Monday, February 20, 2006

Terror Camp in Combermere, Ontario and Other Locations in Canada



Continuing my investigation, I've come across information on a specific location inside of Canada of a Jamaat ul Fuqra (JuF) "jamaat", a rural community of Islamists appparently training in terrorism.

The jamaat in question is located in the Madawaska Valley in Combermere, Ontario.

Note that this is just outside of Ottawa!

The information comes from Defense Watch . It's an article posted on Free Republic. It's one bloody hell of a read. Go and read it!

A couple of excerpts for the bigger picture:

The upstate New York town of Hancock serves as the American headquarters for al Fuqra, with at least six major rural communities, jamaats, of two to three hundred members located in Red House, Va., Tulare County, Cal., Commerce, Ga., York, S.C., Dover, Tenn., and Combermere, Canada. Total membership in al Fuqra is believed to be between one and three thousand, with smaller jamaats being reported in over 25 locations throughout the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean. The communities themselves are primarily walled or fenced-in gatherings of trailers or mobile homes. At least three of the compounds are known to have firing ranges, and the compound in the Sierra Nevada Mountains of California has a fully functional airfield.


(...)
Additionally, Al fuqra owns two private security companies in Brooklyn, N.Y. that not only provide armed protection for the jamaats, but also compete for government and private security contracts.

WTF!

Just read it!


Also confirming the location: Weekly Standard

Excerpts (emphasis mine):

Gilani launched his U.S. operations in 1980. Within ten years, Fuqra's communes were billing themselves as havens where Muslim converts--many of them inner-city blacks, sometimes recruited in prison--could build new lives. At least seven such communities are active today, in Hancock, N.Y.; Red House, Va.; Tulare County, Calif.; Commerce, Ga.; York, S.C.; Dover, Tenn.; and Combermere, Canada. While some of these enclaves contain only rudimentary buildings and trailers, the California compound has 300 residents on a 440-acre spread, according to a recent report by a local ABC station. Residents deny any involvement with terror, but Fuqra has a history of getting into trouble with the law.

Over the years, at least a dozen Fuqra members have been convicted of crimes including conspiracy to commit murder, firebombing, gun smuggling, and workers' compensation fraud in the United States or Canada. And Fuqra members are suspects in at least 10 unsolved assassinations and 17 firebombings between 1979 and 1990. Nor is Fuqra's criminal activity all in the past. In the last year alone, a resident of the California compound was charged with first degree murder in the shooting of a sheriff's deputy; another was charged with gun smuggling; the state of California launched an investigation into the fate of more than a million dollars in public funds given to a charter school run by Fuqra leaders; and two residents of the Red House community were convicted of firearms violations, while a third awaits trial.



BREAKING: MSM TO EXPOSE JuF TERROR TRAINING CAMP TONIGHT

Terror training camp to be exposed by MSM tonight at 10 pm EDT, FOX 5 NY

See also CP and The Catskill Chronicle (for liveblogging of the exposure and for screenshots of the camp itself, acquired from FOX 5 NY promos).

This Morning's Top Political Stories from NealeNews

That time again... off to work... no time to blog.

Anyway, Nealenews.com has a wealth of political news stories for y'all this morning. I'll just list the links here which I find worth looking into. Please note: the headlines below are in my own words, not in Neale's. I love making up my own headlines.


PM Stephen Harper, Tories doing very well in polling

Liberal income trust leak probe widening

Emerson to apologize for being stupid, for being Liberal, for attacking Harper, will run as Tory in next election

Venezuela's dangerously anti-American, anti-freedom leader Chavez "warns" US Sec of State Rice, calls her "girl". Racist bastard, ain't he?

US skater wears CCCP jacket, slurs own country


Feel free to write your reactions in the comments. That's why there're comments. Go ahead, discuss it while I'm earning my living... have a good one, y'all!

Muslims Bless Hitler... Shame on Them!

My, oh, my... what an optic. Talk about incitement. Here's a Muslim woman... with that horrible sign. Does she want to start WWIII with this sort of incitement?

Really; that's far, far, far worse than cartoons which simply show Mohammed. The bloodthirsty hypocrites.

It's now time for the good Muslims of the world to do whatever it takes-- including placing themselves in grave danger from their own people-- to stop this sort of hatred and incitement to war before their religion has gone too far, too late. If they don't want Islam to start WWIII, which they absolutely cannot win, and which would lead to the Free World conquering their religion and forcing Islamic nations to "rebuild" according to Western ideals just as Germany and Japan found themselves doing following their ignominious --and fully deserved-- defeat, they must act NOW.

The choice is theirs and theirs alone. The Free World has a completely clear conscience.

