to even have the ability to set our own thermostats. Obama appointee Rosa Brooks (who also worked for George Soros) wants each and every home in the US to have mandatory “smart meters” which can and will have the federal government regulating energy usage. And with the passage of Cap and Trade, you will soon pay through the nose for all of your energy needs. Obama and his feds will have officially entered and begun control of you and what you are allowed to do in your own homes. Don’t forget that ObamaCare is next. If this one passes, Obama and his thugs will control our bodies—they will soon no longer belong to us but to Obama and the collective.

We have now reached the time for Nationwide Protests against a government that no longer works for us but is now almost fully positioned to move against us. If we do not affect them now, there will never be a time in the future that we can do so. It will not be long before Obama will have his private police force (on Google look up the GIVE Act and AmeriCorps) in place. If we do not take National Days of Protest against this increasingly tyrannical government now, we will not be able to do so in the future. I would suggest we begin locally by contacting the people who planned and implemented that April Tea Parties. They have access to the National Tea Party coordinators. If we don’t act now, our country, our jobs, any freedoms and liberties left and our future may—make that will—be gone forever.

Ah, but why take them seriously? They're just "teabaggers" and "all racists", as the Hard Left calls them, right???

After all, anyone who dares oppose Obama the Great and Magnificient and His Big Magic Solutions to Everything must necessarily be an evil monster, right???

Obama's Hidden-Agenda, Racist 2010 Census

Read about it for yourself.

It asks a lot of things, things one wouldn't think mattered. It asks if you're this race or that race this nationality or that nationality, what kind of toilet you have(!), what, if any problems you suffer from, etc.


It doesn’t ask if you are a citizen of the U.S.A., if you are an immigrant, or if you are a Muslim.

One would think it'd be important to know how many are citizens and how many aren't, etc. But this information doesn't matter to the Left, because they now consider citizenship and place of birth to be irrelevant. The Left wants America to become not-a-sovereign-nation.


To assist in the hiring of census takers, the Obama Administration has opted to partner with the following special interest groups (not one of which represents the despised race of whites who settled this country):
(A very long list follows, beginning with, of course, the left-wing extremist, violent criminal organization ACORN and going all the way down to something called "Voto Latino".)

Excluded from the list of census partners are such groups, as the American Legion, the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Daughters of the American Revolution, the Elks Clubs, the Rotary Clubs, the Moose Lodge, and, of course, the Friendly Sons of St. Patrick.

This racial bias inherent in the census has raised the concern that the results will be rigged - - a concern that has been intensified by Mr. Obama’s selection of Robert M. Groves, a sociology professor at the University of Michigan,

Republican legislators have expressed alarm because Mr. Groves’s specialty is statistical sampling — roughly speaking, the process of extrapolating from the numbers of people actually counted to arrive at estimates of those uncounted and, presumably, arriving at a realistic total.

The whole thing will be a fraud, will be rigged according to the Hard-Left agenda. It will not be proper.

It sounds like it'll be messed with as the likes of the "climate change"-propaganda-spewing IPCC messes with its data, which has been proven to be collected in a way to produce the results they want.

The hidden agenda here is to use the Census for the purposes of social reengineering.

Of course. This is the way the Left operates. They lie and cheat and impose. To hell with the Constitution and to hell with whatever and whomever they find inconvenient to their agenda.

But what do I understand? After all, as far as the Obama Regime is concerned, since I dissent with respect to their bizarre, scary, dangerous, destructive, divisive policies, I'm a "right-wing extremist" and a "potential terrorist". Obviously you're supposed to ignore me as some kind of a nut, according to the Regime.

SinoCommies Screw Up, Declare Mao A Criminal

The Chinese Communist Party is losing it.

Of course, the picture wasn't up for long. Heads may soon roll... literally.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) website People’s Net made a huge mistake yesterday. When publishing news about a wanted man who’d surrendered, they used the photo of former communist leader Mao Zedong.

Although the photo was quickly removed, Mao was labeled “the A-class wanted man who trafficked women and children.”

Sabotage from within? To send a message to the ruling elite that their opponents are everywhere and will pop up when they least expect it?

Expect more "embarrassments".

How Do We Know...

...that they're not just making it up...

...so that they can have a phony excuse to get Big Old Media attention by walking around, dressed in outrageous getups, screaming about "white supremacists running amok; Neo-Nazis everywhere!!!"?

Betcha Warren Kinsella and Richard Warman were in on it. Wouldn't surprise me. Oh, and Jennifer Lynch. And Giacomo Vigna. And Syed Soharwardy and Mohammed Elmasry. Sure, why not? It's their thing, after all.

