Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Paul Martin's Lawn Sign

David Frum's Advice for Winning this Election

From the National Post, we see this excellent piece by David Frum.
I'm in agreement with Mr. Frum's advice, part of which is: the end, it is important for Conservatives to remember that this election is not really about them. Canadians will vote Conservative as the best and surest way to punish a Liberal party that has abused the public trust. The job facing the Conservative party over the coming weeks is to drive home to all Canadians how gross, how unscrupulous and how extreme the abuse has been -- and how very nearly the Liberals got away with it. What do you think would have happened to the Gomery inquiry if Paul Martin had won a half dozen more seats last year?

(emphasis mine)

And maybe that too is a theme for a Conservative campaign message: What If? What
if Paul Martin had won a half a dozen more seats last time? What would have happened to the Gomery inquiry then? And what if he wins this time? Will the Liberals ever really repay the taxpayers' funds that found their way to them? Will the Earnscliffe contracts ever be investigated? Will the democratic agenda so humorously assigned to Belinda Stronach ever produce anything more than blah, blah, blah?

Look, the plain truth is that although the Liberals will claim that they're taking the "high road" with a positive message and that Canadians will punish anyone who engages in negative "American-style" campaigning, the truth is the Liberals always have and always will run a filthy campaign and be backed and protected by the loyalist MSM and will win the election if the Conservatives this time believe they'll be rewarded by just being positive and talking about the issues rationally (this is, of course, important, too, but beside the point). The Liberals will have their many, many brainless surrogates across the country committing the false, unfair and malicious demonization of the Conservatives and Mr. Harper. Just recall how much it happened in previous elections and you'll agree. Liberal campaign workers will organize "demonstrations" with left-wing extremists whose sole agenda is to demonize the very party, the Conservative Party, that actually represents the true values of the average citizen. Horrible, defamatory slogans will be screamed and written on banners about the CPC and Harper and the MSM will be there in full force so as to splash all the nastiness on the front pages of the papers and make them the top stories each hour. What better way to terrify Canadians than this? The indubitable fact is that the Liberals are masters of waging a war-propaganda-like, Nazi-style campaign of fear and demonization against their political opponents. If allowed to get away with it, they'll win again. Therefore, as in war, the Conservatives must wage a preemptive, shock-and-awe counterstrike campaign so as to provide the real perspective to Canadians, except they'll be doing it using the truth about the Liberals, which is, as we well know, terrifying to think about.
In short, this election is a bloodless war. It must be fought as such. The future of Canada depends on the overthrow of the fascist Liberal regime.
It's time Canadians learned the truth.

Monday, November 28, 2005

Liberal "Star" Candidate Ignatieff Admitted "Disdain" for Ukraininans

From the National Post:
Newly-coronated Liberal "star" candidate Michael Ignatieff is already under fire from the people of the Etobikoke-Lakeshore Liberal riding association. They want nothing to do with him, particularly because:
...he has expressed views that are offensive to the area's large Ukrainian population, including his admission that he feels a "disdain" for Ukrainians.
On Friday last, suddenly incumbent MP Jean Augustine unexpectedly stepped aside to make this undemocratic coronation possible. It's also apparent from the article that there were nomination hopefuls for the riding, but all of a sudden they were advised of the sudden, without-warning stepping aside of the Minister of State. They were advised that they had until the very next day to file nomination papers, but when they showed up to do so, no one answered the door. It's unclear as to whether their nominations will be honored, as Liberal officials declared they'd honor them "if they were on time". We'll see.
Looks like democracy is alive and well in the Liberal Party of Canada under Paul Martin. Sure, and Shania Twain has just left hubby to shack up with Yours Truly. Sure.
And, sure, Ignatieff is a glowing example of tolerance for diversity:
In his book Blood and Belonging, the author invokes Russian imperialism, writing he feels a "disdain" for the Ukrainian people. Mr. Ignatieff describes Ukrainian culture as "embroidered peasant shirts, the nasal whine of ethnic instruments, phony Cossacks in cloaks and boots."
Now, is it any wonder why I have such strong trepidations about the Liberals under Paul Martin? As you can see here, they have demonstrated their commitment to fair democratic process and to their claimed monopoly on the value of tolerance and inclusiveness with regards to ethnic diversity.
There you have it, folks: this is the kind of ruling regime you have now. Do you want to keep it?

Sunday, November 27, 2005

In the Bizarro World's Twilight Zone

...With Bullshit

Heh-heh-heh... I've just come across the most astonishingly, ludicrously unbelievable statement ever made since the claims of Baghdad Bob that the American-led international coalition wasn't anywhere in Iraq.

