An ex-military officer has raised the stakes in the ongoing dispute over Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, filing a criminal complaint against the "imposter" with the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of Tennessee.Is there any doubt that, if the President was a Republican, like George Bush... that, if folks like, say, Michael Moore, were going around accusing him of being a criminal and worse, the Left and the Big Media would be helping him to do so, making him a celebrity? Of course not, because that actually happened.
In his complaint addressed to Obama via U.S Attorney Russell Dedrick and Assistant U.S. Attorney Edward Schmutzer, Eastern District, Tennessee, Fitzpatrick wrote: "I have observed and extensively recorded invidious attacks by military-political aristocrats against the Constitution for twenty years.
"Now you have broken in and entered the White House by force of contrivance, concealment, conceit, dissembling, and deceit. Posing as an impostor president and commander in chief you have stripped civilian command and control over the military establishment."
He cited the deployment of "U.S. Army active duty combat troops into the small civilian community of Samson, Ala.," and said, "We come now to this reckoning. I accuse you and your military-political criminal assistants of TREASON. I name you and your military criminal associates as traitors. Your criminal ascension manifests a clear and present danger. You fundamentally changed our form of government. The Constitution no longer works.
"I identify you as a foreign born domestic enemy," he wrote.
Eligibility lawyer says Homeland Security shadowing him
A lawyer spearheading the effort in Washington state to bring light to the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility to be president says he was shadowed all day today by officers with the federal Department of Homeland Security, the Snohomish County sheriff's office and the Everitt city police department.
"There's definitely observation," attorney Stephen Pidgeon told WND. "Maybe observation in anticipation of making an arrest."
Pidgeon has been the attorney for Washington state plaintiffs challenging Obama's eligibility to be president under the Constitution's demand for that office to be occupied only by a "natural born" citizen. Dozens of similar cases have been filed around the country since the election and many have been dismissed, often because judges rule the plaintiffs don't have "standing" to bring a complaint.
The Washington state case, however, cites state law that vests in citizens the right to raise questions about an elected official's authority, effectively granting standing to those plaintiffs.Pidgeon told WND today he contacted his personal defense attorney, and also was in contact with the Alliance Defense Fund, a national organization advocating for civil liberties and religious and personal freedoms.
It's time for all good people of America to take it upon themselves to exercise willing suspension of disbelief and open their minds to questions without rejecting them out of hand like good little obedient nobodies. Unfortunately, to my shock, even prominent conservatives are failing to exercise this willing suspension of disbelief and have fallen ominously silent. One must necessarily wonder why, considering that the questions are clearly legitimate, as no proof of eligibility in the form of a proper birth certificate (and absolutely nothing else but precisely a proper, original birth certificate!) proving for once and for all the President's actual place of birth has been provided by Barack Hussein Obama for the satisfaction of those who want to see it for themselves. All Obama has to do is order the State of Hawaii to release it, but he has not. Why? Is he hiding the shocking truth, that he is foreign and a fraudster who, with the aid of many who ought also to be questioned for their involvement, commited the ultimate con?
It appears that what's happening here is a sort of reverse of the Big Lie tactic, in which the state apparatus calls a legitimate and very serious question "garbage" and does whatever it takes to have the questions silenced, leave Americans in the dark as to the fact that the question is being asked, and intimidate, frustrate and discourage those who ask the questions. There's even been an incident of alleged criminal corruption identified within the justice system. To me, there is apparently an agenda of preventing judges from considering the questions (they always consider, for example, whatever sexual extremists and others favored by the Far Left want them to consider, but isn't it astonishing that they dismiss out of hand any question as to the constitutionality and legality of someone's being in office?)...
After all, we know that millions of Americans actually believed, due to the Big Media's supersaturative coverage, that former President Bush was all kinds of horrible things. We saw those delusional fools fall victim to Big Lies, having exercised their willing suspension of disbelief and opened their minds, though they didn't bother to use their brains at all, perhaps because the opening caused them to fall out or dry up or something.
Today we're facing a hopelessly inept, dictatorial new President who, no doubt, has not qualified under the Constitution's requirements for the Presidency, to be President.
Why won't the courts hear the perfectly legitimate complaints? Are they controlled by Obama or by those who control him?
Why won't the Big Media talk about the complaints that a foreign national has taken over the country and is apparently militating against its interests and the interests of its citizens? Is the Big Media controlled by Obama or by those who control him?
Why is it being denied with firmly-shut-closed minds?
After years of all those obvious defamations against President Bush being taken seriously by the Big Media, why is the Big Media suddenly silent on Obama, preferring to kiss his ass? Is it that they're brainwashed into believing that Obama can't possibly do any wrong, couldn't possibly be corrupt, criminal or even foreign-born and ineligible to be President, even though they know full well that proof of eligibility via a proper birth certificate (not a "certificate of live birth" that cannot be considered proof of location of birth)?
I'm very serious. I really do see something as being wrong. Dangerously wrong.
And Obama and the Democrats are moving at a shocking speed with their radically extreme agenda, hitherto hidden but now becoming more and more obvious.