Thursday, August 31, 2006

Is Ahmadinejad Satan?

Why not attempt an exorcism?

Read that article.

And note that Ahmadinejad is known for saying the strangest, most delusional things. So strange and delusional it's just bloody ridiculous.

For example:

"I felt it myself. I felt that the atmosphere suddenly changed, and for those 27 or 28 minutes, all the leaders of the world did not blink. When I say they didn’t move an eyelid, I’m not exaggerating. They were looking as if a hand was holding them there, and had just opened their eyes–Alhamduillah!"


Ya know, I think that's just a fancy way of admitting that the had just shat his pants in front of the whole world... and they could tell. Must've been one helluva smell!

Or perhaps he exposed himself and performed an indecent act?

Either way, I wish somebody would somehow exorcise this little sheet head... be it via a priest chanting in Latin or via an American President issuing a stoic, somber order to a Trident submarine somewhere in the deeps of the Persian Gulf...

Until then, Ahmadinejad can go forth and furiously fornicate with a big, fat, squealing, mud-and-crap-caked pig! The offspring will be his spitting image... his very own Mini-Mes! Oh, yes... little bearded, squealing swine!

Arnie's Imposing Legislation An Argument for Homeschooling

Following California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's signing a bill requiring all schools receiving any state funds of any kind in any way, direct or indirect, to "condone" sexual extremism, Christian parents are increasingly looking at homeschooling as an alternative to sending their children off to be indoctrinated by leftoideological, sexual-extremism promoting public schools.

Story here.

Oh, and by the way, I wonder if there are any devout Muslim parents with children in the California public school system, and if so, how do they feel about this? I'd really like to know.

Are there Muslim-only schools receiving state funding? If so, then they, too, must be required to "condone" that which is strictly forbidden by Allah! Bet Arnie didn't foresee any problems on that front, and if not, there could be trouble... for we know what happens when someone merely draws a cartoon!

Even Arnie can screw up big time. He's not perfect, either. Apparently, politics and power does change people. As does spending too much time with the Kennedys.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Islamic Jihadist Runs Down Pedestrians With SUV In America

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting




Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Stories here, here and here. Videos available at third link.



Excerpts from the Northeast Intelligence Network:


--Exclusive: Suspect has at least two Arabic aliases and recently returned from a trip to Afghanistan.

--Exclusive: "...there is a suspicion that Omeed could have received some type of orthodox indoctrination while in Afghanistan...the bride’s family did not want Omeed to return to the US, and attempted to exert pressure and influence against him to abandon his ‘westernized ways.’”- Federal agent, speaking on condition of anonymity

Omeed Aziz POPAL, 29, (also known as Omeed K AZIZ, Omeld K AZIZ, Ohmeed Aziz POPAL according to an investigation conducted by the Northeast Intelligence Network), a native of Afghanistan, began his murderous spree around noon in Fremont, where he hit a man at. Fremont Boulevard and Ferry in Fremont. Upon arrival, officers found a deceased male who had been walking northbound on Fremont in the bicycle lane, when he was struck from behind by a dark-colored Honda Pilot The victim was thrown off the road and pronounced dead at the scene, Fremont police said. Witnesses said the driver did not slow down.

The carnage continued as the driver crossed the bay into San Francisco, where he continued striking pedestrians, injuring at least 14 more people in a series of intentional hit and run incidents that spanned several neighborhoods. The suspect was ultimately boxed in by police officers near Spruce and California, and was ultimately arrested shortly after 1:00 pm at the intersection of California and Laurel after a short chase on foot.

(End excerpts)



Behold... the "Religion of Peace" in the raw! Murder One. Does California have the death penalty? If so, I hope they use it!


Note: the KRON link indicates:


...the suspect has suffered mental problems since returning from a recent trip to Afghanistan.


...or so claims the Jihadist's family. The family, of course! They don't want to admit that one of their own is an Islamic Jihadist.

Hmm... that's since returning from Afghanistan. Apparently he was trained to be a Jihadist. This sort of training apparently screws up the mind.

There is no excuse. No justification. There must be no mitigation. The Jihadist should be executed.

This is the latest act of Jihad in America. And it was directed at Jewish people.

See also Jihad Watch: The man identifies himself to police as a terrorist.

UPDATE:

Michelle Malkin has lots more. Recommended!

This quotation at Malkin caught my eye:

This is becoming an appalling habit in the press and by politicians. An Islamic fundamentalist shoots Jews in a Synagogue, and it’s some sort of random incident. An Islamic fundamentalist uses his car to kill people in front of a Synagogue, and in what would appear to be a somewhat “Jewish neighborhood” and the press takes a while to cover the story (probably looking for the appropriate “frame,”) until someone in authority can be found to sing out, “ROAD RAGE”! Yeah, that’s the ticket! Road rage! Mayor Newsom sees no problem, here…a “relatively young” person, obviously confused! Yes, that’s the ticket!

Omeed Aziz Popal, the poor confused youngster, is 29 years old.

Can you imagine, if someone had (God forbid!) driven a car into 14 gay people, how quickly the press would have managed to cover the story? Can you imagine that Mayor Newsom would call it “road rage” and suggest that there really probably wasn’t a “hate crime” attached to the action?

What the hell is wrong with the press, what the hell is wrong with the leadership?

