Wednesday, March 31, 2010

The Duff On Freedom Of Speech

 Senator Michael Duffy

Transcript of historic speech here.

Well-said, Senator.

Rightie Celeb: LL Cool J

 Ain't no "progressive" weenie:  LL Cool J

Interview with LL Cool J, of NCIS: Los Angeles (I watch that; it's good)...

This dude's all right.  An American patriot, a conservative...  Obviously the opposite of Hollyweirdoes like Sean Penn.

Kinsella Steps In It Again

 Warren Kinsella.
Is this a credible man?
Or just an attention-hogging hypocrite?

Warren Kinsella.  Here he goes again, stepping in it and then putting it into his mouth.

He tried to attack Senator Mike Duffy.  Funny how Leftists like Warren are suddenly on the warpath for no reason other than Sen. Duffy is a Conservative, and Leftists believe that Conservatives must be tarred and feathered for daring to think for themselves.

Well, the Senator responded.

Clearly, Warren was trying to get away with using a carefully selected bundle of text to make it sound as if the Senator was suing because they made fun of him, when, in fact, the Senator sued for defamation.  Nasy, nasty Warren... trying to fool people into thinking the wrong thing.  He's a Machiavellian manipulative psychoaffector, though not a good one, because he's terribly easy to expose.  One can smell the dung on his foot and see it stuck between his teeth.

Time to brush your teeth, Warren.  Don't forget to floss.  And use Listerine.  And try to watch where you put your big, stinky feet, pal!  Might as well consider a whitening treatment too, 'cause of the brownish, long-term buildup.

How To Deal With Closed-Minded, Intolerant Leftists

Story here.

Hmm.  Yes.  It makes sense, all right.  Good article.
So what is the prescription here for those of us who are conservative or libertarian? There may be no way to get the “other side” to understand our views, for they may not have the capacity to do so. Until the lack of empathy for conservatives miraculously changes, we might do better to grow our own ranks, getting more of us involved, rather than trying to rationalize our own views to the other side. Giving in only wastes valuable time that could be put to better use and makes liberals more likely to treat us poorly.
(...) a combination of all three is needed: expanding right-leaning media, getting more people involved, and making sure consequences are dealt out to those liberals who lie and treat conservatives with disrespect. Yes, this means all of us speaking up wherever we are when we hear false, inflammatory, or just plain mean remarks made about conservatives. And finally, clamoring for more diverse educational topics and literature in the schools and media would be helpful.
Conservatives shouldn’t back down on any of this, ever. For it is persistence and consistency that will eventually win the day. The left did it for decades and it clearly works. The left’s advantage has been that the right caves and is so worried about appearing moral that they back down, conceding any power. The right’s advantage is that we understand how the other side thinks, while they do not. Keep this in mind when you think about strategies to keep our liberties and freedoms intact.

A Nurse Warns Of What's Ahead With ObamaCare

Story here.

It doesn't look very hopeful.  There's no reason to believe that the monstrous bill recently imposed via draconian tactical moves by the Democrats and Obama against the wishes of the majority... that it'll help, not hurt.

Besides, and this is something the socialists don't want to admit...
Low-income Americans already have government-run insurance programs available to them – Medicaid and Medicare in most states (including coverage for children under the age of 18).
Those who believe it'll help... they've no reason to believe this.  It's nothing but blind faith in something crafted by... politicians Corrupt politicians.  Hell, those who voted for the bill have admitted they didn't even read the damn thing!

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Extreme-Left-Wing Anarchists Target Tea Parties

No kidding.  See for yourself right here.

Hoo-boy.  These "progressive" guys are obviously lunatics.

Useful idiots.  Brainwashed, and badly.  Poor little souls.  God help 'em, 'cause they need it.

You see, these are the sort of people who go around creating hoaxes, such as phony threats.

They'll do whatever they believe works.  They believe that the ends (socialism) justify the means.

They actually view Mainstream Americana (represented by the Tea Party movement) as evil and stuff.

Whoo-boy!  Oh, yep.  These "progressive" folks are definitely representative of Mainstream Americana... suuuuuure.

Journalism Degree? Who Needs It Anyway?

Story here.

What good is the training and the framed piece of fancy paper if the Big Media journalists are really just going to tell us what they're told to tell us?  What good is it?

I mean, any idiot can read stuff off a teleprompter.

Like the Big Media news anchors.

Like Obama.  And he's not qualified to be President, anyway, but there he is... reading from teleprompters all the time.

I'd rather just get raw facts, thanks.  That doesn't require any fancy skills, just basic intelligence and a motivation to gather the real info, and then report what one finds.  Duh!  Spare me the bedazzling fancy-schmancyness, the spin and the ominous, leading questions and all that crap!

Oh, sure, it also helps to have effective communications skills.  But you don't need to waste four years of your life and borrow a hundred grand to acquire that!

ClimateGate II: NASA Confesses

Story here.

Clearly, the science is NOT "sound".

Why should we believe Al Gore, the IPCC, David Suzuki, Chicken Little et al, then?

Don't worry.  The sky isn't falling.  Be happy!

Majority Of Weather Forecasters: GW NOT Manmade

Story here.
The majority — 63 percent — say global warming is caused "mostly by natural changes in the environment" compared with 31 percent who blamed the phenomenon on "human activities." More than a quarter said they agreed that the phenomenon is "a scam."

Leftist Arrested For Death Threat Against Republican & His Family

Here we go again...

Funny how the Democrats and their comrades in the Big Newsmedia have been attempting to manufacture an illusion that there's "right-wingers" going around uttering threats and committing violence against Democrats, and blaming Republican political criticism for fomenting it all, whereas, in fact...
Federal authorities have arrested a Philadelphia man and charged him with threatening to kill House Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and his family.

The guy uttered anti-Semitic slurs as well as threatening the Republican and his family.

And he donated money to Obama.

Right-wing?  I don't think so.

Expect the Big Newsmedia to downplay the arrest, because the guy ain't a "right-winger".  If he had been a "right-winger", then for sure the "news" folks would make a big stink.

Crazy leftists, eh!  So why doesn't DHS head Napolitano issue a nationwide law-enforcement BOLO for "Left-wing Extremists"?

Enraged Leftists Attack Rove, Shut Down Event

Those violent, violent, angry, angry "CodePink" "progressives", eh!  There they go again, without much coverage in the Big Media, who'd rather point fingers at unseen "right-wingers" doing unseen nasty stuff, as alleged by Leftists who make it all up.
The Code Pink mobsters have been waging these in-your-face attacks for years without so much as a peep of outrage from the selective NYTimes/MSNBC/Democrat civility police.
So they called Karl Rove a "war criminal".  Well, then, what is Barack Obama, if not a "war criminal", for doing exactly the same stuff as was done when Rove advised President Bush?  Hmm?  Why don't the Leftists ever go after folks like Obama?  Are these Leftists nothing other than professional brownshirt-style thugs, community-organized to create propaganda stunts to make conservatives look bad and "progressives" look good by default?

Monday, March 29, 2010

The Persecution of Guy Earle: An Illegal Proceeding

Lawyer walks out, declares proceeding "not legal"...

Background here.

Here's some of the latest (ht: SDA)

Alas, but this is what many law-abiding folks have faced for decades.  The violation of their Charter and human rights, by unaccountable, rogue "liberal fascist" inquisitors who convict without evidence, based on nothing but a filing of a claim and the supremacy of political correctness.

In Canada.

Oh, yes.

Funny how the traditional, established, elite Big Newsmedia haven't been warning us about this tyrannical, fascist institution that doesn't, despite its name ("Human Rights" Commission/Tribunal), care about human rights at all!  The people responsible for delivering us "The News" have steadfastly refused to do their job and tell us the whole story.  Pretty weird... and scary... eh!

