Nutty Lefty Celebrity Spotlight: Tori Amos

That's singer Tori Amos, apparently breastfeeding a pig.

Would you believe that she actually believes she knows more about MidEast politics than does Sarah Palin?

Like, how would she know?  She didn't say how.
Dismissed.

Promises to run as a Republican if Palin runs again.

That someone like this would think about being a Republican is a slap to the faces of Republicans who falsely claim to be conservative.  Now they're so "moderate" that even nutty lefties want to be Republicans, too.

After all, anyone who thinks that Obama is better than Bush (she didn't say why, how, etc... didn't back up her claim)...

So she says Palin "isn't qualified" for the job.  Well, hey, lady, what makes Obama qualified???

Idiot.

Dismissed.  With a laugh.

Get a brain, honey.  Then come back and see me.  But only then, please.  Got important stuff going on... too busy to deal with ditzy-bimbo lunatics.

Vile Tree Ornaments Indicate Obama's Ideology

 

 Above: One of Obama's tree ornaments.

A Communist mass murderer who destroyed Chinese culture, replacing it with ugliness that only pleases the piggishly demonic Communists.

How lovely.  No angels?  No Santas?  No Jesuses, no Wise Men?

Of course, there ain't no wise men in the Obama White House!

A Mao ornament.  A rainbow flag ornament with a tranny's mug and autograph on it.  An ornament depicting Obama's head on Mount Rushmore.

Mass-murderous Communism.  Sexual extremism.  Self-aggrandizement.  Oh, my!


Yep.  Clearly, Obama's a LEFTIST!  All those things are leftist.

Pamela Geller tells us about it.

The facts can only make the reasonable person feel shocked by the Obamas' sanctioning of evil via proxy.

He uses his brand to market the most destructive and cancerous ideas in human history. Obama uses proxies to get the most noxious narrative into the national dialogue, the daily workplace, and the minds of our youth.

I have documented for years the unprecedented hate speech, bigotry, Jew hatred, and anti-American invective on Obama’s Web site, both during the campaign and in its new transitional incarnation of MyBarackObama.com — Organizing for America.

Pamela explains that what's allowed to stay up and what isn't is what demonstrates the ideology of the Obamacrat Reich.  Any wonder now as to why I use the term "Reich" when discussing the Obamacrat government?  It's as if there's a Reich Minister of Propaganda overseeing everything that gets communicated in any way, shape, or form.

I recall that many questions about eligibility and Obama's birth certificate were posted on the so-called "Openness and Transparency" website of Obama's, and they were ALL removed.  Obviously asking The Big Question is verboten and is considered blasphemous to the Reich!

But hate and violence incitement against folks the Hard Left hates... were allowed to stay up, with the excuse that, well, the Obamas didn't write the stuff, so they're "not responsible".  Much like Obama's number one benefactor George Soros makes up illogical gobbleddygook to wrongly deny responsibility and guilt for his collaboration with the Nazis during the Holocaust.

Well, I wonder if there are anti-Muslim and anti-gay comments allowed to stay on any of Obama's sites?  I seriously doubt that (I'd eat my shorts if anyone could provide a link to some old anti-Muslim and/or anti-gay stuff on any of Obama's sites).  Surely such filth would be removed, but not the Judeophobic and anti-Israel hatemongering stuff.

Pamela takes a resolute stand:

This is not moral equivalence. This is sanctioning evil, promoting it under his trillion-dollar brand.

The ornaments were no accident. They were part of a cultural revolution like Mao’s - and you know how that worked out.

It was a very Maoist Christmas, courtesy the Obama White House!

Chinese Pwned Obama, While Harper Wisely 'Kept His Powder Dry'

At Copenhagen, Obama bent over and dropped trou for Chinese Communist Party minions.

As the New York Times reported Sunday in a riveting piece from the back corridor of the conference: "Twice during the day, Mr. Wen sent an underling to represent him at the meetings with Mr. Obama. To make things worse, each time it was a lower level official."

(...)

There's more. The White House set up an evening meeting with the presidents of South Africa and Brazil, as well as the Indian prime minister and the Chinese premier, and when senior staff arrived, as the Times recounted it, they "were startled to find the Chinese premier already meeting with the leaders of the other three countries" - without the president of the United States, the guy who called the meeting in the first place. According to the Times, Obama rushed to the meeting and called out from the doorway: "Mr. Premier are you ready to see me? Are you ready?"

