Thursday, August 30, 2007

Libs Claim They're 'Defenders of Cdn Manufacturing' Despite Outsourcing Jobs to China When in Power

Story here. h/t:
The Liberals are claiming that they're the 'defenders of manufacturing in Ontario and Quebec'. Oh, really?
Amazing. These guys will make up anything at all, no matter how ridiculous and blatantly false.
They, while in power, oversaw a massive outsourcing of manufacturing to China and other countries. Yet they claim to be somehow good for the manufacturing industry and jobs in Canada?
They refused to cut corporate income taxes to competitive levels, thus leaving the manufacturing sector vulnerable should the Canadian Dollar rise (and it did- it's within about five cents of equalling the US Greenback already). Yet they claim that they're the ones who would be the savior of manufacturing jobs in Canada? Please. Who in their right mind will believe ANYTHING these lying, corrupt, crooked Liebrano$$$ claim, ever, ever, ever again? I sure as hell haven't forgotten that these guys' noses are longer than Pinocchio's! Shit, they can have a nose-growing contest with the Clintons, the CAIR and the Chinese Communist Party!
Bullshit, I declare.
They sound interventionist. Oh, my g...! Not that again! Shit, they're showing their communist colors yet again, still trying to chip support off from the NDP and Bloc, having given up on winning back the support they lost to the Conservatives.
The progressive liberal leftist revolutionarism is showing in the Liberal Party of Canada as strongly as ever, perhaps foreshadowing a return to Trudeaupian Liberalism... scary!

Suddenly the Liberals want to get proactive on the economy? Yeah, right. Like hell. It's just political posturing. They're accusing the Tories of "not using the available levers", whatever the hell they mean by that (which I think means state interventionism, which we know doesn't work in the long run as it distorts everything, just as in the Atlantic Provinces, which are still relatively a basket case thanks to decades and decades of state intervention and distortion in the economy of the region. And now they're saying to Ontarians and Quebeckers: Vote for us and we'll give you what the Maritimers got: dependence. Just elect us and submit to whatever we impose on you. Don't worry; Big Liberal Government will handle everything. Just pay your taxes, do as you're told and shudafukup or else.
That's the Liberal Party today: they want to return to Trudeaupian national socialism. Can you say National Energy Program? Can you say appeasement? Can you say destructive social reengineering? Can you say crime, corruption, greed, entitlement, cavalier neglect and gross incompetence? Can you say ADSCAM? You name it, they did it bad!

Invisible-Stuff Kitties

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

Fugitive Thief Gives Hillary $1 Million

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Hillary Clinton, above, demonstrating via her latest exposure, that she's just like Hubby Bill... and Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan... all ditzy, nutty moonbats who like to expose themselves, too! Hey! Do you think Billy took that picture? Would it surprise anyone? By the way, that's an old, very old picture. I sure wouldn't post such a picture if it were taken today! A real lady crosses her legs, right?

Story here.

A Democratic fundraiser who has raised $1 million for presidential candidate Hillary Clinton says he has done nothing wrong and has asked no favors in return, but Norman Hsu didn't mention that he's a wanted man.

A California prosecutor says Hsu pleaded no contest to grand theft, was sentenced to three years in prison and then disappeared, The Los Angeles Times reported Wednesday.


Hsu, an apparel executive who made his first-ever political contribution — to John Kerry — in 2004, is listed as one of the top 20 Democratic fundraisers in the country and is one of Clinton's "HillRaisers" — people who rustle up at least $100,000 for Clinton's campaign, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Nevertheless, it appears that Hillary will NOT return the money:

Clinton adviser Howard Wolfsen told The Times that Hsu has been a longtime donor to the party: "During Mr. Hsu's many years of active participation in the political process, there has been no question about his integrity or his commitment to playing by the rules, and we have absolutely no reason to call his contributions into question or to return them."

Oh, dear... she really is just like Billy. Deny, deny, deny, lie, lie, lie, cheat, cheat, cheat... and show off a little o' the ol' naughty-naughty...

Whoever gets the Republican Presidential nomination shouldn't have too much of a hard time turning Hillary into yesterday's (ultra-far-left-leaning) news. (Oh, look! In the picture, she's actually leaning to her left! Oh, no... you don't suppose it's to blow off the gaseous byproduct of her lunch of beans & weenies?)

Another Call to Ban CAIR


It cannot be said often enough. I've said it before and will again: CAIR is not a force for good, nor for peace, nor equality. It is not simply an organization that stands up for Muslims. It is far more... and very dangerous.

I'll excerpt some points from the article thusly:

They are the Klan without robes, Nazis without the swastika. Yet they’re being treated like a legitimate, viable social organization. These operatives are the consummate duplicitous villains who are intent on destroying us – and the bottom line is that Americans need to wake up.

This dangerous enemy of the United States must be neutralized via revocation of its nonprofit status, its officers charged with treason and jailed. It is for this reason and a host of others that Americans need to become aware of how desperately in need of a housecleaning our Congress is, and mobilize to that end.

CAIR’s Chairman has stated that they plan to take over the world. What more do we need? Let’s stop legitimizing CAIR’s talking heads when they are showcased by America-haters in the press; they’re simply using the tried-and-true tactics of race-baiting and whining victimhood that have worked so well for other American activists.

By the way, don't forget that they have a Canadian chapter, too. The CAIR-Can. Same organization. Make no mistake: these guys are Islamic supremacists who support terrorism. The victimhood act is just a cover, and an effective one, in this age of political correctness run amok and which is paralyzing our ability to maintain national security.

There is no doubt that the CAIR is illegal due to its support for terrorism. Why hasn't it been banned as a terrorist organization?

Lib Leader Dion Rejected By Newfie Premier

Liberal Party "leader" Stephane Dion: Oops! I did it again!

