Tuesday, July 12, 2011

Google Deletes Millions of CHRISTIAN Websites To Appease Obama, Islamic Supremacists

There's massive discrimination by Google against Christian websites.

It's like a holocaust of Christian websites to please both the Obamacrats and the Islamic supremacists who hatefully require Christian websites to register at a special domain to be "legal".

On the very same day that Google caved into these US governments demands, this report continues, they then announced that they had blacklisted and banned over 11 million websites that had been registered for free through the co.cc subdomain the world over.  Giving as its reason for this largest in history removal of private websites Google asserted that it had the right to pull the plug on sites if they “see a very large fraction of sites on a specific freehost be spammy or low-quality.”     

Co.cc is the Internet country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for Cocos (Keeling) Islands, an Australian territory. It is administered by VeriSign through a subsidiary company eNIC, which promotes it for international registration as “the next .com”; .cc was originally assigned in October 1997 to eNIC Corporation of Seattle WA by the IANA.
Most important to note about the .cc domain, this report points out, is its being preferred by Churches and Christian organizations around the world as “CC” also happens to be an abbreviation for “Christian Church” or “Catholic Church,” especially in Islamic Nations where due to strict laws against Christianity these free co.cc websites were the only way those belonging to this faith were able to communicate with each other.

In this Patriarch Kirill I report as to the “true reason” for the US ordered government shutdown of millions of Christian websites in Islamic Nations it states is the “fundamental shift” undertaken by the Obama regime to support radical Muslim elements instead of the once secular Arab leaders it once did.

Left-wing trolls will automatically ignore the links and attack the main link as somehow non-credible just because it's not conformist/"mainstream" in the eyes of narrow-minded, ignorant, brainwashed leftists and those who pay little attention and don't care about important stuff.  The trolls will attempt sophisticated ridicule a la Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals", too...


Canadian Sentinel said...

Huh. Mike Adamson commented herein and then deleted his comment.

I guess he finally saw the part that 100% of the deleted blogs were Christian, and that they were ALL deleted with maximum prejudice.

The devil is in the details, and leftists seek the details that seem to protect anti-Christian bigots from accusations of discrimination and persecution.

If those blogs were all gay or all Muslim, the leftists wouldn't be so excusing of the offending deletor.

Canadian Sentinel said...

"“CC” also happens to be an abbreviation for “Christian Church” or “Catholic Church,” especially in Islamic Nations where due to strict laws against Christianity these free co.cc websites were the only way those belonging to this faith were able to communicate with each other."

So in Islamic nations, what happened here is that ALL Christians have been robbed their human right to be able to communicate with each other.

The nonsense about "spam" and stuff is horseshit. How the hell is it possible for all the millions of Christian blogs to ALL be "spam" and "poor quality"?

That's something the NAZIS would've said about ALL Jews: They're ALL "poor quality" and needed deletion. Same thing.

Just because it was blogs and not lives doesn't mean it's ok!

MikeAdamson said...

Double huh since I didn't delete anything. I'll post Google's explanation again:

On Google’s Online Security Blog, the company’s Oliver Fisher writes, "Google’s automated malware scanning systems detect sites that distribute malware. To help protect users we recently modified those systems to identify bulk subdomain services which are being abused. In some severe cases our systems may now flag the whole bulk domain."

The domain of .cc is revealed by The Register to have twice as many phishng attacks of other domain extensions, and its subdomain of .co.cc is to blame. On that subdomain, the company hosts 11,383,746 freely registered domains, now all blocked by Google.

On his blog post, Fishes says that owners of a shut-down site should contact their subdomain provider if Google’s SafeBrowsing service shows it to be unsecure. From there, they say, they can use tools available through Google to help remedy the problem.


A plausible explanation IMO. I note that any legitimate sites caught in Google's anti-malware net do have a process available through which they can get off the blacklist. I also noted that end users can use a non-Google browser and non-Google search engine to find and access the sites or they can rely on one of thousands of email lists available to those with an interest in topics like this.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, yes, Mike... you posted a comment and then deleted it. Do you want me to c/p it to refresh your memory?

Even after deletion, I still know what was posted herein, because I recieve the comment via email.

Laudable attempt to spin this hate crime of Google's, by the way.