I mean, show me the "white supremacists" and "neo-Nazis". Show me them! Where are they? What evidence is there of them? Were any arrested? Is there audio/video evidence? What evidence?

Why should I believe you guys aren't just paranoid about there supposedly being a whole hell of a lot of those scumbags, as opposed to a very tiny fringe number of them?

I mean, there's more racists and anti-Semites out there who aren't "white", causing violence and vandalism. Why just scream about the tiny fringe minority who are "white"? Why not scream about ALL racists and bigots regardless of color?

Idiots. Racists and bigots come in all colors and from all walks of life. Not just one.

Next time, when you want to claim that there's "white" supremacists running amok and doing stuff, why don't you PROVE what you're claiming, rather than assuming that they were necessarily "white"? They could be any other kind of racial supremacist, like "black", "brown", or they could be Islamic supremacists... Hell, they could be just plain Leftist anti-Christians/anti-Semites/anti-Israelites, like most of the assholes in the so-called "anti-intolerance" parades...

See what Warren Kinsella is doing to the perceptions of youth? He's delusionally screaming about neo-Nazis in bathrooms and so on and so forth, making impressionable young leftists paranoid about those horrible baldheaded honkies in jackboots (like, where are they, show me some, point 'em out) ...

Why did the Canoe News site report on this? It's nothing but unsubstantiated claims by paranoid leftists. Where's the evidence that they're telling the truth, and not just making it up for an excuse to get attention for their Warren Kinsella-esque jihad against possibly imaginary monsters and demons? It's not news. Hell, they could've just called those paraders "teabaggers" and treated them with contempt and derision and called them lunatics and stuff. Just as the Big Old Media treated the million-strong demonstration against the hard-left-wing policies of the current administration in Washington.

If I were to walk down the street raving about Islamofascists being everywhere and that they're going around saying and doing hateful stuff, you know those very same leftists would think I'm nuts. But there's proof that I'm right. Even the leftists have seen it, though they deny it.

Maybe the "Human Rights" Commission employees are going around posing as Skinheads, beating up people, painting swastikas on stuff... hey, if they can hijack civilians' wireless routers to spread hatred and racism online, why wouldn't they masquerade in person as fake neo-Nazis and other scary honky monsters? Hey, it's possible. They do it online, why not in person?

Sounds like a distraction from the other, more numerous, non-"white" racists and bigots out there that the Left doesn't want to believe there are. So they cry "white wolf!!!".

Dammit, when will these idiots ever come to understand that there's racists and bigots all over the place, and they're not necessarily "white"?

They single out "whites" exclusively. This means that they are racists, too. Think about that.

And these youth, most of them, I'd say they need to get a job, or go to a non-ideological/non-political technical school instead of some brainwashing university! Nothing like work to keep the propagandists and community organizers away and keep one's mind unpolluted by their hateful propaganda.

These youth scare me and make me fear for my safety. How do I, a "white" (not my fault; I was born this way, ok?) guy with a near-bald (by choice, to lessen the visual impact of my big bald spot) head, know that they're not going to see me, think I'm a monster, and swarm me and kick my ass? I mean, they're crazy and paranoid! If anything, they must be strenly warned by police to "watch it, don't do anything illegal, don't attack anyone".

Oh, yeah, I'm being partly tongue-in-cheek and sensational, of course. But, hey, so are those dummies in that parade there...

Saturday, June 27, 2009

More Progress In Iraq: Gender Equality Advances

Little steps, but steps forward, nonetheless. Long way to go to even resemble the Free World/Western World, but progress is progress.

Thank Bush. Without his decisive action, this progress would never have happened.

Also: See, the terrorists were beaten. The surge worked.

And Obama can't take credit. Too bad, Barry-O.

Unemployment Rolls Triple In Socialist Obamerica Despite Monster 'Stimulus'

Fat lot of good the monster "stimulus" spending budget has done.

Despite an incredibly monstrous "stimulus" budget.

So tell me: Does the Keynesian way really work?

Show me the evidence that it is.

You know, as far as I can see, beyond the shock of high oil prices and all that entails, I see the communistic lending policies of the Left (Democrats et al), with respect to communistic lending practices, letting those who can't afford to borrow, borrow anyway, and I see the auto unions and the auto executives working together to make the American automobile industry uncompetitive relative to foreign automakers. This is the cause: The Left.

Funny how The Left was elected to fix what they broke in the first place!