(End quotation) (Was excerpted by Malkin from The Anchoress.)

The man's family claims that he's mentally ill, but:

those involved in the investigation -- speaking on condition of anonymity -- discount any mental illness, saying the 29-year-old Afghanistan native seemed coherent, unrepentant and claimed that he repeatedly drove at pedestrians because he "just wanted to.''

(From SFGate.com)

Note the following statement:

“He was absolutely indifferent, no fear, no expression,'’ she said. “He was like a zombie.'’

(From RightVoices.com)

That sounds a lot like a Jihadist to me.

Many bloggers I've viewed via the trackbacks at Malkin are convinced that this is an act of anti-Semitic terrorism, considering the facts at hand.

And many are also indicating that the MSM is playing down the incident.

I've noticed that police have again been far too quick to deny any terrorism here, without giving any reasons as to why they've done so. Suspicious. I smell cover up.

This isn't over. I'll continue to watch and digest the information as it comes in.

A Jewish blogger comments on the attack. Notes that the man who was killed hasn't been identified.

CNN's Kyra Phillips Pees Live During Bush Katrina Speech


Reminds me of a scene from the Naked Gun with Leslie Nielsen's character Detective Frank Drebin taking a really noisy whiz with his mic still on during a press conference. That was so funny...

Now once again, life has imitated art. See also here.

Listen to the video/audio & read the transcript of two ladies taking a weewee and making very personal chitchat.

That's gross... talking to someone else while y'all's doing yer business... if you do that in the mens' room, you run the risk of getting a black eye for being a sick freak... how can girls do this? Eww...

I personally can't hear the audio, but I did notice the one of the President's eyebrows at one point rising quite higher than the other. My, but the man can really keep his composure under the most bizarre situations!

Geez... them loony MSM types!

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Crooked Libranos Pimping, Whoring For Iggy's Leadership Bid Cash

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting



Well, can't say that it surprises me. Story here.

How low can the Liebrano$$ go?

This is surreal! The Liberals have turned to prostituting themselves! Eww!

Then again, come to think of it, that's not exactly a totally new thing for these folks... I think it comes naturally!

Oh, and please note that they're not bringing in much cash this way. Big surprise!

Canada's Socialists Show True Moonbat Face

Conservative pundit Stephen Taylor reports. h/t: National Newswatch (Brand new news aggregator! Check it out!)

The NDP is now apparently trying to out-left the Liberals! Talk about crazy moonbattery!

Perhaps there should be a movie about the so-called "Liberals" and the "New Democrats". I believe it should be called "Left and Lefter" or "Moonbat and Moonbatter", kinda along the lines of "Dumb and Dumber"!

Arnold Goes Bananas, Abandons Conservatism, Morality

Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger once made a little-heard-of movie titled "Hercules Goes Bananas". Back then he called himself "Arnold Stang".

Well, real life has just imitated fantasy, unfortunately. Arnold has gone bananas, and there's nothing funny about this, particularly for conservatives who thought Arnold was one of us.

Read the story here.

And draw your own conclusions.

Sorry, Arnold, but I'll no longer be supporting you as a politician. I hope you get back to making movies, where you can't do any damage to America. And thank goodness you cannot become President.

I am disappointed. What you have done is bananas, to say the least and, I believe, unconstitutional.

You should've stuck with the principle that what is private should stay private. But you chose to combine that which is essentially private with the state.

Is winning at all costs really the right thing all the time? I thought you said that strength is not about winning?

Well, Arnold himself once had an idol named Reg Park, who himself also played Hercules. But then Arnold went on to defeat his idol in competition.

Well, I feel that Arnold has now defeated himself.

UN Exclusively Broadcast Israel Troop Movements

Story here.

h/t: The Source Daily



(Excerpt):


DURING THE RECENT month-long war between Hezbollah and Israel, U.N. "peacekeeping" forces made a startling contribution: They openly published daily real-time intelligence, of obvious usefulness to Hezbollah, on the location, equipment, and force structure of Israeli troops in Lebanon.

UNIFIL--the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon, a nearly 2,000-man blue-helmet contingent that has been present on the Lebanon-Israel border since 1978--is officially neutral. Yet, throughout the recent war, it posted on its website for all to see precise information about the movements of Israeli Defense Forces soldiers and the nature of their weaponry and materiel, even specifying the placement of IDF safety structures within hours of their construction. New information was sometimes only 30 minutes old when it was posted, and never more than 24 hours old.

Meanwhile, UNIFIL posted not a single item of specific intelligence regarding Hezbollah forces. Statements on the order of Hezbollah "fired rockets in large numbers from various locations" and Hezbollah's rockets "were fired in significantly larger numbers from various locations" are as precise as its coverage of the other side ever got.

This war was fought on cable television and the Internet, and a lot of official information was available in real time. But the specific military intelligence UNIFIL posted could not be had from any non-U.N. source. The Israeli press--always eager to push the envelope--did not publish the details of troop movements and logistics. Neither the European press nor the rest of the world media, though hardly bastions of concern for the safety of Israeli troops, provided the IDF intelligence details that UNIFIL did. A search of Israeli government websites failed to turn up the details published to the world each day by the U.N.


(End excerpt)



Does this effectively make the United Nations an enemy of Israel? I contend yes!