For the most assininely audacious claim ever made by a Liberal Prime Minister, click here. And laugh yourself silly!
I'll tell y'all, that's a helluva good one! L-O-L

Now THIS Is a Poll Worthy of Being Taken Seriously

Here's a poll regarding the support of the federal-level political parties in Canada which I believe can be considered to be serious, scientific and totally unbiased, at least compared to the questionable ones we've been seeing that seem always to suspiciously favor the Liberals at the most unlikely of times.
This Robbins Sce Research poll is described as follows:
A representative sample of 18,443 Canadians between November 11th and 16th, 2005. This survey features a margin of error of 2.15%, 19 times out of 20 @ 98% competency. This poll was paid for by a U.S. company doing business in Canada.
Note the virtually unheard-of sample size of over 18,000 Canadians over a one-week period. Note also it was paid for by an American company. Margin of error just over 2% points, 19 times out of 20 98% of the time. Quite superior statistically to those with which we've been inundated by Canadian pollsters using sample sizes only a fraction of this one, with only 90% accuracy.
Interesting, also, that it makes more sense than some polls by Canuck pollsters which sometimes actually claim to show the Liberals on the borderline of forming a majority despite the apparent contempt with which far too many Canadian voters see the ruling cabal.
Read it for yourself and see how much closer to reality it is than the wildly fluctuating ones regurgitated by the annoying Canuck ones.
How come only an American polling firm seems to take its job really seriously? The Canadian ones seem to be simply going through brainless motions or something.
Very illuminating indeed, especially with regards to the seriousness of Canadian polling firms.

Saturday, November 26, 2005

About Nasty Campaigning and the Liberal Party

So the ruling Paul Martin Liberals sent a lawyer's letter to Conservative leader Stephen Harper threatening to sue if Mr. Harper's statement as to Liberal organized criminality should be reiterated outside the legally protective confines of the House of Commons (anything said inside the HOC isn't legally actionable in court).

This means the "organized crime" declaration with regards to the Liberal Party has really stung Paul Martin's gang. Good. They deserve to have someone of high stature and integrity pointing out what's already obvious to millions of thinking Canadians.

We've heard the protestations of the Liberals against Conservative hard-hitting political combat on the eve of the upcoming federal general election. They claim Canadians don't like this nastiness and want to hear politicians have a polite, rational, intellectual debate on the issues that really concern the average Canadian. Huh? The Liberals are never, never, never like that. They fight the filthiest campaigns Canada has ever seen. They have their surrogates go around defaming us as all kinds of horrible things that are never, never, never proven as they're never, never, never true.

So the Liberals do protest too much. They're the pot calling the kettle black. They've won elections in the past mainly by demonizing their main opponents, always aided by a Liberal-left, partisanly biased mainstream media and armies of brainwashed left-wing extremist ruffians who are only too happy to go around illegally defaming people they don' t like as things the Liberals and the left tell them they are but aren't.

The Liberals have already demonstrated they plan to be as dirty and rotten as the scoundrels they are for this election: remember Scott Brison's completely false allegations of criminality against Mr. Harper for which he recently had to fully retract and apologize? It's only a tiny appetizer of what's to come. Which is why the Conservatives are rightly making preemptive strikes in a prelude to what will hopefully be a "shock-and-awe" electoral battle of historical proportions. After all, since 1993, each election the Liberals have gotten away with what amount to, in a manner of speaking, some sort of electoral war crimes against their opponents. Adscam is only the latest example of the dirty, rotten tactics the Liberals use to stay in power, all for the cavalierly greedy, selfish personal enrichment of them and their cronies via the exploitation and virtual enslavement of law-abiding, hard-working, too-much-tax-paying-for-less-and-less-in-return Canadians.

The Liberals pit entire groups of Canadians, one against another, to impress those whose votes they're most likely to receive. They demonize provinces and regions to shore up their supposed core-support bases to hold onto their "safe" seats. They throw away billions of the peoples' own money in an attempt to bribe them with often-broken promises and worthless, never-asked-for pork-barelling programs and projects, usually just before and even during election campaigns. They demonize our next-door neighbor, America, the brightest beacon and defender of liberty, democracy and human rights on the planet, all to win votes from their likeliest supporters on the ultra-far-left.

What purpose do the Liberals have for being the government of Canada, other than to enrich themselves and exploit the land and the people in the process? What have they done to advance anything about Canada? All they did was mess around with spending and taxation so as to simply turn a deficit into a surplus. It had to be done, and was, very easily-- after all, they came to power on the cusp of a very lengthy, historical global economic boom which they cannot credibly claim to have created. The bastards were very lucky and cheated by taking the axe to the core social programs like health and education as well as the Armed forces, the RCMP, CSIS, etc. All the while diverting billions upon billions towards boondoggles, secretive foundations, the completely worthess disaster of a gun registry that continues to fleece us as gunshot after gunshot rings out in cities clear across the nation, killing innocent bystanders. Al Qaeda threatens us and walks freely among us while the Liberals claim to have spent eight billion dollars on "security" while closing RCMP detachments and border stations and continuing to keep the RCMP starved for the resources it needs to operate.

Shameless. Thy name is "Liberal".

Only a total imbecile will believe the Liberals are worth supporting.

If the Liberals stay in power, Canada may very well break up and cease to exist as we know it today. Don't allow that to happen!

Friday, November 25, 2005

This Is What the Liberals Need

That'd sure hurt. They've been asking for it since 1993.
H/T: NealeNews

Message for Paul Martin's Liberals on Election Day

Give it to them!

The Liberal Party and Organized Crime

This is how close the Liberal Party of Canada is to organized crime.

They think it's cute, but the ultimate result won't be pretty!

They will be nasty, but we've learned to play the game. Go ahead, Librano scumbags, make our day!

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Reminder for Ralph Klein

Am very, very busy these days due to the Christmas season. Posting will be more brief and more to the point as a result of less free time.

