Liberals are Scary: MSM Member

There we have it: the Liberals are officially scary. The MSM finally says so!

Story here.

Note the final words of MSMer Charles Adler:

Liberals are scary. Over and out.

TCS flashbacks:

Unhinged Moonbat Spotlight: Carolyn Bennett

Unhinged Moonbat Spotlight: Liberal Bill Graham

Any questions?

A Sign for Today's World

Let's have one on every street!

Ahmadinejad's Letter to Bush: Submit to Islam or Else

You can read the whole letter here.

I'll select the final words of the letter:

(...)

Liberalism and Western style democracy have not been able to help realize the ideals of humanity.

Today these two concepts have failed.

Those with insight can already hear the sounds of the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic systems.

We increasingly see that people around the world are flocking towards a main focal point – that is the Almighty God.

Undoubtedly through faith in God and the teachings of the prophets, the people will conquer their problems.

My question for you is: “Do you not want to join them?” Mr President, Whether we like it or not, the world is gravitating towards faith in the Almighty and justice and the will of God will prevail over all things.

Vasalam Ala Man Ataba’al hoda Mahmood Ahmadi-Najad

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

So President Ahmadinejad has declared that the Free World has "not been able to help realize the ideals of humanity"?

-Well, what would an oppressive, tyrannical butcher who has promised to try to wipe out all of the non-Muslims in the world say are the "ideals of humanity"?


Note he said "Those with insight can already hear the sounds of the shattering and fall of the ideology and thoughts of the liberal democratic systems"

-Clearly he's indicating that he and his followers see their jihad against the Free World as a foregone conclusion; a given that it will happen. History will indicate that these very words were a warning that wise people should have heeded and taken with the utmost of seriousness. After all, isn't it according to Islam that Muslims are required to give some kind of warning of impending attack to their opponents?


Finally, Ahmadinejad says "My question for you is: “Do you not want to join them?” Mr President, Whether we like it or not, the world is gravitating towards faith in the Almighty and justice and the will of God will prevail over all things"

-It is obvious that he is giving the Free World, with Mr. Bush as its chief representative, a final chance to surrender to Islam in order to avoid jihad. It is an ultimatum. Join us or die, he's really saying, in line with a Hadith, in which Mohammed tells his followers:

Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them….If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya [the tax on non-Muslims specified in Qur’an 9:29]. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. (Sahih Muslim 4294)

h/t: Jihad Watch


Therefore, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has declared to the Free World:

Submit to Islam or there will be jihad (war) against you.

It is already predetermined via Islam that Ahmadinejad will proceed to wage jihad against the Free World. Islam requires him to do this. He has already said so many times. But who's listening? We must take his promises seriously.

Wanted AQ Jihadist a McGill Grad

Story here.

Excerpts:

Last Sunday evening, (CFP) discovered a photograph identified as "Ciro Vitolo"--a dead ringer for El Shukrijumah--in a framed picture with the graduating engineering Class of 1998 on display in the hallway of the third floor in McMaster University’s John Hodgin’s engineering building.

(...)

There’s a $5-million bounty on the head of El Shukrijumah, who is being sought by the FBI and CIA in connection with a plot to detonate a dirty bomb--a conventional explosive laced with radioactive material. El Shukrijumah has been described as "the next Mohammad Atta" by American authorities.

(...)

"They lived in the basement apartment and he had lots of male, Middle-Eastern visitors, who never seemed to stay very long when they visited him. He would come and find me if I happened to be working in the basement area and ask me, politely to leave. When I asked him why, he told me he had friends coming over and had something to talk over with them privately. If I had to take my time with something I was working on, they wouldn’t talk while I was there."

Whooo... maybe you know one of those jihad guys... better check out pictures of wanted terrorists just to be safe... after all, they're everywhere... nothing's stopping them, really, from setting up and operating sleeper cells...

Let's keep our eyes open and stand on guard for thee.

More Muslim Savagery: The Torture-Execution of Atwar Bahjat

Update: it turns out that the video of the execution was of another victim, not Ms. Bahjat. See here for more, plus linkage to the video and stills. Ms. Bahjat was indeed murdered, however.


Story here.

Excerpts (caution: horribly inhuman and evil acts depicted):

A large man dressed in military fatigues, boots and cap approaches from behind and covers her mouth with his left hand. In his right hand, he clutches a large knife with a black handle and an 8in blade. He proceeds to cut her throat from the middle, slicing from side to side.

Her cries — “Ah, ah, ah” — can be heard above the “Allahu akbar” (God is greatest) intoned by the holder of the mobile phone.

