Pick on Paulie: Caption This!

(CP Photo/ Frank Gunn)

What's going on above? Why is Prime Minister Paul Martin smiling? And who's the brunette? Like they say, a picture's worth a thousand words. Let's have at it...

A "Battle of Values"? Sure, Bring it On!

So Prime Minister Paul Martin is going around telling the MSM that the coming weeks of the remainder of the federal election campaign will be about a "battle of values" between his Liberals and the Conservatives.

Is Paulie really that stupid?

Paulie,

Most Canadians have seen for themselves what "Liberal" values really are. Crime, corruption, greed, dishonesty, cover-up, starving the military and law enforcement of urgently needed funds, not putting people in jail for possessing handguns despite it being illegal and thus allowing these criminals to run around killing innocents day after day, high taxes, a flatlined economy and fewer high-paying job opportunities due to it, health "care" in which we get the "care" we need only when the bureaucratic authorities deem we shall (normally immediate if we're at death's door but anything less than that, we're forced to suffer painfully, sometimes for months or even years without "care"), racist and sexist civil service hiring practices, cronyism, making Canada a safe haven for terrorists (the Khadrs, for example) and pedophiles (Karla Homolka and Karl Toft, for example, plus an age of consent of fourteen which attracts international pedophiles with an agenda to exploit children), an inquiry into the theft of millions in which the Judge refuses to cancel his appointment of your longtime crony and financial facilitator of your acquisition of Canada Steamship Lines, your very own private, for-profit physician who, coincidentally, made a killing off of the obvious insider trading scandal stemming from the income trust announcement, a complete and utter lack of respect for democracy and for parliament, your campaign of intolerance towards Alberta and towards the western half of the land, your contemptuous disrespect for Quebeckers with AdScam, your continuing imposition of the Liberal doctrine of dependence on the Atlantic Region, etc., etc....

Ok, Paulie. Bring it on! Whatever you can say will mean nothing now, as we've finally become wise to your slimy, scoundrellous scammery.

The Conservatives have been announcing excellent, reasonable, workable policy after policy on a daily basis. You? You merely promise, just to give something to the MSM, to ban handguns which have been banned since even before you even popped out into into the world with that proverbial silver spoon pretentiously protruding from your pompously grimacing mug...

Paulie, you're finished. Read the writing the Liberals are leaving on the stall walls in the little Liberals' room. They're, as I write this, already engaged in a not-so-below-the-radar leadership campaign to replace you. The metaphorical knives are poised and ready for January 24th.

Anyone who would vote Liberal now doesn't have their eyes open and isn't using their brain.

Paul Martin Promised Tsunami Victims $425 Million. Where is the Money?

An email I recently received has prompted me to make this post which I believe an important one. Recall the Tsunami that ravaged some SouthEast Asian nations on Boxing Day 2004. Sri Lanka was one of the affected nations.

This post references the Canada Free Press (CFP) report by Judi McLeod, which is a must-read, as the MSM hasn't bothered with telling us about this crassly broken promise of Paul Martin to poor, suffering tsunami survivors much, if at all. The MSM widely covered the promise, but has so far refused to cover its inexplicable breaking.

Liberal Prime Minister Paul Martin on January 3, 2005 promised $425 million to Sri Lankans in an opportunistic photo-op. The money hasn't reached Sri Lankans, who continue to suffer to this day.

There's a damning video taken at that photo-op which was, as far as I'm aware, never broadcast by the MSM. The CFP provides this video. It might be necessary to download some free DivX software (DivX is a popular digital format these days, available on some newer DVD players and the software download was safe and free of viruses, etc. for my PC) to enable your PC to show the video. This video shows Paul Martin in a very different light than the one in which we see him in the MSM. There's physical intimidation of the Canadian press representatives by Martin's RCMP bodyguards, apparently to prevent the taking of photographs and the asking of questions. And that's just one example of the appalling behavior of Martin and the RCMP. If only more people could know what kind of man Paul Martin really is... I recommend this video to all. It's an eye-opener, I found. Many people, I believe, will have a different opinion of Paul Martin once they view this video.

Important to note: over $40 million of this $425 million was donated by Canadians voluntarily out of their own pockets.

The person who sent me the email that prompted me to do this post said:

I'm kind of upset about this because my own children worked to raise money in their schools to help out.

I don't understand why this is not "news".....MSM News that is?

Wonder what Paul Martin would say to these children?

The name Maurice Strong once again arises. There's an explanation of the significance of Maurice Strong here.

CFP states:

The Canadian $425-million was to have been administered by CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency). Canadian Maurice Strong, an advisor to both UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and Prime Minister Paul Martin is the founder of CIDA.