For the moment, I would like to leave a message here for Ralph Klein. Here 'tis:

Paul Martin's Liberals: BAD
Stephen Harper's Conservatives: GOOD
If so, good.
If not, then if you've nothing nice to say, say nothing.
Thank you.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Terror Attack: Is MONTREAL Next?

Once again, the Northeast Intelligence Network uncovers startling information on terrorism.
This time they report on detailed plans found on a suspected terrorist's computer of the Montreal rail system along with similar plans of the Madrid and London rail systems. Remember, those rail systems suffered devastating terrorist attacks.
The report is here.
What, if anything, is the Liberal government of Paul Martin doing? Are they even aware of this disturbing information?
Obviously Canada, despite its government's appeasenik attitude towards terrorists, is in the gunsights of terrorists.
What, again, is the Liberal government doing to try to prevent terrorism in Canada?
Where is Paul Martin? What's he doing, anyway?

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Paul Martin's CSL Polluting Great Lakes

Click on picture for the whole story...
Short on time. Must be off to work. Read the article on Paulie's pollution of the Great Lakes with Canada Steamship Lines. Cares about the environment? Yeah, sure! Sign the petition here to send the message of your unequivocal disapproval of Mr. Martin!
H/T: Maz2

Monday, November 21, 2005

Desperate Liberals Blowing Billions Before Election Again: Bribing Voters?

They're up to their old dirty tricks again, those greedy "Liberals".
Read the article on the "Liberals"' sudden big spending plans.
With a federal general election pretty much a foregone conclusion in the coming weeks, the ruling Paul Martin "Liberals" have once again undertaken to attempt to impress Canadian voters by throwing their tax dollars all of a sudden towards things they've been putting off for so long. Why do they always seem to save the big, great spending initiatives for the lead-up to an election? Can there be any conclusion other than they're trying to buy the election with the voters' own money?
How about that? Those old buggers! Out, out, damned "Liberals"!

Liberal Gov't Bans Whites From CSC: More Evidence Liberals Racist?

Looks like the "Liberal" Party of Canada under Prime Minister Paul Martin isn't so "liberal" after all.
Now we see that under the "Liberals", Correctional Services Canada has banned the hiring of Canadians who aren't "Aboriginal" or "minority" for parole officer positions. By all definitions of the word, this is racism. Is there any excuse? The government tries to make excuses, tries to justify this awful bigotry with its own leftist dogma. But dogma is dogma and racism is racism. And the Liberals have the nerve to tell us they are the sole representatives of "Canadian values" and that anyone against the Liberal Party of Canada is out of touch with "Canadian values". Well, I would say to the Liberals: Racism is not a Canadian value!

For humanity's sake, don't vote Liberal!

H/T: Maz2

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Liberal Gov't Racist, Sexist? You Decide

Well, we've over the years heard the Liberal Party of Canada brag about how tolerant they are and that they never discriminate against anyone. We've heard them invoke the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, declaring they follow it all the time.

Well, they've been lying to us.

Here's the smoking gun. Read for yourself and draw your own conclusions.

Shame on the so-called "Liberals"!

They're so unfit to govern Canada.

Do they practice this anti-Charter-rights discrimination government-wide? Anyone have other smoking guns?

Liberals Want Another Chance? Fugeddaboutit!

For a summary of why the Liberals shouldn't be elected again, read Laurie Hawn's post, "Puppy Dog Faces" at Strong and Free.

Of course, there's much, much more to come in terms of reasons to kick the rowdy bums out of the Ottawa Saloon...

H/T: Maz2

Oklahoma Bomber Search Warrant Unsealed

Joel Henry Hinrichs III

Continuing coverage of the story...
The search warrant for the late Joel Henry Hinrichs III, who accidentally blew himself up in an apparent failed terror attack outside of a football stadium in Normal, Oklahoma, October 1, 2005, has been unsealed. Read the NIN article for yourself.
From the article:
Documents state that the FBI also discovered "explosive experiments and paraphernalia," including 0.4 pounds of a white powder that turned out to be triacetone triperoxide, or TATP, which is composed of hydrogen peroxide and acetone. The Northeast Intelligence Network was first to report the finding of TATP on the night of the bombing. HINRICHS died October 1 when an explosive device went off about 100 yards from Gaylord Family/Oklahoma Memorial Stadium where 84, 000 people were watching a football game that evening Federal agents also found mixing bowls, a slow cooker, a thermometer, plastic containers, a hobby fuse, a circuit board, six tape rolls, chemicals used to make TATP as well as the TATP in the apartment.
Authorities also reportedly found a profane, single line “suicide note” typed on his computer. According to published reports, HINRICH;S laptop computer was still on and screen notes al legedly written by HINRICHS to himself were visible; at the cursor was a phrase that began with profanity and continued "[Expletive deleted] ... all this. None of
you are worth living with. You can all kiss my [Expletive deleted]."
Mysterious, for sure. What is "all this"? Who are the people to whom the deceased referred as "you"?
Could Mr. Hinrichs have been involved with Islamic terrorists and then realized that they were all nuts and were using him? Or what? Fascinating. Was his death accidental or deliberate? Was it a suicide bombing that failed and only took the bomber's life or what? Who goes to all that elaborate trouble just to end one's life? My own belief is that it was indeed a "suicide bombing" attempt and explosives went off prematurely, fortunately for the over 80,000 football fans nearby.
Hopefully these and other questions will be answered in the future via further investigation and evidence. This is one fascinating, puzzling mystery, for sure.
For the whole story on the OU bombing, see here.