As for the situation in Canada in which there's complaints that the "stimulus" funds aren't getting out all that quickly, I say, good. Because I don't believe that ballooning deficit spending will necessarily be needed. Maybe a huge chunk will not be spent, and will return to general revenues or the Treasury or whatever and maybe the fiscal picture will improve dramatically. Besides, I don't see things as being as bad in Canada as in America, where hardcore left-wing policies were imposed by the Left (Democrats et al), and pretty much continued even under the admittedly not so conservative Bush II Republicans.

I hope that this whole thing will prove to be a lesson in the future. But I fear it won't. Already that nutcase left-winger Barney Frank guy is saying Fannie Mae/Freddy Mac should loosen their lending requirements further... Talk about insanity, eh!

Hang on, folks. It's going to get rougher...

A WHAT Rodeo?

Oh. I see. Wonder what they wear. Wonder what the clowns wear. Do they, like, dress like they do in those special parades?

So what's next, an Islamic rodeo?

Why not a communist rodeo?

How about a Trekkie rodeo? People in Star Trek uniforms riding massive bulls and lassoing livestock...

Time For A Cheetos Registry?

Dangerous weapons: Lightweight, puffy, cheese-flavored snacks?

Charged with assault for throwing Cheetos at each other?!

That's "domestic violence"?

Guess we'll now have to register snack foods...

More Big Old Media Double Standard Re Mentioning Party Affiliation of Disgraced Pols

ABC, CBS and NBC All Fail to ID Indicted Mayor as a Democrat

Two weeks since the ABC and NBC evening shows took multiple days before getting around to informing viewers that disgraced New York Governor Eliot Spitzer belonged to the Democratic Party -- after every ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news program last year immediately highlighted the party of Republican Senators David Vitter and Larry Craig -- Monday's broadcast network evening newscasts all failed to note, verbally or on-screen, Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's party.


The big three broadcast networks have gone out of their way to avoid labeling scandal-scarred New York Governor Eliot Spitzer as a "Democrat." An examination of the fifteen ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news shows through Wednesday night finds Spitzer was called a Democrat just 20 percent of the time -- twice on CBS, once on ABC, and never on NBC. So, how do the networks treat Republicans involved in sex scandals? Always, always as "Republicans." Looking at the ABC, CBS, NBC morning and evening shows in the days after the most recent scandals broke, Republican Senators David Vitter (July) and Larry Craig (August) were labeled "Republican" on every show (100 percent). Yet for Democrat Spitzer, four out of five news programs (80 percent) have skipped his party identification....

Proof that FOX News is fair and balanced. They mentioned the party affiliation of a Republican-affiliated fellow who was a former mayor in Florida who was arrested for being naked in a public place.

Musselwhite, a Republican, was elected to the Gainesville City Council in 2000, where he served for six years, including a stint as mayor. He lost a bid for a state Senate seat in 2006.

See? The Leftist Big Old Media is NOT fair and balanced, whereas FOX News clearly IS.

Obama Eligibility Issue Now In Court, Also Under Indictment by Grand Jury


“For nothing is hid that shall not be made manifest, nor anything secret that shall not be known and come to light.”
Luke 8:17

Yes, it is
. It's for real.

In court...

Kerchner et al V Obama & Congress et al

(...) We all know that we have seen months of stalling from the defendants. We fully expected this dismissal motion which Obama has previously used when he was a mere candidate. The difference now is that Obama is the putative President and not simply a candidate with a 1st Amendment right to run for political office. As the putative President, Obama must show that he is qualified under Article II of our Constitution. We also know that Congress failed to exercise its Constitutional duty to properly vet Obama prior to confirming him as President at the Joint Session. The motion return date is July 20, 2009. (...)


"Plaintiffs' complaint raises significant issues necessitating that the named defendants engage competent counsel to represent their interests. Given the high ranking positions of the defendants, the decision as to who will represent them in this case is not simple and straightforward," the judge said.

But as soon as attorneys are lined up, "the case will proceed expeditiously," he said.


"This is really strange," said the attorney, noting that judges typically do not accept or even acknowledge public commentary on cases that are pending before them.

"The point is the letters are there in the docket," he said.

The question of Obama's eligibility is now in court. There IS a case, and the judge has directed Obama to line up counsel therefor.

It's happening.

It's going ahead.

The Obama eligibility issue is, as they say, "before the courts".

Obama now has something to sweat about. And so do his puppetmasters.

But don't expect the Big Media to tell the People. They won't dare anger their masters by making it known to the People. Shhh! Hush-hush!

Anyone who denies the plain, undeniable, blatantly obvious truth of the matter just because they haven't heard about it in the Big Old Media... are in a state of blissful ignorance of reality.

It's obvious to me because I've seen NO evidence that Obama was properly vetted. McCain was properly vetted, whereas Congress didn't vet Obama at all.

