TSA Now Putting Hands Down Fliers’ Pants

TSA Now Putting Hands Down Fliers’ Pants

The TSA’s invasive new screening measures include officers literally putting their hands down people’s pants if they are wearing baggy clothing in a shocking new elevation of groping procedures that have stoked a nationwide revolt against privacy-busting airport security measures.  

It's ALREADY gotten worse!

Now they're DIRECTLY TOUCHING your winky or pussy... "to prevent terrorism" (yeah, right, sure, that's plausible!).

They're spanking your monkey for you. "To prevent terrorism".

What kind of SICK JOKE is the OBAMACRACY!

Palin: You know, a little media vetting in 2008 would have gone a long way…

Palin: You know, a little media vetting in 2008 would have gone a long way…

Well, that's more or less what I was saying back in '08... the media just simply refused to look into the guy's background at all!

The media didn't care worth a rat turd who the guy was... they just wanted to pretend that he was some kind of savior... pretend, pretend, pretend...

Now look at what they did!

At least the New Media vetted Obama, and continues to do so.

I vetted him, too.  I gave him the thumbs down because he was so OBVIOUSLY a terrible candidate for President, and he's proven me right.

If You See...

Explosive New Justice Department Black Panther Emails - Big Government

 
Explosive New Justice Department Black Panther Emails

The Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) cannot shake the New Black Panther Party scandal. Every week new revelations emerge about the racism and political favoritism that are corrupting our nation’s top law enforcement agency.

Last week, Judicial Watch released to the public brand new documents from the Obama DOJ that provide further evidence that top political appointees at the DOJ were intimately involved in the decision to dismiss the voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party.

And just like previous documents we’ve uncovered, this new evidence directly contradicts sworn testimony by Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, who testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that no political leadership participated in the decision.

Islamist groups seek ‘parallel society’ in Canada: report

Islamist groups seek ‘parallel society’ in Canada: report

Uh-oh...

The Jewish People vs George Soros

The Jewish People vs George Soros

Ooooh... once again, the truth is told about George Soros re his participation in the Holocaust.

Will he silence this latest truthtelling voice?

Liberals Accept Free Travel From Terrorists To Meet In France

Story here.

MPs Raymonde Folco, Carolyn Bennet, Rob Oliphant, Andrew Telegdi and Tom Wappel travelled to France at the invitation of Mojahedin e Khalq, or MEK, also known as the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran. The trips are detailed in travel reports submitted to the Ethics Commissioner for the years 2008 and 2009.

(...)

Bennett admitted that meeting with the group and accepting free travel from it carries risks. But she also said Canada needs to take a second look at the terror listing.

"Sometimes we need to take risks," Bennett said.

Bennett said she knows the group has a checkered past but that she will take them at their word when they say they want to bring democracy to Iran.

Yeah, sure.  And maybe we'll achieve utopian paradise on Earth called "Gaia", and there'll be rainbow-farting unicorns prancing, Ferrari-logo-horse-style, all over the place as everyone will be happy and gay and the state will take care of everything for them and there'll be no bad people at all...

What we're seeing here is an example of Leftist Mental Disorder.  They just WANT to BELIEVE that bad people are actually good... that you just need to "talk to 'em" and they'll be nice, or that it's our fault that they're bad or something...

Seriously, the terrorists they met with:

When Saddam Hussein was in power, MEK received the majority of its financial support from the Iraqi regime. It also used front organizations, such as the Muslim Iranian Student’s Society, to collect money from expatriate Iranians and others, according to the State Department’s counterterrorism office. Iraq was MEK’s primary benefactor. Iraq provided MEK with bases, weapons, and protection, and MEK harassed Saddam’s Iranian foes. MEK’s attacks on Iran traditionally intensified when relations between Iran and Iraq grew strained. Iraq encouraged or restrained MEK, depending on Baghdad’s interests. 

Stupid.  Stupid.  Stupid.  Palin' 'round with Saddamite terrorists.

In liberals/"progressives'" minds, everything they do is right, even when it'd be wrong for non-liberals to do it. It's all in the spin.

Warm and fuzzy ideological words can fool the lazy-minded into thinking that it's ok to treat hellbent evildoers as if they were innocent, sane and rational, sort of like how a gallon of powerful air freshener, profusely atomized throughout the room, can mask the stink of a fresh pile of soft turds. But, of course, if one bothers to look around rather than just closing their eyes and hearing/smelling the sugarcoaty rhetoric/odor, one will discover that the truth is something really awful and disgusting

Dr. Bennett is the same person who, I recall, cried and held her nose and voted against compensating the sufferers/victims of the Hep-C contamination of the blood supply due to governmental negligence. Rather than doing the right thing and quitting the Liberal Party and voting for what's right, she falsely justified doing something unethical, immoral and mean-spirited, with a few crocodile tears. 