Saturday, November 19, 2005

We Must Question All Judges as We Do Politicians

I've done it again: written something in my comments section that I find worthy of sharing via a regular post. This time it's regarding the need to not automatically assume that judges are perfectly impartial and can never be corrupt, for we know deep down in the intellect that it's not true for judges any more than it is for the politicians who appointed them to the bench. We are strongly admonished by authoirities to brainlessly revere judges as always honest and impartial with no political or social policy agenda of their own. We must resist this elitist pressure for the good of the country and for democracy.
Here it is:
Gomery himself is looking more and more suspicious to me. Why do we have to automatically assume that judges are immune to being corrupt or dishonest or playing partisan politics or protecting their political masters or being militant social policy activists hellbent on reengineering the foundation of the nation and its society, the law and constitution be damned? Judges are human. Humans are corruptible, like politicians. Therefore, judges are corruptible. We must, therefore, assume as much and question all judges and their rulings, else they'll become increasingly emboldened and play the role of the absolute authoritarian dictators their political masters would like to be but cannot. Inquiries and their commissioners must as well be questioned. What's preventing the electorate from questioning Judge Gomery? If we don't, then if our Prime Minister is guilty of wrongdoing (remember, I said "if", just for the PM's lawyers' satisfaction), then he or she will get off scot free and win another election due to the lack of knowledge on the part of the voters of the truth.The people must be far more assertive in demanding full accountability. Democracy depends on it.
How do we know the Gomery Inquiry is impartial and has really looked everywhere at everyone who may have had something to do with the brazen theft of so many millions of our tax dollars via the gargantuan ripoff called Adscam?
Don't expect the mainstream media to do it for us. They don't want to get fired like their colleagues have been for asking the necessary questions. Ask the questions of your friends in person and on your blogs. Let the idea get out there and spread. It's for the better of our country and democracy.
H/T: Tony Guitar for the graphic of the Canadian Coat of Arms.

Friday, November 18, 2005

Support the Troops

From Rebekah at Eye Of The Storm:

Okay, it's offical now. Operation Green shirt/ Yellow ribbon has been launched! Please spread the word. From now on, every Friday wear green(preferably hunter green) with a yellow ribbon on your lapel or around your wrist. This is a counter to the movement to wear black "until our troops come home".The green will symbolize our support for our troops and their mission. They are placing their lives on the line for a noble cause and we must never forget it.The yellow will symbolize our hope for them to come home soon, safe and sound.Like I said, please spread the word on your blogs, and comment on others' blogs as well. That's what I'm gonna do.
It's an excellent idea. I'm going to buy a couple of new green shirts. Wonder where I can get a yellow ribbon? 'Course, I could make one myself out of some yellow ribbon... duh!
You go, Rebekah!

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Liberals Culpable for Wrongdoing, To Be Fired: Voters to Rule in Election

I have just finished writing something in my comments section and realized that my more casual musings therein are very much worthy of being posted as a regular posting and are valuable with a view to helping Canadian voters to regain their proper, rightful perspective with respect to the government in power at the moment. An election will shortly be called and this one is the most critical crossroads in Canada's history as it will affect the very future of the Federation: will it continue or will it not? Will Canada be put back on track to deal with the challenges of the future so it can continue to move steadily towards its potential or will it be condemned to mediocrity and breakup under "Liberal" rule?
Here's the post:
Folks, thanks a million for the feedback and tips.

Aizlynne, yes, the interrelationships between Martin, Gomery and Garneau aren't that easy to see at first glance, but the more one looks and thinks about the whole picture, the more one sees how bad it at least looks. No smoking gun, but people have been convicted of murder one without a weapon and even without a body. It's the evidence that counts and what the jury believes that matters. Politics isn't about proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; it's about what is decided by the jury of the electorate who either give the thumbs up or thumbs down to the accused. And in civil trials, at least in America, all one needs for a finding of culpability is the "preponderance of evidence" leading to a reasonable belief of guilt.

And the preponderance of evidence is so gargantuan and so staggering as to Liberal corruption and guilt in pretty much everything they do in the running of the whole country. We've seen it all ever since the crooks came to power the easy way and stayed in power by cheating and by bribing the voters. The linkages here between the players in Adscam and the Inquiry are sufficient for a conclusion of culpability and liability by the jury of the electorate.

It doesn't matter whether the police deem the Liberals as actually having committed a criminal offence. The Liberal Party is not a private individual citizen and therefore isn't subject to the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms as are individual citizens. The Liberal Party is subject only to what the people think of them and is only in government at the pleasure of the voters, and it knows this very well. Hence their uncanny ability to manipulate pretty much everything within their power, be it legitimate or illegitimate, in the country. They do exert influence and control over virtually all insitutions, including the MSM (via CRTC, etc.), the judiciary (via extreme partisan crony loyalty, etc.), the RCMP (we know this by simply having observed what's been going on between the government and the RCMP over the years-- no smoking gun necessary!) and so on and so forth. Is there any doubt now as to the Liberals being filthily corrupt as well as cavalierly incompetent to a degree never seen before in Canadian history? Do we have enough evidence to damn them to hell and throw them out of power like a dead rat out of the house?