Story here. h/t:

ST. JOHN'S, N.L. -- Federal Liberal Leader St├ęphane Dion's plan to deliver a joint blast at the Harper government with feisty Conservative Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Danny Williams fizzled yesterday.
Oh, no! Poor little Stephanie! Don't cry, Stephanie! There's still a few fish left in the Atlantic! Maybe you'll get to kiss one yet!
I note that Dion's making a big stink over an accusation that the Conservatives somehow cheated on election financing rules by supposedly going a million bucks over an arbitrary (federal level) spending limit by allocating some funds at the local level for strictly local, not federal, purposes. Besides, who is he to complain? He's a Librano, for fecksake! The Party of ADSCAM, we know very well! Bunch of crooks, and he wanted to be their leader! And he is! His own party still hasn't started repaying the missing $40 million they owe the taxpayers, stemming from ADSCAM. Why doesn't he do something about that first, before claiming someone else did something wrong?
What a piss-poor, pitiful little poopheaded peepie-weepie! Is this a prime minister? Suuuuure he is, my sweet, tooty patootie! And Britney Spears is a smart, sane, well-adjusted, mature, grown-up, responsible mother who always makes sure she wears panties when going out!

Firemen Sue City For Sexual Harassment, Religious Offence in Forced 'Pride' Parade Participation

Story here.

"These men were sexually harassed in clear violation of San Diego's sexual harassment code," he said. "Further, the California Constitution's freedom of speech provision prohibits compelled speech. What the firefighters were ordered to do was endorse what goes on at this parade through their participation in it."

Hmm... you know, if this lawsuit fails, then what it means is that, for example, "gay" firefighters can legally be forced to participate, in uniform, in a straight, orthodox-Christian pride parade and endure things they find personally offensive! Or that Muslim firefighters can legally be compelled to participate, in uniform, in an Israeli-and-Judaism parade, a "gay" parade, a pig-farmers' parade, etc. And that atheist progressive liberal leftist revolutionaries can be forced to take part in conservative Christian events in which everyone is expected to be on their best behavior and not look, speak nor act in an un-Christian manner. So this will be interesting!

They reported hearing statements such as, "show me your hose," "you can put out my fire," "you're making me hot," "give me mouth-to-mouth," and "blow my hose." When they refused to respond to the crowd, some in the crowd turned hostile and started shouting, "F--- you firemen" and others began "flipping them off."

"In one regard, forcing these firefighters to participate in this parade has removed the artificial veneer of legitimacy from this event to expose it for what it truly is – a temporary suspension of decency laws in the name of inclusion and diversity," said Brian Rooney, a spokesman for the center. "The debauched and decadent conduct at this parade clearly violates municipal codes that prohibit public nudity and obscenity. The city has played make believe long enough."

I've long said that this special type of parade was proof that politicians have ordered the police to not enforce certain laws, like those against public nudity and lewd, suggestive, provocative behaviors. Seems anything sexually offensive is officially sanctioned for these special folks in this special event. Of course the media says nothing, having been warned to not dare even report that there's some guys with their shmeckels shockingly, gaily, offensively hanging (or pointing) around as they paraded in front of spectators, some of whom would be children brought by irresponsible parents. This in a society that still arrests straight women for simply being topless anywhere except in an officially-sanctioned progressive liberal leftist revolutionary public event!

The event is also offensive to the firefighters on the basis of mocking/insulting their religious faith:

"There is a transvestite group dressed up as nuns that marches in this parade every year in crude mockery of the Catholic faith," said Richard Thompson, president of the center. "No other religion would be treated this way.

Wonder why these parades never dare mock or insult the Muslim faith, which is murderously intolerant of sexual extremism of any kind, particularly homosexuality? Why are "gays" afraid of Muslims but not Christians?

"And for the city of San Diego to sponsor such an event and for its political leaders to endorse such behavior by their presence is outrageous. Two of the firefighters who are Catholic were forced to endorse such mockery of their faith by being forced to participate in the parade."

Oh, but it's ok as long as it's politically correct. And politicians and the state apparatus deem what is and isn't ok for the purpose of the suspension of the law, the Constitution and human rights. Right? Think not? Then prove otherwise, in the face of the above facts! Make a fool of yourself if you wish!

I'm so sick and tired of the progressive liberal leftist revolutionary state apparatus literally taking away or suspending peoples' rights in the name of the elevation, exaltation, canonization, supremacism of a selected few special, preferred, favored groups of folks who do not have the courage to be equal, who do not want to have equal rights and responsiblities, who do not want to be subject to the same laws as everyone else! I'm sick and tired of these groups exerting supremacy over ordinary, regular citizens, making us second-class, taking away our rights, hurting us with reckless, uncaring, inhuman, selfish, hedonisitc impunity...

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

What's This?

What's this, a Muslim-Nazi's anti-tank concept?

Tony from the UK actually answers the question, in the comments:
He is a German Paratrooper (Fallschirmjaeger); the weapon is a (in this case donkey-mounted!) "Panzerfaust"-a disposable, charge launched (not rocket propelled) anti tank weapon.Looking at the background there is a good chance the location is Crete, probably just after the successful, and only, German Airborne invasion "Operation Mercury", launched on 20th May 1941.
Thank you, Tony. I never dreamed that anyone would see the picture and know what's what about it.
This blogging thing's quite the cat's pajamas, eh?
I guess the ass-borne weapon wasn't enough to save the Nazis from defeat. It also suggests that the Nazis were at the time devoid of any remaining ability to produce enough real equipment, including transporting it around the world and were forced to make do, much as the Taliban does today. I think it once again demonstrates the similarities between the Nazis and Islamic fascists... And one of the similarities is that they will both have lost the wars they started!

Monday, August 27, 2007

Sarkozy Warns Iran of Military Force Re Nuke Program

French President Nicolas Sarkozy

Story here.

In his first major foreign policy speech since taking office, President Nicolas Sarkozy said Monday that Iran could be attacked militarily if it did not live up to its international obligations to curb its nuclear program.


Calling the Iranian nuclear crisis "the most serious weighing on the international order today," Sarkozy also reiterated his position that a nuclear-armed Iran would be "unacceptable" to France.

Finally, a French leader who doesn't eat cheese! (For those who don't get it, there's a phrase: "Cheese-eating surrender monkey". The French have long been deserving of this label, but now we see a French leader with "boules" hanging between his legs rather than nothing!)

Hear that, Ahmadinejad and puppetmaster clerics? You can no longer count on France to back you up on whatever you demand!

The French have begun to come to their senses. Granted, they have a long way to go yet, but this is a promising start!