Ironically, in an earthshaking twist, Ann Coulter is hauling a left-wing university VP, an F. A. Houle, before a "human rights" commission for violating her rights.  And, yes, even as a non-Canadian, she can do this, as per a previous SCOC ruling that deemed that non-citizens are covered by the Charter.  This is going to be entertaining, mark my words.  Now, wouldn't it be awesome if the whole thing were televised for all to witness for themselves?  Like, this has never happened before.  So why not televise these "human rights" tribunal proceedings like real court cases have sometimes been televised?  Then we can see whether the commisars really do care about human rights and due process of law at all.

I marvel at how steadfastly the Big Newsmedia refuse to tell The People about what's really going on with these scary, so-called "human rights" extrajudicial apparati.

Leftist Sportswriter Launches Hypocritical Attack On Palin, Tea Party

Story here.
New York sportswriter Mike Lupica Monday went on a full-frontal assault of Tea Party members, Sarah Palin, and every American currently voicing dissent about the direction of the nation.


Alas, folks like Lupica and others in the media currently carping about what they see as hate speech not only have conveniently forgotten what happened just a few years ago, but also don't realize that it was their Bush Derangement Syndrome that fostered much of the Right's response to Obama.

Having watched Bush get viciously attacked 24 hours a day, seven days a week, it became apparent that vitriolic demonstrations against the White House and its policies -- regardless of how vulgar and inflammatory -- are now totally acceptable.

As such, what's happening around America today is partially a predictable reaction to years of vile anti-Bush protests not just from citizens but also those that call themselves journalists.
I saw this coming, years ago.  I knew that those anti-Bush nutcases would, when the shoe came to be on the other foot, pretend they never did all that crazy-crap propaganda with respect to Bush, and proceed to point fingers and make largely unfounded accusations against the "other side" when convenient.  This is exactly what I see going on.  Most of the sensational, headline-making accusations made by those who support the Obamacrats have been unsubstantiated by observable evidence.

Remember the appalling, uncivil, insane behavior of the anti-Bush, pro-Democrat, currently-pro-Obama folks?  Here's a refresher, with a content advisory (not safe for work!).

Hypocrites.  Wacky Progs.  Eh!

Violent Leftists Attack Tea Party

Supporters of Democrat Senator Harry Reid proved that it's the Left that's violent.

Funny how the Big Media decided to ignore that massive Tea Party of tens of thousands, with the CNN oddly pretty much dismissing its significance, calling the numbers "at least dozens", dismissing the event, even though there was violence.  Alas, the violence came from the Left, so, of course, it became a "nothing to see here" sort of thing.
Saturday's Tea Party Express event in the hometown of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was downplayed by much of the media -- perhaps because the only incidents of violent behavior among the large crowd seemed to come from angry supporters of Mr. Reid. Following a week in which charges and countercharges about which side in the health care debate has engaged in more objectionable rhetoric, the media's treatment of the Tea Party event in Searchlight, Nev. was curious.


"It's unsettling to see them use threats and provocation like this," he told me. He was especially peeved at what he witnessed given what he said were the unconfirmed accusations hurled at Tea Party protestors last week in Washington, including that some had used ugly and violent language against members of the Congressional Black Caucus. On stage at the Searchlight event, Mr. Breitbart offered to donate $100,000 to charity if anyone could provide video evidence that racial epithets were used against CBC members. Mr. Breitbart says he suspects the accusations were just a cynical attempt by the left and elements of the media to "marginalize" the Tea Party movement.
 Yep.  Seems the Leftist Brownshirts are out there doing their thing...

Moonbat Spotlight: Justin Trudeau

Like father, like son...

Just watch him be a typical Alinskyist following the "Rules" for radicals like him...

Here’s what happened. Mr. Trudeau, a rookie Liberal Montreal MP, was full of vim and vigour yesterday during an appearance on CTV’s Question Period. What landed him in trouble, however, were his sustained interruptions of Ms. Glover.

This did not play well with some viewers – many of whom wrote emails expressing their dissatisfaction with the way in which the panel was moderated (by me) and with Mr. Trudeau’s constant interruptions.

What, was he possessed by professional annoying guy Rick Mercer?  You know how that little frizz-head loves to constantly interrupt folks.  But then again, he's a comedian.  To behave this way as an elected representative of the people is simply... moonbatty.  And immature.

And a sign of someone who couldn't be Prime Minister, obviously.  We don't need a Canuck Obama.

For his part, Mr. Trudeau appears to realize he was being an ass...
Immediately after the show, he tweeted his regrets: “OK, there seems a consensus: no matter how frustrated I get, I will not be interrupting on panels in the future. I’m learning...”

And today, he said he wants to continue to bring that passion but will “wait for my turn.”

Well, we'll see.  We'll be watching him to see whether he does what he says he will.  Never know with them Liberals, y'know.  They're, well, they tend to go "pop!", y'know, like the weasel...

Interruption is a typical tactic of leftist-"progressives" when they're "debating" stuff with conservatives and the conservatives have the upper hand and the leftists haven't a leg to stand on.  Interruption helps the leftists get away with not knowing what they're talking about.  Interruption makes it very difficult for the other person to get their message across effectively, and the leftists know this.  This is why they keep on interrupting conservatives.  And why Big Media journalists do it more to conservatives than to leftists.

Another Kangaroo Kourt Tax-Dollar Waster


Act like complete antisocial asses, deserving to be removed by police for disorderly conduct.  Be as offensive and disruptive as one can, literally preventing people from doing their jobs.  Engage in debasing public behavior.

Thus irritating those one has offended.

The offended party then says offensive stuff in response.

Who gets hauled before the Kangaroo Kourt?

The originally offended party.  The party who was provoked by the rude, antisocial extremists imposing their specialness onto others in an uncomfortably extreme manner.

As for the article's presumptiveness in deeming the offended party's retaliatory verbal offensiveness as "discriminatory", well, I'd suggest that the word's meaning has been so expanded and become so ambiguous as to be effectively worthless as a valid adjective.

Many folks are unaware that gay folks utter hateful slurs with respect to other groups and NEVER get hauled before the Kangaroo Kourt.  What's up with that?  Are the "human rights" tribunals only there for gays and other selected special groups, but not for others not favored by the "Progressive" Intelligentsiya?

As a rule of thumb, if one treats others badly, then one doesn't complain if the others respond in kind, equally badly and oppositely.  One has deliberately brought it upon oneself and has no right whatsoever to be protected from an equal amount of rudeness.  Notwithstanding however "special" one might be, relating to one's "group membership".

One cannot hide behind one's "group membership" and go around treating people badly and then getting mad when their victims get mad.  Like, come on!

The two women, they're aggressive, militantly antisocial assholes whose behavior at the comedy club was boorish and imposing at best and criminal at worst.

I hope they fail.  If they win, I hope that their victim takes the whole thing to the Supreme Court, so as to force the Kangaroo Kourt to account for its violation of his Charter rights in the way it treats him, as it treats all of its victims.

I'd also love to see all non-"special" folks, such as Christians and conservatives, who are "discriminated against" (ie. called nasty names by) such lovely folks as the two women in question... haul their offendors before the Kangaroo Kourts, too!  Funny how this hasn't happened before, isn't it?  Whazzup with that?

Does being "gay" mean that one can do anything they want to others and get away with it?  No!

I'd dismiss the complaint, period.

The two women deliberately, willingly, knowingly provoked the reaction they got.  It's insane to think otherwise.  It doesn't matter to whatever groups one belongs.  If one is going to rudely impose stuff onto others, especially in a manner than prevents people from doing their job, one is therefore a criminal and should be the one subject to punishment!