Pleeeeze, pleeeeeze, pleeeeeeze, Mr. Commmmunist, sir... will you talk to meeeee tooooo?  

Also, got any cheese?

Oh, *GROAN*...

God help America!  Steve Urkel is in da White House!

Obama's got NO DIGNITY.

The Leaders of the World don't respect him.  Wonder why?

OBAMA: FAIL.

As for Canada's position, so closely aligned with the U.S., it is hard to know where we go from here. There is no doubt about the need for a level playing field in our integrated North American economy. Perhaps, Stephen Harper and Obama can negotiate a North America accord that can serve as a model, much as the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement served as a model for the World Trade Organization.

That will take leadership, on both sides of the border. As for the chaotic conclusion of Copenhagen, Harper's role there, and Canada's, were modest to say the least. Given the outcome, it might not be a bad thing to have Canada going along with the Open Bar Accord without having our fingerprints on it. At least Harper kept his powder dry.

Because Harper, a conservative, is smart, whereas Obama, a liberal, isn't.

Harper knows what's going on in the world.  Obama's dreaming in Technicolor and couldn't be any more clueless and hapless.

The sooner Obama's removed from the White House, the better off America will be.

And since hardly anyone's supposed to care that Obama doesn't meet the Constitution's Eligibility Requirements for being President, well, should they then also not care that Bush isn't allowed under the Constitution to serve more than two terms?

Who else'd like to see Bush come back and show Barry how it's done?

Just wondering out loud, hypothetically.  It's not that preposterous, once one thinks about it and looks at the facts surrounding how Obama got to be President, regardless of the Constitutional requirements for being eligible for that office.

Oh, and I couldn't help myself.  Here's Barry-O getting pwned again.  Talk about priceless...

And it's amazing that Canadians haven't yet come to realize that Obama makes Stockwell Day, circa 2001, look like a great leader, by comparison.


HT: Orville H.

Obama Notified Of Terrorist Act TWO DAYS AFTER THE FACT

 

Barack Hussein Obama.  

Clueless.  

Unfit for command.

IMPEACH!

WTF?!

Why wouldn't the President of the United States of America know, within minutes, of an attempted terrorist attack on an American airliner?

Bush knew pretty quickly.

Obama only knew two days later, after the fact.

Whazzup the horse's wazzoo with that?

It's incredible.

And raises serious questions as to whether Obama's on top of anything at all, or is just a mostly-clueless, uncaring-about-anything puppet awaiting orders from the Men Behind the Curtain.

I guess it's more important to worry about what FOX News, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, World Net Daily et al are saying about him...  They're the "real enemy" as far as the Obamacrats are concerned, I guess...

Chuck Norris Disappointed In Obama Re Meaning Of Christmas

Chuck Norris isn't pleased with The ObamightyTM.

Can you believe that Obama?  Saying the Wise Men were just a bunch of powerful rich guys who travelled a long way "to see a little baby".


Chuck Norris reminds us...

(The wise men traveled across te Middle East desert "just to see a litle baby"? Let me quote from the gospel according to Matthew 2:11: "And they bowed down and worshiped him" as the Savior of the world.)

I wonder if Obama'd ever dare diminish Mohammed as "some guy".   Oh, no... that'd offend the Muslims, right?  But who cares about offending Christians?  Not Barry-O; he'll do it with arrogant impunity!

Better listen up.  Chuck Norris is speaking to us!  Who are you going to believe, Chuck Norris or some privileged asshole who lives in a white house?

Chuck, um, I mean, Mr. Norris, also says of Obama's misinterpretation of Christmas:

So let me see if I got this straight. Obama's Christmas theology and mission is thus: Jesus is Gandhi. The wise men were non-greedy corporate executives who were on a baby tour. The "most important message" at Christmas is personal potential. And the "most important thing" children can do for their future is read and do math.

God help us.
I'm all for encouraging children's potential, but, when the president's "most important message" at Christmas time is "You too can be president," I've think we've completely lost our way.

Um, unfortunately, like Obama, many have indeed lost their way.  The direction of America and of Human Civilization (known as The Free World), as opposed to the Atheist/Islamist/Neo-Communist Axis of Evil, has also again strayed from The Path.