We, the jury of the voters, find the Liberal Party of Canada, regardless of its leadership, to be liable for its worthlessness and multitudes of offences against Canada and Canadians over the past few decades.

So ruled. Bailiff, remove the damned Party from the courtroom. *Gavel pounds*

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

The Gomery Inquiry: Impartial, Fair, Balanced & Broad-Reaching OR Whitewash of Paul Martin's Role in Adscam? Paul's Revenge on Jean?

I've lately been closesly examining the whole Gomery Inquiry into Adscam and the players involved. I have come to realize that Canadians aren't getting the complete picture of all the astonishing corruption and eye-opening relationships and connections surrounding the whole sordid matter.
I feel it's now time to summarize what's most important of what I've found. The basis for this summary stems from the following recent posts here on the Canadian Sentinel: Judge Gomery & PM Martin: The CSL Connection and Judge Gomery, PM Martin, Raymond Garneau: More Disturbing Connections
Be certain to read them and examine the links provided.
We all know about Adscam, the Liberal sponsorship program allegedly implemented to combat the threat of Quebec separatism following the separation referendum of 1995. The basic idea behind the program was to boost the visibility of Canada and the federal government via advertising via sponsoring various events such as in the sports and cultural areas. It's as simple as placing a big sign saying "Canada" on it or having "Canada" stitched on some famous player's clothing and that sort of thing. The cost? $250 million. Sounds like a massive rip-off for such simple stuff as that, doesn't it? I would say it certainly is! A quarter billion bucks to advertise the word "Canada". That's the biggest, most effective weapon the Liberal Party of Canada could muster to fight the Quebec separatists? Scary-- just imagine how they would respond to WWIII or a 9/11-type attack in Canada... plainly, simply scary! The Liberals are obviously imbeciles if they thought a horrendously overpriced program like Adscam would be of any worth whatsoever. After all, the separatist Bloc Quebecois is poised to more or less sweep Quebec in the upcoming federal election and separatism support is way up. Nicely done, Jean and Paul.
Approximately $100 million of that was stolen, hence the Inquiry.
Also important to note: the terms of reference provided by Martin for Gomery prevented Gomery from investigating Martin's possible involvement in Adscam. No wonder Gomery had no choice but to "exonerate" Martin of any wrongdoing. He was, for example, unable to delve into the Earnscliffe affair.
Now to the Gomery Inquiry matter.
Judge John Gomery, a Liberal, was appointed by Prime Minister Paul Martin to head the Inquiry into Adscam. Sure, appointing a Liberal was no big surprise, for the Liberals are famous for their patronage and cronyism and publicly express pride therein. But there's more, and far worse, far more disturbing than a simple patronage appointment.
Enter Raymond Garneau, whom Judge Gomery appointed to oversee the advisory body responsible for advising him during Phase 2 of the Inquiry's Report, the "Recommendations" phase.
Garneau had a financial interest in the loan syndicate which provided the financial wherewithal for the then-cash-insufficient Paul Martin to acquire Canada Steamship Lines.
Garneau was also CEO of the Montreal City and District Savings bank, which was the bank used by the Caruana/Cuntrera crime family for which former Liberal Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano (also technically in charge-- in terms of contracting -- of the sponsorship program, though he has denied any wrongdoing therewith) worked as an accountant. The bank in question was apparently used for the laundering of $21 million by said crime family.
Garneau was appointed by Martin when he was Finance Minister to the Board of Directors of the Bank of Canada. Garneau was later fired by then-PM Jean Chretien (whom Gomery blamed for Adscam in Phase 1 of his Report) for declaring Chretien should resign so Martin could replace him.
We the Canadian people must now ask why Judge Gomery appointed, of all people, Raymond Garneau, considering all of the above-- there's a very clear conflict of interest here between Garneau and Martin. Judge Gomery owes us an explanation! Did he make an error in judgement and fail to have a background check performed on Garneau? Why did he choose Garneau, exactly? What did he know about Garneau? Did he receive an order from the Prime Minister or a member of his staff to appoint Garneau?
Now that we know about the conflict of interest with regards to Garneau's appointment, will his appointment be terminated? If it isn't, then the entire Inquiry will have to be deemed by the reasonable Canadian citizen as worthless due to the conflict and Gomery's refusal to rectify it. Canadians could very well come to believe, in such an event, that the Inquiry was a whitewash of Paul Martin's involvement, whatever it may have been, if any, in Adscam and a personal, political vendetta by Martin against his nemesis, Chretien.
Will Judge Gomery do the right thing and cancel Raymond Garneau's appointment?
The very credibility of the whole Commission of Inquiry hangs in the balance now. And, of course, so does the credibility of Prime Minister Paul Martin. This is critically important as Canada is now on the starting line of a federal general election.
This issue is not going to go away. This voice will not be silenced.
The next move is for Martin/Gomery. Just watch them. I will be.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Judge Gomery, PM Martin, Raymond Garneau: More Disturbing Connections