That said, if I were the comedian, I'd simply have called for security or the police and had the disruptive boors removed from the premises.

But I don't blame the guy, given the circumstances, for losing his temper and letting the verbal diarrhea fly.  People do that sometimes.  Sure, they sometimes go too far.  Who doesn't?

After all, the two women were so offensive themselves, that it's astonishing that they're offended by the reaction they deliberately provoked!

Besides, the "human rights" commissions/tribunals have exactly ZERO business hearing this case.  Their only legal mandate is to deal with issues of real and alleged discrimination in housing and employment.  They have ZERO business dealing with cases like this, ie. offensive speech.

Think I'm mistaken?  Prove it.  Do your homework and show me where, in the enacting legislation, it says that the "human rights" commissions/tribunals are allowed to deal with respect to offensive speech, thus dangerously threatening the Charter's guarantee of freedom of expression.  If speech becomes such that it literally incites violence against anyone, then that's a matter for the criminal justice system, not the Kangaroo Kourts.

Also, the comedian didn't incite anything against the two women, which, if he had, would certainly have been a criminal act requiring the real courts to act.  All he did was say offensive stuff in response to their offensiveness.  They were assholes, he was an asshole.  But they started it.  They have no business using our tax dollars to bash him for standing up for himself and the other comedy-club workers whom they deliberately prevented from doing their jobs!


SEE ALSO (National Post, a more complete, fair-and-balanced, more-real-critical-thinking piece than the other article).

ht: NNW 


Sunday, March 28, 2010

Iggy's 'New-Style' 'Democracy'?

I'm not fooled.

We heard similar promises from Obama, but we know he lied.  He turned out to be a tyrant who imposes what he wants no matter what.

Ignatieff is a big Obama fan.  Wouldn't it be logical to expect an Obamite like Iggy to follow his hero's lead?

I don't buy any of it.

For one thing, Iggy said:
“An activist government doesn’t mean another high-ticket federal program,” he said. “What it means is getting a network of deciders together to face common problems.” 

Oh, come on!

Iggy has called for socialized daycare.  This would cost billions.  He's called for billions, billions and more billions in government spending as "solutions" to the nation's problems.  Hell, he even called for a second stimulus spending budget, though the Big Media dutifully mostly stayed away from reporting his stupidity, to protect him from himself.

And the "deciders", they're all Liberals.  Elitist, Establishment, Wealthy, Bigwig, Connected Liberals.  Mostly white old men, too.  Old boys' club.  The "diversity" they use for optics, well, I'd like to see whether the Bigwig Liberals are a visibly-diverse bunch.  Oh, oops!  Am I starting to sound like a leftist propagandist, now?  Oh, ok, you caught me- but I'd still like to see some pictures and video from the conference so I can assess the "diversity" for myself and be assured that it's not a pretty-much-all-white-old-rich-men-with-combovers thing.

Stephen Guilbault was there.  A pony-tailed, bearded Greenpeace enviro-extremist.  He's advocating a carbon tax.  And he's a Liberal.  I hardly think he speaks for Mainstream Canadiana.

Michael Phelps?  Rich, old white dude, head honcho of Westcoast Energy.  OMG!  Big Energy!  Liberals in bed with Big Energy!

David Dodge?  Meh.  Liberal.  Horrific combover.  Who does he think he's fooling?  Who does he think he is, to expect us to believe whatever he says, just because he used to be Governor of the Bank of Canada?

Not ordinary Canadians.

The People should be the ones brainstorming and deciding, not the Liberals.

But the Liberals again believe that they know best, and that The People are stupid "teabaggers" who need to be imposed upon... just like in Obamerica right now.

Politicians are supposed to do what The People tell them, democratically.  Politicians aren't supposed to deem-and-impose, like they're doing right now in Soviet Obamacratistan.  (No offense to Mainstream Americana, and, hey, we've been called, rightly, at one time, "Soviet Canuckistan" by one American commentator... when the Liberals tyrannized us, so now we're even... eh!  :) ).

Carbon Tax?  Yeah, right.  Suuuuure.  Just like ObamaCare, eh?  Like, as with that, WE DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT!

Leave our "carbon footprints" alone!  

Don't tax our lives!

Grassroots Liberals Endorse Carbon Tax

It was brought up by some Liberal Establishment Elitist Bigwigs.

Carbon tax.  The unpopular tax on everything that helped guarantee last election's Liberal defeat.  (ht: NNW)
"You’re going to monetize carbon one way or another," said former Westcoast Energy CEO Michael Phelps.

Liberals across the country — who were watching and listening online, in 53 town hall sessions and in their own basements — chimed in with support for the idea through Twitter and the chat feed on the Liberal conference website.

Scary.  Grassroots Liberals are clearly extremists.
When Phelps praised a carbon tax, stephen f gordon, a university economist from Quebec City, tweeted: "Phelps is my hero. (...)"

OMG...  These people don't understand what they're talking about.  There's clearly something not-right in their heads!

This presents a problem for Michael Ignatieff.  He doesn't want to "go there", he says, by running on the carbon tax platform in the next election.

But grassroots Liberals want him to.

What a fix.  What to do, now?  Be a dictator like Chretien, or abandon his principles and intellect... yet again, like some... common politician?

Poor Iggy.  Probably didn't think it'd be so hard to be Liberal "leader".

I wonder when his second thoughts about the Liberal Party and its membership will come, if they haven't already?  I mean, surely a guy like Egghead Iggy can see how lazy-minded those Liberal members tend to be.  Does he want to have to babysit them?

Obama 'Resigned To Nuclear Iran': Bolton

Story here.

ht: Breitbart
“I very much worry the Obama administration is willing to accept a nuclear Iran, that's why there's this extraordinary pressure on Israel not to attack in Iran,” 


Bolton said that the Obama administration had embraced the view, prevalent in Europe, that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was the key to the resolution of all other conflicts throughout the Middle East, including the Iranian conflict.

He added that the rift in US-Israel relations stemmed from a fundamental difference in the understanding of the Middle East and Israel's role in the Middle East, and is not really about east Jerusalem at all.

Bolton said that the treatment Netanyahu received during his visit "should tell the people of Israel how difficult it's going to be dealing with Washington for the next couple of years."

Apparently the Obamacrat Reich, as feared, is belligerent towards the Free World, especially Israel, and submissive towards the Axis of Evil.

And that's very, very bad.

If the Obamacrat Reich is going to be treating Israel so badly whilst bending over backwards to accommodate Islamic-Supremacist Iran, then the Obamacrat Reich had better shut the hell up,  leave Israel alone and quit telling her what she can and can't do.  The Obamacrat Reich is NOT Israel's master!  The Israeli People are, and will ultimately decide what's what!

Without the current American administration on her side, the truth is that Israel will be far more of a lethal threat to her enemies, because when one's very survival is in question, one will fight like it's 1967 again.

Plus Israel took out Saddam's nuclear-weapons capability, as well as, more recently, Syria's. 

Israel can take care of herself, and will.  She's got what it takes.  After all, when one is able to assert the doctrine of Mutually-Assured Destruction against one's enemies, one will always have the upper hand.

I stand with Israel!

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Big Media Talking Head Incites Violence Against Conservatives

Yep.  Rachel Maddow.  That extreme left-wing propagandist from the extreme left-wing propaganda organization MSNBC.

Story here.
Ms. Maddow, consider that the hatred runs from your side as well. Words matter, and apparently your words are inciting threats from your listeners. How’s that for hate speech?
Maybe a word about that on tomorrow’s show to condemn the hatred of fellow human beings? I won’t hold my breath.
Just doing my part to help folks get some real perspective on reality.

