Saturday, October 31, 2009

Republican Steps Aside For A Conservative

Story here.

It's happening. The Grand Old Party is receiving its punishment from the People already for having turned sharply leftwards.

Things are so horrible in America already that the People realize that drastic action must be taken.

So they're abandoning both the Democrats and the Republicans for untainted-by-corruption candidates (on the "right", that is).

The announcement comes after a Siena College poll found she was in third place with 20 percent of the vote in the heavily Republican upstate New York district that has been safe ground for the party for more than 100 years. Conservative Party nominee Doug Hoffman and Democratic nominee Bill Owens were too close to call with 35 percent and 36 percent, respectively.

The race has pitted conservative and moderate wings of the Republican Party in a battle of ideology both nationally and statewide. Hoffman and his backers say Scozzafava is too liberal to represent the GOP, specifically noting her support of abortion rights and same-sex marriage.

Uh-huh. The GOP candidate who stepped aside wasn't a conservative at all. Nothing new about those leftist, RINO GOPers, though. What's new is that the People have had enough of them as well as enough of the Democrats.

So they go to a real conservative, or at least someone who's saying he is.

The Republican Party can no longer take their core constituency for granted, because, as they've been doing so for so long already, they've lost it. Besides, look at the polls. The majority of Americans say they're conservative, with the remainder saying they're about a third "moderate" and about a fifth "liberal". You do the math, and figure out where the Republicans must go, ideologically, to get back the votes to beat the horrible, terrible, destructive "Democrats" and that dumbass puppet, Obama, he with countless billionaire hands up his scrawny ass!

The Democratic candidate, in response, issues an obvious propaganda talking point, quite over-cliched, too (keep in mind that Obama, through some partisan organization, has been paying his law firm, so far, to the tune of $1.7 million to desperately keep his REAL birth certificate and other damning documents a secret to, obviously, hide the logically, rationally, extremely probable fact that he wasn't born in America and therefore isn't legitimately, Constitutionally the President):
"Obviously I think what has happened here, is the right wing extremists in the Republican Party have spent over a million dollars to drive her out of the race," Owens said Saturday night.
Yep. Yet another brainwashed, whorey, "progressive", Obama-ass-licking Democrat pulled out the silly, meaningless "right wing extremists" slur again. Just like the Napolitano DHS used it to smear the majority of Americans for daring to oppose The Agenda. Yep. Another left-wing extremist asshole smearing and demonizing yet more Americans for not being submissive Obamite sheep!

It's silly and dismissable to smear moderates (ie. Republicans, especially the more conservative ones, are definitely moderate compared to the extremely radical, neo-communist, anti-Constitution, anti-America revolutionaries comprising the Democratic Party, inhabiting -obviously unconstitutionally- the White House, and encompassing the Big Media) as "right wing extremists.

Besides, "conservative" is a very moderate word. "Progressive" is an extremist word, on the other hand, especially considering the kind of dangerous wackos and lunatics who thusly label themselves, their movement and policies.

To be "right-wing" is to be moderate.

To be "progressive" is to be extreme. Just look at the blatant, frightening, shocking extremism of Obama, the Democrats and the Big Media (except, of course, for the "right-wing", moderate, hardworking, fair and balanced Fox News, who has more viewers than anyone else... by a massive amount, precisely because of the way it operates, compared to the Obama-ass-licking Big Old Dying Media!).

What About Rifqa's Civil Rights? What About Protecting Her From Harm?

(Bumped to top due to importance and urgency. New posts found below this one.)

The Big Media is silent on young Rifqa Bary's plight, despite the fact that her civil rights have been taken away by a criminally mean-spirited judge, and the fact that her family is going to kill her in accordance with Shariah Law. Therefore, most people are unaware of the danger Rifqa Bary faces.

Al Qaeda terrorism suspects have more civil rights than Rifqa Bary.

Civil rights taken away

Just because she's now Christian, she's treated like a criminal.


This is an egregious crime. How will we know if Rifqa is not being psychologically abused, physically abused? How will we know if she is ok? Rifqa Bary should be posting to a facebook page everyday. These Islamic apologists are not protecting this girl but rather endangering her life.

They say there is no threat but they would not release details about her trip back to Ohio "for safety reasons". They are going to kill this girl. Ohio is enforcing sharia law. Female apostates must be imprisoned until they recant.

Why is the American state apparatus so afraid to oppose inhumanly hateful Islamic supremacists who hate, torture and kill women and non-Muslims?

Note to "progressive" liberals: Hey, if it's ok to take away Rifqa's civil rights, then perhaps it's time to take away the civil rights of yourselves, your "partners", your family and friends and of Muslims and homosexuals, too. And of anyone else at all. What do you think of that? If you care for the civil rights of yourselves, those you love, and GLBTs and Muslims and left-wing extremists (like many of you actually are), then you better stand up for Rifqa Bary's civil rights and help save her life from those who are going to kill her in the name of Allah and Islam.

Don't get mad at me. Get mad at the judge and at the horrible, murderous, intolerant Islamic supremacists.

Note to the Big Media: Why don't you say anything? If Rifqa was gay and in danger from gay-bashers who were everywhere and, in accord with their own special "laws" as organized bigots, were going to kill her, you'd fecking definitely say something, because you care about those folks. But as Rifqa's a Christian, an apostate from Islam, and because the Islamic supremacists hate her and are going to kill her, you just don't give a fecking damn. Nice people you are. Typical "progressive" liberals. That's why I fight you- you're evil, as far as I'm concerned.

Don't get mad at me. Get mad at the judge and at the horrible, murderous, intolerant Islamic supremacists.

Same questions go for OBAMA, who doesn't care about Rifqa. Then again, Obama doesn't care about anyone at all!

Get mad at Obama, too! He's hateful and wants an innocent young girl to be slaughtered by Islamic supremacists! How can I say this? Well, just look at him say and do... nothing! Yes he can? No he won't!


Ohio is practicing sharia law. Where are Rifqa's civil rights? Where is her freedom of religion? Why isn't Obama fighting for her right to NOT wear the hijab?

Her parents, here illegally from Sri Lanka, perjured themselves repeatedly and abused Rifqa for years. They are devout Muslims. The punishment for apostasy in Islam is death. Why can't Rifqa choose her own attorney? She is up against a litany of legal talent and her parents have changed lawyers as frequently as toddlers change diapers.



Franklin County courthouse
Franklin County juvenile court
4th floor
373 S. High street
Columbus, Ohio 43215

Phone: 614.462.4411, Franklin County Juvenile Court clerk


Check Atlas for details as trial draws closer ......


Atlas is working with Bostom and Spencerand jamal Jivanjee putting together a Rifqa event for the evening of the 16th


U.S. Art Agencies Seeing Massive Boost In Taxpayer Funding


Yep. Obama's army of Leni Riefenstahls is definitely getting "stimulated"!
WASHINGTON (AP) - The National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities are expected to receive their highest levels of funding in 16 years from a bill President Barack Obama is expected to sign into law by this weekend.


The increase—amid a record federal budget deficit—comes after an aggressive push by lobbyists to show that arts organizations provide thousands of jobs across the country. Many arts groups, including the Baltimore Opera, have closed their doors or cut jobs because of the tough recession.
Uh-huh. Just in time to expand the ObaDeMedia Complex's propaganda and mass-deception capacity and reach.