Wonder if you'd similarly spin it if the sites were all gay or all Muslim, and if it wasn't Google, but News Corp, that got rid of them... LOL

Sorry, the spin isn't going to impress. Fancy gobbleddygook making no sense, you c/p'd. Most folks won't understand, so perhaps you'd like to interpret it directly in plain language, so as to attempt to show that this massive act of discrimination wasn't a bad thing, and that it was unavoidable.

Remember, keep the WHOLE case in mind, and don't just cherry-pick the gobbleddygook that falsely exonerates Google like Delta's gobbleddygook falsely exonerates their hatefulness.

glacierman said...

MA, if Google were to delete all Muslim web-sites in the Western world, would you be ok with that? The radicalized Muslims and most others would be throwing hissy-fits and I'm sure the Human Rights Tribunals would be having brain aneurysms from a decision like this.
How about all the Jewish websites? Do you think there would be some rattling of sabres?
On the bright side of this, it will force the Christians to get out of their basements and off the keyboards, do the face to face with those who are in need of the gospel of Jesus Christ. They can go out and feed the poor, look after the orphan and the widow, heal the sick, cast out the demons and raise the dead, just like the Church is called and commissioned to be doing! Maybe there will be a return to what the values of Kingdom which this world was created for. JMHO

Anonymous said...

Glacierman~You are right on in your last sentence...well through it all for sure.

It is time for Christians to stand up for what is right and I believe it is during these times that we are made to fight and unveil the evil.

I too am curious Mike Adamson was JUST the Christian sites..YOU dont find that weird...really?? If you believe the hog wash you just posted, then you sir, are a fool to an unsurmountable degree.

You must be a liberal...which would explain why you gave that explaination. Geez...good luck convincing anyone of it that has a brain.

MikeAdamson said...

Thanks CS, I would like the c/p back up since my replacement comment left out a couple of points and it might help with your "gobbleddygook" problem. While we're keeping the whole case in mind, we should note that the RT.com article clearly indicates that not all of the affected websites are Christian in nature.

If you're able to repost my first comment then I'll be better able to expand and defend as required.

MikeAdamson said...

I figured I'd browse around in Pakalertpress.com since I'd never heard of it before today. The most popular stories right now are "Six Zionist Companies Own 96% of the World's Media" and "Israel did 9/11, ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD!!"

Is this standard fare for that site?

Canadian Sentinel said...

Have you seen the bizarre crap coming out of the "mainstream" media lately, Mike?

I guess the MSM can't be trusted either, then.

Hell, let's trust no one.

Further, are you calling the site a liar? Or just playing the game of attack the messenger when you can't successfully attack the message? ;)

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, and yesterday, the CNN hosted a post claiming that FB CEO Zuckerberg had been arrested and charged with child molestation.

I guess the CNN can never be trusted again either, then, just like CBS for that big lie told by Dan Rather... LOL

MikeAdamson said...

I wouldn't discount the story based solely on its appearance on a site rife with anti-Semitism but I'd take it a little more seriously if there were more sources than Patriarch Kirill I. There's two sides to every story but if I'm faced with a choice between Google and the Pakalerts of the world then I honestly have to go with the former.

Did you happen to read the comment thread appearing with the story? Probably part of the larger misinformation campaign but still pretty gross.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Well, the MSM can be more subtle. And often is. But not always.

However, we thinking folks KNOW that the MSM is pursuing agendae and deliberately fails to present "two sides" to stories, such as Israel's and Sarah Palin's. The hatred apparent in the "subtle" MSM is actually blatant to those of us who can and do think for ourselves based on observation and pattern detection, not to mention logic, reason, etc...

Perhaps it's a draw between that site and the MSM.

Funny how the MSM doesn't seem to care about a lot of stuff that's important. I say it's because they're mostly leftists who don't want to accept that many important things are in fact important, whilst attaching false, and excessive importance to unimportant stuff...

MikeAdamson said...

All I know is that you've linked a bizarre story on an iffy website. I guess the believers will believe, the trolls will troll and life will continue on its merry way. Have a good one!

MikeAdamson said...

Looks like Mr. Infinity deleted his comment too, which is a pity because I'm more sympathetic to his argument. I wonder if the Patriarch has an opinion on the problem of spontaneous comment deletions? We can only hope that Sorcha Faal will be on that trail next.

∞ ≠ ø said...

Well... I don't know if my comment was removed, sort of doubt it. Sometimes I preview stuff and then forget to hit the publish before I go on. I often have way too many tabs open and have done that before.