The Leftists are the big bullies, you see.
Even a child knows, as a victim, he automatically gains the moral high ground, and garnishes the power of justice to his side. It’s also the tactical defense of bullies and the emotionally stunted Left. From professional victim “Rev.” Jesse Jackson, to the White House chihuahua, Chris Matthews, leftists have been whining all week long.

It’s time for the adults to ignore the whining, and look at the bigger picture.

It’s a given that law abiding citizens do not threaten officials. Conservatives by nature are law abiding; we don’t use slander, destroy private property or bite off the fingers of those we disagree with.

When the adults get real quiet, behind the voting curtain–that’s when we’ll give them something to really cry about.

See? Tea Party Is Peaceful


Don't believe the Obamacrat and Big Media smears to the contrary, nor the hoaxes, designed to intimidate non-leftists into silencing their peaceful dissent while deceptively making the tyrannical Obamacrats look like innocent, meek victims.
"We're not going to sit down and shut up. Thank you for standing up," Palin said.

Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department sent dozens of uniformed and plainclothes officers to patrol the crowd. Officer Jay Rivera said there was a report of a fistfight in the morning, but when police responded, they found nothing. He said there had been no arrests.

"So far it's nice and peaceful," Rivera said.
See?  Perhaps someone who doesn't like Tea Parties decided to call in a phony report.  Naturally, no violence was in evidence, because Tea Party folks are non-violent, unlike the thuggish left.

If the Left is going to be manufacturing this apparent massive propaganda attack campaign, well, they won't get away with it, because non-leftists are going to be exposing the truth behind the Left's behavior, as well as the complicity of the leftist Big Media.

Prominent Leftist Spews Horrific Hatred Against Conservatives

 Mike Malloy, dangerous left-wing extremist

...and the Obamacrats have been screaming about alleged threats and alleged violence allegedly being incited by conservatives?

I doubt we'll hear much, if anything, however, about this prominent Leftist.

Know what?  Obama supporters, Democrats, Leftists, and the Big Media won't have a problem with this terrible, hateful guy.  Why not?  Because he's one of them.  They excuse anything and everything their own kind do, after all.

Those Violent, Violent Leftists

Looking at the reality...

That’s right, Sarah Palin’s church was damaged by arson after the 2008 election. One man in Modesto, CA was beaten to a pulp because he was handing out “Yes on Prop 8” stickers and a pastor’s car was shot up because he also supported a ban on gay marriage.

But you never heard liberal activists described as “domestic terrorists” did you? Of course not. That privilege goes to the far-left media and those who decided to ram healthcare down our throats.

Congressman Eric Cantor, the House Republican Whip, whose own office was hit by what police say was a stray bullet at days ago in Virginia said yesterday that the Democrats are needlessly and “dangerously fanning the flames by suggesting that these incidents be used as a political weapon.”

I agree. Not only are the Democrats acting like cowards but they are deliberately trying to distract the public from what’s really in the healthcare bill that they passed without ever reading.

Guess I'm not alone in my suspicions that the Democrats and the Big Media are trying to pull a big propaganda diversionary stunt.  Again.

Given incidents such as the burning down of Sarah Palin's hometown's church and the brutal beating of a Prop-8 supporter, shouldn't we be saying that the hateful utterances of leftists towards folks like Palin and folks who supported Prop 8.... that such horrifying Leftist communications are "fanning the flames of violent left-wing extremism and inspiring leftists to commit violence"?

Who Are The Violent People?

The Leftists, that's who.

Read about it for yourself.  Big Media, I predict, won't tell us about it, because they'll protect the Obamacrats from the inconvenient truth about who they are and what kind of folks they are.

Founding Bloggers is promising to soon provide photographic evidence of left-wing extremists committing violence against Tea Partiers, including Andrew Breitbart, whom the Leftists are said to be blaming for "provoking" it.  Ah, of course... simply begging to differ from Obamacracy orthodoxy is obviously "provocation".  Being different and having a dissenting point of view has apparently gone from "patriotic" (in Obama's own words) to being a "provocation" and justification for hard-leftwing extremists to commit violence.  Eh!

Saturday’s “never mind” moment will live in infamy as the Congressional Black Caucus claimed the N-word was hurled 15 times. YouTube video shows that at least two of the men in the procession were carrying video cameras and holding them above the crowd. They have not come forth with evidence to show that even one person hurled the vile racist epithet. The video also shows no head movement one way or another. Wouldn’t the N-word provoke a head turn or two? Is it really possible that in 2010, in a crowd of 30 or 40 thousand people — at the center of a once-in-a-lifetime media circus — not one person’s flipphone, Blackberry, video recorder or a network feed caught a single incident? And if not, then at least someone could have found an honest tea partier to act as an eyewitness — or the Congressional Black Caucus would have confronted the culprit(s). If that had happened, there would be an investigation to see if the perpetrator was a left-wing plant.

I maintain my contention that the Demcrats are perpetrating a clever hoax so as to paint themselves as victims, when, in fact, they're tyrants.  With followers who engage in threatening and thuglike behavior.

And it appears that the leftist Big Media is helping them to commit this dishonest propaganda campaign to make themselves look better and their opposition look like monsters or something.

The truth will come out.  But when it does, the Big Media won't tell it.  They'll pretend that nothing ever happened, nothing to see after all, move on...  They don't want to admit that they were (sometimes knowing and willing) party to a lie.

Will SCOTUS Strike Down ObamaCare?

Andrew P. Napolitano believes so.
President Barack Obama is one of the worst presidents ever in terms of respecting constitutional limitations on government, and the states suing the federal government over healthcare reform "have a pretty strong case" and are likely to prevail, according to author and judicial analyst Andrew P. Napolitano.

Nevertheless, the extreme-left-wing Obamacrats continue to delude themselves and the lazy-minded as to the constitutionality, legality and legitimacy of the extremely revolutionary change.  Not to mention the potential terrors thereof.

Allan Rock Spews Typical Liberal BS At UOttawa

Eh what?  Uh, ha-ha!  I gotta go! Bye!
Former Chretien Liberal Reich cabmin Allan Rock (now President-in-absentia of the University of Ottawa) looks at his watch, apparently eager to run away from responsibility, today, as before.
What does one expect of a mean-spirited Liberal infamous for his horrific treatment of those who contracted Hepatitis-C due to gross state-apparatus incompetence?
 Out of touch with reality, pretending that his job is purely political, as if he was still in the Chretien Reich...

And in complete denial of what's going on.  He's running away like a complete Left-wing coward.

Allan Rock.  Remember that idiot?
Given all of that, one would expect the person who runs the university to rise to its defence. Especially when that person is a former federal cabinet minister who has some experience in dealing with controversy.

Instead, Allan Rock's brief written statement bore no relation to reality. "Freedom of expression is a core value that the University of Ottawa has always promoted," Rock asserted. Maybe his VP didn't get the memo. The president then claimed that people had gathered to "listen to and debate Ann Coulter's opinions." Not quite. She didn't get to speak. And by "debate," he must have meant "shout slogans." Rock finished up by encouraging everyone to maintain the university "as an open forum for diverse opinions." Does he really think that is what his university is?

Rock didn't defend the approach taken by his vice-president academic, nor did he condemn it. He neither supported nor criticized the students who prevented Coulter from speaking. In fact, he said nothing. And he's sticking to it. "No further comments will be issued," the statement concluded.

I guess that old poop was still following the advice of the old Chretien Reich communications wizards and strategists.  Probably thinks it always works, eh?  Say some gobbleddygook to try to manipulatively, disingenously soothe the appalled, and then smile and run away, eh?  Typical Leftist asshole.  Big double thumbs down, with tongue stuck out.

Friday, March 26, 2010

See? Obama's A Communist

Communism is as communism does.