They call it "news" and "art".

Of course, the Chinese Communist Party also calls China the "Peoples' Republic", even though it's abundantly clear that the CCP does NOT consider China as belonging to the People.

Just because we call something what we call it, doesn't mean it is what we call it.

And this boost in funding comes on the heels of Obama's cutting short America's F-22 air superiority fighter program, plus the alternative, backup engine program for the F-35 multi-version, versatile-platform fighter. This, of course, axes thousands of jobs at a time of deep depression caused by the Left's destructive financial industry policies started in the Clinton era.

Real smart of them to replace thousands of axed national-security-related jobs with a relatively-paltry handful of regime-propaganda jobs, eh?

Gotta sell Obama's National Surrender Agenda!

Literary Treat: Dennis Miller

Dennis Miller: Yet another Hollywooder who is NOT a "progressive" ideological-political whore

I seriously doubt we'll ever witness Dennis Miller insanely bash Sarah Palin as do many of his far-less-intelligent Hollywood brethren.

You also won't hear him speak of Obama as if the guy was some kind of deity or rock star, either.

I remember the first time I landed upon, whilst surfacing the boob tube for something worth watching, this guy. He was verbally ripping Osama bin Laden several "new ones", in a manner not hitherto observed coming from the "progressive", brainless fringe of financially-desperate, unethical ideological-political whores in Hollywood.

Today I land upon Dennis Miller whilst surfing the internet and delight at his writing prowess as he rips Barack Hussein Obama a bunch of new, stinky ones. Get it? First Osama, then Obama. Hee-hee!

Enjoy Dennis Miller's writing here!

No trick... here's a little excerpt treat...
In his rush to humble America in the eyes of the world, he strives to placate every mook coming down the midway with a bullied nation in their hip pocket and in turn supplant them in the villain column with a national news agency whose most egregious error would appear to be not swooning every time he opens his "wiser than thou" piehole to speak in encyclical.

What's wrong with this picture? The waiting room outside Dr. Obama's Snake Oil Emporium is populated by the likes of General McChrystal, the Dalai Lama and Fox News, meanwhile Kadaffi, Chavez and Aqua-velvajad are walking around backstage with All-Access laminates. Not since Lana Turner hooked up with Johnny Stompanato has a great star exhibited such poor taste in men.

Yup. Good stuff! Dennis Miller, folks... telling it like it is about Pseudo-President B.H. Poopybama!

Hey, if it's ok for the Obamites to say infantile crap about G.W. Bush and Sarah Palin, then it's ok to say silly stuff about the current pseudo-POTUS, too, so...

Besides, the amateur comedian in me was a bit overzealous, trying to be a bit like the comedian Dennis Miller is also known for being.

ht: Big Hollywood

Canadian Threat Environment Report, Plus A Critical Juxtaposition

Via the RCMP Commissioner. Read the whole thing for yourself.

In a nutshell...

It's serious and worsening.

And we need to step up measures and activity to combat it.

I'd like to comment on the following comment.
While disrupting credible and imminent threats without sufficient evidence to justify criminal charges is sometimes necessary, he said, "counter-terrorism measures based exclusively on intelligence that falls short of the evidentiary threshold are fraught with danger and difficulty."
Hmm. You know, the "Human Rights" Commissions don't even bother with evidence at all. And they persecute/convict innocent people for "hate crimes" based on crappy or no evidence, usually nothing more than an accusation made by someone who doesn't like them or what they said or did.

Why is it that the Big Liberal Media lets the unconstitutionally powerful, criminally unaccountable "Human Rights" Commissions off the hook every time they bash Canadians with this biased persecution, but when the police go after and charge dangerous terrorists and other criminals, the Big Liberal Media puts the police under a scanning electron microscope, with extreme prejudice, always ready to trumpet/headline the accusations made by the advocates/apologists for the terrorists/criminals?

If the "progressive" movement and the Big Liberal Media, comprising that very real, authentic conspiracy of political correctness fascism, double standards and deception, is going to so aggressively go after those responsible for keeping Canada and Canadians safe, then they must also go after the so-called "Human Rights" Commissions! Why the double standard? It seems that the "progressive" movement and the Big Liberal Media are just as dangerous and destructive as are their counterparts in America!

Apparently civil and human rights are important to the Left only in certain types of situations whilst not in others. There is no doubt about this whatsoever, except in the minds of the terribly ignorant (which is the average Canadian with too little time to self-enlighten and who receives pretty much zero critically important information from the Big Liberal Media upon which they're primarily or wholly dependent).

It's very fascinating, the bizarre approach of the Left. Why do they practice this double standard? Are they trying to tyrannize and oppress Canadians, or are they just useful idiots serving those who seek to do so? Are they the Enemy Within, or just the useful idiots of the Enemy Without?
Without mentioning the federal government's now-discredited security certificate regime for jailing and deporting immigrants suspected of terrorism based on secret intelligence rather than open criminal courts, he said, "I believe that law enforcement and criminal prosecutions will be the new paradigm of national security in democratic nations the world over.

"Most democratic nations have realized that infringing on the very rights and freedoms we seek to protect from terrorism is ultimately untenable, it is also not very effective in countering terrorist threats."
Know what? What is said in those two paragraphs must also be applied to the "Human Rights" Commissions and the whole concept of "hate crimes" and "hate speech". Take away the Lord-of-the-Flies-style HRCs and leave it all up to the real, proper courts, just like it's done for the Enemies of Canada, the real, authentically dangerous and threatening terrorists. Why should the HRCs be allowed to convict people based on secret evidence, if indeed there's any evidence at all beyond a mere accusation by some paranoid, hateful lunatic? If we can't protect Canada from the most dangerous enemies we've got by having secret evidence and so on, then what the hell are we doing tolerating the HRCs oppressing, tyrannizing, persecuting, summarily convicting, taking civil rights away from ordinary, law-abiding, rights-exercising Canadians? What the hell is going on here?

The Hateful, Destructive Left can't have it both ways! We the People must stand up and say, "NO! We will NOT tolerate you hateful fascists and what you do to us! You will stop your dangerous, hateful activities, your discrimination, your taking our rights away, your oppression, your tyranny NOW!"

Taking innocent, law-abiding, rights-exercising peoples' rights away will not do anything to "stop hate". Absolutely not! In fact, it actually creates new hatred, ie. hatred of the fascists and of those who enable them! It can also create new hatred where none existed before, ie. towards hateful lunatics (like, say, Syed Soharwardy, the hateful, mean-spirited, intolerant Islamic supremacist who started the unconstitutional, un-Canadian persecution of Ezra Levant for republishing some famous Mohammed cartoons) who make the complaints to the HRCs in the first place and who get taken seriously when they don't deserve to be.

So it's time to abolish the "Human Rights" Commissions in order to help reduce and prevent hatred!

Friday, October 30, 2009

On Donolo

Peter Donolo. Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff's new Chief of Staff.

You know, during the Chretien Years, I was a keen observer of the Liberal government and what it said and did. Behind it all was... Peter Donolo.

Back then, I remember myself thinking of how to counter the Liberals' propaganda and dirty tricks.