Even then, there is no quick release for Bahjat. Her executioner suddenly stands up, his job only half done. A second man in a dark T-shirt and camouflage trousers places his right khaki boot on her abdomen and pushes down hard eight times, forcing a rush of blood from her wounds as she moves her head from right to left.

Only now does the executioner return to finish the task. He hacks off her head and drops it to the ground, then picks it up again and perches it on her bare chest so that it faces the film-maker in a grotesque parody of one of her pieces to camera.

Read it all. Definitely read it all. The excerpts are only part of the story.

She was singled out partly for being a woman. Two men who were with her were shot and quickly killed. But the Muslim savages gave her particularly evil treatment, in keeping with the dictates of the Koran, which regards women as equivalent to property or livestock.

The fact that she was one of Iraq's top journalists who had reported on the terrorist attacks within Iraq and denounced them is the other part of why she was executed by the inhuman Muslim butchers.

Michelle Malkin reports as well.

Jihad Watch weighs in:

Anyone who thinks that God's greatness is established by such acts of barbaric cruelty must be resisted at all costs. Yet those who hold to the same ideology, and who think that God Himself will grant Paradise to those who "kill and are killed" for Him (Qur'an 9:111), are streaming into Western countries, by the design and forethought of Western leaders, with no attempt whatsoever made to determine whether or not they approve of such slaughters and the ideology that motivates them.

Consider this another warning sign. Remember that no one had come to the aid of Ms. Bahjat, despite the horror of the situation. One must ask oneself: if Muslims stand by and do absolutely nothing as such inhuman atrocities are committed on human beings, does that mean that they accept such inhumanity? Is inhumanity an intrinsic part of Islam? Is it really a religion of tolerance and peace? The more we observe and the more we learn, the more the answer is "no".

All the more reason to keep fighting jihad, for jihadists are never going to stop trying to wipe out the non-Islamic world and Islamify it. It is, after all, the order of the Koran. The Koran forbids Muslims from being friends with Christians and Jews. The Koran requires all able-bodied Muslims to practice jihad against non-Muslims.

Now, the left in the Free World is hellbent on offending and assaulting Christianity and Judaism. Given that undeniable fact, how is it they want the Free World to bend over backward for Islamaists who infiltrate the Free World? Why does the left want to protect Muslims while trying to wipe out Christianity and Judaism via the ACLU, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and so on? Why the incessant war-like attacks on JudeoChristianity while inviting the jihadists to come on in and do as they please under the guise of "multiculturalism"?

What does the left think about, for example, the violence against women that is prevalent in the Islamic world? Do they look away? Do they not care? Do they think it's ok to treat women like dirt as long as it's in the name of Islam?

The left certainly has a lot of explaining to do! Does the left approve of what these Muslims did to this Muslim woman, or do they wish to continue with their moral relativity insanity? Imagine what the left would do if this evil had been done to a gay person within the Free World. Big difference. The left picks and chooses who they wish to protect or support. The left discriminates! The left is dangerous!

Fight and defeat jihad!

Unhinged Moonbat Spotlight: Liberal Bill Graham

Interim Liberal Party leader Bill Graham, shown above-left in the House of Commons and above-right on his free time, recently got unhinged at a Liberal Party gathering...

Story here.

Seems the Liberals still haven't learned from their recent, ignominious defeat in the last election. They're still attacking the Conservatives just as they used to when they were in power themselves. Still making the same stupid, unbacked-up attacks. All in the face of the Conservatives' rising popularity amongst Canadians, including in Quebec, where they went from dead last place in the single digits to being the most popular federal party in the province. Not to mention that they're also far ahead of their nearest rival, the Libs, federally, in polling.

He calls the Conservatives' policies "destructive" without explaining which ones he means, nor making his case for his unhinged claim of "destructiveness". What a blast of smelly hot air!

He claims that the Conservatives are "ripping apart the fabric of Canadian society". Is he serious?! What kind of drugs is he on? Oh, wait... no drugs, necessarily: he's a leftist, and being a leftist means that one has a mental disorder, hitherto undiscovered by the psyciatric profession (hopefully someday there'll be a treatment for this debilitating, embarrassing affliction).

What does he mean, specifically? He doesn't explain. He doesn't make any case.

Besides, the Liberals were tearing apart the country and its social fabric like there was no tomorrow. That's their legacy. It's widely accepted that if they were reelected, Canada would've had a national unity crisis of a magnitude never before experienced... just because of the Liberals' horrible administration, lying, cheating, playing favorites, stealing... and they ripped into the social fabric by undemocratically forcing SSM upon the country, having lied that it's written in the Charter that it had to be done. All to curry favor with their dwindling support base of left-wing radicals and corrupt corporate bigwigs, among other undesirables who could care less about other Canadians or even about Canada.