And now here she is again attempting to justify appeasing evildoers. She's not fooling me. This woman would rather do the easy thing than do the right thing. 

Typical leftist-"progressive". They delusionally tell themselves and others that everything's ok as long as they "mean well".  But knowing that one's doing something that's wrong, even while "meaning well" doing that which one knows all along is wrong... it doesn't work that way- it's illogical and doesn't make a wrong ok.

Guilt negates fake "well-meaning".

Also...  "Progressive" propagandists will conveniently accuse me of "defending Iran", which I am NOT doing, but if they make this charge, then they're themselves saying that terrorism is ok.  But the next moment, they'll turn around and fearmonger about imaginary, hypothetical, unseen, unfound "right-wing extremists" allegedly, hypothetically "committing anti-state terrorism" in response to "progressive" governmental policies, as if it requires the suspension of all "right-wing" peoples' rights in order to stop the "terrorism", though, in classic "progressive" double-standard fashion, they'll never accept any sort of violation of the rights of any Islamic supremacist terrorists, nor "progressive" extremist terrorists, let alone all of them.

 
This is yet another reason why we can't afford to have the Iffy Liberals in power in Canada, either as a minority/majority gov't, or in coalition with the NDP and separatist Bloc Quebecois.

Islamic Supremacicts Do Grave Dishonor On Remembrance Day

...burning a poppy, which symbolizes remembrance of the Valorous who fought, often paying the ultimate price, for our freedom.  And who continue to do so as we speak.

A large model of a poppy was burned in protest of the war in Afghanistan and several demonstrators chanted during two minutes of silence in London during Thursday morning Armistice Day ceremonies.

A group that calls itself Muslims Against Crusades chanted, "British soldiers burn in hell," and held signs saying, "Islam will dominate" and, "Our dead are in paradise, your dead are in hell."

The Remembrance Day protest, near Hyde Park, involved 50 members of the group, the Daily Mail newspaper reported.

Another 50 counter-demonstrators were also there. The two groups were separated by police.

Oh?  Muslims against Crusades?  In other words, Muslims think that the Christians shouldn't have finally gotten fed up and defended themselves after four centuries of Islamic attacks, invasions, slaughters, occupations, enslavements, forced conversions, and, of course, the building of Victory Mosques (or conversion of Churches into Mosques) in Muslim-invaded-and-occupied Christian lands?

Those fools are nothing but brainwashed imbeciles and vile, disgusting, filthy, slimy, detestable supremacists.

I wonder how those fools would react if someone burned a big Koran?  If someone drew a picture of Mohammed?  I think we know, so that's why this sort of blasphemy against Freedom and against the Valorous is rather ironic.

Obama Eligibility NOT Vetted: Leaked Internal Congressional Document

 

Thank you, Mr. Obama.

Now turn sideways...

Ok, thank you.  Now here's your orange coveralls.

You'll now be escorted to your new accommodations.

Story here.

The left-wing propagandists are going to experience cranial implosion now, 'cause they've been arguing that there's "no question" as to Obama's Constitutional Eligibility to be President according to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution that requires all to be born on American soil in order to legally be President.

Now there's no question that there has been no vetting whatsoever.

Authored by Jack Maskell, the legislative attorney in the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service, the document was a memorandum written for the subject "Qualifications for the Office of President of the United States and Legal Challenges to the Eligibility of a Candidate"

It can be viewed and downloaded on Scribd.com.

Maskell confirmed to WND that the document is authentic.

(...)

What the CRS admits is that Obama got a pass from Congress and the federal government as a whole on his birth qualifications under Article 2, Section 1. Nobody in Congress or the federal government sought to look for Obama's certified long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate, because no law or regulation required them to look.

After the document was written, nobody in Congress could claim that Congress or anyone else in the federal government had reviewed Obama's birth certificate or determined Obama was eligible to be president. It simply did not happen. 

So...

Is Obama Constitutionally the President... or not?

It matters.  Oh, YES, it DOES!

It's the Constitution, stupid!

Now, Mr. Obama...

More Pisspoor, False, Biased Liberal Media Reporting

This time at the British leftist rag, "The Guardian".

Story here.

Obviously the leftists at The Guardian don't know what they're talking about, and didn't bother to check to see if they had their facts straight.  It's like they just prattled a rumor as if "news".

Blah.  I always considered The Guardian to be leftist.  Now I know it's crap.

Why do we need a Big Media when we've got tons of unpaid civilian bloggers who post the same sort of fake drivel?