With the whitewash of the UN Oil-for-Food scandal ongoing, should anyone be surprised that a two-month investigation by the Financial Times has also found that several UN agencies are still refusing to disclose details of their relief expenditure–in spite of earlier pledges of transparency by senior UN officials?

Award-winning Canadian documentary journalist Garth Pritchard has been asking questions for a long time now about whatever happened to the money.

Pritchard, in Sri Lanka at the invitation of DART, says Canadian soldiers watched in disbelief as white SUVs roared up and down the coastal highway with the UN flag and the UN logo in black letters on the doors.

"They were showing their UN presence, but they never stopped. In the end, the local people formed human barricades to stop these vehicles. They were worried that the SUVs were traveling at such a high speed, they posed a danger to children."

One year later, many tsunami victims are still exposed to the elements scrounging for food. " Billions of dollars are out there somewhere, but the people are still with nothing," Pritchard says.

"It seems that the meager food that they had been allotted was to be cut off in December. One man states the obvious: `I live in a tent. I scrounge every day. My family is dead. I can’t say that I’ll be in a house soon, because they keep saying they’re going
to build some housing for us. But they haven’t started yet. And really, we don’t know if they will.’"

Well, Paul Martin? Well, United Nations? Where's all the money the people have given to help those in need? Did you people take it to enrich yourselves?

Has a massive crime been committed?

Paul Martin has something big, big, big to answer for here.

Paul Martin Makes "Slime" Magazine Cover

H/T: http://napoleon.fastpuppy.com

Gomery: A Very Important Question

This CTV report reminds me of a post I did awhile back demanding something of Justice John H. Gomery for the sake of the appearance of impartiality of the Gomery commission of inquiry into AdScam.

The post in question is here. Read it and the links provided therein. There's much eye-opening stuff the MSM hasn't told us.

Recall I demanded Judge Gomery cancel his appointment of Raymond Garneau on the grounds of Garneau's connections to Paul Martin which, if the MSM were to make a big deal out of it, would certainly cause Gomery to make such a cancellation. Still hasn't happened.

The CTV report is about Gomery's discussion of his appointment of former Mulroney "right-hand man" Bernard Roy to be chief counsel to the sponsorship inquiry. Apparently Gomery has always been aware of the questions surrounding this appointment.

Gomery, according to the CTV report, had misgivings about Roy due to his political connections. He chose to appoint Roy so as to ensure a fair and balanced inquiry, apparently.

Speaking of fair and balanced, how is it fair and balanced to appoint one of the folks who aided Paul Martin in his acquisition of CSL at a time when Martin had no financial ability to do so to head up the advisory body overseeing the recommendation phase of the Inquiry?

There is an apparent conflict of interest here. Gomery must know about Garneau's relationship to Martin. Does he or doesn't he? If he does, why keep Garneau? One must ask the question.

Either way, it's necessary to remove Garneau from this appointment to preserve the credibility and integrity of Gomery's commission, if there is any.

Is the Gomery Inquiry a whitewash of Paul Martin's involvement in AdScam?

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLE IN THE NEW YEAR!

CHEERS!

Anarchistic Santa Impersonators

Santarchy!

"No force on earth can stop one hundred Santas!"

What about stopping nine Santas?

Supreme Court of Canada

"The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," -Chief Justice Beverly McLachlin

Who deems what these "unwritten constitutional norms" actually are?

How, in a free and democratic society, can one person or nine people unilaterally declare what is normal?

Why must we necessarily trust these supremely powerful, unelected, unaccountable people? Should we obediently acquiesce to the supreme wisdom of the Prime Minister, the Liberal Party of Canada, the mainstream media, the left, and a certain group of absolutely powerful, unstoppable, Liberal Prime Minister-appointed avowed left-wing social activists?

Do we live in a democracy? Or do we live in a dictatorship?

It's really supposed to be up to the people as to whether they really want their country to be overruled by a system such as there is today.

This is a perfect issue for serious consideration and discussion right now as we're in the midst of a federal election campaign which I personally see as a crossroads of sorts for the future of the Canadian federation itself. What kind of a Canada do you want, if there's going to continue to be a Canada at all?

I see it as a choice between "liberalism" and democracy. As a choice between the Liberal Party's corruption and arrogantly, undemocratically impositive behavior and the freedom of democratic choice of Canadians.

Do tell, what do you think? And why?

H/T: Neale News for the "Santarchy" link.

Martin Claims to Favor Elected Senate?

So Prime Minister Paul Martin claims (in BC, not Ontario, natch) to suddenly see the need for an elected senate?