And we have NOT seen Obama's birth certificate. The Obamites only released a copy of a different kind of document, a "Certification of Live Birth", which is issued, and indicates Hawaii registration, even in the case of a foreign birth, and therefore CANNOT be considered as evidence of actual, physical place of birth.

I know that people have been conditioned by the Big Old Media's silence on the whole thing to believe that it's all a non-issue, that it was, of course, settled and taken care of. But the fact is that it hasn't been. No one has demonstrated otherwise. Folks who want the question to go away, rather than proving it's already settled properly, engage in a campaign of ridicule and of de-credibilization, using the silly smear word "birthers" and accusing those who dare to ask the question of being "conspiracy theorists".

Well, only proof can settle the issue. And there hasn't been any proof provided by the defendant, Obama, nor by Congress.

And now it's in court, in a real case.

If it had been proven that Obama has indeed been properly vetted according to the Constitution's requirements, then such proof would have already been furnished to the judge, who would then have dismissed the lawsuit. But obviously there is no proof of vetting, so the case is going to trial.

Yes. Obama is on trial. To determine whether he's, under Constitutional rules, legitimately the President.

Next step will be to see on July 20th whether the judge will be impressed with Obama's Motion to Dismiss based on the standard refrain of "they don't have standing to do this".

As far as I'm concerned, any American citizen "has standing", and the judge certainly can say the same.

And that's not the only serious thing happening.

The Steady Drip brings to us the fact that a Texas Grand Jury is now investigating the possibility of fraud and treason having been commited by Obama re. his eligibility to be President.

UPDATE: Actually, I'm now aware that the Lone Star Grand Jury has actually already INDICTED Obama for fraud and treason.

Barack Obama, aka: Barry Soetoro and Barack Hussein Obama was indicted by the Lone Star Jury of Texas on two counts: Fraud and Treason. It is now up to court system in the State Texas to formally prosecute our “presumed” President.

Documentary proof of Grand Jury Presentment (Indictment)

In the comments, in response to skeptical commentor "Balbulican", I've posted links for y'all to understand, in a nutshell, what is a "Grand Jury".

In short, it's the "Fourth Branch of Government", but isn't actually government, but rather a civilian body acting independently to gather evidence as to whether there has been a crime commited, including by a public official (the President obviously counts). If a Grand Jury feels that there is sufficient evidence for an "presentment" (indictment), then it makes such presentment to the court.

The Grand Jury is a RIGHT guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

See also: What is a Grand Jury?

The grand jury system, an institution of English-speaking countries, was established in the US by the fifth amendment to the Constitution. It is a codified practice of Anglo-Saxon or Norman (depending upon your expert) common law. "The grand jury is supposed to function as a body of neighbors who aid the state in bringing criminals to justice while protecting the innocent from unjust accusation," according to Consumer Law.

Read it all.

Here's more information. This link is to a resource site for legal professionals, called "Find Law".

Here's a little taste:

(...)Its adoption in our Constitution as the sole method for preferring charges in serious criminal cases shows the high place it held as an instrument of justice. And in this country as in England of old the grand jury has convened as a body of laymen, free from technical rules, acting in secret, pledged to indict no one because of prejudice and to free no one because of special favor.'' 3

[Footnote 3] Costello v. United States, 350 U.S. 359, 362 (1956). ''The grand jury is an integral part of our constitutional heritage which was brought to this country with the common law. The Framers, most of them trained in the English law and traditions, accepted the grand jury as a basic guarantee of individual liberty; notwithstanding periodic criticism, much of which is superficial, overlooking relevant history, the grand jury continues to function as a barrier to reckless or unfounded charges . . . . Its historic office has been to provide a shield against arbitrary or oppressive action, by insuring that serious criminal accusations will be brought only upon the considered judgment of a representative body of citizens acting under oath and under judicial instruction and guidance.'' United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 571 (1976) (plurality opinion). See id. at 589-91 (Justice Brennan concurring).

I'm honestly, at this point, convinced that, despite the utter lack of any indication thereto in the Big Old Media, that, in fact, a Grand Jury in Texas has indicted Barack Hussein Obama on the charges of fraud and treason.

If I'm wrong, I invite proof as to this. Real proof. If such is provided to my satisfaction, I'll pleasantly consider appropriate modification or retraction with respect to this post.

After all, just because the Big Old Media hasn't said anything about it, doesn't mean that it's not happening.

Reality isn't created by the Big Old Media; it doesn't depend on the Big Old Media to play god to deem that which is and isn't real.

Friday, June 26, 2009

More Are Skeptics On 'Climate Change' Than Ever Before

Story here.