And today I know even more about how to deal with Liberals.

So, rest assured, whatever Peter Donolo does, I'll be here to deal with it.

Rest assured, Peter Donolo will again have to depend on dumb luck as well as acumen. But, you know, Peter is still an imperfect mortal, just like Ignatieff, who once seemed so powerful and invincible, but now looks as dumb as Dion, his predecessor.

So Peter Donolo's Liberals are beatable.

I'm not afraid of the Chretien Machine anymore. I regard it as something to take apart and put away.

Just Like George Costanza?

Above, the TV George Costanza, wearing prescription swim goggles and eating an onion.

Below, left, the real "George Costanza", Larry David, Seinfeld creator, wearing sweatpants. In Public.

The guy with his pants down is Steve Martin in The Jerk. That pic just seemed appropriate for this post.

Like the guy on the right, Larry David is being a jerk.
Perhaps he actually believes he's George Costanza, who's a jerk, too?
And what's with the sweatpants? What'd Jerry say about wearing 'em in public?
Sheesh. He kinda looks like me, y'know, bald with glasses. Except he's older. And taller. And ooglier.
And how come his hand is behind his ass? Got an itch? the "real" "George Costanza", Larry David, creator of Seinfeld and who plays himself in Curb Your Enthusiasm.

I'll say up front, unashamedly, that I'm a big fan of Seinfeld. I must've watched each and every episode of that show like at least three times each. I'm so programmed with Seinfeld trivia that pretty much everything makes me think of Seinfeld. It's a mental disorder, I guess. Pobody's Nerfect, y'know...

I also watched Curb Your Enthusiasm a few times and found it even more hilarious than Seinfeld. In fact, it makes Seinfeld seem only mildly amusing in comparison.


Going peepee on a picture of Jesus?!

In a recent Curb Your Enthusiasm episode, Larry David accidentally urinates on a picture of Jesus while he is a guest in someone else’s home. This, in turn, leads to a misunderstanding in which the homeowners think they have a miraculously weeping Jesus.

Some Christians are understandably upset.

Just some thoughts on what this episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm has revealed:

Are producers of this show, or Larry David, or anyone else connected to it fearing for their lives right now? Are there Christian groups calling for the death of anyone in connection to this episode?

Well, nope. Nothing to worry about, Larry. We won't wage jihad against you, won't chop off any part of your anatomy or anything. Relax, dude. We Jesus People aren't anything like that at all.

But, like the article points out, you haven't gone peepee on a picture of Mohammed or on the Koran on your show.

HBO has come to the defense of the episode, saying that it is all about parody. Everyone needs to lighten up. So, if Larry David urinated on the Koran, would HBO tell everyone they need to lighten up because it is parody? What does it say that we know for a fact that the latter would simply never happen?

Tell me, why not? Hmm?

NAACP Wants To Ban Halloween Dummies, Plus What They Should Go After Instead

Now they want to ban simple Halloween dummies.

Hey, dude, what did you say when someone hung an effigy of Sarah Palin? Did y'all say anything then? I read the news reports on that incident, but don't recall reading anything about the NAACP saying about that, "that looks bad... it should be taken down".

Why is the dummy on the left bad, but the one on the right okay?
Remember, it's Halloween in both situations.
Hey, did the NAACP complain when George W. Bush was hung in effigy?
Besides, that looks like a white dummy, just like the Sarah Palin one!

Talk about going too far to get attention!

Go after REAL racism.

You know, there's not just white supremacists in America, but I have also observed that black supremacism is on the rise, is becoming more brazen, more open, etc., (police respond to the armed racists here) (the racist Obama Justice Depatment refused to prosecute these criminals despite their clearly-documented felony of intimidating different-race voters from voting!) But what does the NAACP do instead of going after the racist "New Black Panther" thugs and militant extremists? Demand a ban on halloween dummies as they're, in the NAACP's opinion, necessarily "racist"!

Are they "Djoken"?
"Something should be done right away," Djoken told "When you look from a distance, it doesn't look good. We should just remove it."

But Holtzinger disagrees and dismissed the roughly two dozen complaints the NAACP received as part of an "attempt to get publicity" for the organization and to "justify" its existence. The display won't be taken down any sooner than scheduled, he said.

The dummies, clad in jeans and stuffed shirts, hang in Baker Park from ropes affixed to their torsos up to 30 feet in the air — creating a sight that some say reminds them of lynchings while others describe it as a harmless holiday display.

"Certainly these weren't meant to offend anybody," Holtzinger said. "But at the same time, if you look at these things, they're not realistic, they're not tied by a noose. So I don't think they're anything other than a typical Halloween display you can see at any number of places."

I suggest that, instead of going after harmless Halloween dummies, the NAACP should go after the abortion industry, whose true, original and continuing agenda is black genocide. And after Obama (ironically, yes, but remember, "progressivism" is a mental disorder, and anything's possible for "progressives", and Obama's a "progressive", after all) for pushing that agenda.

But I don't hold my breath waiting for the NAACP to give a damn that most of the demonstrated-to-have-a-racist-culture, and founded-by-a-racist, "Planned Parenthood" murder factories are deliberately located in minority neighborhoods. Refusal to go after real, authentic, undeniable racism will be the NAACP's undoing. I certainly hope the NAACP isn't just a far-left ideological-partisan political attack organization like ACORN and is a genuine anti-racism organization.

Anyone from NAACP reading this post, I recommend you watch the video Maafa21.

Here's the trailer:

I see that the entire movie can be viewed on YouTube, though it's obviously best to buy the DVD for yourself (your purchase will help raise awareness of this silent, unreported genocide campaign).

Part one of Maafa21 can be viewed here. You can find the rest on YouTube.

NJ School Refuses To Provide Lyrics To Imposed Obama Song

WTF?! What are they hiding? had filed an open records request seeking copies of materials provided to parents of New Jersey second-graders who performed a controversial song praising President Obama filed an open records request Oct. 19 seeking copies of materials provided to parents of students at B. Bernice Young Elementary School prior to the song's performance at the assembly in February. The song sparked a national controversy when someone posted to YouTube a video of the students performing it again, on March 23, when author Charisse Carney-Nunes visited the school in recognition of Women's History Month.

The video violated school policy, and some parents were angered that their children were recorded without their permission. Others have lambasted the school administrators for the video's message, which they say amounts to indoctrination, though other parents disagree that there was anything underhanded about the song.

Superintendent Christopher Manno, in defending the performance of the song, has said that the teacher sent the lyrics home to parents in advance, but the lyrics were nowhere in the documents released Friday to
Why hide the lyrics?

Why force students to sing a song praising a current political leader?

Ok then. When Sarah Palin is President, the Left better not complain if some schools force the kids to sing songs praising Sarah.

Much better to read the Bible to kids in class. That's what they did in my (public school, believe it or not!) classes circa 1980. Much better than political songs! Besides, Jesus is very good, whereas most politicians are horses' asses!

I say, if some people have a problem with the Bible being read to kids, with having the kids sing Christmas songs derived from the Bible, then I have a problem with schools making kids sing political-praise songs. Let me tell you, kids are programmable. Much better to program them with messages of being good to one's fellow people than of worshipping The Exalted Obama, a mere mortal who's proven to be a liar, a destroyer of America and an arrogant, narcississtic, uncompassionate ogre, as far as I'm concerned. He doesn't deserve such incredible praise.