Following my recent post, Judge Gomery & PM Martin: The CSL Connection, this post brings us deeper into the darkness of the connections between Justice John Gomery and Prime Minister Paul Martin.
In that previous post, it was reported that Gomery appointed Raymond Garneau, who was involved in the loan syndicate Paul Martin used to secure financing in order to acquire Canada Steamship Lines, to oversee Phase 2 of the Gomery report.
Now, from Prime Time Crime, and thanks to Maz2 for providing the link in the comments, I have discovered further astonishingly sinister relationships of which Canadians must be aware. Do read the entire thing and follow all the links within it. It's all immensely fascinating as well as disturbing and damning to the Liberal Party of Canada under Paul Martin. Spread the word!
For this post I'll focus on Mr. Garneau, as it is his appointment by Judge Gomery that is an apparent bad move; an apparent conflict of interest, as PM Martin is connected to Garneau via CSL via the loan syndicate in which Garneau was involved.
Here it is:
The loan syndicate isn't the only business in which Garneau was involved that raises disturbing questions, now involving former Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano and the Mafia. Garneau was the CEO of the Montreal City and District Savings bank, which was the bank used by the Caruana/Cuntrera crime family for which Alfonso Gagliano worked as an accountant. The bank in question was apparently used for the laundering of $21 million by said crime family, a fact established by RCMP Sgt. Mark Bourque. There are other links in the Prime Time Crime expose regarding Gagliano and the Mafia. See for yourself- this post is about Gomery, Garneau and Martin, mostly.
Why did Gomery choose Garneau? Did he have any background check done? Was he aware of PM Martin's financial connection to Garneau? Of his having been CEO of a bank used for money laundering by a crime family for which the former Public Works minister, Gagliano, also involved in Adscam, worked?
Did Paul Martin tell Gomery to appoint Garneau?
Remember, Gomery is a Liberal. He was appointed by Paul Martin. And he "exonerated" Martin while blaming his nemesis, former PM Jean Chretien. Which brings us to the following:

Now, all of this is suspicious and sleazy enough. The CEO of the bank used by the Caruana / Cuntreras at the time was Raymond Garneau, who was appointed by Paul Martin in his capacity as Finance Minister, to be a Director of the Bank of Canada. He was fired by Jean Chr├ętien after he had the temerity in 2002 to suggest it was time for Chr├ętien to resign in favour of Martin.

So PM Martin himself appointed Garneau to be a Director of the Bank of Canada when he was Finance Minister. Garneau called for PM Chretien's resignation so Martin could take over, earning a firing from Chretien himself.
Hmm... Garneau is obviously a Martin loyalist. Martin obviously sees him in a very favorable light. Martin appoints Gomery. Gomery appoints Garneau to help him with the inquiry. Gomery exonerates Martin and blames Chretien, while knowing full well the terms of reference given to him by Martin for the inquiry did not include any investigation into any possible involvement of Martin in Adscam. The inquiry apparently was designed to investigate Chretien's involvement.
And apparently the mainstream media won't look into the relationships, ask questions, let alone report all of this to the electorate. Just how far will the MSM go to protect the Liberal regime?
And as for the RCMP: why is it they only do these big, serious investigations upon the orders of the government? Why don't they independently keep an eye open as to possible criminality, regardless of the possible perpetrators, up to and including the Prime Minister, and launch investigations on their own without political prompting? Why is the RCMP Commissioner appointed by none other than the Prime Minister? Why has the Liberal government under both Chretien and Martin deliberately underfunded and underresourced the RCMP to the point that they cannot do their job much of the time? Recall the RCMP investigated former PM Brian Mulroney only on the say-so of the Liberal government. What have the Liberals done to the RCMP? And why doesn't the Liberal government ever take action to combat organized crime? What have they ever done with that?
What is really going on with the Liberal Party of Canada? What's going on in Canada?
Why wait forever to maybe someday find out? Vote the Liberals out of power. Vote in a new government who will do what's necessary to find the answers to the questions and put a stop to all the corruption Canadians have come to loathe in the government under the Liberals.
Whatever you do, don't vote Liberal!

Saturday, November 12, 2005

Bruce Willis Supports Operation Iraqi Freedom; Pledges Million $ for Bin Laden/al Zarqawi/al Zawahiri Capture

Tough-guy actor Bruce Willis has proven he has a mind of his own; no allowing the Michael Moores of the world to tell this real man what to think. Willis has ponied up $1 million US out of his own pocket for any civilian who captures top terror leaders Osama Bin Laden or Ayman al-Zawahiri or Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Willis recently did an interview with Michael Yon, an embedded blogger deep inside Iraq accompanying American troops as they fight to free people of the newly-democratizing nation from the clutches of the inhuman, murderous Islamofascists, both Iraqi and foreign. You can read the interview here.

Michael Yon's blog is here. Highly recommended for excellent coverage of the reality of the war in Iraq, far superior to and much more extensive than possible from the mainstream media. More truthful, too, as far as I'm concerned.

See also the National Ledger's report.

It's heartening to realize that there are still many people in the world who understand the importance of Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war on terror. The leftist "pacifists" (many of whom nevertheless utilize violence in their protests) who cultishly follow the likes of Michael Moore, who imposed upon the world his dishonestly trashy yet appallingly profitable "Fahrenheit 9/11", unfortunately don't understand the dangers the world still, as always, poses for humanity and civilization. History has taught the thinking person of the need to be vigilant and take action against evildoers when necessary, sometimes even preemptively.

For those interested in a movie contradicting Michael Moore's views, see on this site "Michael Moore Hates America". Scroll down a little for that post.