And Obama claims to be a Christian?  Well, then, what kind of "Christian" is he?  The kind that never goes to Church again, ever since quitting the racist, Judeophobic, anti-American so-called "church" he attended for two whole decades, quitting only for political reasons.  Guess he couldn't find another "church" like his old one, the one pastored by the infamous Jeremiah Wright.  All those many, many churches out there everywhere, and he can't find one, can't just drive around, spot one, and walk in and say, "Hi... may I join the congregation, please?".  Whatever happened to "yes we can"?  Guess he can't, or won't.

Why doesn't Obama just admit that he's not a Christian?  Why not admit he's either agnostic, atheist, or still a Muslim, as he was thusly born?  Why not admit he celebrates Festivus, if applicable?

Maybe Obama just celebrates himself.

No One Leading TSA

What's the matter, Barry-O?   Must you appoint no one other than Hard-Left extremists to absolutely everything in the Administration?

Don't you ever consider anyone who's moderate and not a Hardcore Leftwing Radical?

Many American airline passengers may be surprised to learn the Transportation Security Administration, the agency responsible with securing all modes of transportation in the country, currently has no leader.

Republican lawmakers have placed a "hold" on President Obama's pick to head the TSA over concerns he could undermine safety by unionizing airport security. The nominee is Erroll Southers, assistant chief in charge of security and intelligence at the Los Angeles airport's police department.

"It's very simple. Giving union bosses control over security at our nation's airports is dangerous and will harm our ability to respond to serious threats," said Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C.

"If President Obama's nominee will not commit to putting homeland security above the whims of union bosses, it should give everyone serious concern," DeMint said last month when the conflict developed.

And that's not all with Erroll Southers.  There's more.  He's been censured by the FBI.

Erroll Southers, who was serving as an FBI special agent at the time of the censure, asked a co-worker's husband who worked for the San Diego Police Department to run a background check on his ex-wife's boyfriend.

We've already seen, in Canada, what happens when we allow unions to run things, like health care.  People die needlessly!

After all, unions are run by Hard-Leftwing Extremist Radicals.  And such folks aren't fit to run anything more complex than their own hotdog stand.

C'mon, Obama.  DON'T BE AN EXTREMIST!  Appoint someone MODERATE!

Declare that there will be NO UNIONIZATION OF SECURITY-RELATED FUNCTIONS!

It's a matter of life and death!

It's not a matter of entitlement for the pampered, brainwashed, useful-idiot few!

Just pick someone who won't inspire objections.  Pick a moderate who's willing to declare unequivocally that he will NOT allow the unionization of the TSA.

National security is more important than neo-communist ideology and its imposition.

I predict that Obama's going to dig in and insist on this far-left extremist leading America's transportation security apparatus.

Perhaps it's better, however, for there to be no leader at all than to have a neo-commie as leader.  Let the frontliners take care of stuff by themselves, then.

No wonder Obama's approval ratings continue to steadily worsen.

Any Opposition To The New Housing Is Just Judeophobic

Story here.

ht: Drudge Report

There's nothing wrong with Jews living in any part of Jerusalem, nothing wrong at all.

They have as much of a right to live in "East" Jerusalem as the so-called "Palestinian" Muslim/Arabs have to live in Israel, which they actually do, wherever they live.

The Israelis/Jews are just moving into new apartments in a different part of their capital city of  Jerusalem, which is clearly, indubitably in their own country, not a mythical nation dubbed "Palestine" which has never legally existed at all.

The Muslims just don't want any Jews living near them, so they oppose, out of red-eyed hatred and prejudice, any new Jews in the neighborhood.  Shame on the bigoted "Palestinians"!  They're xenophobic haters, plain and simple!  The "Palestinians" are no better than were the Nazis, who also had a red-hot hate-on for Jews and were able to execute many more than the "Palestinians" have been able to, but only because the Nazis controlled everything.  If the "Palestinians" control enough stuff, then watch out, for they're going to unleash Hell on Earth when they see the plausibility and probable success of doing so.  First they've got to weaken Israel... that's their modus operandi and they're very patient with it.  History is the proof, for those who doubt what I'm saying here.

The "Palestinian" Muslims are no better than stupid homophobes who don't want any "faggots" moving into their neighborhoods.  They're no better than white supremacists who drive new black neighbors out of the neighborhood.  No better at all.  We should be viewing the "Palestinian" Muslims like we view deranged homophobes and white supremacists.