Sure, and Gilles Duceppe is a federalist, Jack Layton is a capitalist, Stephen Harper is a communist and Arnold Schwarzenegger is a 98-pound girlie man.

Paulie isn't going to fool anyone. He had since 1993 to support an elected senate but didn't. He promised to fix the democratic deficit but made it far worse for the purpose of winning the Liberal leadership and the election.

Could there be a more ridiculous spectacle?

Mon dieu!

Developing Story: Missile Narrowly Missed Airliner in US in Apparent Terror Attack: Proof Here

From the Northeast Intelligence Network:

Following up on an earlier post here on TCS, I provide proof that a terror attempt on a passenger airliner did indeed occur. A missile was fired at an aircraft and narrowly missed. Read the post for the background and visit the NIN.

The NIN reports (emphasis mine):

Radar images, supplied by T. A. Adams show anomalous event on 26 November 2005 involving AA Flight 612 shortly after takeoff. The Northeast Intelligence Network requested a commercial airline pilot to review the images of the radar activity as it related to AA Flight 612 on 26 November 2005. Earlier today, the pilot, currently flying for a well-known national carrier, confirmed that the event was unusual and "could be consistent with the pilot's observations of a missile or rocket eclipsing and missing Flight 612." He added: "Based on what I reviewed, the unidentified object was not a bottle rocket or flare, but was absolutely consistent with some type of missile possibly aimed at the aircraft."

Here I provide the radar images, with the plane and the "unidentified flying object", the missile, circled in red by myself:

Be sure to click on the link "Radar images" in the quoted paragraph above for a more detailed explanation of the radar images below. I'll put it in simple terms here.

In the first picture below, circled by myself in red, you can see the airliner by itself, far away from any other planes.

In the second picture you see that suddenly there are two "planes", actually one is the first plane and the other cannot possibly be a plane, as you can see from the NIN site data and explanation. The second object is definitely a missile, as analysis confirms. No plane can possibly appear out of nowhere so suddenly, unless it was some sort of stealty fighter with the speed of a missile, which is much faster than any known aircraft. It had to have come from land. The pics below may be too small to read the details, so again, go to the NIN radar images to see the times and altitudes and explanations. The supposed explanation of a "flare or bottle rocket (a kind of fireworks)" cannot be accepted as they're incapable of reaching such high altitudes and of travelling fast enough to be the second flying object.

In the third picture you see the objects overlapping. Obviously far too close for comfort, particularly if it was actually two planes and not a plane and a missile, which fortunately missed.

In the final picture in the series below, we see the second plane pulling away from the first. This is what the pilot saw when he reported it in the first place to air control and was reported on one radio news broadcast and then never again reported by the MSM.

Be certain to follow the original post here on TCS and the reports on NIN for the most complete, up-to-date information you can get. Forget about the MSM. It begs the question why they have absolutely no interest in advising the people of this apparent attempt at terrorism inside of the United States. Isn't it important to remind people of the very real continuing threat from terrorism?

See the actual, full-motion shocking radar data for yourself here! (enter the date and time of the missile incident (November 26, 12:49) and select 20-mile range to view the activity)... from World Net Daily

I viewed the real-time activity for myself and have no doubt that there is definitely proof here of a dangerous situation that cannot be dismissed as another plane (no plane appears suddenly out of nowhere like that; only a missile does!) or as fireworks, which cannot reach such altitudes, let alone at such velocity from land.

Also very, very informative is the following World Net Daily report. Look into it! The MSM has completely dropped and forgotten about the ball when it comes to terrorism. I'm watching for new developments on the NIN, WND and other sources. I recommend them to all. They're listed in my sidebar links list.

Bloggers, let's keep an eye on this story. Let's prove we're relevant and the MSM isn't anymore when it comes to news on terrorism.

Canada's Military is Out of Gas. Where's Paul Martin?

Canada's military is out of gas...
while the Librano Grinch and
his great buddy Slick Willy
yuk it up for a fawning press...






Based on the CBC report here

Yep, thanks to the incredible stinginess of Librano Grinch Paul Martin towards the brave people who try to make Canada as safe as possible from attack, these brave warriors cannot do much now since they've no money left for fuel to operate their necessary equipment. Astonishing. Where's Paulie? Where are all the Liberals who wish to represent Canadians following the next election? I'm waiting for them to say, "We've immediately given the Military the necessary emergency funds they need." I'm not holding my breath. Even though they had no problem giving more money to the already brobdingnagianly over-budget Long Gun Registry (which hasn't done feck-all to stop gun-caused murders and hasn't taken guns away from criminals, who are increasingly going around shooting innocent people).

Well, I have a message for Paul Martin:

Hey, Paul Martin of the "Liberals":