Now that they've imposed ObamaHealthControl, they're going after the mortgage-lending sector with their velvet-gloved iron fists.

Communism is as communism does.

And Barack Hussein Barry Soetoro Obama, the (Kenyan?... Pending release of REAL birth certificate-American) International Man of Mystery does communism.  Just see for yourself.  Open your eyes...

Count on it... they're looking at everything.  They're on a Khruschevian shopping spree as long as they've got power and opportunity.  They realize that they may well not be in power in America forever, so they're doing whatever they can while they're there.

The Obamacrats are looking at ways to impose, tyranically, on the business sector, forcing them to do the bidding of neo-communism.

Ultimately, of course, this will prove devastating for America.  And this is a BAD thing.

The economic indicators are continuing to prove devastatingly negative in America, as compared to "extreme" (the Big Media's words) Conservative-ruled Canada, which is doing quite damn well, thanks.  What an unforeseen turnaround... even for Yours Truly!   Damn... I used to live in "Soviet Canuckistan", but now I, living in Canada, look and see to the south, something I never foresaw.... the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics of Obamerica...  I feel badly for my American friends...

Conservative Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.  
A  shining example to follow for the future of America, at least compared to the likes of the folks the Yankees currently have oppressing and tyrannizing them with all that neo-communist bullshit...

Eh.  In Canada, we're on the cusp of balanced budgets.  Could come as early as next month, or so.  Avoiding Obammunism, notwithstanding the "stimulus" spending (which might be partially an illusion... stay tuned), Canada, under Conservative rule, is actually experiencing an economic rebound, an employment rebound, a tax-revenue rebound, an auto-sector comeback (PLUS!!!), etc...

So how's that "Hope 'n' Change" thingy workin' out for y'all, my American friends?  Miss Bush yet?

Obamacrats Manufacturing Hoax Threats, Attacks, To Point Fingers At Opponents?

All of these alleged incidents of threats and attacks supposedly directed at Democrats.  The Big Media is incessantly hollering about it as much as are the Obamacrats.

But how do we know that they're not largely or wholly maunfactured threats and attacks?

Where's the evidence that what's being claimed is indeed happening, and that it's non-Leftists who are responsible?  Show me the proof!

What if it's just fake stuff committed by the Hard Left's brownshirt operatives to curry public sympathy for the Obamacrats?  Of course, the Obamacrats have badly wronged The People, and may now be cheating to restore favor by perhaps faking violence and "hatred" and pretending to be victims and all that... all the while blaming Republicans, and especially Sarah Palin.

But why is it that when the Democrats, the Hard Left and the Big Media were incessantly, crazily spreading hatred, contempt and incitement towards President Bush, doing so was seen as "patriotic" and "just" and "righteous", whereas now any criticism of the Obamacrats is claimed to be "causing the threats and violence"?  Gimme a break!

I say it's fake, fake, fake... LIKE THE BURNING OF THE REICHSTAG BY THE NAZIS.

It's like a suspect punching himself black and blue and then blaming it on police interrogators so as to claim "police brutality" and get off because of it.

There's no proof that the alleged threats and violence are coming from anyone on the "right".  It's just what the Leftists want to claim.  Same with the Big Media, who's only too happy to holler about it all, all day, every day.

Don't forget... we saw all kinds of threats and actual violence coming from the Democratic side over the years.  We've blogged about it.  I've blogged about it. The New Media online has dutifully reported on it, and there have been MANY reports, which were either largely ignored or largely sanitized by the Big Media to protect the Democrats.

I call bullshit.  I call hoax.

Seems to be a LOT of this bullshit all of a sudden, and I seriously suspect Hard-Leftwing operatives behind it.  I seriously doubt that ordinary Americans are behind it.  Ordinary Americans do NOT believe in civil violence, nor in threats of violence, as do left-wing extremists.  Ordinary Americans are doing the right thing by demonstrating, organizing, discussing, reporting, etc., etc... and they also know that in just a matter of months, they will be able to throw the bums out.

I seriously doubt that what we're hearing from the Obamacrats and the Big Media is the truth.

After all, the Left has a long, nasty history of faking violence and blaming it on the "right", which is actually the Mainstream.



Of course the Obamacrats desperately want to get people to stop talking about the draconian, tyrannical tactics they employed to force a massive monstrosity of a revolutionary change upon Americans, the vast majority of whom are vehemently opposed thereto...

Ah, but, as it was said many times on Seinfeld- IT STILL SMELLS!

UPDATE:  Michelle Malkin on FaceBook:

How the Left fakes the hate: A primer

(Read 'er all)
the Left never takes a break from falsely accusing the Right of fomenting hatred and violence through political speech. The MSM never takes a break from whitewashing leftist intolerance, death threats, and extremism — and engaging in selective reporting (or rather, non-reporting) of the long history of leftists’ manufacturing of hatred for political gain.

Tories Already Moving To Curb Lib Fascist Star Chambers

 Biggest three of those places to be shut down!
Good news for freedom of expression!
Still, shoe-on-other-foot-now-style, a certain F. A. Houle will be hauled before one of the remaining ones...

Good news for freedom of expression and for our Charter rights and freedoms!

Though perhaps bad timing and a little inconvenient for Ann Coulter, who's filing a human rights complaint against an  F. A. Houle from the "University of Zero" for his prejudicial, bigoted, hateful, hurtful comments to her before she even came to the country and said a single word?

Of course, only the biggest three (which together hear most of the complaints) Star Chambers are going to be shut down.  There's still others.

I see the PSAC is opposed to the shutdowns, saying it'll make it harder for "marginalized groups" to launch complaints.  (Funny... I didn't know that the PSAC was an extreme left-wing political propaganda organization... I thought it was a civil servants' labor union... guess not anymore... now it looks little different from the corrupt, extreme-left-wing, sometimes violent ACORN/SEIU in America)

I guess the PSAC therefore supports Ms. Coulter, who's obviously a member of two of the most marginalized groups of all:  Conservatives and Christians.  And being a woman, too, makes her all the more marginalized, because, obviously, "progressives" especially hate conservatives and Christians who are also women.  Like, the sexist progs think, "how dare a woman think and speak like that?"... No one is more hated by "progressives" than people belonging to specially-exalted-by-"progressives" identifiable groups... who are outspokenly conservative and politically incorrect.  Ann Coulter could be a lesbian Muslim with a really good tan, too, and walking with a cane, and she'd still be as reviled by the progs because she doesn't obediently, submissively adhere to political correctness.  It's not about whether one is a "minority" or not... it's really about the supremacy of extreme left-wing socialism and tyranny.

Hmm.  Could this shuttering of some Star Chambers be related to the imminent HR complaint by Ann Coulter against that nasty F. A. Houle of UZero?  Do the Conservatives finally feel safe to do this, now that they can say to the progs, "Well, if you support the HRCs, then you therefore support Ann Coulter and her human rights and right to say whatever she wants, and everyone elses' right to say whatever they want, even if it offends people belonging to whatever group."...

The Big Media and the progs are going to have a hard time explaining themselves on the HRCs vis-a-vis the surprise move by Coulter to haul an F. A. Houle before the Star Chamber.  Perhaps the Big Media and the progs will now... shut up, because their big mouths are their new biggest enemies?

Enjoying the show and the ironies...

Conservative MP In Bed With CBCer?

Strange bedfellows? 
CBCer Krista Erickson and Tory MP Lee Richardson: What's the story all about?

Story here.  Significant "eww!" factor involved.
“It’s one thing to have a personal relationship,” she said. “It’s another thing entirely to be benefiting from that relationship. Actually being able to fly for free because of that relationship kind of brings it to a new level. A reporter who covers national politics in any way who is in a relationship with an MP is clearly in conflict.”

Kevin Gaudet, of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, says it looks bad.