Among the many reasons President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority are so intent on quickly jamming a cap-and-trade system through Congress is because the global warming tide is again shifting. It turns out Al Gore and the United Nations (with an assist from the media), did a little too vociferous a job smearing anyone who disagreed with them as "deniers." The backlash has brought the scientific debate roaring back to life in Australia, Europe, Japan and even, if less reported, the U.S.


The number of skeptics, far from shrinking, is swelling. Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe now counts more than 700 scientists who disagree with the U.N. -- 13 times the number who authored the U.N.'s 2007 climate summary for policymakers. Joanne Simpson, the world's first woman to receive a Ph.D. in meteorology, expressed relief upon her retirement last year that she was finally free to speak "frankly" of her nonbelief. Dr. Kiminori Itoh, a Japanese environmental physical chemist who contributed to a U.N. climate report, dubs man-made warming "the worst scientific scandal in history." Norway's Ivar Giaever, Nobel Prize winner for physics, decries it as the "new religion." A group of 54 noted physicists, led by Princeton's Will Happer, is demanding the American Physical Society revise its position that the science is settled. (Both Nature and Science magazines have refused to run the physicists' open letter.)

The collapse of the "consensus" has been driven by reality. The inconvenient truth is that the earth's temperatures have flat-lined since 2001, despite growing concentrations of C02. Peer-reviewed research has debunked doomsday scenarios about the polar ice caps, hurricanes, malaria, extinctions, rising oceans. A global financial crisis has politicians taking a harder look at the science that would require them to hamstring their economies to rein in carbon.

ht: Drudge

France's Muslim Nazi Barbarians


Above: Muslim Nazis, WWII/Holocaust era.
Below: Today's Muslim Supremacists in various uniforms.


Story here. Read the whole thing.

Geller: The death of Ilan Halimi can only be described as an unspeakable horror, and yet typical of the increasing Islamic Jew-hatred and violence against the Jews. A group calling itself the Muslim Barbarians targeted Jewish men for torture and murder. Their first attempts to kidnap a Jew were unsuccessful, despite the lure of a beautiful girl. Ilan Halimi was not so lucky. He did not escape the Islamic homemade concentration camp the Muslim Barbarians had set up.

The banality of evil lived in that apartment building. Apartment dwellers, all Muslims, heard Ilan's screams and cries of torture over a period of three weeks, and yet did not call the cops. The screams must have been loud because the torture was especially atrocious: the thugs cut bits of flesh off the young man. They cut his fingers and ears. They burned him with acid. They poured flammable liquid on him and set him on fire. Not only did those in the building not go to the police -- they did nothing at all. Worse, many took part in the tortures.

So systemic is the Jew hatred in France that it impeded rescuing Ilan or securing his release. Halimi's family said that throughout Ilan's entire captivity, the French police refused to move on any of the evidence that pointed to an anti-Semitic motive. Instead, the police conducted a routine kidnap investigation (which invariably involves ransom, not death). The police refused to pursue the anti-Semitic motivations of the kidnappers in spite of the fact that, according to newspaper accounts, "in their e-mail and telephone communications with Ilan's family, his captors repeatedly referred to his Judaism, and on at least one occasion recited verses from the Koran while Ilan was heard screaming in agony in the background".

The family begged the police to listen to torturous phone calls from the kidnappers and acknowledge that Ilan was abducted because he was Jewish. Clearly, had the police not acted in judeophobic fashion, they would have recognized that Ilan's life was in terrible danger and taken urgent action. But law enforcement was not the only guilty party. The government refused to acknowledge the anti-Semitic motives behind the torture and killing a full week after the Halimi turned up mutilated and dead.

These torturers aren't human. They're animals. Just like the Nazis responsible for the Holocaust.

Oh, but, hey, they're Muslims. Muslims can do no wrong. Islam is a religion of peace. We dare not suspect any Muslims of any wrongdoing ever, else we're awful, hateful "Islamophobes".

Imagine if we weren't allowed to do anything about Skinheads doing such stuff to Blacks in America, or in Canada in Skinhead-filled apartment buildings. Imagine if the police didn't care, didn't want to believe in the possibility, or actually condoned or even supported what was going on. Imagine also if it was being done to homosexuals by torturous, murderous gay-bashers.

What's the difference? Oh, of course, the victims of these crimes against humanity, of these police-no-go-zone mini-Aschwitzes, are Joooooos! Therefore the sophisticated, "Palestine"-positive, Israel-hating French look the other way.

The trial of these filthy, inhuman, monstrous beasts, these Muslims who tortured and murdered the man because he was Jewish, is a closed trial, closed to the public and the press.