Scrap the UN!

Monday, August 28, 2006

The Sentinel Confronts a Real Islamofascist

Go to Jihad Watch.

I've encountered a real Islamic imperialist. This guy is the real thing. This guy is the enemy! A real jihadist!

And I give him hell.

I'm rolling!


UPDATE: The jihadist has been banned from Jihad Watch. Oh, well, I did manage to tell him off and inform him that he's delusional to think that we will submit to Islam. I warned him that I'm not alone. Click the link to see the comments thread.

What an idiot... he seems to think I'm the only one who would dare to stand up against Islam and fight... which proves that these jihad guys are really out of their minds.

Now, that's the very first troll I've seen who was an Islamic jihadist.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

eBay Joins Leftist Attack Campaign on Homeschooling

Is EBay coming out of the closet as a malevolently powerful leftist organization, as Google already has?

Story here.

(Emphasis mine)


eBay prohibits textbooks for homeschool teachers

Lumps them with illegal drugs, bootleg recordings,prompting avalanche of complaints from customers



"Really the homeschooling community is a huge participant in eBay when you get to thinking about it," said one customer who was identified as "Angelwings" on an eBay blog. "We buy textbooks naturally but we also purchase items like microscopes, slides, globes, maps, manipulatives, educational games, reading books, supplies for our classrooms … stickers, idea books, folders, sheet protectors, school supplies, software, educational movies, models, post cards … the list is enormous."


(...)


"They told me that it fell under their heading of 'illegal, dangerous, offensive, or potentially infringing,'" she said. "What are they thinking? I have a mess of curriculum here that I can't sell, and needing money from it to buy curriculum for the new school year."



If this isn't evidence of a leftist campaign to discourage or cause the extinction of homeschooling, then what is it? Does the left believe that homeschooling is evil because it doesn't necessarily conform to what the left wants to be taught in schools and which the left, via its power brokers within the state apparatus, is succeeding in having added to mandatory curricula?


And this comes on the heels of this post I did recently about a public school inexplicably forcing children to march in an "XXX-rated" gay "pride" parade. Hmm... public schools imposing such radical, uncalled-for "teaching" combined with an attempt by the left to crackdown on homeschooling... draw your own conclusions, keeping in mind that these incidents are by no means isolated. I've seen other examples of this sort of thing and will be watching for more.

The left must be opposed in its attempts to Machiavellianly, insidiously, stealthily, undemocratically reengineer Free World society according to its own bizarre, dogmatic doctrines.

The left will pooh-pooh this post, citing eBay's authoritarian policy, arrogantly claiming that it's somehow "proper" and saying I'm fullashit for highlighting this apparent attempt at social reengineering and infringement on the civil rights of parents who homeschool their children, which is perfectly legal and has been done since time immemorial (like traditional opposite-sex marriage, which, btw, the left apparently, effectively generally opposes and wants to extend to whomever wishes to call themselves "married").

Just because the MSM isn't warning the people about this sort of stealthy, insidious left-wing power imposition by ideological extremists doesn't mean that it isn't happening. Leftists will naturally deny it. And don't forget that the MSM is, after all, in on it all, doing its part to further the very obvious, vast leftist agenda.

And, last but not least, I advise leftists to remember that their moonbat queen and likely Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (Slick Willy's old ball and chain) has claimed some kind of a "vast, right-wing conspiracy", yet you don't dismiss her, so think twice before automatically slamming this post as whatever you're wont to deem it.


UPDATE: More info & musings:

I would also draw attention to the following:

One blogger noted that public school interests have been opposing homeschooling more and more, as homeschooling has grown substantially in recent years. Recent estimates have put homeschool attendance in the U.S. at more than 2.5 million. And the same comment noted book publishers also dislike having the products re-sold.

Sounds to me like eBay was indeed likely pressured.

Homeschooling is apparently growing. Why? I'd surmise that more and more parents are wary of the increasing leftist slant and dogmatism evident in public school curricula, like, for example, teaching about various bizarre sex acts that have nothing to do with the real goal of proper "sex ed" of preventing pregnancy or STDs, teaching kids to "be Muslims", etc... all of which take away from the intellectual development of children via progressively pervasive leftoideological indoctrination.

So is it any surprise that the forces of leftism would want to try and put a stop to the increase in homeschooling? Pressuring companies like eBay is one way they can do this. And it's perfectly legitimate to ask whether this is the real reason for eBay's sudden action which mostly hurts homeschooling parents.

Leftists, I believe, see homeschooling as a threat to their efforts to reengineer society via the forcible indoctrination of children in public schools in their dogmatic doctrines, regardless of parental approval or disapproval. We've heard countless reports of fights between school boards and parents' groups over the teaching of radical, controversial and arguably leftist "values" and dogmas, after all. And I see this war intensifying in the future.

Many parents see homeschooling as their only alternative, short of private schools with strict curricula meeting their approval (which would be too expensive for many parents), so they opt to teach their own children themselves. Why not? It's their right to do so. It's consistent with the value of freedom, upon which the Free World is founded, after all. So why do leftists want to take away this right? Strange... leftists are always screaming about their supposed rights being violated, yet they're fine with taking away the rights of folks who don't agree with their values. Therefore, leftists are hypocrites. Hence my continuing to expose their hypocrisy, inconsistencies and other undesirable behavior to the light of day.