“That will be a problem for them, for the Tories and the CBC. That will be a problem all the way around. It looks to me like he would be running afoul of the conflict of interest commissioner, and their guidelines of avoiding the appearance of conflict of interest,” said Gaudet.

“And I would have thought that she would be tripping over journalistic integrity by putting herself so closely aligned with the reception of resources available to a member of Parliament.”

Hmm.   Is Lee Richardson a closet Liberal?  Or has he been seduced by a hot Big-Media spy?  WTF is wrong with the guy?

As for the CBC chick, well, what does one expect from a CBCer, what with the whole culture of entitlement thing?

One would expect this of a Liberal MP, not a Tory one.

At least the CBC chick is hot...  Perhaps Richardson isn't thinking with his brain.  Hard to do that, when all your blood has migrated to another anatomical location...

Of course, the CBCer must similarly be questioned.  Like, what has she been thinking... if she's been thinking at all?

Damn.  In Ottawa, everybody's horny...

ht: NNW

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Profs' Union 'Deeply Disturbed' With F. A. Houle

Via Ezra Levant...

Really.  F. A. Houle, the Provost of the University of Ottawa, has "deeply disturbed" the Canadian Association of University Teachers .
We are deeply disturbed by your correspondence with Ann Coulter regarding her speaking engagement at the University of Ottawa tomorrow. Your admonishing her about speech rights in Canada raises serious questions about the University of Ottawa’s respect for freedom of expression and academic freedom.
Not only that, they also want F. A. Houle to apologize to Ann Coulter:
We feel you owe an apology to Ms. Coulter and, even more importantly, you owe the University of Ottawa community an assurance that the administration of the University strongly supports freedom of expression, academic freedom and views the role of the university as fostering and defending these values.
Perhaps F. A. Houle will be getting the shaft...

 F. A. Houle

See what happens when left-wing extremist ideologues assume positions of power, such as at universities?  Hmm... I'd also point out that the far-leftwing ex-Chretien Liberal cabmin Allan Rock, who tried to become Liberal leader, is the President of the University.

 Allan Rock, ex-Liberal cabmin, President, U of Ottawa
With some questionable plants (nope, they're not the fringe-element, far-left students)

Shout-out to Allan Rock:  President Allan, do you agree with F. A. Houle's hateful bloviations?  Hmm?  Speak up!  I can't hear you!  Ah... silence is consent, I guess...

Obama Tries To Dictate To Israel: Debka

This is very bad.  I knew all along that Obama and the Democrats were anti-Israel.  Like, duh!

Debka ends its report by citing a report by the left-leaning Washington Post, which clearly disagrees with Obama on this (I guess that makes the WaPo "racist", then, for disagreeing with Obama?).

Obama "Ideological, vindictive": Washington Post
The Washington Post laid the blame for the crisis squarely on President Obama, whom it accused of treating Netanyahu "as if he were an unsavory Third World dictator, needed for strategic reasons but conspicuously held at arms length."

The WP went on to say: "Obama picked a fight over something that virtually all Israelis agree on, and before serious discussions have even begun.

"A new administration can be excused for making such a mistake in the treacherous and complex theater of Middle East diplomacy. That’s why Obama was given a pass by many when he made exactly the same mistake last year. The second time around, the president doesn’t look naive. He appears ideological -- and vindictive."
  Ideological.  Vindictive.  Obama.

Free Speech Nonexistent At Cdn Universities?

Are Canadian universities nothing more than "progressive"-ideology indoctrination factories, turning out "progressive" zombies, albeit functional ones?
Of course, Canadian universities long ago forfeited any claim they ever had to be considered bastions of independent thought and speech. In fact, all universities shelter within their grey headquarters petty bureaucrats called “equity officers” whose job it is to ensure that groupthink prevails at all times.
"Equity officers", eh?  Oh, he means "liberal fascists".  Heh.  Them progs... always perfuming their poop with floral-scented euphemisms...
Last year, Queen's University went further, hiring students to surreptitiously eavesdrop on other student conversations lest anything untoward be said. This plan was dropped when some alumni objected, but it gives a good indication of the mindset of university administrators. You might recall that, a decade ago, administrators at the University of Western Ontario did everything in their power to make psychology professor Philippe Rushton a pariah on campus because of his unorthodox research conclusions on race and IQ.
Our universities can best be understood today as finishing schools in political correctness. From pre-kindergarten days, students have been brainwashed by the liberal consensus on all issues – political, moral, social. The university exists to round that off with a little learning. So the Ann Coulter saga is neither the first nor the last to expose the corrupt heart of the university.
No wonder the left-wing extremist cunning linguist Noam Chomsky was able to visit my old campus in the afternoon, unbothered by a single protestor...  Hell, the old fart was strolling down the hallway with a professor-groupie of his, and both were, I swear, cackling...

ht: NNW

U Of Zero Students Give Canada 'Black Eye' With Thuggery Against Coulter

Story here.

ht: NNW
She is absolutely correct when she says it reflects poorly on the university and its students. It is also a black eye for all of Canada.

This country encourages debate, dissent and peaceful demonstrations, but we should not condone violence, bullying or other acts that stifle free speech.

“This has never, ever, ever happened before — even at the stupidest American university,” she said later. “It’s always the bush-league schools.”

Canadians can only hope Coulter’s address in Calgary on Thursday goes more smoothly. In London, Ont., on Monday, it created the predictable amount of controversy, but went off as planned.

The behavior of the U of Ottawa's Provost, F. A. Houle, and his deranged, brainwashed prog students has seriously tarnished the institution's reputation for a long time to come.  Much like what happened with the infamous Kristallnacht at Concordia awhile back, in which far-left extremists and Islamic Supremacists committed massive acts of violence, intimidation and property damage, thus making the security situation such that Israeli President Netanyahu was unable to give his speech.  Hell, in fact, a Holocaust survivor was assaulted by far-left thugs!

Dammit!  This is Canada, 2010, not Germany, 1938!  Fofecksake!

"Progressives", give your heads a shake (not too hard- mind the intracranial ricocheting of the pea-sized thing within) and learn to behave yourselves, to be civil, respectful, open-minded, tolerant, understanding, sophisticated, urbane, nuanced, all that good stuff...  Prove y'all are as y'all claim y'all are!  Make your actions match your claims about the content of your character!

Do The Crime, Don't Get A Dime!

No more checks-for-nothing for monster Cliff Olson!

No more soup for you!

No more taking MY money away and giving it to mass-murdering lifers behind bars!

How The Liberals Were Defeated On Their Hard-Left Motion

Those hapless, hopeless Liberals...

Obamacrats Using Nazi-Style Propaganda

Of course we've heard the recent accusations coming from the Obamacats, with respect to all those CLAIMED "threats" supposedly being received by them.  At the same time, they point the propaganda finger at the Republican Party, blaming them for it all somehow, if indeed it's real.

Well, how about this, which happened to a Republican?  Where's the violence actually coming from, and who's committing it?  Got to be a "progressive" Obama worshipper!

I think the Obamacrats are crying wolf.

It works, apparently, this propaganda bullshit.  It's helping them raise money.

You know, I'm thinking back over the years.  Of all the threats and violence, against whom has it mostly been committed?  Against conservative politicians and conservatives in general.  By whom?  By mostly Left-Wing Extremists.  Such as those from ACORN, the SEIU, and from quite an impressive number of dangerous hard-left extremists representing the anti-Proposition-8 side.

This is definitely a massive propaganda operation for the Obamacrats.  They're trying to distract people from the monstrosity health-control bill they just imposed via draconian tactics, against the will of the majority of Americans.