First Muslim US Congressman: His Latest Offence Against America

Story here.

Keith Hakim Mohammed Ellison, America's first Muslim Congressman, is going to be the latest Grand Marshal of the Muslim Day Parade.

So what?

Here's what's so:

Past parades have included accused death squad leader Ashrafuzzaman Khan, unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Siraj Wahhaj, and Dhabah ("Debbie") Almontaser who recently resigned her position as Principal-designate of the Khalil Gibran International Academy (KGIA) children's school for openly defending t-shirts calling for an Intafada in New York.

My-o-my... what a brilliantly astute political choice for Keith! Being the latest in a string of Muslim Grand Marshals, which included some quite unsavory characters.

Imagine if George Bush were to be Grand Marshal of the Christian Day Parade. Imagine the massive coverage the media would devote to that. You can rest assured that Christianophobic statements would spew forth fast and furious from the left. Oh, wait... we don't have a Christian Day Parade, or even a Christian Day. That'd be politically incorrect due to the possibility that "some people might be offended".

Well, the Muslim Day Parade offends many, not only for the characters who've led it and participated in it, but also as it's suddenly being held just two days prior to the anniversary of 9/11.

And the first Muslim US Congressman is the Grand Marshal.

Of course, the MSM won't dare say anything. Can't offend the Muslims by asking, "WTF is up with this?! Is the guy crazy? Doesn't he understand the optics of this? Is he an Islamic fascist himself, a question we must ask, owing to all the associations he has with Islamic extremist groups...?"

The Grand Marshal for the 2006 parade was Siraj Wahhaj, a Brooklyn imam who is known for his fiery speeches, including those that have been considered threatening to the United States. In February of 1995, Wahhaj was named—along with such people as Osama bin Laden and bin Laden mentor, Abdullah Azzam—as a potential co-conspirator to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

Another Grand Marshal of a past parade was Muzzamil Siddiqi, the former President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a mosque umbrella organization that was recently named a co-conspirator to the financing of millions of dollars to Hamas. Siddiqi, like his sidekick Wahhaj, has also verbally threatened the United States,
stating in October of 2000, "America has to learn. If you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of G-d will come."

Another parade stalwart is Ashrafuzzaman Khan, ex-Secretary General of the Islamic Circle of North America, parade sponsor and a top donor to a Pakistani charity that has been providing tens of thousands of dollars to the head of Hamas, Khaled Mashaal. Khan is accused of being a death squad leader for Al-Badr, the Muslim Brotherhood of Pakistan's former paramilitary wing, during the 1971 massacre that led to Bangladesh's independence, and believed to be personally responsible for the cold-blooded murders of seven Bengali teachers at Dhaka University.

By the way, some folks who are offended include Americans Against Hate, who will be protesting this parade. They say the timing of the parade is disrespectful and offensive as it is just two days prior to the 9/11 anniversary. In fact, one wonders why, whereas before 9/11, it had been held on the final Sunday of September, it's now been moved waaaaay, waaaaay up to 9/9?

I guess Keith Hakim Mohammed Ellison may be regarding Americans Against Hate with disdain, at least... if he respected the victims of 9/11, he wouldn't be Grand Marshal of this parade. In fact, he'd condemn the organizers for holding it when they're going to hold it. But this isn't the case.

So draw your own conclusion about America's first Muslim Congressman.

On Afghanistan and the Liberals

Lorne Gunter's column here. h/t:

It's unconscionable that a government would send soldiers into a war zone underequipped for the deadly hazards they would face. It is doubly unconscionable given when the government was sending them for purely political purposes; sacrificing Canadians' lives just so it could claim it was acting tough in the war on terror.

Of course, the government I am referring to is the Liberals...

Hamas Torturing, Murdering Gazans

Yet another big reason why Israel shouldn't have pulled out of the "Gaza Strip", which is rightfully owned under international law in the first place, and which prospered and enjoyed human rights liberties and protections under her control.

Now under the control of the Islamofascistic barbarian terror group Hamas, we're learning of the atrocities now taking place, including astonishingly horrible torture on the orders of Hamas.

Some "resistance". Hamas, as well as Fatah, needs to be resisted, as they're the evil ones, not Israel.

Is this so hard to understand, or does much of the world simply not want to understand and prefer to be pure, unadulterated, prejudicial bigots against the surrounded-by-hateful-barbarians little nation of Israel, who only wants to be left alone in peace? Why would anyone favor bloodthirsty barbarians like Hamas, Fatah and their ilk, who've proven beyond all possible doubt that they aren't interested in peace, but only in genocide, supremacism and imperialism?

With both legs badly bruised from a vicious beating, Shaher Abu Oda can only move around with a painful shuffle. In the town of Beit Hanoun, on Palestine's Gaza strip, however, he is just one of many young men bearing limps, plaster casts, and stitches - the black and blue aftermath of an unprecedented crackdown on dissent by the strip's new rulers, the Islamist group Hamas.

(...)"They threw me in a room," said Mr Abu Oda. "From 11.30 to 3.30 in the morning, they came in every 15 minutes and beat me with sticks, fists, kicks, and a black leather crop."


Now though, human rights groups and ordinary Gazans say Hamas is committing exactly the same crimes as its Fatah predecessors, whose corruption and brutality were one of the main reasons why support for Hamas grew. "We are receiving reports of political detentions every day," said Mahmoud Abu Rahma, of the Gaza City-based Al Mezan Centre for Human Rights. "Hamas is conducting wide sweeps and interrogations to collect information. The interrogations include harsh treatment, and in many cases, torture and beatings."

They're both (Hamas and Fatah) actually the same kind of barbarians. The only difference is that the leader of Fatah pretends to be "moderate" and pretends to want peace with Israel (and now even wears a Western-style business suit!). One is a rabid wolf. The other is a rabid wolf in sheep's clothing.

Don't be fooled by "Mahmoud Abbas" (Abu Mazen is his terrorist name). He does NOT want peace. Even if he did, what can he do? The rest of his people are clear that they won't have any of it, and will resist it. So what the "Palestianians" are really resisting is peace, not "occupation" (not that there's any "occupation" beyond in the minds of Muslims, the media and moonbats).