Those leftists... again wanting the state to control people. Control what they think, what they're taught, how they're raised (oh, and don't forget the Canadian leftist campaign to promote state institution-run daycare and financially discourage raising children at home, in the family -recall the Liberals' "beer and popcorn" epithet against stay-at-home moms and dads!), like some kind of authoritarian communists. And I reject authoritarianism and communism as inconsistent with freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights, each of which, sometimes, leftists don't seem to believe in at all (as they sometimes are inconvenient or are obstacles to the radically extreme, often-statist agenda of the left)!

As for evidence supporting my contention that there's a significant left-wing campaign against homeschooling, I'd say to commentor Maryjane that there's quite a few links to stories about this campaign at the end of the WND article. I believe that this campaign bears a striking resemblance to all sorts of leftist campaigns we've seen and are seeing, like, for example, the relatively sudden, hysterical leftist push towards gay marriage.

Friday, August 25, 2006

LITTLE KNOWN MARITIME FACTS

Thanks to fellow blogger Aizlynne, who's been taking the whole summer off from blogging, I bring y'all the following she forwarded via email to me:



A number of primary schools were doing a project on "The Sea."

Kids were asked to draw pictures or write about their experiences. Teachers got together to compare the results and put together some of the 'better' ones.


1. This is a picture of an octopus. It has eight testicles. (Kelly age 6)

2. Some fish are dangerous. Jellyfish can sting. Electric eels can give you a shock. They have to live in caves under the sea where I think they have to plug themselves to chargers. (Christopher age 7)

3. Oysters' balls are called pearls. (James age 6)

4. If you are surrounded by sea you are an Island . If you don't have sea all around you, you are in continent. ( Wayne age 7)

5. I think sharks are ugly and mean, and have big teeth, just like Emily Richardson. She's not my friend no more. (Kylie age 6)

6. A dolphin breathes through an asshole on the top of it's head. (Billy age 8)

7. My uncle goes out in his boat with pot, and comes back with crabs. (Millie age 6)

8. When ships had sails, they used to use the trade winds to cross the ocean. Sometimes, when the wind didn't blow, the sailors would whistle to make the wind come. My brother said they would be better off eating beans. (William age 7)

9. I like mermaids. They are beautiful, and I like their shiny tails. How do mermaids get pregnant? (Helen age 6)

10. When you go swimming in the sea, it is very cold, and it makes my willy shrink. (Kevin age 6)

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Liberals Lose Discipline, Unity, Confidence

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


Story here and here. h/t: Bourque.org


Divided, infighting.

No ideas. No policies.

No credibility. No integrity.

No decent leadership candidates.

No prayer in the next election whatsoever.

Is the end near? Is the Liberal Party of Canada about to kick the bucket? Buy the farm? Call it quits?

Nothing is forever, except diamonds. And the Liberal Party is a mere lump of coal. Time to toss it into the furnace... so it can finally go up in smoke!

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

AQ's World Domination Strategy

Spiegel Online: h/t: National Terror Alert (in the sidebar)


An Islamic Caliphate in Seven Easy Steps

In the introduction, the Jordanian journalist writes, "I interviewed a whole range of al-Qaida members with different ideologies to get an idea of how the war between the terrorists and Washington would develop in the future." What he then describes between pages 202 and 213 is a scenario, proof both of the terrorists' blindness as well as their brutal single-mindedness. In seven phases the terror network hopes to establish an Islamic caliphate which the West will then be too weak to fight.


The First Phase

Known as "the awakening" -- this has already been carried out and was supposed to have lasted from 2000 to 2003, or more precisely from the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington to the fall of Baghdad in 2003. The aim of the attacks of 9/11 was to provoke the US into declaring war on the Islamic world and thereby "awakening" Muslims. "The first phase was judged by the strategists and masterminds behind al-Qaida as very successful," writes Hussein. "The battle field was opened up and the Americans and their allies became a closer and easier target." The terrorist network is also reported as being satisfied that its message can now be heard "everywhere."



Find out the rest of the seven steps. We're currently supposedly in the second phase.


The enemy expects the Free World to be "too weak" to fight back. The enemy expects to emerge victorious and Islamicize the world.

Will they succeed? Or will we defeat them? We can and we must crush them.

Never submit. Never.

Let's roll!

School Kids Made to March in "XXX-Rated" Gay Parade

Story here. (World Net Daily)



Elementary-age students have marched in a homosexual pride event under the banner of a San Diego public school, amidst triple-X rated behavior by "gay" activists, according to a Christian blogger who reports daily to 7,000 people.



(The link at the WND article is faulty, so I found the appropriate hyperlink. Here it is: http://jameshartlinereport.blogspot.com/2006/08/action-alert-elementary-school-brings.html )


The subheadline at James Hart's blog reads:




San Diego Elementary Charter School Brings Young Children Into Pornographic Gay Pride Parade:

Tell The Board of Education To Stop The Madness!



(JHR) At this time last year, the San Diego Gay Pride organization (www.sdpride.org) was under investigation for employing numerous pedophiles as volunteers and staff superviors during it annual parade and festival. The scandal involved dangerous sex offenders working for San Diego Gay Pride who had been convicted of having sex with young male minors or young children
(http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45151).