And the trial is currently suspended. Any hopes that justice will ever be done? Not many, as, after all, the animals responsible for the atrocity are Muslims. Muslims are obviously so special that they can't be treated as equals before and under the law relative to non-Muslims; they must be given better treatment, according to dhimmi political correctness fascism.

The silence in the media and across the world is a crime against humanity. Imagine, if you will, the unthinkable, the impossible -- if Ilan had been a Muslim and his attackers had been Jews. Stop laughing -- I know it is impossible, but that's not my point. This is damning proof of the Jew hatred that is running wild across the world. Israel shuts a light off in Gaza and the world wants to eliminate her. Imagine if Ilan had been black and his attackers had been white. Stop and think about it.

I would recommend an armed civilian rescue force to storm the apartment building to rescue Mr. Halimi.

After all, when the police refuse to do anything no matter what, it then becomes time to take the law into one's own hands. And the police would have no right to complain.

Obamites Got Atlanta Tea Party Event Axed

Story here.

Emphasis mine.

"With just a few days left until the Fourth of July Tea Parties begin, this is very unfortunate timing! One wonders why Simon Property Group waited until now to interfere."

But he also connected the dots for those who really wonder:

  1. Gwinnett Place Mall shut down the Atlanta Tea Party.
  2. Simon Property Group owns Gwinnett Place Mall.
  3. Melvin Simon (a Forbes 400 billionaire) is co-chairman of Simon Property Group, Inc.
  4. Melvin Simon has provided large political contributions to Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Al Franken, John Edwards, the DNC and many other Democrats and Democrat organizations.
  5. Melvin Simon was a major contributor to Barack Obama's inaugural committee and has given at least $1 million to the William J. Clinton foundation.
  6. Melvin's wife, Bren, personally donated almost $100,000 to various political candidates, was a fundraiser for Hillary Clinton's presidential bid and contributed to President Obama's inaugural committee.
Interesting links to the Democrats and Obama.

The timing is suspicious, to say the least. Did the Obamites deliberately wait until so late before the event to twist arms? Yes, I know what mall management claims, that they "weren't advised" until just recently, but that wouldn't be mall management's fault, would it? One would have to blame the Obamites who waited so long to say something.

I hope the Atlanta Tea Party still goes ahead. There's no reason why it can't. After all, the Constitution guarantees Americans the right to assemble, to protest, to speak freely. If they're to be denied any and all opportunities to have their assembly, especially on July 4th, well, what does that mean?

Of course, they can find some alternative means. Surely they can gather somewhere and do what the Left, the GLBTs and the Islamists get to do all the time.

ACORN Probe Nixed By 'Powers That Be'


Story here.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. has backed off his plan to investigate purported wrongdoing by the liberal activist group ACORN, saying "powers that be" put the kibosh on the idea.

Mr. Conyers, Michigan Democrat, earlier bucked his party leaders by calling for hearings on accusations the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) has committed crimes ranging from voter fraud to a mob-style "protection" racket.

"The powers that be decided against it," Mr. Conyers told The Washington Times as he left the House chambers Wednesday.

The chairman declined to elaborate, shrugging off questions about who told him how to run his committee and give the Democrat-allied group a pass.

This is Obama's America, folks.

Zero accountability. Zero.

No wonder some call Obama "Zero". He's zero of the good things Americans expect in a President!

Analyzing The Obama-ABC Propaganda Broadcast

All Barack Channel

ABC ObamaCare Special Turns Into Presidential Filibuster

While Obama had to field some difficult questions -- from the audience and ABC -- he faced no Republican critics of his proposals. The network also allowed him to dominate the program with long-winded and vague answers. Out of the 75 minutes the network dedicated over the two programs (commercials excluded), the president managed to take 60 percent of that time: 45 minutes to give 19 vague responses – not exactly the “dialogue” advertised by ABC:

In fact, at one point, the president went on for four minutes and 33 seconds to answer a question about government interference, the “Big Brother fear” as the questioner put it and how it would be paid for. In the next segment Gibson pleaded with the president to keep his response to the next question shorter.

Obama was also granted the opportunity to deliberate over two of the audience questions during the commercial breaks. And the initial hour-long program never even addressed some of the most debated aspects of health care because Obama consistently ran long and was unchecked by the hosts. And while some of the members of the audience asked challenging questions, not one Republican critic of Obamacare was given a chance to be heard. Gibson did attempt to question the president about such critics, but no Republican voices were allowed to speak for themselves.

And don't forget that ABC refused to air any opposition commercials during the whole thing.

Talk about fair and balanced, impartial, unbiased, non-partisan. Talk about following the "fairness doctrine". Talk about openness and transparency (that's Obama's part, which he isn't upholding with respect to anything).

