George Soros. DTN Profile HERE.
This is very inconvenient for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff, and raises questions about why he's connected to the man spearheading the foreign-originated campaign against Canada's upcoming SUN TV News.
Canadian Liberal Party Leader Michael Ignatieff
Uh-oh...
Michael Ignatieff, the great-grandson of the founder of the Russian secret service, the Okhrana, a leading proponent of the abolishment of the modern nation-state. Ignatieff, through his writings and pedigree, has proven himself to be an asset of the currently dominant financier-oligarchy. Ignatieff is also closely connected to financier George Soros through Project Syndicate, a media network which is funded by Soros's Open Society Institute.
Want to see Iggy with Soros in pictures? Go HERE... and HERE.
How about the CBC, Toronto Star, Globe & Mail, etc... ask Iggy about his connections to the bad man?
25 comments:
Will you be posting Larouche's identification of Queen Elizabeth's role in the international drug trade?
Too funny.
I googled their names together and discovered that my post is number one...
Funny... never heard of that.
Link?
Anyway, can you point to anything at the links I provided and demonstrate that any of it's untrue?
You can take your pick...she was also behind the Oklahoma bombing.
http://www.google.com/search?q=larouche+elizabeth+drugs
I'll pass on adjudicating Larouche's research though.
Actually I'll give you this problematic statement found at the link you provided. Referring to the Liberal leadership convention won by Dion:
However, what is known, is that these oligarchs were both surprised and dismayed that both their candidates were defeated, and that Canada will not face a choice between the Conservative goon Steven Harper and a boot-licking lackey of the Liberal Imperialist Establishment.
I don't know if Iggy is related to a former Russian intelligence chief...even if he is, so what? My point is that the article you cite is a textbook example of paranoid lunacy which passes for scholarship in some extremist circles.
No direct link to anything actually written by Larouche, I see. No actual evidence that he actually said the Queen was behind a terrorist attack.
I did a quick glance and saw hostile pieces against him, the credibility of which I cannot tell upon a glance.
Nevertheless, just because someone said something weird in the past, it doesn't mean that their facts on something else now are wrong.
Speaking of credibility, anyone linked to George Soros in any way must be viewed as tainted and suspect. And that's Ignatieff.
You're quite good at this stuff, by the way. Anything to do with Soros, yourself, perhaps indirectly? If Ignatieff can be connected...
Seems a lot of weird-looking blogs have a hate-on for LaRouche...
No telling what's true and what's not, on those blogs...
Nevertheless, it's not wrong that Ignatieff is connected to Soros.
The BC Blue link provides a direct link to a piece written by Ignatieff on a Soros-funded site.
And the pix, a further link. It's about global governance, the thing they were both at.
Just putting some pieces of the puzzle out there for people to decide.
Whatever one thinks about the LaRouche thing, one still needs to look for the evidence, and it's found, that there IS a connection.
Besides, what about the Media just believing everything the "Palestinian" spokesmen say to them about what Israel's allegedly done? Like terrorists are credible?
The Media is actually worse than I am, here... Nobody's perfect, but at least I have the sense to disregard anything uttered by "Palestinian" terrorist spokesmen.
That's not surprising, given that Larouche believes the Gulf oil spill was part of the British Empire's continuing attack on America.
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/14806
Her Majesty has been in Larouche's bad books for years. You will find the stuff if you go through his articles. Sometimes cranks will get stories right but Larouche is so far out there that he doesn't deserve the benefit of any doubt.
My final observation is to note that Iggy is in fact descended from the head of the Tsar's Intelligence Agency so that statement is true. I would have thought that anti-bolshevism should be a plus rather than a minus but then the whole matter is beyond silly.
I wouldn't make too much about a connection between Iggy and Soros simply based on an article that he wrote for a Soros funded site...pretty tenuous IMO.
Tenuous, sure, at this point.
But then again, you know, when the Left does this stuff to non-Leftists, it's also tenuous, if not outright false.
So the Left can't complain that the psychops campaign is happening, going the other way.