One of those pedophiles was hired by the San Diego Gay Pride group to work in its children's garden during their 2005 festival (http://www.10news.com/news/4857263/detail.html). Most San Diegans would have thought that in 2006, the last place that public schools would allow their children to be on July 29, 2006, would be participating in the pornographic event of the San Diego Gay Pride parade, especially in light of the previous year's pedophile scandal. These San Diegans have guessed wrong.



Read it all!



WND continues:



Hartline told WorldNetDaily that he lived as a homosexual for many years, but left that lifestyle choice after becoming a Christian seven years ago. He now watches with trepidition the activities of the community where he used to live.




(Note to commentor "Maryjane": See, one can choose to change one's sexual orientation. Consider this more proof)




"We're going to be investigating what they're teaching these kids in school," he confirmed.

(...)

"What school being funded by the taxpayers of San Diego would be so immoral as to allow small children under the official banner of the San Diego school system to march in the midst of this pornographic gay parade?" Hartline asked.




In my opinion, this is scandalous and a wakeup call to rational, mainstream parents and concerned citizens as to what schools are "teaching" our children.

If I had children, I'd pull them out of that school immediately. If I then had to appear in court, then good! I would not have anyone teaching my children about sex and sexuality, certainly not in such a reprehensible, extreme manner!

Hmm... I wonder if there are any devout Muslim children at that school? And what would happen if their parents were to complain? That I'd like to see: a big, public fight between gay extremists and devout Muslims. Who could win this fight? Would there be an uproar in the Islamic community such as we've seen stemming from the Mohammed cartoons?

I wonder about this, as I doubt that the state apparatus would care if any Christian parents were offended by all this.

MidEastern Men With Radioactive Material in Truck Lie to Authorities

Story here.



(...)Two men, both of Middle Eastern origin, speaking Arabic and broken English and operating a tractor trailer, with the trailer bearing radioactive cargo placards, provided the travel center false information: fraudulent registration information and a false vehicle identification number.

(...)

The men then proceeded to travel west on I-80 through Pennsylvania and into Ohio where they were stopped by the Ohio Highway Patrol in Warren County.



(Emphasis mine)

That was last Sunday night.

Surrender to Iran: Ahmadinejad

Story here. Video also available.

Transcript here.


Get a load of this sentence, uttered by Ahmadinejad:



America and England purport to support human rights, freedom, and democracy.



"Purport to support..."?!

And Iran gives a shit about human rights? Says who? Ahmadinejad? Dhimmis? Useful Idiots? Michael Moore? Cindy Sheehan? Ward Churchill? Noam Chomsky? Hugo Chavez?




Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting






Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


Is this "human rights"?!
No. This is Islam. And Iran is a totalitarian Islamic theocracy.
Islam is all that matters to Iran's dictators.
Human rights in Iran, my ass!

Monday, August 21, 2006

Ahmadinejad Ominously Promises "Response" Tomorrow on Nukes

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting




Story here. h/t: NationalTerrorAlert.com




IF some Iran-watchers in the US are to be believed, we could be 24 hours away from the day of judgment. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's President, has promised to deliver tomorrow his response to international demands that Iran stop enriching uranium for nuclear use.

By the Islamic calendar, Tuesday is also a holy date: the night when Mohammed rose to heaven from the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem on a "buraq", a fabulous winged beast with the body of a horse and the face of a woman, and reappeared in Mecca. Will Ahmadinejad seize the moment to unveil the possession of some new fissile material or weapons system - perhaps a nuclear-tipped one?

Bernard Lewis, the West's foremost scholar of Islam, has even warned that on such a symbolic date it would be wise to bear in mind the possibility of a "cataclysmic" event such as a strike on Israel.

(...)

An expert on the Middle East, Ilan Berman, is based at the American Foreign Policy Council. He said last week: "I'm not in the camp that believes the end of the world will come about on Tuesday, but there is a strong apocalyptic strain in Ahmadinejad and his group. He is positioning Iran to be in the vanguard of the clash of civilisations with the West."



While we might prefer to believe Ahmadinejad's just some uppity little sheet head jumping up and down and hollering aggressively at folks much bigger and more powerful than he, kind of like Yosemite Sam, Donald Duck, Daffy Duck or Scooby Doo's aggressive little puppy counterpart Scrappy Doo, the fact of the matter is that he's far too dangerous and serious about his intentions to be dismissed. Just as it was a grave error for most folks to dismiss Hitler as harmless enough to not be cause for too much worry, so is it a grave error to summarily, cavalierly wave away Ahmadinejad's apocalyptic promises based on his ancient, evil ideology, to which he clearly adheres like Crazy Glue.

That being said, we must now prepare and brace ourselves for the worst. Today, not tomorrow.

I hope Ahmadinejad's just a little shit with a big, foul mouth, but I fear he's much, much more. We have, after all, witnessed some of the worst monstrosities before, and it's to be expected that history is about to repeat itself sooner or later.

The question is: will that time come tomorrow, August 22, 2006?

See also: Speculation Rages About Iran's Plans for August 22 for more specific expert information and speculation.

Sunday, August 20, 2006

The NB Leaders: A Comparison


Left: New Brunswick Liberal leader Shawn Graham.