All in all, it was bad for democracy.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Obama Regime Negotiating, Dealing With Terrorists

Flashback: Obama: I Won't Negotiate With Terrorists, Just Their Sponsors

"George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists"
-Barack Hussein Obama

Story here.

Emphasis mine.

Why was Obama so reluctant at first to condemn the brutal crackdown by the Iranian Regime against the Iranian People?

Because the Obama Regime has actually been negotiating and dealing with, at least indirectly, the Iranian Regime, through hardened, guilty-of-execution-of-US-soldiers terrorists backed by Iran, operating in Iraq.

(...) Even as the mullahs are terrorizing the Iranian people, the Obama administration is negotiating with an Iranian-backed terrorist organization and abandoning the American proscription against exchanging terrorist prisoners for hostages kidnapped by terrorists. Worse still, Obama has already released a terrorist responsible for the brutal murders of five American soldiers in exchange for the remains of two deceased British hostages.


About two weeks ago, the Obama administration released Laith Qazali after extensive negotiations with the Asaib al-Haq terror network. That network has long been in negotiations with the fledgling Iraqi government, dangling the possibility of laying down its arms, renouncing violence, and integrating into Iraqi society, provided that its top members — particularly Qais and Laith Qazali, as well as Ali Mussa Daqduq — be released. Realizing, however, that these terrorists were responsible for kidnapping and killing American soldiers in gross violation of the laws of war, the Bush administration had declined to release them.

ht: Bill Roggio, LongWarJournal.org

The Obama administration has not only released Laith Qazali, it has been in negotiations to release his brother, Qais Qazali, as well. The negotiations and release were carried out in flagrant disregard of the longstanding policy against exchanging prisoners for the release of hostages. Undermining that policy endangers all American troops and civilian personnel — as well as the troops and civilian personnel of our allies — by encouraging terrorists to kidnap them to use as bargaining chips.
Back in May 2008, in a speech before the Israeli Knesset, President Bush derided the “foolish delusion” of unidentified, na├»ve politicians who “seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along.” Exhibiting a thin-skinned consciousness of guilt, Sen. Barack Obama assumed Bush had been referring to him, and lashed out: “George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists.”

President Obama is now way beyond mere support of such engagement. Under his leadership, and even as the mullahs who have been at war with the United States for 30 years are engaged in a Tiananmen-style crackdown, Obama is neck-deep in terrorist-for-hostages negotiations with Iran-backed killers who have American blood on their hands.

ht: Watcher

Also interesting: Obama Regime sent letter to Ayatollah Khameini prior to Iranian elections: Stories here and here.

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Monkey Whizzes On President

Now, that's a headline you don't see very often.

Guess the monkey was a supporter of the other guy.

Hmm... having a monkey whiz on one's jacket? Well, would one rather have a bird crap on one's head?

Well, at least the President, apparently a classy dude, didn't retaliate and whiz on the monkey.

Enviro-Looni Suzuki Totally Unhinged!

Dr. David Suzuki, Canada's own Al Gore

The Fruit Fly Guy gets unhinged again. See for yourself what had him going bonkers.

Bill Tieleman tells us about his encounter with an unhinged David Suzuki...

I was attending a reception when suddenly the host of CBC TV's The Nature Of Things was in my face.

"I want to talk to you!" a red-faced and agitated David Suzuki said, finger pointing at my chest.

"You have no right to demonize me!" he yelled, causing people around us to back away.


"I don't give a shit about you..." Suzuki almost screamed.

So he was mad 'cause the other guy rightly pointed out that Suzuki wasn't all that consistently supportive of the NDP.

ht: SDA

Hey, I remember the other guy. Bill Tieleman. I did a post which, among other stuff, dissed something he said. And he left a couple of comments under that post.

Be "Mean" To Liberal Fascist Jennifer Lynch!

Jennifer Lynch, Liberal Fascist

Blazing Cat Fur's got a contest going on, so go and vote for the best slogan to "get" Jennifer Lynch, Canada's Grand High Liberal Fascist, who gets paid $300,000+ a year to stomp all over Canadians' rights.

Hatred and contempt? Nah. Just derision and dismissal of this dumbass and her Dark Ages ideology.


ht: SDA

Ban The Burkha: UK Muslim Woman

Saira Khan
Saira Khan

Story here

In the predominantly Muslim enclaves of Derby near my childhood home, you now see women hidden behind the full-length robe, their faces completely shielded from view. In London, I see an increasing number of young girls, aged four and five, being made to wear the hijab to school.

