Thursday, September 09, 2010

Long Gun Registry Worthless, Wasteful: REAL Cops

...not the "police chiefs", who are really just politicians in police clothing.

A choice excerpt:

Most rank-and-file cops also believe it's useless, according to a recent straw poll of officers, conducted by Edmonton Const. Randy Kuntz.

"Randy Kuntz"?

Conan the Dictator

  The "King".
Well, he's never really been that big on law, ethics, morality...


Schwarzenegger ignores state responsibility to defend Prop 8

Brown and Schwarzenegger consistently have refused to defend the law because they hold personal disagreements with Proposition 8, the 2008 ballot initiative that amended the California constitution to define marriage.

"The California constitution has no 'if you like it' provision," Pacific Justice Institute president Brad Dacus told WND. "We have filed a writ asking the state Supreme Court to order the attorney general and governor to fulfill their job requirements pursuant to the state constitution, which specifically requires the attorney general to defend the laws of California. State statute uses the word 'shall,' not 'may.'" 

SLIPPERY SLOPE...

"The bans on incestuous and polygamous marriages are ancient and deeprooted, and, as the majority suggests, they are supported by strong considerations of social policy," Baxter warned in his dissent. "Our society abhors such relationships, and the notion that our laws could not forever prohibit them seems preposterous. Yet here, the majority overturns, in abrupt fashion, an initiative statute confirming the equally deeprooted assumption that marriage is a union of partners of the opposite sex. The majority does so by relying on its own assessment of contemporary community values, and by inserting in our Constitution an expanded definition of the right to marry that contravenes express statutory law.

"Who can say that, in 10, 15 or 20 years, an activist court might not rely on the majority's analysis to conclude, on the basis of a perceived evolution in community values, that the laws prohibiting polygamous and incestuous marriages were no longer constitutionally justified?" Baxter wrote. That state court decision was overturned by voters a few months later. 

We know that's how it works.

Already, we see, in Canada, after SSM's legalization by the Liberals without democratic legitimacy, a legal push by polygamists to strike down the anti-polygamy laws as "unconstitutional".  No doubt they'll get an activist, far-left judge, too.

Arnold Schwarzenegger?  Soooo NOT my idol now.  I'm better than that now.

Wednesday, September 08, 2010

RIGHTNETWORK

RIGHTNETWORK

Blastoff!

Check 'er out... online & on cable!

Coulter On Koran Burning, GZ Victory Mosque

Bonfire of the Insanities

The reason not to burn Qurans is that it's unkind -- not to jihadists, but to Muslims who mean us no harm. The same goes for building a mosque at ground zero -- in both cases, it's not a question of anyone's "rights," it's just a nasty thing to do.

That's it in a nutshell. Click the link for Ann's usual "nastiness".

If the Ground Zero Hate House is cancelled, then maybe the pastor will cancel the Koran burning.

Not gonna happen, though.  The supremacist Imam Rauf is hellbent on putting up that monument of hate, murder and supremacism and on hurting peoples' feelings.  He's gonna do it come hell or high water, apparently.  And it will be a hateful provocation even worse than a mere Koran burning.

Need I mention that Ground Zero is the place were Islamic supremacists murdered, in cold blood, thousands of innocents... in the name of Islam and Allah?

So those who don't understand why the Mosque's construction is an act of hatred, supremacism, imperialism and sadism, remember where precisely it's being built.  On the edge... the very edge... of sacred ground.  Islam has zero business flaunting itself there because of what its practitioners did.  If Muslims have any human decency, the Mosque will not go up.

Same Difference?


The Koran-Burning Pastor & The Victory Mosque @ Ground Zero Islamic Supremacist:
Morally-equivalent plans?

Sunday, September 05, 2010

Liberal Leader Ignatieff Linked To Nazi Collaborator George Soros

 George Soros.  DTN Profile HERE.

This is very inconvenient for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff, and raises questions about why he's connected to the man spearheading the foreign-originated campaign against Canada's upcoming SUN TV News.


 Canadian Liberal Party Leader Michael Ignatieff

 Uh-oh...

Michael Ignatieff, the great-grandson of the founder of the Russian secret service, the Okhrana, a leading proponent of the abolishment of the modern nation-state. Ignatieff, through his writings and pedigree, has proven himself to be an asset of the currently dominant financier-oligarchy. Ignatieff is also closely connected to financier George Soros through Project Syndicate, a media network which is funded by Soros's Open Society Institute.

Want to see Iggy with Soros in pictures?  Go HERE... and HERE.

How about the CBC, Toronto Star, Globe & Mail, etc... ask Iggy about his connections to the bad man?

Weird FaceBook Site

...for people who like black socks.

Told ya it wuz weird.

All kinds of freaks out there, eh!

Myself, I generally wear white socks.  Unless I'm wearing a suit, of course.

But when the pants come off, so absolutely must the black socks.

Nothing's douchebaggier than a pantsless guy with black socks on, after all.

Weird, however, how women, on the other hand, can get away with wearing nothing but black stockings, isn't it?

Ah, never y'all mind me.  Long weekend silliness.  :)

Critically Important Questions Re "Palestine"

Necessary questions.

Ask yourself them.

Try to answer them.  Better yet, try to find evidence to back up your answers.

You just might find your whole view of the MidEast situation being transformed...  Unless, of course, you already know the truth.

Unwanted Touching

 
...hey, WTF?!  The bad, scary man is... touching me!


Come to think of it, has anyone ever seen any visible evidence that the troops like Obama any more than he likes them, which obviously isn't much at all?

Has anyone ever seen Obama visiting wounded troops in hospitals?

Remember how much Bush cares about the troops, and how much they very obviously love him?

Obama clearly doesn't have that kind of relationship with the troops.  They don't trust him, and for good reason.  The know he just doesn't care whether they live or die.  And neither does the Liberal Media, who no longer makes as much of a news event when US soldiers are killed in action, and certainly they no longer want to turn the homecoming-in-coffins ceremonies into major news events, 'cause to do so would make Obama look bad...

The troops know what's what, and it shows.  They don't say anything publicly, because they're forbidden to speak out politically.

But their body language tells us everything we need to know.