At least two detainees have died in Hamas custody since July 11. In the most recent case, Waleed Abu Dalfa, 45, was arrested on suspicion of collaborating with Israel. Thirty masked militants from Hamas' armed wing, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, arrested him and his two brothers in the night. Seven days later his dead body was dumped at a Gaza City hospital. The doctor on duty reported "bruises on the hands and the legs, haematomas in the legs and signs of stranglehold on the neck."

Sunday, August 26, 2007

Two Men Demanded Cockpit Access During Flight

On a Westjet flight from Calgary to Winnipeg.

Story here. h/t:

"As they boarded the aircraft, they did ask if they could see the flight deck and were fairly insistent on it, so the captain did take them on the flight deck and showed them a few things," said WestJet spokesperson Gillian Bentley.

"They took their seats and during the course of the flight, the two people involved did approach the flight attendant at the front of the aircraft, asking to go on the flight deck again," Bentley said.

"She told them they could not. They were very insistent," she said.


The men were not armed and did not appear intoxicated, Bentley said, but continued to pressure the flight attendant to let them into the cockpit

No explanation is provided in the article as to why on earth these two men were so insistent to gain access to the cockpit during flight. And, naturally, no mention was made as to what they looked like, if you know what I mean, nor their names. Probably for politically correct purposes.

But draw your own conclusion.

My own impression? Hijacking attempt? Or possibly two possible terrorism/forward recon agents testing to determine the level of security on planes at this point in time, perhaps to determine how difficult it would be to hijack a plane? I call the latter.

Why else? The only other reason I can think of for the bizarre, suspicious, alarming behavior of these two men is insanity. Or possibly a stunt like that infamous one which the infamous Six Imams pulled on another plane not long ago. I bet the CAIR-Can was poised and ready to announce that a proper reaction by counterterrorism authorities was "Islamophobic" or something like that...

What would a progressive liberal leftist revolutionary think when reading this article? Probably nothing at all, if they even bothered to read it; that is, which would require that they actually read newspapers (other than perhaps "Workers' Daily" or "The Moonbat Tribune") in the first place, which would definitely be a Kodak moment were it to be witnessed. They wouldn't have any questions in their heads as to why this incident (and the two men involved) wasn't investigated by RCMP and CSIS, etc...

If authorities haven't conducted an investigation into these two men based on probable cause stemming from their blatantly alarming, suspicious behavior, then the state isn't doing its job to stand on guard for thee. I hope there IS an investigation, albeit one that's apparently quiet and invisible, which I suppose is ok, but we the people need to see that this is being done!

Why Outsourcing Manufacturing Must Stop

Article here.

Corporations have been living in a fantasy world where they can ship jobs overseas but still sell products at home at a good profit. It's brilliant until the effects of that kind of thinking work their way through the system and the people who you need to buy your stuff no longer have the money.


We haven't seen the worst of the China problem yet. Once western countries have lost their production capacity -- and we're nearly there -- the next step will be for China to raise the prices of its goods. We will be reduced to economic colonies that supply raw materials and buy consumer goods, but don't make the value-added stuff ourselves.

The solutions offered so far are of little value. North American politicians like to imagine a future in which all of us have advanced university degrees and participate in the "knowledge economy." Think it's going to happen? What will happen is that the middle-class people who relied on decent manufacturing wages will be pushed into low-paying service jobs. That's already the case for tens of thousands of Canadians. It won't affect people in government and well-paid economists, though, so they don't see the problem.


What we need to do is see beyond our belief that cheaper is better. Instead of outsourcing all their production to China, it's time for North American companies to start supporting their own cities and towns with jobs and reminding consumers that quality has value. The price we are all paying for our addiction to cheap goods is simply too high to sustain.

What do you think? Do you agree with this article? (I do)

Evil, Supremacist Klan Membership Up in Response to PCness, Terrorism

Disturbing story here.

This is disturbing. The dreaded, racially supremacist Ku Klux Klan is unfortunately claiming (plausibly, I'm afraid), increasing membership in Canada.

But it doesn't come as any surprise. We see the rise of all kinds of race-and-ideology-based supremacism/extremism worldwide. We see Islamic fascist terrorists chopping off peoples' heads for simply being different. We see North Korea pursuing a "master race" genocidal program, we see the Chinese Communist Party engaged in a Holocaust against the innocent, tolerant, peaceful, non-threatening Falun Gong. We see the rise of anti-Semitism and Christianophobic discrimination everywhere. We see the German state continuing to enforce Hitler's law against homeschooling, jailing and committing families and children, forcing them to be indoctrinated in whatever the state deems, regardless of their religious and human rights.

Now, is it any surprise that there's a bunch of white people joining together under an evil banner in response to various social problems they see as being unfair and even racist towards them? I do NOT accept the KKK at all, but, because of human nature, people sometimes become like this. We saw it in the Nazis, in the Islamic fascists today, in some of the Aboriginals of Canada, now in some white people.

Extremism and supremacism of all kinds are clearly on the rise in the world today and it is very disturbing. It appears that large portions of humanity haven't learned the lessons of history, of tolerance, of equality, of living together peacefully. We see favoritism and discrimination of all kinds, including of the kind that gets sugarcoated with rhetoric invented by "progressives" to justify their own brand of racial discrimination and favoritism and other kinds of bigotry. The unfortunate, and predictable, end result of this discrimation, however delusionally well-meant or not, is to cause feelings of exclusion and resentment in some people who will react in strong... and unacceptable ways.

None of this is good. Nazis, Communists, skinheads, the Black Panthers, the KKK, the Nation of Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, "Palestinian" terrorist groups, Hezbollah, Aboriginal terrorists, false, self-claimed "Christians" (like KKKers) who go nuts and distort their religion's scripture to justify evildoing (just like the Islamic fascists), the CAIR, homosexual supremacist groups, feminazi groups, you name it. There's all kinds. And it's disgusting. And all dangerous.

I find it particularly offensive and absurd that these folks would have the nerve to claim to be "Christians". What they stand for is NOT Christian. They're just like the Islamic fascists who claim to represent Islam and use certain parts of scripture to justify evildoing. I'll be damned if I just sit idly by and let these cowardly, hooded scumbags get away with hijacking Christianity.