Right: American Democratic Chairman Howard "The Scream" Dean







Left: New Democratic Party leader Alison Brewer.

Right: Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe (at pro-Hezbollah, anti-Israel rally... what an asshat!)







Left: NB Tory Premier Bernard Lord

Right: Alberta Tory Premier Ralph Klein







Yep, it's election time again in New Brunswick. In my opinion, it's about who gets to do the same old stuff and with what style. Take your pick, fellow Herring-Chokers: The Screamer, the Communist or the Real Premier.

That's basically what it comes down to. Oh, of course, it's really between the Premier and Screamin' Shawn. The NDP is irrelevant and always has been anyway.


Really, there's nobody worthy of taking the reins away from Bernie. Sure, he could do more, but the other two-- they offer pretty much nothing but dueling, mundane little election promises.

For me, what needs to be addressed is the longstanding, chronic have-not, relatively-economically-flatlined status of New Brunswick. Someone has to demonstrate a real acceptance and understanding of the problem, its true, root causes, its maintenance causes and its real, permanent solutions. This isn't happening, therefore expect me to yawn a lot.

This is the only issue in New Brunswick that matters right now as far as I'm concerned. Most everything else should take a back seat to really, really building the provincial economy, something that I've never seen happen in my lifetime.

If Stephen Harper, who has already demonstrated to me his understanding of the problem, wasn't busy running and rebuilding the whole nation, I'd want him running for Premier of New Brunswick.

Recommended Reading: Islam's Useful Idiots (Leftists)

Ok, class, your latest assignment is to read about what exactly is a "useful idiot" and learn more about the truth about Islam.
Bit by bit, the truth will come out. The Islamic world brought it upon itself with 9/11, many other acts of violence, both mass and small-scale, and their disproportionate overreaction to some cartoons of Mohammed. Is it any wonder more and more folks are taking it upon themselves to learn more and more about Islam, without the political correctness and the lies?
Amil Imani is an Iranian-born American citizen and pro-democracy activist residing in the United States of America. Imani is a columnist, literary translator, novelist and an essayist who has been writing and speaking out for the struggling people of his native land, Iran. He maintains a website at AmilImani.com
Mr. Imani's essay is here.
His description of "useful idiots" is spot-on and will instantly remind you of all kinds of leftists (actual leftists reading the essay will, however, immediately, predictably, lapse into denial and petulantly protest that it isn't they who're the idiots).
You might learn some new, damning facts about Islam which you've most likely never heard from school, the MSM or your peers.
The Muslims act out so crazily whenever there's any big exposure of the truth about their ancient, flatlined Dark Ages ideology, such as in the form of cartoons depicting their exalted "Mohammed" as he actually was... according to the Koran. Given that, I'm surprised that Muslims don't get mad and threaten to behead us "Kaffirs" for reading a Koran to see for ourselves what's really what.
Well, enjoy the essay!

More Evidence of Leftist Discrimination Against Conservatives

Recall this TCS post about the discrimination suffered by popular, successful radio commentator Rush Limbaugh just because he's conservative.

Now read this story about the Democrat who relentlessly went after Mr. Limbaugh for a crime he didn't commit and which isn't even considered serious by prosecutors anyway and is rarely ever prosecuted.

Note how he refuses to go after a wealthy, connected Democrat for having sex with children, instead attempting to merely charge him with solicitation.

Far as I'm concerned, this is yet more proof that many leftists are hellbent on hurting conservatives at every opportunity they find while bending over backwards to absolve other leftists of their real, serious crimes, like the Democrat pedophile in the story, like Bill Clinton for his various sex-related offences and his lying to the nation, like Ted Kennedy for drunk driving and homicide...

I believe we'll be hearing more about stuff like this.

Mohammed & Mahmoud: Separated at Birth?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

The resemblance is astonishing... and very fitting!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


"In a nutshell"! Get it? Mahmie's a nut, after all... now would someone please crush that nut?

h/t: MideastTruth.com

Meanwhile

(Click the picture for larger version)
Uh-oh... another cartoon... guess that means they're gonna get mad again.
Note the brown robe he's wearing. That's so his minions don't know he's messed himself during the Israeli operations against his thugs.

Saturday, August 19, 2006

Bin Laden, Al-Zawahiri Sighted on Move?

Story here. h/t: National Terror Alert (see this blog's sidebar)



Has Osama bin Laden been sighted? A report with the Government of India says Al-Qaeda's top leadership was recently spotted near Darkot, a Pakistani village near the border with Afghanistan's Wakhan corridor.

Sources say the report was made less than a fortnight ago.




Recall this critical-information post. NOW.


Consider this possible Bin Laden-Al-Zawahiri movement sighting within the context of legitimate fears of massive jihad attacks, possibly even nuclear, coming from Iran this coming Tuesday, August 22, 2006.

I hope this is nothing, but the world is still sorry to have dismissed Winston Churchill's warnings about Hitler and the Nazis.

Can we afford to have our heads in the sand... anytime?

Always remember, the vision and infiltration of supremacist, imperialist Islam is worldwide. No non-Islamic nation is exempt.

The sleeper cells are everywhere. Of this there is no doubt.

Keep your eyes open. Don't be afraid to report anything suspicious to the police.

You may end up saving lives.