Any parents from the school in question, if you still have the document with the lyrics, send them to FOX News. Why should the school not let FOX know what they say? All FOX will do is let the People know, report what the songs said, and let the People decide for themselves. What could be wrong with that?

Perhaps the lyrics were never sent to the parents. One parent says they weren't.

Hmm... interesting story. Hope FOX digs deeper. Never know what might be uncovered.

That's why the Extreme Left hates FOX. Because FOX isn't submissive, isn't a useful idiot, nor a fellow traveller, and refuses to imbibe in the mind-numbing koolaid being pushed at them. FOX is inconvenient to their agenda and threatens to derail it. That's why they've been engaged in a massive jihad against FOX, smearing it with lies, defamatory accusations, etc.

The only real news organization out there is FOX News. The others are just... Astroturf who act as Obama's propagandists.

Hate Preacher Who Incited 9/11 Terrorists Now Renounces Terror, Violence

Story here.

Looks like 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta was a mentally-disordered dupe of, in turn, another mentally-disordered dupe (who himself was duped by other dupes, who were duped by other dupes... ad infinitum) as well as a deranged, cold-blooded murderer.

Hmm... Mohammed El Fazazi... Fazazi sounds like a great name for a new Itlalian supercar...
In 2001, imam Mohammed El Fazazi of Morocco preached that it it is a Muslim obligation to "slit the throats of non-believers" in a Hamburg mosque. Among his listeners and star pupils were Mohammed Atta, Ramzi Binalshibh and Marwan al-Shehhi, three of the men who participated in the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington.

Today, eight years later, Mohammed El Fazazi has foresworn acts of terrorism against Western targets. "I admit that I went too far and overshot the target," he wrote in an open letter to his daughter, who lives in Hamburg, and Muslims living in Germany.

Muslims living in Germany, he said, should draw attention to themselves and their issues through "peaceful demonstrations, strikes and protests that are far removed from indiscriminate attacks" and the "killing of innocent people with the argument of killing kuffar," or non-believers.

Earlier this week, SPIEGEL reported about the former hate preacher's apparent change of mind. Since then the letter, which SPIEGEL ONLINE has posted in a slightly abridged form, has begun making waves. Early indications suggest that Fazazi's letter swearing off violence is likely to trigger a debate in mosques and, especially, among jihadists.

Muslim Mafia: Deadly Detroit Shootout, CAIR Linked

Story here.
Already under increased scrutiny after revelations in a new book, the Council on American-Islamic Relations now is defending itself against documented links to a federal case that drew national attention this week when an indicted Detroit imam was killed in an FBI raid.

Internal documents from an undercover investigation by the authors of "Muslim Mafia" show CAIR helped finance the legal appeal of Muslim cop-killer Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin, who is named in the Detroit criminal complaint as the spiritual leader of a radical group that calls for violent action to establish a sovereign Islamic state within the U.S.

Canadian connection

The federal complaint also states one of the 11 indicted followers of the imam who was killed in an exchange of gunfire with the FBI Wednesday, Luqman Ameen Abdullah, attended a mosque "affiliated with CAIR" in Windsor, Ontario, just across the Canadian border from Detroit.
CAIR incites violence
The criminal complaint suggests CAIR literature supporting Al-Amin incited Abdullah to violence.
WHY is the CAIR still in existence? WHY haven't they been shut down?

By the way, what about all those alleged "right-wing extremists" of whom the DHS has so breathlessly screamed about? Any activity in apprehending any of them? No? Oh, right. The so-called "right-wing extremists" are the victims. Of persecution. And of potentially deadly violence. Just because they dare to openly disagree with the revolutionarily radical Obamacrat Regime.

Who are the dangerous, hateful subversives (besides the ObaDeMedia Complex, that is)?

----Just hateful Islamic supremacists hellbent on crime, violence and the overthrow of the American government to replace it with an Islamic kalifate, that's who.

Shots Fired Close To Lou Dobbs's Wife

The Far Left and the Obamacrat Regime, as well as the Big Media, must stop their nasty smearing and hatemongering propaganda campaign against honest, openly critical Regime opponents such as Lou Dobbs et al.

Because it might be leading to potentially deadly violence.
Recently a lot of hubbub had been made about the possibility that the peaceful tea party protests and some conservative voices would stir up emotions that could lead to violence. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was even one of those sounding that alarm.
But what has gone unsaid by those same voices has been the possibility of violence against those who might take a position antithetical to that of the left.
Of course, neo-Nazi nasties like Nancy don't give a crap about anyone who's not one of them, ideologically. They don't care about violence against opponents, just against themselves and their fellow travellers and useful idiots.
"But I want to tell you, when you talk about what they've done - they've created an atmosphere and they've been unrelenting in their propaganda," Dobbs said. "Three weeks ago this morning, a shot was fired at my house where I live. My wife was standing out and that followed weeks and weeks of threatening phone calls."


"And, as I told the state patrol, and by the way, the New Jersey State Patrol is absolutely terrific - they responded instantly. But this shot was fired with my wife not, I don't know, 15 feet away and we had threatening phone calls that I decided not to report because I get threatening phone calls," Dobbs continued. "I now - it's become a way of life - the anger, the hate, the vitriol, but it's taken a different tone where they've threatened my wife. They've now fired a shot at my house while my wife was standing next to the car. It's become something else."
Shame on the Hard Left and the Obamacrat Regime! They're fomenting potentially deadly violence, inciting their mentally-deranged brownshirt, purpleshirt, redshirt, pink shirt, kaffiyeh-wearing and rainbow-color-shirted footsoldiers to commit (either directed or independent) "personal jihad" against those they've been told are supposed to be "The Enemy".

Sheesh... they're just like the "Palestinian" homicide bombers and rock throwers, whose minds have also been poisoned (by the indoctrination and propaganda infrastructure of the "Palestinian Authority", ie. the PLO-Fatah, Hamas et al, funded with our very tax dollars, no less!) with deranged, unwarranted, prejudicial hatred and deadly-violence hellbentness.

But nothing to see here, folks. The target wasn't a Leftist, nor a GLBT, nor an Islamic fundamentalist-supremacist, nor a visible minority supporter of the Obamacrats, nor any other special-group member. It was just that awful, horrible Lou Dobbs, who dares to disagree with the wonderful Obamacrat Regime.

The Hard Left and the ObaDeMedia Complex must be stopped, crushed & pulverized by The People in the elections, stripped of their dangerous power to incite hate and deadly violence (as well as power to destroy America and take Americans' liberties away from them) because, obviously, people are going to get killed if those frighteningly hateful, violent, "progressive" liberal neo-Nazi extremists are not stopped.

Now is the time for the brainwashed, no-mind-of-their-own, "progressive" liberal useful idiots/fellow travellers to look into the mirror and have a lifechanging epiphany.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Horrific Hate Crime In L.A.

Story here.

I can just hear the Judeophobic, "progressive" Leftists asking,

"Are the victims gay? No".

"Are they Muslim? No."

"Are they abortionists? No."