I note that a Klan spokesman in the article claims that the KKK isn't evil or violent anymore and that its intents are merely peaceful and positive. Yeah, right, suuuuure. Bullshit! That sounds about as credible as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's claiming that his nuclear program is about electricity production and not building nuclear weapons. It's about as credible as the Chinese Communist Party claiming that they respect religious peoples. It's about as credible as Hitler's promise not to attack Britain. About as credible as Mahmoud "Abu Mazen" Abbas' claim that he wants peace with Israel and that his goal is a "Palestinian" state. About as credible as the claim that Islam is a peaceful religion. About as credible as Russia's claim that it's building new ICBMs at a Cold War pace and resuming heavy bomber patrols worldwide "because they feel threatened by the West".

Too bad we can't just simply get rid of the KKK. It's not that easy. If we can't get rid of the CAIR, then how on earth will we be able to get rid of the KKK? I say get rid of all extremist/supremacist groups! For if we allow them to grow in size and power, the ultimate result may well be civil war, and we do NOT want this.

But, hey, let's go right the bloody heck ahead and ban all extremist/supremacist groups. Let them go to court if they want.

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Incredible Dhimmi Illogic: Anti-Islamic Fascism Rally Banned; Anti-US Rally OK'd

Story here.

Brussels Mayor Freddy Thielemans, who toasted the death of Pope John Paul II with the call, “Champagne for everyone!” has banned the Stop the Islamicisation of Europe (SIOE) demonstration, planned for September 11, but authorized the anti-American United for Truth (UFT) rally for September 9.

The SIOE protest was to take place in front of the august and new age European parliament buildings.

Mayor Thielemans, biggest appeaser since Neville Chamberlain, is worried that the SIOE demonstration will upset the large immigrant population of Brussels. More than half of the inhabitants of the Brussels region are of foreign origin, many of them from Morocco.

As some would put it, the Muslims might not tolerate native Europeans protesting against their continent becoming “Eurabia”.

Well, I protest the Islamification of the whole fecking world. How dare the Islamic fascists carry out a worldwide, if somewhat discreet (or non-reported by the MSM, more accurately), imperialist campaign to impose their evil ideology on the world, taking away everyone's rights, slaughtering billions of people ultimately, as they surely will justify via Koranic verses? So go ahead and be intolerant of my protest. The stupid fool of a mayor of Brussels himself is intolerant of any protest he deems politically incorrect or potentially offensive to people who want to chop off our heads because we're different and refuse to convert to some evil, intolerant fascist ideology.

Hey, shut up, progressive liberal leftist revolutionaries! How dare you denounce my post? You people are infamous for spewing incessant hatred towards Christianity and Judaism and have successfully manipulated Free world state apparati into taking these innocent, peaceful, harmless peoples' rights away!

If it's okay for progressive liberal leftist revolutionaries to demand the crushing of JudeoChristianity in the world while submitting to the war march of Islamofascist imperialism, then surely it's perfectly ok to oppose that to which they submit.

So I recommend that, notwithstanding the Brussels mayor's denial of the human right to demonstrate in his city, the protest go ahead anyway. And should the mayor order police action to stop this peaceful demonstration, well, I cannot be held responsible for any number of anti-Islamic-fascism demonstrators doing whatever they choose to do... kinda like he fears happening with the anti-American bigots he's allowing to demonstrate in his city. Why not ban the anti-American demonstration? If it's ok to preach hatred against a country, then, hey, why not allow the same kind of demonstration against, say, Iran, Saudi Arabia, "Palestine"? (Oh, wait... "Palestine" isn't a nation, nor was it ever, nor will it ever become one, as long as the Islamic fascists get their way, which they currently apparently are!)

Besides, the mayor is clearly a hater of Christianity, having toasted the Pope's passing. Imagine what would have happened if he had toasted Ayatollah Khomeini's or Yasser Arafat's death... can you say, "fatwa"?

Hillary: More Proof She's Unfit For Command

Stories here, here and here. h/t: Drudge Report

Apparently, she's far too extremely, militantly radical (as well as being a communist) for even many still-there Democrats.

If many of her own people don't want her to be President, then it's clear she has not a snowball's chance in hell of winning in 2008. Democrat-leaning voters will just stay away from the polling stations, just as Republicans stayed away from them in 2006, thanks to a lack of interest in a not-any-longer-conservative agenda apparent in GOP leadership.

Perhaps ordinary folks who happen to be Democrats are beginning to awaken as to the reality of who and what Hillary Rodham Clinton really is and recoil in shock...

Friday, August 24, 2007

Cuffed, Jailed For Opposing School's Imposed Homo-Orthodox Indoctrination

The progressive liberal left continues to impose its fascist ideology on people who dare to exercise their civil rights as guaranteed by their nation's constitution.

Has Adolf Hitler been reincarnated in the form of the progressive liberal leftist state apparatus of the United States of America?

If so, here's one of the many examples of how he's imposing fascist dogmae upon innocent, law-abiding Americans via the progressive liberal leftist state apparatus:

A Massachusetts man handcuffed and hauled to jail after he objected to a public school teaching his kindergarten-age son about homosexuality has gone to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals seeking justice.

The man, his wife and another family are battling what they describe as a court order for segregation, after a
judge ruled if they didn't like the school's advocacy for homosexuality, they could take their children and leave.

They also are arguing that U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf's statement that "as it is difficult to change attitudes … after they have developed, it is reasonable for public schools to attempt to teach understanding and respect for gays and lesbians," actually is unconstitutional.

Incidentally, I've blogged on how Germany today imposes Adolf Hitler's very own, personally-devised-and-imposed, still-existing law against homeschooling, using police-state tactics to force children to go to public school and endure forcible indoctrination/brainwashing on how great and wonderful homosexuality supposedly is. Germany jails homeschooling parents and places their children in psychiatric hospitals for psychiatric evaluation. Wonder if Dr. Mengele's been reincarnated to work those places, deeming people insane for daring to exercise their human right to think for themselves and believe as they wish?