Organized Crime Blankets Canada

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


300 gangs.
11,000 gangsters.
In our streets.
In our cities.
Everywhere.
In Canada.
I didn't make this up. (h/t: Bourque.org)




Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Above: the Librano$. Now, these guys are scary! (Payback's a bee-atch, Jean and Paulie!)


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Above: These guys need no introduction. Some might be in Caledonia now.



Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Above: Jamaat ul Fuqra founder and Bin Laden loyalist Sheikh Mubarik Gilani


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Where's Osama? Hey, I think I found "Death" himself in this picture! I think I see Saddam, too, perhaps before he moved into his hole.

Er... how come I feel a little like looking over my shoulder now? I might've pissed off some of these fine gentlemen above...

Friday, August 18, 2006

Leftist State Apparatus Continues Crackdown on Christianity

Story here.



A few more court decisions like this week's over a display of a Bible in Houston and the United States will be approaching the "China-level" for Christian persecution, according to a leader in the midst of that battle.

The ruling from the Fifth Court of Appeals said the display of a Bible on public ground in Houston to honor the founder of a mission has to go, not because it was unconstitutional itself, but because it became unconstitutional when a Christian group rallied around it.




Oh? Really? In America, religion, association, assembly and expression are unconstitutional?

The "court" says so? My-o-my... now the leftist state apparatus of the United States is, just like the Canadian one, declaring that the Constitution does not support what we know it does.

So a religious group cannot have a little tiny monument of their holy book in public, cannot gather around it and cannot make any religious expressions whatsoever?

This is what the "court" is declaring?




The pastor's group said that means any monument, building, or even feature of nature is an illegal "establishment of religion" if a church ceremony is held there.

(...)

"Any kind of an event is okay, as long as you didn't express any religious faith. What is that telling you?

"We're not persecuted yet, we know that. But we're on our way there. Add that to the surprising acceptance of militant Islam, the fear of speaking against that from a Christian standpoint and then we're dangerously approaching the point where we have literally given away and yielded our freedoms that were earned," Welch said.

(...)

"The ramifications of this tortured decision are breath-taking and without any historic or legitimate Constitutional rationale," said the pastors' organization. "For the court to state that if a private citizen exercises his or her First Amendment rights of religious expression and assembly on public property, that any monument, building or fixed item of any kind that contains religious references becomes 'establishment of religion' is simply irrational."



Let me get this straight: the courts permit public parades based on sexual preference, which include nudity, which isn't supported by either the Constitution nor by law. The courts permit left-wing extremists to have public parades in which there are people commiting treason against the United States of America and its President in uttering the malevolent, prejudice-based hatred and incitement to all kinds of violence... my site is rife with this sort of moonbattery, which is clearly supported very much by the leftist state apparatus. And then there are Islamofascists marching down the streets, chanting slogans like "down, down America", "freedom go to hell", "Islam will dominate the world", "behead those who insult Islam", banners supporting terrorism and calling for the destruction of Israel... you name it... and it's all allowed by the state, including the "courts", who themselves forbid religious symbols, assembly and expression in public.

When will the "courts" get around to declaring that rainbow flags are also unconstitutional (hell, the "judges" can make up any insane, illogical, wrong and mean-spirited bullshit ruling they want and get away with it) and call for the abolition of mosques and all evidence of Islam? When will the "courts" ban the wearing of the burqha and the hijab? When will they ban turbans?

Why do the "courts" only single out Christians and Christianity for this kind of discrimination?

And remember, this isn't an isolated incident. My blog is searchable. See the little search box in the upper left area? Try entering words like "Christian" and "Christianity" to find some posts of mine about the worldwide crackdown on Christiantiy... as well as on Judaism.

All of this is happening at the same time as the leftist state apparatus is boosting, elevating, exalting, canonizing, sexual minorities, radical perversions and Islamic fundamentalism.

Want to see more of this extremist moonbat/Islamofascist activity... in public?

Once again I direct readers to this site:
http://zombietime.com/

Why is it "unconstitutional" to have a bible monument in a public place and for Christians to gather around it and say peaceful, non-imposing, non-harmful-to-others words... but the following is permitted, even encouraged by the state?



Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting





Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting




Is all of this "constitutional"? Where in the American Constitution can we find the declarations that these things above are "constitutional" but if Christians were to do the same sort of thing, like with Bibles, Crucifixes, Nativity Scenes, and Churches, it's "unconstitutional"?

Are the American "courts" hellbent on the elimination of Christianity? As the Nazis and the Muslim fundamentalists have always been hellbent on the elimination of Judaism?


And why do the "courts" seem also to want to elevate homosexuality, as they do Islam, high above Christianity?

What is the real agenda of the American legal system?

This is frightening, particularly if one is a straight Christian or Jewish person.

Who runs America? The left? Gays? Islamofascists?

Who is in charge?

Latest MidEast Info

Israel alarm at UN force members (h/t: Bourque.org)

Israel says it would be "difficult if not inconceivable" to accept nations which do not recognise its right to exist as part of a UN force in Lebanon.


---What the hell is the UN thinking, including anti-Israel troops in an international forces' presence? This will only make things worse.

Bloody UN... ever-stupid! Ever-worthless! Time to scrap the UN and replace it with the United Democratic Nations!

Evil empires/regimes shall have no right to membership, nor any right to have their interests heard.