H/T: "Willis and Yon" at and Neale News.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Judge Gomery & PM Martin: The CSL Connection

Based on the Canada Free Press article Martin loan syndicate runs surveillance on Justice John Gomery, I have found some interesting facts I believe Canadians should know about Justice John H. Gomery and Prime Minister Paul Martin and Martin's now-held-by-his-sons Canada Steamship Lines.
Read the article for yourself.
Here I'll try to make some sense of what exactly is the big deal and leave it to readers to formulate their own questions about the relationships and the circumstances surrounding Gomery and Martin (All emphasis mine).
Of course, Justice Gomery is a Liberal who was chosen by Martin to head the Commission of Inquiry into the sponsorship program and advertising activities.
The other names we need to know are:
-Raymond Garneau: special investor, CAI Private Equity Group (loan syndicate involved in Martin's 100% takeover of CSL equity and liabilities)
-Laurence Pathy: former CSL co-owner, sponsored the $182 million loan to Martin to take over CSL in 1990
-Paul Desmarais, Chairman, Power Corp.
-Frank McKenna, former Premier, New Brunswick, and currently Ambassador to the United States, appointed by Martin, and also a special investor in CAI Group, plus former chairman of CanWest Global, which owns the National Post
1973: Desmarais appointed Martin as President of CSL
From the article:

It seems that in June 1981, Desmarais needed a buyer, who wouldn’t tip the markets to his off-book debt-for-equity swaps, to take CSL off his hands. Martin stepped up to the plate. The CSL price tag was $195 million. Martin, who had scant money of his own, went to his sometime golfing buddy, Laurence Pathy, whose tightly held Fednav commanded Canada's biggest ocean-going fleet and assets of at least $500 million. Pathy agreed to ante up $35 million in preferred shares and to foot the cost of three new ships as collateral allowing Martin to borrow the rest. Martin turned to Desmarais's long-time backer, the Royal Bank, whose chairman sat on Power's board. Power received $30 million in preferred CSL shares. Martin has never revealed the amount of his loan from the bank or Desmarais. By the time the deal closed, the price was down to $178 million: Power kept $17 million in CSL's cash and liquid assets but did not oblige Martin to remortgage his Montreal house.

June 22, 2005: Justice Gomery appointed Raymond Garneau as chairman of an "Advisory Committee of distinguished Canadians" to "provide guidance for Phase II .. to prevent mismanagement of sponsorship programs .. in the future".
The article points out that the CanWest Global paper National Post, the day of the release of the first Gomery report, declared Martin "cleared" "before its contents could be digested".
It also points out McKenna's positions at CanWest, his involvement with the loan syndicate CAI, and his appointment as Ambassador by Martin.
The final question the article asks is:

Who dictated that Canadian Order in Council, which made Raymond Garneau–one of 28+ special investors in Paul Martin’s loan syndicate–the watchful chairman of the Justice John H. Gomery Advisory Committee?

Fascinating facts and interrelationships, are they not?
One must wonder...

Friday, November 04, 2005

Paul Martin's Orwellian Authoritarian Plans for Canada

Now that the Gomery Inquiry has confirmed the corruption of the ruling Paul Martin Liberal Party, we must look critically at the alarming plans the Liberals have for Canada. Read the entire article. It's a must-read! It was written by Beryl Wajsman, who was one of the people banned for life from the Liberal Party by Prime Minister Paul Martin. He wasn't even a member. Here's some of what he wrote:
Next month the Martin government will bring forward legislation allowing for the monitoring of e-mail and internet communications. The bill would force providers of internet and telephone services to duplicate records of their clients' activities and require, on simple request, that the information be passed on to police authorities. The proposal demands that network capacity be constructed to allow for tapping of some 8,000 individuals at any one time. Federal Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has told Justice Minister Irwin Cotler that the law would allow security authorities to access more information about Canadians' personal lives than ever before. Yet Ottawa remains strangely silent on consideration of any judicial safeguards and oversight even in light of the fact that current evidentiary requirements for standard wiretaps have already become flimsy and shallow.
Big Brother Paul Martin will be watching us if he's re-elected yet again. Will Canadians be stupid enough to allow this to happen?
Such legislation could easily be used as a loophole to, for example, spy on political opponents, in a "legalized" Watergate-style manner. It could be used to spy on anyone for any reason the Prime Minister deems. And, as we have seen, there's no reason to believe that the Liberals have any intention to use such legislation to fight terror, as they've actually let terrorists go following the discovery of their active cell. Read the article, "Toronto Terror Cell “Dismantled”… by Freeing Ringleader", at that link. It would be reasonable, therefore, to believe the real reason for expanded state surveillance powers is to control the people, to limit their liberties, to intimidate them, etc. Do we want to always be looking over our shoulder, Soviet style, to see if the Canadian version of the KGB is watching us?
The federal Liberals have also gone on record as being committed to proceeding with Bill C-17, the Marijuana Decriminalization legislation, and with Bill C-53, the Proceeds of Crime act. Though legalization, not just decriminalization, of marijuana is long overdue, the problem of C-17 is that it also allows for random stopping of motorists to check for drugs without any necessity of probable cause as exists in the United States. C-53, which seeks to allow the government to seize any assets obtained through illegal means, also has within it the reversal of burden of proof. Unlike even the RICO statute in the U.S. or the "Guerin" law in Ireland, the Proceeds of Crime Bill would make certain accused guilty until proven innocent turning hundreds of years of civil liberties protections on its head.
Think police state. Think authoritarianism. Is this the hidden agenda of the Liberal Party of Canada? They've already ignored Commons majority votes, so what's their next step? To take away our constitutional rights?
How far will they go if they remain in power?