Imagine the massive, eardrum-tearing uproar and outrage if a school attempted to force homosexual and Muslim parents to put their children in school to be forcibly indoctrinated in how wonderful Christianity and Judaism are, that they must be respected completely, never criticized, never spoken ill of, that America is great, Israel is great, and that heterosexuality is great and wonderful and that anyone who dares think otherwise is insane, hateful, racist, bigoted and must be thrown in jail or a nuthouse...

Read on...

You can see that the progressive liberal leftist state apparatus is hellbent on forcing/imposing their dogmatic agenda upon Christians against their civil, human and constitutional rights.

The Progressive Liberal Leftist Political Correctness Enforcement Gestapo is goosestepping up and down the streets, up and down school hallways, sitting behind the judge's bench, wielding the gavel of absolute power... forcing all to submit to their dogmatic fascist agenda or be thrown in jail. What's next, concentration camps?

We are losing more and more of our rights by the day, due to the war the progressive liberal left is waging on normalcy, on human rights...

Adolf Hitler would be proud of the progressive liberal left today.

Which is why we must continue to oppose the progressive liberal left just as King Leonidas of Sparta opposed the self-deemed "god" Xerxes, who demanded that everyone kneel before and sumbit to him or die.

We must never kneel, never submit to the Xerxian progressive liberal left.

Sound extreme? Well, just look at the behavior and rhetoric of the progressive liberal leftist state apparatus.

Will George Bush do anything to stop the illegal, unconstitutional militant fascism of the progressive liberal leftist fascists and restore the supremacy of the United States Constitution, the supremacy of human rights, of individual rights, over the state apparatus? It's his sworn duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America.

Otherwise, the citizens will uphold the Constitution themselves. History is precedent.

The state cannot override the Constitution just because a small, small number of extremists want it to.

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Islam in Action in Iran: Public Flogging

Eighty lashes for drinking and for extramarital sex. In Iran. In the name of Islam.

"Come watch! It's a flogging! Flogging!"

Story here. h/t:
Two police officers hold the legs of 25-year-old Saeed Ghanbari and another his arms to ensure there is no escape from the punishment of 80 lashes handed down by a religious court.

Traffic was brought to a halt in Qazvin, 90 miles west of the capital Tehran, as more than 1,000 men gathered behind barricades to watch the public flogging.

Some took pictures on mobile telephones, others climbed traffic lights for a better vantage point as Ghanbari was marched to the centre of the square under the watch of blue-uniformed guards carrying machine guns.

A four foot long metal bench was taken from a police van and the convicted man was made to lie on it on his stomach, his fawn checked shirt pulled-up to his shoulders to expose his back and waist.
Sharia Law's a bitch, ain't it? And Islamic fascists want to implement it everywhere on earth.
This is what happens to people in Iran. Even a mere accusation of wrongdoing is all it takes to get you whipped, whipped, whipped...
Now, wouldn't it be a good idea to go over there, remove the tyrants from power and liberate these poor people from this kind of thing?
Oh, and by the way, they hang folks in Iran... for being homosexuals. So I hope the "progressives" in the Free World are listening very carefully, now... if they really care.

7th-Graders Interrogated, Arrested, Shackled, Jailed for Bum-Patting

Left-wing, progressive, liberal political correctness is getting extremely, extremely out of hand. Emphasis mine.

At Patton Middle School in McMinnville, Ore., students created something called "slap butt day." On one such day in February, according to the Oregonian (July 22, 2007): "Two boys tore down the hall of Patton Middle School after lunch, swatting the bottoms of girls as they ran – what some kids later said was a common form of greeting. But bottom-slapping is against policy in McMinnville Public Schools. So a teacher's aide sent the gawky seventh-graders to the office, where the vice principal and a police officer stationed at the school soon interrogated them."


"After hours of interviews with students," the Oregonian continues, "the day of the February incident, the officer read the boys their Miranda rights and hauled them off in handcuffs to juvenile jail, where they spent the next five days."


And it gets worse. The seventh-graders were not permitted contact with their parents for 24 hours, they were brought into court in shackles and jail garb, and they were strip-searched four times.

Clearly, their civil rights have been violated. I hope the ACLU helps them. Or maybe the ACLU is too busy going after Christians for being Christian to come to the aid of young people who have their civil rights grossly violated by the state apparatus?

They were falsely charged with a serious felony and were made to feel like sex offenders, but the charge was withdrawn and they were charged with mere "sexual harassment" instead. And the girls whose bums were patted didn't really have a problem with it, they said, and said they were
pressured into complaining.

Oh, my... we see the dark forces of fascist political correctness of the ultra-extreme progressive liberal left are still at work in America. The moonbats are goose-stepping around, everywhere, all the time, looking for opportunities to take away peoples' rights in the name of the supremacistic ideology of political correctness.

If these students were, say, homosexuals or Muslims, then all hell would break loose following reports of their civil rights being so grossly violated. But as the students are just regular, ordinary boys, to hell with them, says the progressive left...

I guess it's bad to treat Gitmo prisoners like dangerous people, but it's appropriate to treat boys, for simply being boys, as if they were Al Qaeda terrorists ...

Student Suspended for Drawing Sketch of Gun

Above: a kitten reacts in shocked disbelief at such incredible moonbattery, in which the drawing below was deemed by progressive liberal leftists to be a potential threat.

WTF?! Now drawing a picture of a gun gets kids in the same kind of trouble in school as they'd be in if they drew a picture of Mohammed? There goes the frickin' neighborhood! The ultra-far left once again demonstrates that nothing's too absurd as far as they're concerned.

Story here. Yet more proof that many who run the educational system are brain-disordered "progressive" liberal moonbats!
A 13-year-old boy has been suspended for three days by an Arizona public school because he sketched a picture that resembled a gun, something school officials said they "absolutely" believed could pose a threat.

A crappy kiddie drawing that vaguely resembles a handgun "absolutely could pose a threat"? In a world where we're not allowed by the left to think that someone who looks and acts like a terrorist on, say, a plane, could possibly pose a threat?

The awesome illogic of the progressive liberal left never stops making my chin hit my chest!

"He was just basically doodling and not thinking a lot about it," she said. "We're not advocates for guns. We don't have guns in our home. We don't promote the use of guns. My son was just basically doodling on a piece of paper."