H/T: Nealenews.com. Read the whole story here.

Well, I'd say to that incredibly stupid woman in the picture-- GOD BLESS THE BRAVE DANES. GOD BLESS THE FREE WORLD.

Sunday, February 19, 2006

Khadrs Liable for $100 Million for Attacks on US Soldiers

The Al-Qaeda-connected family the Khadrs, of whom some walk freely and openly among us --in Canada; I didn't make this up -- are now on the hook for over $100 million for an attack by Omar Khadr (now in Guantanamo Bay detention facility) on American soldiers which left one dead and the other disabled. The late patriarch of the terrorist clan, Ahmad Sa'id Khadr, is also named in the suit.

Story here, courtesy of FoxNews.

Justice is beginning to be done. But not in Canada, unfortunately. Hope that changes. Justice is, after all, a Canadian value, unless the now-deposed, hated Liberals somehow made it otherwise.

Hope this cripples the terrorists in question. Hell, they deserve worse.

Garth Turner Gets Nice Office Despite Criticism of Cabinet Appointments

This is a good sign.

Tory MP Garth Turner, who openly criticized the government's appointment of turncoat David Emerson and unelected Michael Fortier to Cabinet and was rebuked, nevertheless apparently hasn't been punished.

Yes, this is good. Mr. Harper, despite his very duly questionable first week appointments, doesn't seem to have doled out any punishment other than the voicing of disapproval of the public criticism from within by Mr. Turner. Mr. Turner gets a very nice office on the top floor rather than the "converted-crapper" one in the basement he figured he'd end up with.

I must say that this is a good sign. Dissent, while not impervious to being frowned upon, is still tolerated. Contrast this to Liberal practice in which one can be expelled from caucus for speaking out against one's own party. I remember John Nunziata and Carolyn Parrish very well.

Freedom of expression continues in the Conservative Party, it seems.

Being in government apparently means sometimes doing unpopular things. The measure of whether it is a good government is partly determined by its openness and ability to take criticism.

In the future, either in this term or in the next one if a majority is needed, I'd like to see the Tories bring in laws restricting certain types of appointments. If not banning them outright, in cases like the Emerson and Fortier appointments, there should at least be a requirement to wait first and go to a byelection before being appointed to Cabinet. Although I can understand the political strategy behind the appointments, I would like to see a law addressing this sort of thing to make appointments more democratically palatable to the people. Perhaps there could be exceptions allowed, as in, for example, national emergencies or times of war, when time isn't a luxury, for these kinds of appointments. This would be consistent with the already-existing allowance of a government to temporarily avoid an election in wartime, as an election at such a time could be considered too dangerous in too many ways.

There needs, I believe, to be a better balance between political/governmental needs and the democratic rights of Canadians.

Still, the real, big-deal work has yet to begin. The brand-new government requires a bit of time to get settled in to the everyday nuts and bolts of governing prior to the return of the House on April 3rd. Then it's going to get interesting!

Saddam To Hang in Months?

This sounds good: deposed mass-murdering Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein may be hanged within months!
This couldn't happen a moment too soon. Just hang 'im high!
And I'd recommend taking a look at the nature of the new Iraqi justice system. I like it. It does away, following a single conviction and death sentence, with unnecessary further prosecutions which simply serve to waste everyone's time and give the scumbags more chances to gloat about their evil deeds. Once one is sentenced to die, any further prosecutions and sentences are redundant... why try a dead man, only to sentence him over and over and over to death? Just get it over with. So the other scumbags can be dealt with sooner. After all, the courts have enough to deal with already.
Contrast this to Canada's system, which is horrendously inefficient and only serves, most of the time, to let scumbags off the hook or let them out early just because a bunch of leftists at a table say so. And then they often go on to reoffend.
The left should have compassion and be understanding and be as helpful as possible towards the victims, not towards the evildoers! Are you listening, all you ultra-far-left-wing "Liberals", New "Democrats" and Blocqistes?
All good human beings must send a message to all evil ones: evil will not be tolerated!
And, by the way, Saddam really deserves to have his genitals (if any) eaten by starving rats prior to his execution. And a whole lot more. He should suffer all the suffering he ordered that his own people, the people of Kuwait, the Kurds, and the innocents inside Iran would and did suffer. After all, Islamic penalties are extraordinarily severe, and if there ever was a Muslim who deserved what's prescribed by the Koran for his evil deeds, it's Saddam Hussein. Hell, the Koran is too lenient for monsters like Saddam! If Saddam wants to make a big deal out of being a Muslim, then let him be punished as one!
Next: Osama Bin Laden!