They're trying to change the channel using negative, alarmist fearmongering, particularly against their opposition, be they the American People or the Republican Party.  Bet the Obamacrats wish they could re-deploy the triple-K again, like they did before, to terrorize, punish and many times even kill anyone who wasn't a Democrat.

It reminds me of when the Nazis burned the Reichstag, so as to impose martial law and control everything with an iron fist.  Of course, the Nazis blamed their opponents, whom they also called the enemies of Germany, and this propaganda act worked.  Of course, what followed was horrific...

How far the Obamacrats plan to go, well, it remains to be seen.  I just don't have a good feeling about these radical extremists.  They go too far.  How much further, now?  What do they have planned next for America?

 Oh, and, by the way, guess who loves the Obamacrats' health control thingy?

This guy...

ht: Drudge Report

More Anti-Christian Persecution

Story here.
ELMIRA, N.Y. — A man who had been arrested after praying in 2007 at a public park was suddenly arrested again last week by Elmira police while his case is still on appeal. The arrest of Julian Raven came suddenly on March 15 while he was at his office. According to his wife, police escorted him out of a court hearing Tuesday in handcuffs in front of his crying children to begin serving his 9-day jail sentence.

“Christians shouldn’t be punished for expressing their religious beliefs. It’s ridiculous to consider the act of peacefully exercising one’s faith in a public park to be ‘disorderly conduct’ worthy of a jail sentence,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster. “We are surprised at how eager the city was to arrest Mr. Raven again in light of his appeal. Now he will serve time in jail; however, we will continue to aggressively pursue his appeal in court.”

Raven’s original arrest in the case People of the State of New York v. Raven is currently on appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. In 2007, Raven and other Christians entered Wisner Park in Elmira with their heads bowed to pray for the participants of a “gay pride” event. Materials advertising the event stated that it was open to the public and that all were invited.

The group made their way to an area in front of the stage and began to pray silently while lying prostrate in the grass. A police sergeant had earlier informed Julian Raven that he could not enter the public park, walk through the park, or talk to anyone in the park about his religion. After the group began to pray silently on their faces, all were arrested and charged with disorderly conduct. Since then, the charges have been dismissed against everyone but Raven.

Apparently the police in Elmira are being used as brownshirt thugs...

Say, since when is it a crime to offend people by simply being who you are, as protected by your Constitution?

What about the "gay" folks?  What if their presence nearby offended someone?  Then why shouldn't they be arrested, too, for "disorderly conduct", stemming from their public display of their "gayness"?

Double standard here.  "Gays" are first-class citizens, whereas Christians are something less... at least in the eyes of the Leftist State Apparatus.

Leftists won't have a problem with arresting Christians.  Leftists think it's fine to forbid Christians from being themselves peacefully in a public park where it's already been declared that "all are welcome" for the duration of the nearby "gay" event.  Leftists are fine with coming up with any lame, invalid "reason" for persecuting Christians.  Why?  Because Leftists, including militant "gays", hate Christians.

When's the last time you heard about Muslims being arrested for praying in public?  Hmm?  No way in hell will they arrest Muslims, even if said Muslims happen to be praying near a "gay" event.  Oh, no... can't do that to the very special Muslims, who are obviously superior to both Christians and "gays"...

This bigoted state-apparatus shit happens all the time everywhere.

So who's persecuted and who's not, NOW?

Next time a bunch of hateful "gays" gather in front of a Church to picket and demonize Christians and the Church, I want to see THEM get arrested!  Because only then will the state apparatus prove that it treats people equally!

I believe that "gay" folks are getting unfair favoritism from the state apparatus.  The preponderance of evidence I've seen over the years is why...  When's the last time you ever heard of "gays" getting arrested for either peacefully or even aggressively and hatefully offending Christians?  Hell, the "gays" get protected, not arrested!  I say arrest the "gays" if you believe they need "protection", and protect the feelings of the Christians in so doing, just like you protect the feelings of the "gays" by arresting Christians...

To be arresting Christians for peacefully praying, merely exercising their constitutional/human rights in the spirit of liberty, equality and fraternity, is to admit that "gays" hate Christians and is to endorse this "gay" hatred of Christians.  And this is wrong, and hateful.  And the ANTI-CHRISTIAN POLITICIANS RESPONSIBLE for ordering the police to violate the Christians' rights are the ones who must be held accountable for HATE CRIMES!

Equal is equal.  If the state apparatus is going to take rights away, then it should take rights away from all groups equally, or take no rights away from anyone at all!

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Hoax? Let's Have Proof From Obamacrat Claimants

The fact that they're claiming they've "received threats", and then immediately turning around to demand that Republicans "do more to condemn the threats", well, it sounds like political propaganda.  Lie, lie, lie, and then demonize the other guys, as if they were somehow responsible... HOW ABOUT PROOF?

Where were the Democrats when all those Hard-Left crazies were making threats all the time, directed at former President Bush???  They could've done a LOT more to condemn threatening communications, etc., but we know they relished it, because it made them look better by default.

And I'd like to see the Democrats (and the Canadian Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois, etc., MPs) condemn the threats directed towards Ann Coulter in Ottawa.  It's not as if Ms. Coulter is going to impose a damn thing upon Canadians, nor even on Americans.  It's the Democrats and Obama who do the imposing!  Harper and the Tories?  What can they possibly impose anyway, with a minority government?  Besides a little holiday or something?  As if that was a bad thing, like, say, with the Obamacrats taking more and more of The Peoples' money away from them plus taking their rights away, ie. the right to choose what happens to their own bodies...

Such threats of violence are intolerably unacceptable, no matter from whom they come.

If only those damn Leftists would do more to stop their minions on the streets from throwing molotov cocktails, rocks, cream pies, etc...  Then they'd be in a position to tell their counterparts to "do more".

Coulter Writes Of Terrible Canadian Welcome

Story here...
Posters advertising my speech have been officially banned, while posters denouncing me are plastered all over the University of Ottawa campus. Elected officials have been prohibited from attending my speeches. Also, the local clothing stores are fresh out of brown shirts.
Wow... they wouldn't treat the ultra-hard-and-far left-wing anarchist Noam Chomsky like that!  I know... saw the old fart on my campus many years ago, walking around freely and cackling... no protestors, not a one, bothering him...  Even though the Chomster is arguably a hateful little turd...

Chomsky DTN profile here.

Chomsky is infamous for many utterances, including, shockingly, appallingly calling America "worse than Nazi Germany"!

Hell, I seriously doubt if they'd treat terrorist William Ayers like that.  Or, say, Jeremiah Wright.
What other speakers get a warning not to promote hatred? Did Francois A. Houle send a similarly worded letter to Israel-hater Omar Barghouti before he spoke last year at U of Ottawa? ("Ottawa": Indian for "Land of the Bed-Wetters.")

How about Angela Davis, Communist Party member and former Black Panther who spoke at the University of Zero just last month?

Or do only conservatives get letters admonishing them to be civil? Or – my suspicion – is it only conservative women who fuel Francois' rage?

How about sending a letter to all Muslim speakers advising them to please bathe once a week while in Canada? Would that constitute a hate crime?
 F. A. Houle

Anyway, for those of you who aren't up to speed, well, Mr. F. A. Houle is going to find himself the subject of a human rights complaint, courtesy of, of all people, Ann Coulter.  Betcha he never, in his wildest wetdreams, saw that coming...

Apparently Leftists in Canada need to be taught by an American rightie about human rights...

This is fecking priceless.  I'm loooooving it.

Ann, you go, girl!  I hear you roar!

Go and get the F. A. Houle!