Imagine that... school officials who probably wear tinfoil hats in the staff room...

"I just can't believe that there wasn't another way to resolve this," Mosteller told the Associated Press. "He's so upset. The school made him feel like he committed a crime. They are doing more damage than good."

The drawing did not show blood or bullets. Nor did it show injuries or target anyone, the Mostellers said. It just resembled a gun.

Expect much more of this insane bullshit if a Democrat, God forbid, becomes President of the United States. Particularly if it's Hillary Clinton. Because progressivism clearly rots one's brain and causes one to do insane things.

Next thing we hear, school officials will be alarmed by a G.I. Joe lunchbox...

Oh, wait... the self-labelled progressives/liberal-left have already demonstrated their bizarre phobia with respect to the Bible, the Ten Commandments, crucifixes, etc... while claiming that, in comparison to those Christian things, Islam, the religion of intolerance, supremacism, imperialism and war (jihad), isn't scary at all...

Clearly, very, very clearly, there's lots of folks on the left who are indubitably insane and really belong in an asylum or something! Yep... there's nutcases walking around, sometimes actually employed in public service positions!

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

The Enemy is Being Invited Into America

Story here. (Always on Watch/Vigilant Freedom/910 Group)

From the August 14-20, 2007 edition of Insight Magazine (subscription required):

Hundreds of Islamic fundamentalist clerics have been allowed to enter the United States to take over mosques in major cities. The clerics come from countries such as Egypt, Jordan and Pakistan and have been influenced by al Qaeda. Many are fresh graduates from Saudi-financed Wahhabi seminaries….

According to the article, hundreds of these imams with radical training are already here and teaching in mosques in our major cities, including locations in New York, New Jersey, Michigan, and the Washington, D.C. area. Several of these imams are graduates of Cairo’s Al Azhar University, which has ties to Al Qaeda, and of various seminaries in Pakistan. Furthermore, despite warnings from various law-enforcement officials and the National Intelligence Estimate, our State Department continues to pursue this import-the-imams agenda.

Freedom's Watch

This came to my attention today. Saw it first while watching CNN (I don't currently get FOX, so...) and receiving the link via email.

See the Freedom's Watch commercials here.

Freedom's Watch is essentially the opposite of George Soros's anti-freedom, defeatist "".

Freedom's Watch's website is here.

Here's one of the commercials as a taste:

See... the left no longer has a monopoly on public communications.

Arctic Resources Belong to Canada: US

Story here. h/t:

OTTAWA -- The United States recognizes Canada's claim to resource rights in the Northwest Passage, the U.S. ambassador to Canada David Wilkins said Wednesday.

At the same time, Wilkins reiterated the U.S. insistence -- stated by President George Bush on Tuesday -- that Canada does not have exclusive shipping or navigational rights through the passage, which the U.S. considers an international waterway.

That does not mean, said Wilkins, that Canada doesn't have sovereignty over both the Arctic archipelago surrounding the Passage and the resources in the sea and beneath it.


Wilkins also said he had no problems if Canada militarized its Arctic islands.

See, "Liberals" and other left-wing political parties? When you don't say nasty, unfair things about our best friend America and her President, they will reward us by being reasonable and backing us up on stuff for which we could use backing. (Saying nice things instead about Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Hu Jintao, Vlad Putin, etc., like you self-labelled "progressives" do, will only get Canada so far!)

Apparently our leaders this week at their summit were discussing substantial issues that really matter. Where's the evidence that they're planning a "North American Union"? If there ever was some secretive shared desire to move towards that sort of thing, perhaps now there isn't any longer, thanks to the widespread, multi-ideological opposition thereto by the people.

I welcome America's reasoned approach to the question of Arctic sovereignty. I have no problem with American vessels sailing through Canadian waters at all, as long as said vessels aren't up to anything illegal and pose no threat whatsoever to my country's security or sovereignty.

And America's recognition of Canada's Arctic sovereignty bolsters our claim with respect to Russia's and Denmark's competing claims.

After all, Canada has been (and still is) using and operating in the Arctic region, certainly within her indisputable borders (which extend quite far up and wide in the North), for as long as she has existed as a sovereign nation. I know this, as my father, as a young man in the Canadian Coast Guard, was once stationed in the North as a radio shack operator as part of a joint US-Canada operation shortly following World War II (I still marvel at the pics he took of ex-WWII Mosquitoes he saw when he was there). Plus, one of my brothers, while in the Canadian Air Force, was once stationed very close to the North Pole at Canadian Forces Base Alert, on Ellesmere Island, which, at least then, was the 'northernmost station in the world'.

So make no mistake: that which is Canadian territory is Canadian territory, period.

Crazy Leftist Judge: Illegals Not Illegal

Above: The Cookie Monster reacts to the Judge's ruling.

WTF story at WND:
Story here.

An appeals court has concluded that just being an illegal alien in the United States doesn't necessarily violate the law, so a judge cannot deny probation and require a jail sentence for a convicted drug dealer who is an illegal alien.

WTF? Does this mean that illegal aliens, even when convicted of felonies, cannot be put in jail for their crimes? Think in terms of precedent and in terms of what the left will say ("The courts said illegals aren't illegal, ergo felonious 'undocumented workers' cannot be punished").

Sound like b.s., what I've just written? Well, with all the insanities going on these days (like with the CAIR still being allowed to be a legal entity, despite actually being an illegal terrorism-oriented entity!), it wouldn't surprise me to find that one day, if the "progressives" get their way, illegal aliens are above the law and citizens are subject to it and to harsh prosecution for straying therefrom.

Astonishing illogic from the ultra-far left. Being lucky to be a "judge" doesn't mean that whatever one deems is correct. Or even a legal deeming. The "Judge" claimed in his ruling:

(...)while an illegal alien is subject to deportation, that person's ongoing presence in the United States is and of itself is not a crime unless that person had been previously deported and regained illegal entry into this country," the ruling, written by Judge Patrick McAnany, said.

Bullshit. This "judge" is apparently either stupid, insane or he's doing the ultra-far-left's bidding for some reason, breaking the law himself and he ought to be fired and tried for treason against the USA. One thing is for sure: he's a moron and has no business being a judge.

