Monday, September 05, 2016

Muslims Target Chinese in France For Racial Violence, Chinese Demonstrate

...and the Media dutifully refuses to ID the racist attackers as Muslims.

Funny how it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools invariably favor Muslims over everyone else.  In this case, it favors Muslims over non-Muslim Chinese living in France.  And it seems that the progressive establishment and its tools don't care about racism at all when the racists are Muslims.

Story HERE.

This harassment of the Chinese near Paris has been going on for a long time. It got so bad that at one point the Chinese ambassador to France was forced to pay a visit to Aubervilliers to try to calm his countrymen down. And in 2013, the Socialist mayor of Aubervilliers, Jacques Salvator, suggested that the violence against them could be halted if Chinese companies would agree to hire more Arabs and Africans. The Chinese were not assuaged, countering that “Muslims do not work as hard as the Chinese, that they are more demanding, and that they complain too much.”Anyone familiar with Muslim work habits would need no convincing.

Since that demonstration in Aubervilliers two weeks ago, apparently little has been done to placate the Chinese. They described to reporters covering their demonstration in Paris their feeling of frustration at not being listened to by the French authorities who, they said, fail to realize what kind of daily terror they endure. And in addition to the attacks on Chinese who live in the suburbs, there has been a steady increase in the number of attacks targeting Chinese (and Korean, and Japanese) tourists in central Paris. These Asian tourists are known both to buy luxury goods to take home with them, and to carry lots of cash. Just the other day, a gang of six (unidentified men) jumped onto a bus just about to leave a hotel for the airport, and made off with luxury-filled luggage belonging to the 27 Chinese tourists on board. The attackers in Aubervilliers have been identified as Muslims, but in the stories about attacks on Chinese tourists the criminals are not identified. But reading between the lines suggests that those attacking the tourists, like those known to be attacking the Chinese in Aubervilliers, are Muslims, and for a simple reason: had any of these criminals been French, the press, which tends to protect Muslims, would certainly have been eager to describe them as such. A refusal to identify them, in the current climate, almost certainly means they were Muslims.

Tuesday, March 22, 2016

The "Mainstream" Media's Terrible Bias Regarding Left-Wing "Protests"

The media is uncritical of far-left-wing extremist "protestors" (who are almost always phony and frequently paid) who gather en masse at non-left-wing events, including those for non-left-wing politicians (like the US non-establishment Republicans and the Canadian Conservatives, for example). They're uncritical of such "protestors" no matter what the "protestors" say, what their signs say, of even what they do. It doesn't matter if the "protestors" are uttering BIG LIES and DEFAMATION of the absolute worst kind, nor even if they engage in destruction and violence.

But call a left-wing politician a "liar" or a "socialist" or otherwise speak the inconvenient truth of THEM... the media will go out of its way to destroy you and yours in the eyes of the masses.

If there were to be protests against left-wing politicians such as Obama, Hillary, Bernie or, in Canada, Trudeau, Wynne, Notley... including hollering "no hate", "no racism", "no fascism", "they're like Hitler/Nazis", etc... the media would demonize such protestors as, perhaps,  "extremists", "racists", "neo-nazis", "far-left"... or may just pretend that there were no protests at all (in the case of peaceful, truth-based demonstrations, no matter how massive, such as the Tea Party protests against Obama's agenda) or pretend it was just a "couple hundred" when it was thousands strong.  The media may even try to demonize such peaceful, truthful protests as being "a bunch of extremists/racists/far-right".

Anyone disagree? Be prepared to explain why, and state whether one is on top of current events daily, including going over the heads of the "mainstream", politically-correct, leftist media... or not.