"Oh, they're Jews? Ah. Big deal. Nothing to see here. Let's go get a beer."

If the answer to any of the first three questions had been "yes", you just know that the "progressive" Left would be up in arms. You know that Obama would push everything aside to have a special, breaking press conference to denounce the hate crime with very strong language.

But in this case, don't expect the "progressive" Left, Obama and the Big Media to say much, if anything.

Because we know about the barely-hidden, if at all, Judenhass of the "progressive" Left.

Liberal: MPs Should Get Vaccine Before Everyone Else

Can you believe the nerve? Can you believe it's Hedy Fry? Oh, of course... Hedy Fry, the infamous asshole. "Crosses are burning as we speak". Yeah, right. Talk about playing the race card... and NOW she's talking about the supremacy of MPs over ordinary Canadians.

Yep. She's all "I'm an MP and you aren't. I'm superior to you, you little nobody. Therefore I deserve to live and you don't."

Talk about hatefully selfish, eh!

Typical Liberal.

Liberal Apology Plus Their Awful Race Card In The Mail

The Liberals have apologized for a mailout that exploited Aboriginals and angered the Aboriginal community. That mailout was an obvious attempt by the desperate Liberals to smear the Conservatives by playing the race card.

Well, following their apology, guess what? I just came home and found another Liberal race card in the mail!

Paid for by the taxpayers, no less. A partisan attack, including the playing of the race card by those awful, racist Liberals! This after the Liberals complained that the Conservatives send out mailings like that that tell us about how yukky Ignatieff and the Liberals are? Such Liberal hypocrisy!

On the cover, we have a picture of a Canadian passport, a diverse-looking bunch of folks, and the message, "Who will they abandon next?". Oh, come on! You guys, your desperation is showing! Y'all gotta stop listening to that horrible Warren Kinsella!

Inside, the Liberals call the Conservatives the "Reform-Conservatives". Oh, come on yet again! Still with the assinine, defunct labelling! Ok, then, I'll call the Liberals the Lie-berals, the Librano$, the Liberal Fascists, the Liberal Commies, hell, I'll call 'em The Stinking Poopheads...

Inside, there's a headline that says, laughably simplistically, "A Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian". Oh, brother! What's next, they'll tell us that a duck is a duck is a duck?

Of all the stupid, lame-ass slogans, that's the best they could come up with?

The text sounds like a subtle suggestion that the government must somehow (illogically) be racist just because of the Suaad Mohamud matter, which is unfortunate, but, really, there's more to the story which the Liberals aren't mentioning, as they're making it sound really horrible just because Ms. Mohamud was temporarily detained by officials who were only doing their job.

Really, the Conservative government didn't do anything wrong. How dare the Liberals exploit an unfortunate incident to play the race card and suggest that the government somehow meant to do something illegal? Shame!

Then there's the line, "Liberals believe there are no second-class Canadians". Oh, bullshit. Liberals clearly believe that only Liberals are Canadians, and anyone who's not a Liberal pretty much is dirt, and not worthy of being called a "Canadian", but rather "un-Canadian" and "offside with Canadian values".



Liberals believe that there are no second class Canadians? Yeah, right. Suuuure. But how do they explain their abandonment of William Sampson? Was it because he was white, and not a Muslim? Was it because he didn't belong to any of the special target groups the Liberals go after to solicit votes? Why did the Liberals let William Sampson be tortured so heinously, so cruelly? Why? Why? Why?

We also recently heard that immigrant groups like the Sikhs are abandoning the Liberals in droves and going over to the Conservatives because the Liberals never cared for them at all, and only wanted their votes. This, of course, is helping to drive down Liberal support in the polls to historic levels.

No wonder the Liberals are so desperate to go around saying, "Hey, look! Those guys are racist! So come back to us, please! We promise we aren't racist!"

Disgusting, this desperation and race-card playing. Terrible smear campaign. Dirty tricks. Dirty, rotten soundrels.

Liberals are such hypocritical, racist assholes!

No wonder they're in the toilet in the polls.

Peter Donolo won't be able to fish them out. Too much crap surrounding them, not that one could tell the difference. Besides, Liberal turds are infamously corny!

Oh, and by the way, the name of the Liberal MP on the race card is John McCallum. You know John. He lied about driving a Chevrolet, remember?

Eligibility Case Clerk Tied To Obama Via Law Firm?

Story here.

Bloggers are buzzing about a law clerk who purportedly works in the same California court that's hearing a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president – and his possible ties to a law firm that has defended Obama in other eligibility cases.

A Wikipedia page has been cited by dozens of bloggers after it listed Siddarth Velamoor as one of the newest law clerks for federal Judge David Carter – who is hearing the eligibility case Barnett v. Obama, in the Central District, Southern Division Court in Santa Ana, Calif.

Velamoor is also listed in the Martindale lawyer database as an associate of international law firm Perkins Coie, the same law firm of Robert Bauer – top lawyer for Obama, Obama's presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee and Obama's Organizing for America – and the same Washington, D.C., lawyer who defended President Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president.

As WND has reported, Federal Election Commission records for "Obama for America" show that the lobby organization has paid Perkins Coie exactly $1,666,397.01 since the 2008 election.

Well, there are Obamites everywhere...

For the sake of the independence of the judiciary, if there is indeed an Obama-linked clerk involved in an Obama eligibility case, such a clerk must be removed from having anything at all to do with the case, just to be safe, and to protect the perception of justice being fair and blind.

Anyway, the case is moving forward, for sure...
(...) summary judgment hearing Dec. 7 at 8:30 a.m., with a time frame to file the motion Nov. 16, and opposition required by Nov. 26. The final pretrial conference is scheduled Jan. 11, 2010, while the jury trial is Jan. 26, 2010

Just Like Soylent Green

soylent-a.jpg soylent green image by anonymouse69

It's not science fiction anymore, folks. It's not just a scary movie anymore.

Reality, again, imitates art....

This stuff... IS PEOPLE!

(Emphasis mine)
(...) Neocutis, a company with offices in San Francisco which has developed a line of anti-aging products that include an ingredient the company has trademarked as Processed Skin Cell Protein, or PSP, developed from skin cells harvested from an abortion.

(...) infused those nutrients into a line of cosmeceutical anti-aging products: Neocutis skin cream, Journée day cream, Lumière eye cream and Bio-Gel bio-restorative hydrogel – products Vinnedge is advising women to throw in the garbage before contacting Neocutis to voice their concerns.

"There is absolutely no reason to use aborted babies for such selfish motives," Vinnedge said. "It is anti-life, anti-woman and counter-productive, as Neocutis is about to find out!"

Exploiting slaughtered human beings and exploiting the vanity of women, neglecting to mention to them that they'll be rubbing dead, murdered people on their faces (!!!), for the purpose of making profit.

Oh, yeah, that's "progressive".

Oh, I'm sure that scary-extremist Obama "czars" John Holdren, Cass Sunstein et al will, of course, favor this sort of thing, using every excuse they can come up with. "It reduces carbon output and saves the world", "It's stimulatory on the economy", etc., etc...

I'm suuuuure that the Big Media will say something about this, too. Right. Like they're talking about John Holdren, Cass Sunstein et al.

Do you want to rub shit on your face that's made out of murdered people?