And Iggy better hope that there's not going to be more exposures, like there was with Bamma, y'know, all the inconvenient stuff that led to the 900 wholly-un-debunked footnotes in "The Manchurian President"...
Seems Iggy's an onion. The more you peel him, the more he smells... And I fear that there actually might be more to him than meets the eye, like it turned out with Comrade Obama.
Too many bad associations and connections... it's politically dangerous. And it's already hurt Obama, most likely permanently. Guess he's the wrong man after all, with all the wrong baggage...
CS put your hand behind you ear and listen "do you hear them on television-the media talking about this story?'
Oh wait! I hear something-they are talking about "dining in the dark' boy this is some news.
Nevertheless, Glenn speaks regularly of SOROS and his plans for the take in the billions of dollars when USA goes bankrupt. Glenn has more guts to talk about SOROS than any of the msm put together.
One request CS, since the twits in the media are afraid of their own shadow, you and other bloggers have to keep reminding the canadians about the liberals connect to SOROS ETC, by revisiting and highlighting this news and whatever else you find.
Don't forget Maurice Strong and his desire to kill 'capitalism'
I'll let you be my ears, Jen, cos mine haven't worked since I was a kid.
Soros has already made billions off of the recession, actually. He profits on other peoples' finacial diasters! What does one expect of a man who, serving the Nazis, happily stole from the Jews before they were forced onto the boxcars, and today feels zero remorse?
He's been convicted of insider trading, admitted that he did it and yet denies guilt, denies it's a crime. Just like aiding and abetting the Nazis in the Holocaust. He has zero sense of right/wrong, good/evil. He's totally amoral.
This man is wholly unethical, immoral, evil.
And Ignatieff is proud to be connected to him! Is this a PM?
Rest assured, efforts are already underway to bring up Soros, Strong and Iggy et al, all over the place...
And just wait til we get SUN TV News. Since Soros hates it and wants to abort it (again with his abortion fetish!), it's gonna be GREAT! :D
I that the Toronto Sun and Ezra Levant have retracted statements made about Soros and his alleged Nazi past...and a full and unreserved apology as well of course. It's good to see that media sources often identified as conservative leaning still retain some level of devotion to the truth and are unafraid to admit their factual errors.
http://www.torontosun.com/comment/2010/09/17/15388356.html
Unlike some
Are you saying that George Soros did NOT help the Nazis steal from condemned Jews during the Holocaust?
Are you saying that he did NOT admit it? And that he said he "doesn't feel any guilt"?
IS this what you're saying?
Keep in mind that he did this in a 60 Minutes interview.
What specific "facts" have been gotten wrong?
Oh, wait... is it that the OPINIONS based on the concrete, observable facts (Soros's own admissions) were silenced?
If it wasn't factual error but opinion instead then Sun Media is pretty gutless in retracting it and apologising, wouldn't you say?
Actually, I agree with you that SUN was gutless to do that. Of course, they don't have Soros's kind of money, power and connections. Even if they're right, Soros still could really hurt them very badly, and probably emerge unscathed himself, despite the other guys being in the right. They can't fight him alone. It takes an army to beat another army.
A wise fighter knows when to make a strategic retreat. The fight can be resumed another day when the fighter has a bigger, more powerful army.
Gutless, yes, but wise, as opposed to foolish. To try to take on Soros directly could just prove suicidal.
Having reread the Sun's statement I'm satisfied that the retraction relates to statements of fact which could not be substantiated rather than opinions advanced using the facts for support. I must then again congratulate the Sun for admitting and correcting its error while wishing that other media sources and bloggers were equally devoted to the truth.
It doesn't take much to satisfy you when things go your way, does it? ;)
And I see you don't deny the fundamental facts of Mr. Soros's involvement with the Nazis during the Holocaust.
That's the important thing here, notwithstanding the retraction/apology.
We know that a retraction/apology cannot change the truth.
Please, if there's any smart and sharp young people out there ready to tackle Russian history- READ!! You will find all of this stuff has happened before!! Check out the tactics and plans of the Bolshevics and you will see Soros and Obama on every page- You won't believe it!! And right now... Vive La France!!
Post a Comment