SILENCED! Left Threatens Violence, Forces Cancellation Of Coulter Speech


ht: NNW

I note, also, that the Globe article opens with the words "Right-wing antagonist".  They'd never label the likes of Noam Chomsky "Left-wing antagonist", but, of course, proving their hard-left orientation, the Globe and Mail will certainly not miss an opportunity at pure, unadulterated propaganda and demonization.  Like the good little Progs they are.  Their lies, defamations, smears, vilifications, hurled towards Ann Coulter, make them pretty ugly and detestable.  But they can't help themselves, for they have a mental disorder...
The move followed boisterous demonstrations outside that sponsors of the appearance feared could turn violent.

“There was a risk there could be physical violence,” said Canadian conservative activist Ezra Levant, who was scheduled to introduce Ms. Coulter.

Yep.  Left-wing brownshirts.  Those Astroturf mobsters were community-organized in force to try to intimidate Ms. Coulter into silence.  Shades of the Third Reich, which silenced inconveniently politically-incorrect voices, too.

It reminds me of Kristallnacht at Concordia, which involved violence, property destruction and the silencing of Israeli President Binyamin Netanyahu.  You'd never see the "right" do this with respect to a scheduled speech by Abu "Mahmoud Abbas" Mazen, the leader of the PLO/Fatah/"Palestinian Authority".

It reminds me of what Islamic Supremacists do to silence David Horowitz wherever he goes to exercise his equal right to be heard.  Can't let the Joo speak, eh!

I'll give Ms. Coulter a voice herein:
In an interview, Ms. Coulter said she's given 100 to 200 speeches at colleges and last night was the first time one of her addresses has been “completely shut down.” She said the incident reflects poorly on the University of Ottawa.

“It's at the absolute bush league, bottom of the barrel schools that you get the worst treatment and yet and still I've never seen this before,” she said.

“I'm guessing the scores to get into the University of Ottawa are not very challenging.”

It also reflects very badly on Canada.

I'm embarrassed and ashamed.

But at the same time, I do remember that America and the rest of the Free World also have these very same kind of deranged moonbats who hypocritically seek to threaten violence to silence "the other side".  The entire Free World is full of these brainless, deranged hard-leftwingnutcase extremists and brownshirts, and Canada is by no means any exception.

This incident only steels my resolve to continue to speak out against those Liberal Fascist bigots.  The more they behave like this, the more motivated I am to condemn their extremism and anti-social, anti-human-rights dangerousness.

And, here's the BIG NEWS...

Ann Coulter is hiring Ezra Levant to take the whole issue before the "Human Rights" Commission, the Star Chamber Liberal Fascist Commissary...

This is BIG.  Canadian Freedom Fighter Ezra Levant teaming up with American Freedom Fighter Ann Coulter!


Canada and America are as close as ever.  Standing ever-united against tyranny, we will not fail!

Civil Strife Already Underway In Aftermath Of HealthControl Bill Imposition

If they hadn't imposed this HealthControl monstrosity, and certainly if they hadn't stubbornly insisted on the part that forces Americans to pay for all abortions for all motivations, then things might've been more peaceful.

But the Obamacrat Reich apparently doesn't want peace, any more than the "Palestinians" apparently want peace.  The Obamacracy would rather impose "peace", obviously.  But that's another story for another day.

Whatever's coming, the Obamacrat Reich has only itself to blame.  They'll try to blame others, but, hey, when one starts it, fully cognizant of the potential consequences (even while delusionally believing that, no, there won't be any), then one is to blame.  Just like Hitler et al were to blame for World War Two (of course, Hitler blamed everything on the Jooooos, just like many leftists today blame everything on same, as well as on Christians, conservatives, etc.).

The reportedly increasing radicalization, due to the HealthControl bill's imposition, of the pro-life movement is but one of the consequences.

The Obamacrat Reich has now pushed them too hard, too far.  So they'll be pushing back.  In what ways, I don't know, but I hope there won't be any violence, y'know, the kind of violence we see coming from Obamacracy supporters like the SEIU purpleshirts.  Granted, there may be an isolated, lone-wolf incident or two, but I hope the movement will stick to legal and social-activism tactics only, and continue to prove itself superior to the hard-leftwingnutcase activist (including some ultra-aggressive, deranged pro-babykilling) groups.

As for the article to which I linked above, there's something funny about it, in a macabre way.  It's the way the author treats the pro-life movement, thus suggesting that the site is actually one on the religious LEFT (y'know, like Obama's longtime pastor, the extreme radical Jeremiah Wright, who's definitely a religious leftist).  Calling the pro-life movement "anti-choice" is clearly a sign of "Progressive" Mental Disorder.  After all, being pro-life is to be pro-choice, because it allows EVERYONE the choice as to whether they'll live, as opposed to allowing others the "choice" as to whether to decide to take the life of another human being.  While it's arguable that the unborn cannot consciously choose, well, those who are already born, they can't yet consciously choose until they're older, and it's not just infants who are unable to make a rational, informed choice, such as the mentally-challenged, for example.  Which is why ALL must be protected by right-to-life legislation!  Being "pro-choice", in terms of the abortionists' agenda, is to be in favor of choosing to murder human beings just because they're wrongly, insanely deemed somehow-inhuman and inconvenient.  It's immoral and wrong to argue that killing the unborn will somehow "save a woman's life", because this puts society onto a slippery slope towards a society that may one day deem that women have a right to choose to murder their already-born children just because they're having trouble paying their bills, etc, or for some other reason of "inconvenience".  If society propagates such a hateful imperative, then brainless leftists will believe it.  Just as the German People believed the horrific stuff the Nazis told them about the Jews, and just as the "Palestinians" believe the horrific stuff the "Authority" tells them about the very same people.  It's precedented.  The masses can indeed be that easily-led-astray-to-darkness.

It's also bizarre that "pro-choice" folks tell us that we as a society have no right to choose whether to execute the most evil serial murderers out there.  It's disingenous and inconsistent.  Yet they tell us as a society that we're supposed to "choose" to allow individuals to "choose" to take human life, as long as that particular human life is as defined by the state?  This is purely, simply untenable!

No offence to conservatives who couldn't care one way or the other, but I believe that there's far more leftists than conservatives who aren't particularly opposed to abortion, though I do believe that real conservatives, whatever they think of abortion in general, will be royally pissed at the bill's forcing the taxpayers to pay for what's supposed to be "choice", ie. something one is allowed to do, as long as one pays for it oneself, not making others pay for it.

It's not really just about abortion.  It's about IMPOSING it on EVERYONE, FORCING EVERYONE to PAY FOR IT.  And the bill doesn't protect peoples' religious rights and liberties, doesn't allow doctors and other workers to remove themselves from anything to do with infanticide, and this is an unconstitutional imposition and is unacceptable.

It's the same as forcing people to conduct same-sex "marriage" ceremonies against their religious beliefs, or else become unemployed.  There's no requirement to accommodate!  Religious people should be accommodated, and tax dollars allocated towards this accommodation so that there will always be alternative folks with no moral objections available to provide relief.  But even the free-spending (with other peoples' money) Obamacracy wouldn't do this, proving their hatefulness!

These are examples of the Obamacracy's explosively-expanding agenda of tyranny and oppression against people they hate!

Of course, behind the scenes, Muslim doctors and clerics will be exempt, because the political-correctness people behind the curtain will ensure than only Christians will be inconvenienced, oppressed and tyrannized.  This is what I suggest to be the reality, more or less, not that there's necessarily a curtain per se.  After all, when's the last time we heard of a Muslim being forced to conduct a same-sex "marriage" ceremony against his/her religious will?  Would the gayfolk dare to impose that onto Muslims?  The gayfolk never, ever impose on Muslims, but only on Christians, one will find if one does diligent research of news and blog reports, or if one is a longtime watcher of such reporting.

In short, the HealthControl bill is a socialist monstrosity which will make it easier for the hard-left tyrants to tyrannize The People.