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Gomery Confirms Liberal Corruption; Cloud Still Hangs over PM Martin with Earnscliffe Issue

Since the Gomery Inquiry report on the Adscam scandal of the ruling Paul Martin Liberals was released yesterday, much of the mainstream media (MSM) has been loudly trumpeting headlines at us declaring Prime Minister Paul Martin as "exonerated", given the lack of evidence of any direct connection of him to Adscam while he was Finance Minister. Of course, the terms of reference crafted by Martin's regime for Justice John Gomery to follow prevented him from examining Martin's involvement. For example, Gomery couldn't investigate the Earnscliffe connection. Perhaps later on a future government will order the RCMP to investigate Martin's role, if any, wrt Earnscliffe Group and the sponsorship program. Martin isn't necessarily in the clear at all. The questions as to what he knew and what he did or didn't do remain unanswered by Gomery.

Well, we have a non-MSM news outlet from America giving a different view of the report than the Canadian MSM generally is. CNSNews declares:
The chances of a December general election in Canada have mounted with the release of a judicial inquiry report confirming corruption in the governing Liberal Party.

So is the perspective of much of the MSM the only take possible? Apparently not.

We also have a Canadian non-MSM news organization, CNews, stating the following based on the Gomery report:
Justice John Gomery has delivered a serious - but not imminently fatal - blow to the governing Liberals with a finding that the party's Quebec wing ran kickback scheme to squeeze donations out of federal sponsorship contractors.

So, as I explained in my immediately previous posting on the Gomery report, the ruling Paul Martin Liberal Party is still in serious trouble following the release of Justice Gomery's findings.

h/t: Kate at for the Earnscliffe thing.

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

After The Gomery Report: The Liberals are Still in Trouble

Ok, I've just finished watching former Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien deliver his reaction to Justice John Gomery's report on Adscam. Chretien will be challenging the report in Federal Court. Ok, so let him. It doesn't matter anyway.

Why doesn't the report matter? Why is it irrelevant that the evidence pointed more to the fault of Chretien than to current PM Paul Martin? Why shouldn't Martin and his Liberals breathe easy now?

Because the people of Canada have seen the evidence for themselves in the televised testimony at the Gomery Inquiry into the sponsorship scandal which the Liberals claimed was implemented for the purpose of "fighting the separatists". The people have already made up their minds about what happened and as to who's to blame... and who exactly is the problem.

The people of Canada know already that the Liberal Party of Canada is the problem. The Liberals are the ones found to have done all the sinister deeds involving the passing around of my and your hard-earned and easily-taken tax dollars, dollars which were given for little or no work done, and an astonishingly huge amount at that. After all, why is it necessary to pay someone huge sums of money for delivering a check to some organization? Just use FedEx at the regular rate and save us a bundle. But nope, the Liberals knew that then there'd be no way to kickback some of the money in the form of party or candidate donations. We know that people who were paid a lot of money for little or no work at all did give money to the Liberal Party. We're not stupid enough to think that politicians wouldn't do something like this as long as they believe they'll get away with it.

The point here: the Gomery Inquiry gave us the evidence we needed to confirm this: the Liberal Party of Canada is corrupt to the bone. It is completely unfit and undeserving of being the Government of Canada and we must punish them by throwing them out in the next election.

It's programmed to win power and stay in power at virtually all costs. Rules have definitely been broken. Money has definitely been stolen and given to Liberals who subsequently donated money to the Liberal Party.

Mr. Chretien was named in the report as being responsible for Adscam. He did declare he, as PM, is responsible, as are all Cabinet Ministers who are members of the Treasury Board, which included Mr. Martin. Therefore, as Chretien said, Martin knew just as much as he did, as he was fully aware of the sponsorship program and voted in favor of its implementation.

So, with the overall, deeply-ingrained culture of corruption and arrogant entitlement of the Liberal Party and considering the fact that both Chretien and Martin were in a position to be able to have known of the wrongdoing, we must conclude that either they knew about it or they were so astonishingly, cavalierly incompetent in the exercise of their respective responsibilities as Prime Minister and Finance Minister that they were completely clueless as to what was happening with the program they claimed was so bloody, fundamentally critical to the very unity of the nation.

We must ask: if they were either knowledgeable of wrongdoing or completely clueless as to what was going on with the oh-so-critical program, what else have they been similarly negligently incompetent with? Think about what they've done to the Canadian Armed Forces. Think about the fact that despite billions of dollars being tossed around in the name of "national security" in the post 9/11 world and with malevolent fascist dictatorships such as North Korea and Iran declaring their nuclear ambitions for the world, there is no evidence that anything much has changed since 9/11 to assure us of greater security against terrorism and nuclear missile attack.

We cannot trust the Liberals with our money. More importantly, we cannot trust them with our country.

It's time to wipe the slate clean of the filthy corruption and begin anew with a completely new government for a far, far better Canada. We owe it to ourselves. It's as easy as marking an "X" on a small piece of paper.