Saturday, February 18, 2006

The Investigation Continues: Jamaat ul Fuqra: The Founder


The investigation into terror group Jamaat ul Fuqra is continuing by The Canadian Sentinel as well as by CP and the Northeast Intelligence Network.
Today I happened to be just browsing casually amongst some links I had discovered via Google yesterday. I thought I'd share a little bit right now.
I must confess that, although a Christian (Catholic) myself, I really don't know the content of the Holy Bible as do some, like Jack Van Impe (for whom I have great respect, as he also understands the nature and magnitude of the threat to the free world posed by terrorism and isn't afraid to express his opinion thereof). I'm not exactly a "practicing" type myself, but I'm nevertheless proud of my Christian heritage, as I have great respect for the religion and can see how Christianity has greatly contributed positively to human civilization over the centuries and has even provided the basis for the Constitution of the United States, which itself is something to be admired. Christianity also is the true original foundation of modern society in terms of its fundamental values. Some will certainly disagree with this statement; let them, for freedom of expression stems from the values of Christianity itself as far as I'm concerned.
But I came upon this and then became suspicious. I'm no expert on the Bible, but the claims made by Imam Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani, the founder of JuF, with respect to Christianity sounded strange and I wonder if they're false; if he is purporting, as a Muslim and not a Christian, to declare what is and isn't true about Jesus and others of the Christian history. Below, I'll excerpt examples from the document, Greeting to Our Christian Brethren, from the website, http://www.holyislamville.org (check it out; there're links all over the place which make me wonder, like the claim that a visitor to the organization was cured of cancer, but the link is "under construction"... sounds a lot like a cult to me).
Gilani refers to Jesus in the following manner:
...Jesus, son of Mary, the second Last Messenger of Islam...
This is the first thing he wrote that raised a troubling red flag for me. He seems to be implying that Jesus was a Muslim! Never have I ever heard of Jesus being a Muslim, so perhaps someone who would know the truth would kindly advise...
...so called followers of Jesus are involved in committing adultery, perversion, drinking, and gambling...
Well, I won't take issue that there are indeed many Christians who are involved in these vices, but, who is he, a Muslim, one of the folks who become (sometimes murderously) extremely angry when it is pointed out that there are a lot of Muslims everywhere who believe in and even practice terrorism? Hell, simply draw a picture or cartoon of Mohammed and some actually want to chop off your head! I would expect if giving Christians a "greeting", he wouldn't be speaking so boldly of these vices lest he upset Christians just as Muslims get upset at any kind of criticism at all, particularly the factual observation that most terrorists are Muslims; not all, but most. Perhaps it's more of a blatant offense than a greeting, which he calls it?
Today priests or devils have legalized what he forbade but they could not save mankind from the evil consequence of sins such as AIDS, mental disease, murders, earthquakes and tornados!
With the exception of his shockingly declaring mental disease a "sin", I don't argue with most of the rest of the statement. But what is completely unacceptable and offensive to all Christians is his using the words "priests or devils" in such a manner as to pejorate priests as devils. If we Christians were to say, "Imams or devils", would we get away with it? Really, semantically, it's obvious he's saying that he'll use either term to describe priests. Unacceptable. This man doesn't sound respectful at all, and this is logically a red flag. For those who disagree with this analysis, think about what would happen if a Christian conservative were to use the phrase "homosexuals or devils". You know there's always hell to pay for such phrases.
The priests of his time were not different from Gene Robinson, Jimmy Swaggart and James Baker. They invented lies and falsehood against the Almighty and Jesus son of Mary; they incorporated heathen mythology and paganism in the
Gospel and made him the “son of god” and invented the fable of dying on the cross for mankind.
I quote Thomas Paine, a great thinker and moralist who arrived at the following conclusion when he used reason to under the Bible. “The Bible and Testament are impositions upon the world… the account of Jesus Christ being the son of God and his dying to appease the wrath of God and of salvation by that strange means are all fabulous inventions dishonorable to the wisdom and power of the Almighty. That the one true religion is . . . the belief of one God.” (Age of Reason, by
Thomas Paine)
You be the judge of that. Myself, I say that this man, a Muslim, a very reasonably suspected leader of a terrorist training camp, has no business speaking to Christians this way; if a Christian spoke in such a manner to him, how the would he feel? Perhaps he'd order one of his minions to behead the individual? The sheer nerve of this pretentious criminal/terrorist organization leader! Quoting some author's opinion doesn't make it acceptable to make the slur himself! He says the crucifiction is a lie. He should stick to his own religion and shut up just as he would expect non-Muslims to shut up about his. This man certainly should be considered a dangerous threat; after all, he founded a criminal/terror organization!
It is ironic to observe that, despite the fact the Jews tried to murder Jesus son of Mary, and the so-called church, raised in his name, have no authentic evidence that (He) ever existed. Our Holy Quran is the only evidence of the existence
of Jesus, his mission and his raising up alive of the Almighty.
Notice that he accused the Jews of trying to murder Jesus? If this isn't an incitement to the Jews and Christians to become enraged from this slur on the Judeo-Christian people, then cartoons of Mohammed are, what, nothing at all? What an anti-Semite as well as an Anti-Christ! I would furthermore say to him given the chance: "Guess what? There's no authentic evidence that Mohammed ever existed". And what's up with his phrase, "so-called church"? How about we start saying "So-called Mosques"? And how about his claim that only the Quran is evidence of Jesus and what he did? I doubt this, even though I didn't read either texts. Still, he's merely preaching Islamic dogma. Did this actually come from the Quran or was it made up by dishonest Islamofascists?
Near the bottom is the line:
Contact the International Quranic Open University branch nearest you:
And three addresses, including the terror training camp in Hancock. The others might ring a bell with watchers of terrorism. If so, don't hesitate to let me know. Links are always welcome.
In closing this post, I would contend that the words he wrote in his so-called "greeting" to Christians are no less offensive than the cartoons of Mohammed which have been leveraged by Islamofascists across the planet to incite their brethren to extreme violence. The whole "greeting" is nothing but an arrogant affront to Christianity. This man is obviously one to watch closely. Talk about "hidden agendas", eh?
This is the founder of Jamaat ul Fuqra. This post was intended to expose some of his attitude towards non-Muslims. I myself find his attitude troubling, especially when combined with the facts unearthed in the investigation by CP and the NIN.