The rational, reasonable person already knows that if one has committed a crime, one is guilty after the commission of the crime, not merely at the moment of its commission. That is why, for example, murderers can be tried and sentenced years and years after the commission of the murder.

If one enters the country illegally, then they are not in the country legally. Therefore their presence is illegal. Duh! Duh! Duh!

Hey, "Judge", you know, if I was a judge, just to teach you a lesson in not being a stupid poophead and not being the power-mad self-deemed god of illogic which you clearly are, I'd render a ruling to the effect that lynch mobs for corrupt judges are not illegal because the lynch mobs are upholding the law and defending the United States from her enemies, foreign and domestic. (Of course, this is purely hypothetical and definitely not intended to suggest anything whatsoever to anyone. But the illogical parallel is equivalent!)

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Ah, Not Another Leftist "Consensus"!

Story here. h/t:

First we saw the alleged "consensus" of a supposed 2,500 "scientists" telling us that we are destroying Earth and that we must stop using energy or else a massive climactic catastrophe will ensue and wipe out the human race (but their confidence level, in fine print, that we're at fault, is only 90%, plus I've read that many of the "scientists" never really agreed with the position of the IPCC organization and that their signatures aren't worth much more than the ink with which they're squiggled).

Now we have a "consensus" of 130 people who want the "safe-injection site" in Vancouver to remain in operation. These folks clearly are of an ideological bias themselves and are playing IPCC, claiming they know scientifically that these druggie-shooting centers are good for society, good for the druggies, are actually widely used by the druggies and are going to get druggies off the streets and ultimately reduce drug use in the streets. One must question them, investigate them. Especially because they're getting all political about it now while telling politicians not to get political! Hoo boy!

Hey! I had a great idea! Let's get a whole bunch of conservative-in-ideology scientists to gather together, formulate a claim that they've proven something that the left won't like one bit and announce that they're "in consensus" that this thing must be as they declare! Now, that'll work- if it works for the leftist scientists to carry through such an impressive scheme, then it'll work for anyone! Nothing will be too farfetched!

Expect to see more of these "consensuses" (is that a word?!) by leftist scientists (and later conservative ones) in grand schemes to force governments to forget about important stuff and do what the consensus-mongers want.

Nevertheless, notwithstanding the leftwing group's claims of scientific proof supporting their position of keeping these shoot-yourself-up-high-as-a-kite fun factories in operation (on the taxpayer's dime, mind y'all!), I accuse them of faking and of defaming the government by accusing it of being merely "ideological".

So they say the government is being ideological, not scientific? Well, I ask: How do they know? Have they been made privy to Health Department documents and so on? Have they been granted access to the government's scientific research into the matter? I'd be bloody surprised if they had been! It would be unprecedented, as far as I know! Imagine that: a bunch of self-proclaimed "experts" demanding access to whatever they want in the government. And being granted such access. Heh- I don't think so!

Yes, I'm a "denier". I deny that we need to have places folks can go to to get high. If people are addicted, then they must go to some kind of rehab clinic... to get off the drugs, not to keep doing them, and doing them at taxpayer expense, to boot! So I suggest that the money that goes into the injection sites be reallocated to rehab clinics to get people off the drugs.

Besides, I've heard that at least some of the junkies don't go to the sites as they're frustrated at the bureaucrats there who tell them how much and when they may do. I mean, really, do you think junkies are going to do what they're told, rather than what they want to do? Get real. Junkies are already stuck in the nightmare world of only doing what they feel like doing, no matter what, no matter what anyone else says. And destroying themselves. It would be evil to actually help them to continue to destroy themselves!

So I'll see if I can find this alleged "scientific evidence" of which the consensus-mongers speak so adamantly. Should be interesting. Wonder if they have millions of pages just like the IPCC does, so no one will be able to make any sense of the mountain range of alleged "evidence"?

Still, no "consensus" of self-proclaimed "experts" can compel the government to do or not do anything. It takes a vast, well-organized, well-planned, well-funded conspiracy, such as that created by Maurice Strong (the chief architect of the Kyoto Protocol as well as apparently having a lot to do with the UN-Iraq Oil for Food Scandal, and who has been in voluntary exile in China since his name came up regarding the latter and has recently been in a conspiracy with George Soros and Malcolm Bricklin to dump cheap Chinese crap cars onto the NA market) and Al Gore (you know what's what about that snake oil salesman! The guy makes Benny Hinn look like an amateur!) and is known as "global warming" and "climate change".

Wonder what they'll come up with next? I know! They'll push the human-rights-for-monkeys nonsense!


Here's the "evidence" offered. Not much, is it? Real impressive, eh? Much better than what the Government of Canada can do, eh? Sorry, not impressed. You would call the Government of Canada "ideological", yet this is all you offer? You claim proof and that everyone must agree?

It comes across as quite political and ideological as I read it. Not so much in the way of scientific evidence I can see, other than a few references, amongst which are mainstream media (MSM) reports. MSM. Think about that. Some of his sources are MSM!

I think that Mr. Hwang and his 129 comrades are as ideological as anyone could be. They clearly want there to be "injection sites". I note also that they don't mention that it's a good idea for people to get off drugs rather than keep using them.

As for the 130 "experts", so they "endorse" his commentary. Ok, but the places they work for do not, it is disclaimered.

(...) have endorsed Dr. Hwang’s commentary, and their names are listed below. Institutional affiliations are provided for identification purposes only; no endorsement by any of these institutions is intended or should be inferred.

Well, nothing's wrong with "endorsing" something. I guess "peer-reviewed", an impressive-sounding (but perhaps ultimately meaningless) phrase, means that they "endorse" whatever someone asserts. I doubt that those who sign (just like the IPCC consensus-mongers) actually are tested to determine whether they actually read any evidence or even the commentary. What's stopping them from simply signing, like we do with contracts without reading them at all? Impress your colleagues by acquiescing and "fitting in" and your future will be more financially rewarding. Refuse and, well, we've heard what has been happening to scientists who question the IPCC's claims.

It's a lot like being in politics. If you belong to a political party, it is expected that you endorse its ideology and policy positions, even if you don't agree with it all. No one likes a refusenik, I guess.

It's okay to doubt. Doubt is healthy.