And as for you leftists who decry the Canadian seal hunt: What if these products were made out of slaughtered seals? Would you then march naked, like Pammie Anderson, in the streets to protest it? If so, then you better march naked in the streets to protest the real-life Soylent Green shit!

Those who don't have a problem with harvesting murdered human beings for profit and for personal vanity... are scary, unethical, immoral... just like all good "progressives".

This is just one step away from cannibalism.

They're trying to slowly, step-by-step, desensitize the People...

Before you know it, you'll be taking something like this to the checkout line...

No, no, no... stop laughing! It's not funny!

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Grand Chief Blasts Liberals' 'Offensive' Mailout

Raaaaaacists! Liberal shame!

Story here.

ht: Orville H.

"From the beginning I have said the crisis has been about people, not politics," Ron Evans, grand chief of the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs told MPs today at the Commons health committee studying preparedness for the H1N1 influenza pandemic. "(Our children were) used as props in political theatre."

Evans held up a black-and-white photocopy of a pamphlet distributed by the Liberal Party of Canada with the headline "No vaccines, just body bags."


Evans said he was offended by the pamphlet, which includes photos of the body bags and a crying child, because it was politicizing an issue he thought should be non-partisan.

He also said that after Health Canada issued its report the community had wanted to move forward and felt this was raising the issue needlessly all over again.

But raise it needlessly all over again, the Liberals did. Because they thought it might help them smear the Conservatives as "racists", which they're always trying to do.

Hmm... Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett's name is on the pamphlet.

I recall that she, as a Liberal government MP, voted against compensation for victims of the tainted-blood scandal who had contracted Hepatitis-C. Of course, she was whipped into doing so, whipped so hard that she literally cried. Worthy of mention is the fact that Peter Donolo, leader Ignatieff's new Chief of Staff, was a key player in the Chretien Liberal government back then, as was Warren Kinsella, who's also back with the Liberals and contributing to their reprehensible and clownish antics of late, not to mention their horrible showing in the latest polls.

Obama's Cash-For-Access Scheme


Story here.

ht: Drudge Report
During his first nine months in office, President Obama has quietly rewarded scores of top Democratic donors with VIP access to the White House, private briefings with administration advisers and invitations to important speeches and town-hall meetings.


One top donor described in an interview with The Times being given a birthday visit to the Oval Office. Another was allowed use of a White House-complex bowling alley for his family. Bundlers closest to the president were invited to watch a movie in the red-walled theater in the basement of the presidential mansion.
Hmm... the White House lies claims that they've got the "toughest ethics standards in history" for fundraising.

Yeah, right... suuuuure. And Paris Hilton is prim and proper, just like Britney Spears. And they never deliberately accidentally exposed their smooth-shaven frontal vertical smiles to paparazzi.

The White House also, bizarrely, asserts that the Administration has:
reduced special-interest influence over the policymaking process to promote merit-based decision-making
Can you believe the chutzpah? No one, other than mentally-disordered Obama-positives, believes such blatantly untrue claims, yet they make them anyway.

The bigger the lie...

ACORN Soliciting $$ From Federal Employees


How on earth is it that an extremist political-ideological intimidation/propaganda/child-prostitution/vote fraud group is allowed to solicit donations from federal employees?

Never mind that the donations don't end up in ACORN's own coffers, but go to other charities (who knows if any of them are yet other far-left groups masquerading as "helpful to people", and who knows whether any of them are in any way linked to ACORN?). The very fact that ACORN is allowed to do this is obscene and intolerable.

If I was an American federal employee, I'd be offended and alarmed by this.

After all, the terrible, criminal, extremist nature of ACORN is clear. Which makes it offensive and intolerable that anything having anything to do with ACORN is treated as if they're "ok".

Obamite NEA Head: Obama Most Powerful Writer Since Caesar

Hoo-boy! Get a load!

Drudge Report
Rocco Landesman is President Obama's handpicked chairman of the National Endowment for the Arts. Last week he gave the keynote address to the 2009 Grantmakers in the Arts Conference. Those of us concerned about the politicization of life and art in the Age of Obama will not be consoled by a reading of Landesman's speech. The speech bears examination in its entirety, but Landesman's tribute to Obama is especially worth a look:

This is the first president that actually writes his own books since Teddy Roosevelt and arguably the first to write them really well since Lincoln. If you accept the premise, and I do, that the United States is the most powerful country in the world, then Barack Obama is the most powerful writer since Julius Caesar. That has to be good for American artists.

Well, Obama does seem to have a Caesar complex of sorts. The narcississm, the delusions of omnipotence, etc. Everything's supposed to be about whether he gives a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, as far as Obama worshippers are concerned. Really. If Obama, for example, were to say that drinking urine cured swine flu, they'd believe him, just like that.

Besides, it's widely believed that Obama actually used a ghostwriter to write his books. Evidence seems to indicate that Obama's good buddy and former neighbor, the domestic terrorist William Ayers, actually wrote "Dreams from My Father" for Obama.

Landesman is sucking up to Obama like Obama sucked up (ok, he just bowed) to the slaveowning Islamic supremacist king of Saudi Arabia.

Is East St. Louis Police Dept Racist?

Story here.

ht: Drudge Report
The suit, filed Oct. 1 in U.S. District Court in East St. Louis, claims, "Shortly after Parks became Mayor in May 2007, Frazer became aware of Parks' bias against hiring white persons." It continues, "When the city was searching for a new Chief of Police, on or about August 2007, Frazer and Murphy felt that the most qualified candidate was a white male with extensive law enforcement experience and no criminal history. However, Parks told Frazer at that time that he would not recommend the Board's candidate for the position because he was white. At Parks' recommendation, the City then hired Michael Baxton, Sr., an African-American male, as Chief of Police, even though he was less qualified than the Board's candidate ... ."


"[The] defendants thereafter fired all of the candidates hired by [Frazer and Murphy] and hired several new officers and employees based on their racial and political beliefs," the suit alleges.
Sounds like they ought to have a sign that says "No whites need apply for work here".

Islamic Supremacist Goes Down In Gunfight In Detroit FBI Raid

Story here.

ht: Maz2/Free Republic

He refused to surrender, fired a weapon and was killed by gunfire from agents, FBI spokeswoman Sandra Berchtold said.

In a court filing, the FBI said Abdullah, also known as Christopher Thomas, was an imam, or prayer leader, of a radical group whose primary mission is to establish an Islamic state within the United States.

"He regularly preaches anti-government and anti-law enforcement rhetoric," FBI agent Gary Leone said in an affidavit. "Abdullah and his followers have trained regularly in the use of firearms, and continue to train in martial arts and sword fighting."

Let it therefore be understood that the Enemy is already here. If you thought they were all in Afghanistan and Iraq, well, boy, you were mistaken!

That was just one example of the Enemy. Many more of them remain at large.

And a note to Janet Napolitano of the DHS: Time to issue a memo to U.S. law enforcement agencies warning about Islamic supremacists. Forget about "right-wing extremists"- they comprise the majority of Americans (ie. those who oppose the Obamacrat Agenda), so no point in going after them.

Now, when the hell are they going to raid/shut down the Jamaat ul Fuqra terrorist training camps we know there are across America?