A couple of weeks ago I posted a comment on TF's site, with some difficulty on Word Smith's inane registration, and was promptly banned. Hi to TF. Sorry if my registration irked you.

I'll reassemble the comment.

∞ ≠ ø said...

House Resolution 1512:
Commending Google Inc. and other companies for advocating for an uncensored Internet, adhering to free speech principles, and keeping the Internet open for users worldwide.
Sponsor: (idiot)
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy [D-NY4]
Cosponsors: (more idiots)
Frederick Boucher [D-VA9]
Bill Foster [D-IL14]
Bob Inglis [R-SC4]
Sheila Jackson-Lee [D-TX18]
Mary Jo Kilroy [D-OH15]
James Moran [D-VA8]
Peter Welch [D-VT]
David Wu [D-OR1]

A big round of applause for these idiots and a reminder not to let the door hit them in the ass.

“(The domain of .cc is revealed by The Register to have twice as many phishng attacks of other domain extensions, and its subdomain of .co.cc is to blame. On that subdomain, the company hosts 11,383,746 freely registered domains, now all blocked by Google.)”

Ooooooo. Twice as many. Just what the hell does that mean?!
How does that validate the lack of further discrimination in banning ELEVEN MILLION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FORTY SIX websites?

That number Googles my mind!

(Pretty much what I said the first time.)

∞ ≠ ø said...

Perhaps GG has turned to the dark side!

Deletings and maulings,
Gabzilla Oh my

Deletings and maulings,
Gabzilla Oh my!

On a side note I'm afraid I'll have to ask Gabbers if she can account for her whereabouts on the morning of July 6th.

MikeAdamson said...

I'm sure your comment wasn't removed and I'm reasonably confident mine wasn't either. I only bring it up because our host assumed that I had withdrawn mine when we all know that a comment disappearing for no apparent reason is not an unheard of event...unusual though.

Anonymous said...

Infin~Now you KNOW I would NEVER delete your comments!! If fact, they intrigue me and well, can be challenging to say the least. As to my whereabouts...lol. If I told ya, I'd have to kill ya..as the saying goes ;) Yes..as Obammy would say, those reports are soo misleading..HAHA.I can say this, it wasnt my fault!LOL. They were like the conservative press..in my face asking questions..I ..I..didnt know what to say without my telepromter..HAHA.

Had to retaliate of course. Sure I could have walked away ..like how Obammy did during critical talks, but opted for this instead. Oops, spilled the beans on your question..haha. Wait, I can retract that right? lol

∞ ≠ ø said...

So... there it is... not guilty!

Obama is no grizzly. He can't stand on his own legs. In fact he is more of a spray and run sort of fellow.


"("The QPB Encyclopedia explains the "pole" portion of its name comes from the Latin word "pullus," which means "chicken."

That might come from the way skunks like the taste of chicken, the book states.

I also checked the book for the origin of the name "skunk," itself. It explains American Indians called the critter "segankw" or "segonku," an Algonquian term meaning - I just love this - "he who squirts."

Pioneers corrupted the word to its present form of "skunk."

Incidentally, French Canadian trappers called skunks "enfant du diable," which means "child of the devil.")"

Yep Obama is a Polecat. Spraying socialist tripe and then cocking his head back in appreciation of his own foul stench.

Many Americans have lost their sense of smell it would seem. Like those living in the plume of a paper mill they soon fail to realize the toxicity of their environment. Obama's sprayings are attractive only to others like him; most of whom congregate the smelly urban environment.

Much like a weasel, he is ravenous for nest eggs, is wasteful and has no respect for the homes of others. He is a thief and, like all skunks, seems to be fond of peas.

While others have focused on a more off color use of the metaphor,


I feel that the comparison goes much further and is legitimate.

Lastly polecats (or poll cats) like Obama are best dealt with from a distance, lest they put the stink on you. They have only one natural predator, wisdom.
It's time for America to wise up.

balbulican said...

"I guess he finally saw the part that 100% of the deleted blogs were Christian, and that they were ALL deleted with maximum prejudice."

Scenty, I can't find that reference. Can you clarify, please?

Anonymous said...

So, again, you just made that up?

I figured. Just wanted to confirm.


MikeAdamson said...

Since our host is busy perhaps I can clarify. At the expense of putting words in his month, I believe that CS is referring to my deleting my comment because I finally read the part etc. etc. I didn't delete the comment and CS has offered to cut and paste it back up when he has time.

Hope that helps.