And we must necessarily, if we're righteous folks who care about the difference between right and wrong, moral and immoral, truth and lies, etc., view the Jews/Israelis as defenders of their own existence and own nation, which the Islamic World has been trying to destroy from Day One, first via conventional war and then by "terrorism" and an international hate-propaganda campaign.

Isn't it weird that the nations of the Islamic World, just next door to the area, have banned the Muslims of the area, since 1967, from relocating to those Islamic nations?  Why do they refuse all "Palestinian" refugees?  The Free World is obviously superior to the Islamic World on the refugee file, and so is Israel, for treating the refugees as equals, for giving them equal opportunities, allowing them to become Israeli citizens, run in and win in Israeli elections, etc., etc...  But the "International Community" doesn't seem to be privy to these indubitable facts, or, alternatively, is, but chooses to ignore these facts out of Jew-hatred.

It's all part of a vast conspiracy to destroy Israel.  Oh, yes.  A conspiracy.  Only idiots and fools and haters will disagree with this obvious reality.  It's been revealing itself right before our very eyes for decades!

By the way, what the hell need Israel care about what America thinks of what she does?  What business is it of America's?  Hey, maybe America should be bossing the Chinese around vis-a-vis Taiwan, if it's demanded that America boss Israel around!  How about bossing Russia around vis-a-vis the Georgian land they stole and now occupy?  Why not boss Iran around, rather than just letting the Islamic theocracy carry on with its evil agenda that promises to destroy both Israel and America?  Hmm?

It's ridiculous, in light of the bigger world problems facing us today, to bitch and whine about a few hundred Jews moving around in their own city, in their own country, moving into new apartments.  I mean, who does it harm?  How could it harm anyone?  Really, they're not hurting anyone.  The only people who ever start any harming is the "Palestinians" who do it just because they hate Jews.  Israel is only causing harm in the name of her own self-defence and fight to survive against those who hate Israel beacause she's a Jewish nation, and the only one in the Middle East, and the only one that practices freedom, democracy, the rule of law and human rights!

To hate Israel and impose impossible demands upon her is to hate all of the good things she's about.  To hate Israel is to love tyranny and oppression and evil.

It's time for the "International Community" to awaken.  And to tell the Islamic World, including those who self-label as "Palestinian", to stop hating Jews and Israel and to accept their existence and equality, and to leave them alone... if they, in turn, are to be left alone.

Bottom line:  Leave Israel alone and Israel will leave you alone.  Attack Israel and she'll attack you back.  Fair is fair!

Dem Drunk On Taxpayer Dime

...and get his name... Max Baucus, which is close to Bacchus, the Greek God of Wine and Intoxication!



Hmm.  Looks like, as a commentor on that site said, YouTube seems to have stopped the hitcounter at 176,795.  If they think that'll fool us into thinking that only that number of folks saw the video, well, it's not going to work, as someone over an hour prior to this post pointed out the stoppage of the hitcounter at that number.

MORE...

On his Facebook page, former congressman Mark Foley commented on the video: "This is the senator that hired his staffer and then took her on trips...and divorced his wife....and they had me run out of town."

Obamacrat Response To Terrorists A Return To 9/10 Mentality

 This makes sense to me.

(...) while the United States was on a strong war footing during the Bush Administration, rejecting the criminal paradigm of the previous administration, we were not attacked again.
Coincidentally again, now that we are back to a strategy of denying the Jihadis of warrior status, treating them like criminals who simply need to be found guilty in a court of law, there is an apparent uptick in attempted/successful attacks against Americans on American soil.

 

 

ABOVE: Obama sending the wrong signals to The Enemy, who interprets "diplomacy" as weakness.  The Enemy doesn't respect wimpiness ("niceness", the Obamacrats call it).  The only thing that keeps monsters like the fellows above from attacking us is the knowledge that it will only bring about massive, destructive retaliation, such as that demonstrated by George W. Bush.  Today The Enemy breathes easy and carries out attack after attack with impunity, secure in the knowledge that there won't be any consequences as long as that little pipsqueak Obama is in power.

Evidence that Democrats have returned to the 9/10 mindset of treating Jihadis as nothing more than common criminals, not worthy of the status of warrior, can be found in the Obama administration’s reaction to the Ft. Hood Jihad massacre. The official response has thus far been to refuse to admit that Hassan committed an act of Jihad when he gunned down dozens of Americans.

Evidence that Democrats have returned to the 9/10 mindset of treating Jihadis as nothing more than common criminals, not worthy of the status of warrior, can be found in the Obama administration’s decision to bring the 9/11 Jihadis to NYC to face trial in a common criminal court, rather than a military court.