Shockingly, the Dickensian bone disease rickets has reemerged in the British Muslim community because women are not getting enough vital vitamin D from sunlight because they are being consigned to life under a shroud.

Thanks to fundamentalist Muslims and 'hate' preachers working in Britain, the veiling of women is suddenly all-pervasive and promoted as a basic religious right. We are led to believe that we must live with this in the name of 'tolerance'.

And yet, as a British Muslim woman, I abhor the practice and am calling on the Government to follow the lead of French President Nicolas Sarkozy and ban the burkha in our country.

The veil is simply a tool of oppression which is being used to alienate and control women under the guise of religious freedom.

She also points out that the Koran doesn't say anything about having to wear a burkha.

I'd also like to see the Kaffiyeh (that stupid big-dishtowel-like thing Yasser Arafat wore on his head which is now popularly worn by far-left anti-Israel bigots) banned. It's a symbol of Islamic-supremacist/dhimmi anti-Semitism as far as I'm concerned.

Conservative Teacher Gets Job Back

Tim Latham

Fired for being a conservative, Mr. Latham won his job back.

Congratulations, Mr. Latham!

A big victory for equality rights for conservatives everywhere!

And a reminder to liberal fascists everywhere: "Right-wingers" have rights, too, and you must respect them at all times and never, never discriminate, or there will be significant consequences.

Virginians Oppose Saudi Madrassa Expansion

Story here.

"The Fairfax County government no longer pretends to be fair and impartial in its dealings with residents who oppose the railroading of the ISA expansion through its offices," said James Lafferty, chairman of the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force, or VAST. "This is an outrageous effort to stack the deck against the protesting county residents just weeks before the vote on the massive ISA expansion."


He says the county-sponsored Islamic dinner also raises constitutional questions about "separation of church and state."

"No church or synagogue ever got such preferential treatment from the county government," Lafferty argued.


The Saudi school's alumni include Omar Abu Ali, an al-Qaida operative convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush. Ali graduated valedictorian, and the school proudly published another superlative for him in its yearbook: "Voted Most Likely to be a Martyr," a caption under his photo read.

There's also a connection to a couple of the 9/11 terrorists.

Don't expect the ACLU to oppose the county government's involvement with the madrassa. After all, the ACLU hates and seeks to destroy Christianity, not Islam. Otherwise, they'd screech and scream about "separation of mosque and state", rather than their biggest fetish, the myth of "separation of church and state".

No Way! Really? Liberals Soft On Crime?!

No kidding!

ht: NNW

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson accused the Liberals of being soft on crime, saying the Senate is stalling legislation needed to protect Canadians.

"Liberal softness on crime is demonstrated again and again by gutting our crime legislation, tying it up in red tape and playing procedural games so that it never becomes law," Nicholson said.

The Liberal majority in the Senate, however, says it won't simply rubber stamp legislation and the Conservatives themselves are responsible for many of the delays.

There the Liberals go yet again, wrongly blaming the Conservatives for the actions of the Liberals themselves.

Does anyone recall a single fecking time during the thirteen-year Chretien-Martin Regime in which the Liberal-dominated Senate didn't automatically rubber-stamp whatever legislation was dumped onto their table?

And now for my commentary on Liberals being soft on crime...


Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Old Media Is Obama's Other Wife


Can there be any doubt that Obama and the Old Media are in bed together?

Also, is it any wonder that the Old Media's audience has shrunken to its smallest size ever?

On the other hand
, surely y'all have noticed reports of vastly superior ratings for FOX News?

For example, as for FOX News...

With the Iranian conflict the defining news story of the week last week, Fox News channel ranked 3rd in primetime and 6th in total day among Total Viewers. MSNBC ranked 27th in Prime and 32nd in Total Day. CNN ranked 28th in Prime and 22nd in Total Day.

Fox News has ranked 5th or higher for 24 weeks in a row in prime time.

Now, see, that's not just for news... it's for ALL OF CABLE TV.

See? FOX News, which isn't screwing around with Barack behind Michelle's back, is the one news network to which Americans really turn and which they trust. It's blatantly obvious.

It's clear to me that the Old Media no longer cares about doing its job without bias, with scrupulous impartiality, with credibility and integrity. They're nothing but a partisan, ideological propaganda tool for the "progressive" movement, the Democratic Party and, of course, for Obama.

This Is Enough Reason To Ban Him From Canada

The United Nations says he's a terrorist.

The same guy a court ordered the Canadian government to let come back to Canada.

So will the Left call the UN a liar?

You know, if someone had been identified by the UN as a "white supremacist", then, no matter what, the Left would say, "Keep him out! Haters stay away!".

ht: NNW