And don't forget the one just outside Ottawa!

RELATED: Islamic Dad on Lam, "Westernized" Daughter in ICU

ARIZONA- An Iraqi-American father is at the center of an extensive man hunt. Police are looking for Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, last seen fleeing the Department of Economic Development parking lot in Peoria, AZ on Tuesday October 20, 2009.

Almaleki is accused of attempting to kill his 20 year old daughter and her boyfriend's mother by running over them with his silver 2009 Jeep Grand Cherokee (license plate number ADS-9192).

Why didn't I see this "on the news"? Surely the Big Media realizes that a crisis of Islamic "honor killings" going on in America is newsworthy?!

Damn. Jeep jihad again... Is there something special about Jeeps that attracts criminally deranged Islamic supremacists and terrorists?

Yes The Liberals Can Do Better


ht: Maz2

This is the Liberals' press release regarding H1N1 (click the image to enlarge and see for yourself):

'Nuff said.

Appeal Filed Against Eligibility Judge's Arrogant Dismissal Ruling

Story here. Yup. The Obama eligibility thing again. *Groan*, you say... But I'm posting it, like it or not.

"A court cannot refuse to hear a case on the merits merely because it prefers not to due to grave social or political ramifications," he continued. "The court's opinion dismissing the Kerchner complaint/petition did not address the real Kerchner case but rather looked for a way to dismiss the case without having to reach the merits of the question of whether Obama is an Article II 'natural born citizen.'

"The American people deserve to know whether Obama was in fact born in Hawaii. More importantly, even if he is born in Hawaii, given that he was born with dual allegiance and citizenship, the American people deserve to know whether he is an Article II 'natural born citizen' which would make him eligible to be president," the attorney said.

Seems the judge was looking for an easy way to weasel out of doing an inconvenient job which would anger the Powers that Be against him.

Pity too many folks insist that it's proven that Obama qualifies to be President, despite knowing full well that they never saw any valid evidence at all, that none was ever offered by anyone. People who lazily prefer to believe what the Big Media and the Leftist intimidators are demanding they believe... ie. political correctness... are pussies.

No one who has told me I'm nuts to be pursuing this issue has ever presented me with any link to any valid evidence, either, that Obama ever proved he was born on American soil.

It's for this lack of evidence that I continue my interest in the issue. Someone has to do it, despite the social consequences of doing so.

As an analogy, pretending I'm Christopher Columbus:

They can all say the world is flat if they want. But I say it's round because of what I've observed, and due to the fact that nothing I've observed logically suggests it's flat. Besides, the flat-earth folks never offered any evidence to back up their insistent dogma that the world's flat.

The world is clearly round, and Obama is, absent valid evidence to the contrary, clearly not legally, Constitutionally the President.

Can anyone prove that he is, legally, Constitutionally, keeping in mind the Eligibility Clause, President?

If it's proven to me, then I'll drop it. But until then, if ever, I'll continue.

Because I believe that the U.S. Constituion is sacred, sarcosanct, and MUST be obeyed.

Those who willingly disobey the Constitution are risking helping to inspire civil war.

This is the importance of the Constitution: When there are those who believe in it and those who don't, and there's no Constitutionally-required, proper, strict, democratic process followed for changing it for those who want it changed, then civil war is a very real possibility.

What's happening now is that Obama and the Democrats are disobeying the Constitution, smearing those who say they must obey it, calling legitimate questions about constitutionality of policies "not serious".

It's a very dangerous game the Obamacrats are playing.

Civil war is a potential result when there's disagreement between a fascist regime who dismisses the Constitution on the one hand, and, on the other, the People who believe in it and insist it be obeyed.

Does the Extreme Left want to have a civil war over the Constitution? Will they risk this to impose socialism onto America, take away Americans' rights and submit America and Americans to a global governing regime, whose essential nature is unknowable?

Barack Born Bastard: Michelle

He said, she said...

Oooooh. Mrs. O and her big mouth! Might as well read the whole thing.

Obama said his parents were married when he was born.

But Michelle said that Barack's mom was single.
Barack saw his mother, who was very young and very single when she had him, and he saw her work hard to complete her education and try to raise he and his sister. And he saw through her struggle essentially what she tried to teach him, that you can do anything with a little hard work in this country. But he also saw her struggle to make ends meet, sometimes relying on food stamps.
Oh, my. If Barack's parents, as he claimed, were married, then Barack's daddy was an asshole, not taking care of his wife and son.

But Michelle said Barack and his mommy were left to fend for themselves, as his birth was, after all, illegitimate.

Also quoted at MSNBC:
His own mother, she said at the beginning of her remarks, was "very young and very single when she had him."
How long until the Powers that Be get these quotations nixed?

Who, therefore, lied? Barack about his parents being married at time of his birth, or Michelle about his mom being single?

Oh, well... it wouldn't be the only lie Barack Hussein Obama's told us!

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Chretienite Donolo Back To Liberal Party

They're baaaaack.

Warren Kinsella (l), fmr. PM Jean Chretien and Peter Donolo.

Thirteen long, torturous years of these guys... redux.

In time for Halloween? Well, they are scary...

Story here.

ht: Bourque

What to expect now? Good question.

Kinsella screwed up badly after returning to lead the War Room.

Current Leader-Appointed Michael Ignatieff has proven worse than Do-Over Dion.

The Party is waaaaay down in the polls, with formerly loyal voters defecting in droves to the ruling Conservatives.

So the Evil Cretch sends Peter Donolo in to try to do what he did before.

This should be interesting...

And fun. I'll be watching.


Via email, Orville H. reminds us (emphasis mine):
Wonderful . Now we have Kinsella and Donolo in Ignatieff's office - both were principals in the Chretien era and the sponsorship fraud that was perpetuated on the Canadian taxpayer. Maybe we have the players that can answer where the missing 40 million dollars are, that Gomery enquiry couldn't find. I just wonder if their advice to Ignatieff would be, to do what was so successful for Chretien, in achieving votes and popularity - envelopes stuffed with cash. I suspect both Donolo and Kinsella would know some of the inner operations of that era, and Ignatieff could rely on their knowledge. I suspect the pollsters will have to wait and see, if Canadians are enthused to return to the old sponsorship days, where taxpayer money was distributed by cash in stuffed envelopes which could not be traced, in comparison to the stimulus money which distribution is highlighted by giant carnival cardboard cheques , as to exactly where the monies are going with some fanfare and publicity, but apparently highly appreciated by the recipients, whether they are the provincial government, municipal officials or deserving organizations. Any bets what Canadians will respond, if they are asked if they want to go back to the good old sponsorship days of distributing taxpayer monies, as we can expect with Donolo and Kinsella in charge of Ignatieff's office, given their track record. Wasn't Kinsella also a close advisor of David Dingwall of "I am entitled to my entitlements" infamy, and wasn't it KInsella's advice to Dingwall that he should charge his chewing gum to the Canadian taxpayer?

More About The Astroturf Flash Mob

Now, these folks are "Astroturf", no doubt.

They're definitely NOT ordinary grassroots Canadians.

They were sent by their community organizer, an NDP Party operative.

And one of them faked a nosebleed for TV.