This Cartoon Says It All

Friday, February 17, 2006

Woman Sues Gov't for Murder of Husband by Paroled Murderer on Lam

Read the report.

Now, recall this (emphasis mine):

Abramenko says she was shocked to learn that Fish was a convicted killer on parole who had escaped from a John Howard Society halfway house in Vernon six weeks earlier.

That's right: the killer of her husband was a convicted murderer who escaped custody and was allowed to walk freely among us, completely unrecognized. Is this dangerous or isn't it?

"This man was on the loose, and they didn't even bother to go look for him. [They] didn't even put his picture in the paper."

She called for a public inquiry after her husband's death, but her request was turned down by the federal government. Now she has filed a lawsuit against the RCMP, Corrections Canada and the National Parole Board, as well as the non-profit John Howard Society.

Why did the Liberals turn her down? Were they too busy? Impossible, unless they were doing something secretly of which we would strenuously disapprove. I believe we're going to find out just exactly what they were doing that they thought more important than helping a Canadian citizen who had been badly hurt by someone who was the responsibility of the state and for whom the state took no such responsibility. The Liberal government is responsible for what happened! I hope Mrs. Abramenko wins her lawsuit.

"Caring, compassionate" "Liberals", my ass!

It's proof that "Liberal" justice was a complete and utter failure. The Liberals failed Mr. Abramenko and treated Mrs. Abramenko as if she was nuts. They clearly violated the rights of the Abramenkos, instead favoring a convicted murderer over them, choosing to fugeddaboutit when he went on the lam.

It's time to look forward to a radical overhaul of the Canadian justice system courtesy of those who care: the Conservative government. The overhaul cannot come too soon! Please, Mr. Harper, make haste! It's not too hard; nor should it take long to do it. But let's get to work!

Rights for victims; punishment for victimizers! That's a Canadian value!

Terror Training Camp Inside America




Interim report on Jamaat ul Fuqra: here.

Yes, you read that right. A terror training camp. In America. I did not make this up.

For the whole story, and more to come, go to The Politics of CP

That's one I'm going to have to add to my blognet links list! I'm still reading through what they have on this training camp of Jamaat ul-Fuqra and their US headquarters compound in New York.

The blog working on this investigation, The Politics of CP, is partnered with the Northeast Intelligence Network, thus expanding the investigative ability of citizen investigators to uncover terrorist activity inside America and other nations of the Free World.

Looks like The Canadian Sentinel isn't alone out there after all! Go check out the investigation and the "CP" site. CP's work to date can be studied here.

Of course, we'll have to watch for further developments in the investigation to come.

Question is: is the MSM at all interested? If this is indeed as it seems, I would hope the heavily-financed MSM monoliths would do their job and inform Americans as to the threats right within their borders.

World Net Daily has picked up on this story already as well. Other bloggers are looking into it. Googling this terrorist organization will unearth a wealth of information the MSM would obviously rather ignore.

The Canadian Sentinel will be investigating JuF's activities inside Canada. Yes. In Canada. I didn't make this up. They're here.