Saturday, December 19, 2009

Insane Ruling: Criminal Conviction For Making Coffee Naked In Own Home!

All he did was make coffee in his kitchen. So he was bareassed. In his own kitchen in his own home. How many of us have done stuff like that in our own homes, bareassed? Plenty of us, at one time or another (hey, we were alone; it was our own home, so so what?).

So what's the big deal? The big deal is that some woman peeped into his window whilst trespassing on his property and saw his winky.

WTF?! She trespassed, a criminal offence. She acted as a peeping tom, a criminal offence. She leered at him, staring slack-jawed at his weewee. Then she called the cops on HIM!

And HE gets arrested and charged!

Imagine what'd have happened had the circumstances been reversed.

Why is it that this guy gets into trouble, but these guys and these guys don't? (Warning: clicking on those links will lead, first, to a serious warning that what you'd view might not be something you want to see, though I doubt that people who'd be leering into Mr. Williamson's house nowadays would necessarily have a problem with the other guys, though the other guys aren't simply bareassed and they sure ain't making coffee and they sure ain't in the privacy of their own homes).

I mean, what Mr. Williamson was doing doesn't even hold a candle to what Bill Clinton does. Hell, I doubt that even Bill Clinton has behaved like those San Francisco extremist freakazoids who are apparently, for some corrupt political reason, above the law and immune to arrest for brazen infractions thereof.

17 comments:

Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Bloviating Zeppelin said...

So HOW is it this guy is in his own home and HE gets arrested? How does THAT come about in Canada?

BZ

Balbulican said...

a) It wasn't in Canada.

b) His room-mate (male) testified that the guy was up at five thirty in the morning, walking around naked with the curtains open, with a hardhat. The roommate told him he could be seen from the street, and that he should put some clothes on.

c) He was first spotted from the street by a woman driving by in a car.

d) Two hours later he was standing naked in his carport, and was seen by a woman accompanying her seven year old child to school (this is the woman Sentinel accuses of being a peeping tom".

e) There is a school bus stop just outside his house.

f) The police who testified said they felt his goal was to be seen.

Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Canadian Sentinel said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mahmood said...

Heh, Balbull's readership consists of the other Bunkhead dude, a sooey and something called a thwap...tonnes of "logic" over there I tells ya.