That is my position. We must discriminate against evil regimes with maximum prejudice. Appeasing them will only make them more aggressive, more arrogant... and more dangerous.



Disarm Hezbollah? Not a chance, soldiers say

Lebanese troops admit they're not up to task assigned by the UN


---Ceasefire? What ceasefire? You mean like the millions of ceasefires and truces between Israel and the supremacistic, genocidal Arab-Muslim aggressors?

84 Hollywood Celebs Condemn Hez, Hamas. MSM Ignores.

Story here.

This information has been ignored by the MSM as far as I and Democracy Project can see.



Article from: AAP

NICOLE Kidman has made a public stand against terrorism.The actress, joined by 84 other high-profile Hollywood stars, directors, studio bosses and media moguls, has taken out a powerfully-worded full page advertisement in today's Los Angeles Times newspaper.

It specifically targets "terrorist organisations" such as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine.

"We the undersigned are pained and devastated by the civilian casualties in Israel and Lebanon caused by terrorist actions initiated by terrorist organisations such as Hezbollah and Hamas," the ad reads.

"If we do not succeed in stopping terrorism around the world, chaos will rule and innocent people will continue to die.

"We need to support democratic societies and stop terrorism at all costs."

The actors listed included: Michael Douglas, Dennis Hopper, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Danny De Vito, Don Johnson, James Woods, Kelly Preston, Patricia Heaton and William Hurt.



Ah, yes... of course, Bruce Willis and Sly Stallone, of course! The guy from Die Hard and the guy who played Rambo... at least these tough guys are consistent! I recommend that whoever sides with the Free World and condemns the Islamofascists, communists and other malevolent enemies of humanity be rewarded via the viewing of the movies they make, etc.

Those who are Dhimmis, however... boycott what they offer. They deserve the consequences of supporting evil!

There are others, of course.

Democracy Project laments:



The question is why I have to get this news from an Australian newspaper, when Nicole Kidman and 84 other Hollywood heavyweights take a strong stand against Hezbollah and Hamas? I just checked google news and there isn’t another story on this out there.



Why has the MSM ignored this? It is significant, for damn sure! Besides, whenever a celebrity or other bigwig asshat screams something anti-Bush, anti-American, anti-Israel, pro-"Palestine", pro-Hez, pro-Hamas, etc., like the Dixie Chicks, the MSM will be all over them. Does the MSM want the population to believe that most people are therefore of such an opinion? It stands to reason that this is the case if one just observes the pattern of reporting of the MSM of such statements.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Ahmadinejad's Blog Hacked

Remember how on Monday we couldn't get into Iranian Islamofascist leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's blog?

Well, that's because Israelis converged simultaneously upon the little freakazoid's sissy-dinky little place of self-idolatry, astonishingly unfettered narcississm and hatred and other such bovine manure... causing it to crash.

Mission accomplished: Madmud Assholinajam got the message very clearly. He knows that he personally is opposed. Whether he understands the meaning of this symbolic "opposition" vis-a-vis the larger picture and the real opposition in the offing is another story (it's short: the story is that he doesn't understand!).


H/T: CBV (It's in French, but you'll understand what it's all about: fighting Islamofascism and supporting Israel. Check it out... plenty of great graphics and links!)

Cult of Death


"Palestinian" children.
With guns.
On the streets.
Of "Palestine".
Getting their formal, mandatory "education".
I did not make this up.
This is where terrorists come from.
This is the raison d'etre of "Palestine".
Not to become a "nation".
But to be the means by which Islam attempts to destroy Israel.
Just because Israel is not Islamic.
After all, under Islam, that which is not Islamic must be destroyed.
This is the truth.
It is not a "religion". It is not about peace.
Islam is a cult of barbarians and merciless, murderous supremacists.
That is the truth.
To see many more damning pictures, click here.
It is NOT "resistance" to "occupation". It is all about Islam's ultimate goal of Islamifying the planet... beginning with Israel, the only non-Islamic nation in the Middle East. The only nation in the Middle East with freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights all guaranteed.
Islam forbids all of the things the Free World stands for, that the people of the Free World cherish... and sometimes take for granted.
Islam has no place for freedom, democracy, the rule of law (other than Islamic "law") and human rights. Therefore, they are required by their evil ideology to eliminate these things. And they must start somewhere... and they chose right there in the most Islamofascist region on earth... to wipe out the only nation in the region representing genuine humanity.
To read about the truth about the Middle East, go here. I've just begun reading what's at this link and have already learned things I haven't previously.
And witness your indoctrination go up in flames... and feel the anger... at Islam. At the Islamic Arab world for always having, since the very beginning, denying the Arab "refugees" permission to immigrate to their countries, just for the puropse of using these people as pawns and human bombs in an attempt to get rid of Israel... for simply being non-Islamic.
Learn about how the Islamic world cleansed their nations of Jews... at gunpoint... and confiscated their possessions. And feel yourself becoming angry again at Islam and Islamofascists.
The mainstream media will never tell you the truth. Nor will the education system of the Free World, for the forces of political correctness and Dhimmitude want the truth to fade away into oblivion!
Do you want to know the truth... or will you be more comfortable submitting meekly to lies and political correctness fascism?
The choice is yours. Choose your side: good or evil.