The protester in question, Jeh Custer, was interviewed on the CBC at 5:15 PM EST. Blood was smeared on his face. He and his fellow interviewees took pains to describe how Custer's face was smashed into a wall, and dragged across it, smearing blood everywhere. Yes, indeed, it must have been a forceful impact if his face was still bloody three hours after the event in question.

Except...hmmm. Looking a bit fishy now. It seems that a CBC camera crew caught footage of Mr. Custer as he walked out of Parliament, and...would you look at that?! There's no blood on his face, nor is he holding any bandages to his skin.

They'll lie about the whole climate-change thing.

Of course they'll lie about getting their nose bloodied by law enforcement personnel.

Hmm... hey, are they with ACORN-Canada?

Bloody left-wing extremist, teabagging climate-changers, eh!

More Pelosi BS

How dare you question me, you piece of...!

Here she goes again.
( – When asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday where the Constitution authorized Congress to order Americans to buy health insurance--a mandate included in both the House and Senate versions of the health care bill--Pelosi dismissed the question by saying: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”


"Who gives a f*ck about the f*cking Constitution? What are you, a crackpot conspiracy theorist? I betcha you're a birther, too. And a racist, a Nazi, a mobster, an Astroturfer, plus your crazy question will lead to violence! How dare you mention the Constitution? Can't you see we're doing the progressive thing and trying to destroy America, and get rid of sick and old people via rationing? Forget the Constitution!"

Pelosi then shook her head before taking a question from another reporter. Her press spokesman, Nadeam Elshami, then told that asking the speaker of the House where the Constitution authorized Congress to mandated that individual Americans buy health insurance as not a "serious question."

“You can put this on the record,” said Elshami. “That is not a serious question. That is not a serious question.”
Oh? Not a serious question? Ah. When non-leftists ask of the leftist regime about the constitutionality of something big and scary they're proposing, they get branded as "unserious". Next thing you know, they'll be simplistically, childishly derided as "birthers" or something like that. And there'll be a massive intimidation campaign to prevent people from asking the regime to prove that the Health Bill is constitutional.

Just like they treated people who simply asked to see proof that Obama actually qualified to be President by proving that he was born on American soil. A fair demand, yet anyone making it gets publicly mocked and shamed.

They're going to do the same thing whenever people ask to be shown precisely where the Constitution gives the federal government the right to force Americans to buy something against their will.

Again, when the Left wants to nix something they don't like, they say "It's unconstitutional, so get rid of it".

But when someone asks for proof that the Left's stuff is constitutional, they get branded "not serious".

Double standard again. See? Oh, but it's ok, 'cause it's "progressive", and anything "progressive" is ok all the time, right?

Assholes. Throw them all out in 2010! Every single one of them!

Far-Left Crackpot Mob Disrupts Parliament

These folks get plenty of Big Media coverage for their antics.

Unlike the American Tea Party folks, who, in contrast, when they're not being ignored altogether, get smeared by immature "news" people in the Big Media.

If anyone deserves to be mocked and ridiculed, it's the brainwashed, far-left enviro-fascists. They're the real teabaggers, the real extremists. They're the real mob. C'mon, Big Media dummies- be fair! Either ignore 'em or make fun of 'em with crude sexual inuuendoes, etc!

Oh, and they're also "Astroturf". They're NOT ordinary, concerned Canadians at all. They're NOT grassroots.

See their community organizer, who's a NDP operative:

Nevertheless, the Big Media gives these hyper-partisan, hyper-ideological extremists, cranks, crackpots, teabaggers, racists, Nazis, mobsters, (add your own convenient smear words here)... a respectful platform for the dissemination of their hateful, racist, subversive views! WTF!!!

Oh, yes, I'm drippin' with sarcasm. Can't help it. That effin' Big Media again proves its biases. They ignored the anti-Obammunism protests in America, even slurred and smeared them with lies, but they'll treat the above-noted extremist lunatics with respect and donate their broadcast time to them to propagate their horseshit message.

Hateful Atheists Do It Again, Nix Nativity Scene

Here we go again. Yes, there are plenty of hateful, bigoted, supremacist atheists out there who apparently have nothing better to do than spread the Big Lie of "separation of church and state", which they claim to be in the Constitution, but, actually, isn't.

How is it that something that is in the Constitution, ie. freedom of religion, keeps getting trumped by a Big Lie, an Urban Legend, ("separation of church and state") that isn't in the Constitution?

Are you still connected to the Matrix of Delusion, believing the Big Lie? Disconnect yourself and Google the U.S. Constitution and try to find where it mentions "separation of church and state". You will not find anything like that.

You will only find where it says that government is forbidden to "establish a religion" (ie. a state religion). It's the "Establishment Clause". This clause simply means that government cannot establish a religion, nothing more, and to extrapolate from this restriction on government (not on the People, nor on their religions) is simply wrong and intolerable.

(Funny how an obvious, and oppressive, coercive, state religion of sorts, Obammunism, has, de-facto, been established, but no one cares about the unconstitutionality of that!)

Speaking of Obama and the Constitution, how come Obama gets to be President without having to adhere to the Constitution's Eligibility Requirement? In this case, Obama never proved to anyone that he qualifies under this requirement to be President (ie. he never proved he was born in America, and the "proof" uttered by his people is fraudulent and inadmissible).

So it's really annoying that we have, on the one hand, Obammunists saying that the Constitution is irrelevant vis-a-vis Obama's being President, and on the other hand, saying that something that isn't in the Constitution must be respected as a "fundamental Constitutional principle".

Also, why doesn't "Freedom From Religion", the hate group who bashes Christians, also bash the Muslims? Aren't those atheists offended by such things as Islamic footbaths and Islamic prayer rooms in public buildings, plus mention of Ramadan and Eid by public officials all the time? Aren't they offended by hijabs and burkas and turbans and such? Oh, right... too afraid of being beheaded to dare to focus on Muslims, so they target meek, non-violent Christians instead!
John Satawa's family has displayed a nativity scene on a street median in Warren, Mich., virtually every Christmas season since 1945, but following an intimidating letter sent by the Freedom from Religion Foundation, Satawa's county has put stop to the 63-year-old tradition.

The Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation proclaims its purpose in the letter to the Road Commission of Macomb County was to "protect the fundamental constitutional principle of separation of church and state."


Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Law Center, commented in a statement, "Every Christmas holiday, militant atheists … use the phrase 'separation of church and state' – nowhere found in our Constitution – as a means of intimidating municipalities and schools into removing expressions celebrating Christmas, a national holiday. Their goal is to cleanse our public square of all Christian symbols.

"However," Thompson continued, "the grand purpose of our Founding Fathers and the First Amendment was to protect religion, not eliminate it. Municipalities and schools should be aware that the systematic exclusion of Christmas symbols during the holiday season is itself inconsistent with the Constitution."

Why is it that these anti-religion hatemongers are getting to get religious evidence nixed from public places, but people who don't like to see evidence of homosexuality and fascist Islam don't get to demand the nixing of such public evidence, lest they be branded "haters" and thrown in prison under Obama's unfair, unconstitutional "hate crimes" laws?

Next thing you know, Christians will be required to wear a yellow fabric cross on their clothing to identify them as such.

Then they'll be required to wear striped pajamas all the time...