Evidence that Democrats have returned to the 9/10 mindset of treating Jihadis as nothing more than common criminals, not worthy of the status of warrior, can be found in the Obama administration’s reaction to the failed Christmas Jihad of 2009.

 ABOVE: British PM Chamberlain attempting to appease Hitler.

As History's lesson teaches us, it didn't work.

Because it doesn't work to appease those obeying the Devil's orders.

Check out the expression on Hitler's face.  Looks like he's thinking:  "What a fool!"

Indeed, the warnings that the Obamacrats wouldn't protect America from her enemies... are being proven true... by none other than the Obamacrats themselves.  No denying this.  No argument.  Debate irrelevant.  The reality is clear and sound.   

The Obamacrats are NOT protecting America.   

They're leading America towards catastrophic change.


Skeptical?  Don't be.  See for yourself that The Enemy, as backwards, unimpressive and ragged as they look, is openly declaring war on America, notwithstanding Obama's incessant bowing and apologizing and putting on his Muslim face and all that...

Remember, hardly anyone took Osama bin Laden seriously when he declared war on America.  Hardly anyone dreamed that that Chong-resembling camel-humper dude in the sandals way out there in some Middle Eastern desert could possibly execute such a catastrophic attack on the most powerful country in the world, briefly bringing her to her knees?

It's catastrophic that folks like Obama don't understand the reality of the world.

In the meantime, be prepared for the unexpected and keep your powder dry.

Thwarting The ACLU

So the ACLU hates the Ten Commandments and wants them removed from public view?

Well, too bad for the ACLU.

Because every time the ACLU succeeds in getting a particular Ten Commandments display banned, a bunch of Ten Commandments displays, bigger than the banned one, will be erected on private property, clearly visible to the People.

The ACLU will have to come up with a whole new argument now, since the myth of "separation of church and state" can no longer be cited as a bogus, albeit accepted by leftwing activist judges, reason.

Speaking of separating religion and politics, what the hell is a de-facto religious figure, Obama, doing as the supposed President of the U.S.?  Seriously, Obammunism is a de-facto religion, so it's rather daft to trumpet the myth of "separation of church and state" whilst exalting and worshipping The Messiah Obama as he resides in the White House.  Shouldn't, therefore, the ACLU logically be suing to remove Obama from the White House on the grounds that Obama's  presidency allegedly violates the myth of "separation of church and state"?  Surely, if a former Pope were to become President, don't you think the ACLU would militate against him, for having been elected largely on the basis of what they'd call religious propaganda?

Really, the Ten Commandments only offend the arrogantly immoral Hard Left.

It's also silly for the ACLU to be wasting time and resources in trying to eradicate all symbols of Christianity in America.  After all, hey, Americans do have the freedom of looking the other way if they so choose.  So, really, why bother to go so far to remove things in public that those who prefer to ignore them are ignoring anyway?

Myself, I ignore the "gay" parades; I don't bother to go and see 'em.  But I'm not going to bother to sue to have them banned on any grounds.

Seems that the ACLU thinks that religion is bad and must be kept out of the public realm and forced to remain a private thing, just like sex acts.  Funny how they don't care about the "gay" parades in public, reasoning that only religion is bad, and that sodomy, cunnilingus and fellatio are somehow good things that will somehow enrich and enhance society and human civilization.  Oh, sheesh!

Why, however, does the ACLU target Christianity rather than Islam?  Ever heard of the ACLU suing to ban public Islamic footbaths and Islamic prayer rooms for Muslims on the grounds that they violate the myth of "separation of (religion) and state"?

I guarantee y'all that if there's a monument erected in public somewhere in America that says such things as "Islam is peace" or "Islam is the light" or "Islam is salvation", etc.,  the ACLU will NEVER sue to have such things removed.

Hmm... just a thought here... y'know, how about claiming that the Constitution somehow supports a doctrine of "separation of sex-related stuff and state"?  Then we could sue to ban "gay" parades and other such things that mix sex-related stuff with public places.  After all, we don't see porno stores being permitted to set up kiosks in shopping malls, do we?  Oh, no- gotta keep all that stuff out of view of the public so as to avoid corrupting too many people, especially children, right?

One day the tables will be turned on the ACLU, their tactics stolen and used against them and their ideological masters and comrades.