When will he be widely exposed and forced to resign?
The sheer lunacy of the czars of the Obamacrat Regime is inexplicably being ignored by the Approved Media.
Sheer lunacy like this.
WND has obtained a copy of "Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment," published in 1977 and co-authored by Holdren with Malthusian population alarmist Paul R. Ehrlich and Ehrlich's wife, Ann. As WND reported, the authors argued involuntary birth-control measures, including forced sterilization, may be necessary and morally acceptable under extreme conditions, such as widespread famine brought about by "climate change."Right. Take away womens' right to choose. Guess it's not sarcosanct after all!
To prevent ecological disasters, including "global warming," Holdren argued the U.S. Constitution would permit involuntary abortions, government-imposed sterilizations and laws limiting the number of children as steps justified under the banner of "sustainable well-being."
This czar believes in imposing, coercing, forcing, and denying one the "progressive" movement's supposedly sacred, claimed "right to choose" what to do with their own bodies and babies. Hmm. Wonder what "progressives" think of this? Wonder if they'll practice doublethink yet again and see the "brilliance" of Holdren's musings, even if it means abandoning their preexisting convictions in certain cases?
Of course. Everything's ok as long as it serves the neo-communist agenda.
Holdren also talked about various groups in society (ethnic, etc.) and what he called the differential rates of reproduction between them, and asserted that if certain groups contributed more than others to overpopulation and other bad stuff, then the government could legally treat them differently, and force them to have abortions. Racism and other -isms are therefore apparent in his thinking.
Arguing that "ample authority" exists to regulate population growth, Holdren and the Ehrlichs wrote on page 837 of their 1970s textbook that "under the United States Constitution, effective population-control programs, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society."
In the next sentence, the authors were careful to n,ote that few in the U.S. in the 1970s considered the situation serious enough to justify compulsion.
Still, in the next paragraph, the authors advanced their key point: "To provide a high quality of life for all, there must be fewer people."
Now, doesn't that stuff sound just like Nazi "logic" to you? Recall how the Nazis "reasoned" that there were too many people in Germany, and that a certain group was allegedly solely responsible for all its problems, so that group would have to be eliminated "To provide a high quality of life for all".
You know, speaking of Nazis and population control and abortion, one of the things that the Approved Media will never, never mention is that "Planned Parenthood" founder Margaret Sanger was a Nazi. A racist, too, which makes it no surprise that most of the PP abattoirs are located within ethnic minority neighborhoods.
Isn't it astonishing that the likes of ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN et al steadfastly refuse to demonstrate one iota of curiousity about these "czars", even though they're aware of the many findings by the New Media regarding the frightening extremist mentality of them? The Old, Approved Media reminds one of many of the German People, who brainlessly, immorally, unethically went along with whatever the Nazis told them...