He says the Conservatives have a "short-sighted and mean-spirited agenda". Again, what on earth does he mean? What gave him the idea? Does he even have ideas, or does he just brainlessly parrot the leftist line?

The Liberals are the short-sighted ones. They have demonstrated that they cannot see past themselves, their families, friends and radical supporters. They never showed any caring for Canadians as a whole. They're mean-spirited, as well. Rememeber when they refused to compensate many Hep-C sufferers who were infected by the state... just because they were infected prior to a cutoff date arbitrarily deemed by the Liberal regime? They never showed and still don't show any caring for victims of crime, instead favoring the criminals. They figure, so what if innocents have been hurt or killed... they have to tend to the "needs" and "civil rights" of the criminals, treating them like kings and queens, letting them go early or letting them off scot-free. What about the needs and rights of those who were harmed by these Liberal-favored people? Of course, there's also the health care system from which they ripped funding. The waiting lines grew and grew under their regime, meaning increased numbers and durations of suffering and even deaths... just from being forced to wait for "care" which has been rationed, communist-style, exactly as in North Korea and Cuba (the only other countries with purely socialistic medical care systems).

So he doesn't like the budget? Canadians do, as seen in this poll.

Clearly, the Liberals are offside and out of touch, particularly their interim leader, Bill Graham.

He's delusional. Believing it'll be no problem to win again. Believing that Canadians will forget what crooks and left-wing demagogues the Liberals really are.

Telling himself that the Conservatives are frightening ogres when clearly the reality shows that they're already proving themselves as a good govenment!

Hey, Billy, about that monster in your closet...

...with profuse apologies to the monkey for using him as a stand-in for that unhinged-liberal human. The poor simian really doesn't deserve to be insulted in this way. But the resemblance is uncanny, isn't it?

Zarqawi Blooper Video

On the heels of this comes a blooper video of jihadist Al-Zarqawi.

You'll see that he has no idea how to operate the machine gun and requires assistance from a fellow jihadist. And you'll see that he's wearing sneakers! Sneakers-- how American! How infidel! I wonder what the Koran has to say about wearing infidel footwear?

Hell, he looks like a rapper making a music video...

What a dork. A murderer, but a pathetic man. Yes. Zarqawi is a pathetic man, all talk but he can't walk the walk. A coward-- he has other people go blow themselves up while he hides safely away. What a wimp!

This is why the Free World will defeat jihad. Jihad leaders are cream puffs!

And as for Usama Bin Laden: he's too chicken to show his face on video anymore. Cluck-cluck, Usama, yo' mama! Cluck-cluck, peck-peck... boom!

So the fearsome, murdering terrorists are actually, on the inside, quite limp-wristed and yellow. We'll kick sand in their faces and they'll cry and turn into dust...

We're coming for you, O jihadists!

You're finished, O jihaidsts! You're all going to hell!

I noticed that Kate at SmallDeadAnimals.com posted on the video as well. Too bad her comments function is temporarily out of order. Y'all can discuss it here if you wish.

Unhinged Moonbat Spotlight: Carolyn Bennett

Story/editorial here. h/t: NealeNews.com

Calling the Conservative approach "spiteful," Bennett added: "There's actually no plan for early learning and child-care spaces. So it's a good job they're putting more money for prisons in the budget, because we're going to need them if we don't get this early childhood right."

I totally agree with the editorial. Carolyn Bennett, like some kind of communist, seems to be implying that the state would be better for children than their own families.

Astonishing. More proof that leftism is a mental disorder, rendering sufferers incapable of logic and of understanding the reality of the world, not to mention being susceptible to indoctrination from the left.

Dr. Bennett (yes, she's actually a doctor, believe it or not!) has pissed me off. I was raised by my Mom while my Dad went to work to support the family. Thanks to this fact, I learned to read by age five. I did well in school, earning a university degree in business with honors and a diploma in information technology with a 93% average. All despite being deaf since age five. I have no doubt at all that if I had not had the benefit of "early childhood" learning at home by my own caring, loving, education-oriented family, I might have turned out differently. But left-wing imbeciles like Carolyn Bennett don't understand this. They obviously worship the state as the best answer to everything. Idiots.

And Carolyn Bennett suggests I belong in prison just because I wasn't dumped into a daycare center for the first six years of my life? What's the matter with this "Liberal"?

I've also noticed that Dr. Bennett has been behaving in a rather furiously unhinged manner in the House of Commons during Question Period, right from the first day of the new Conservative government in the House.

Hey, Bennett, I would suggest you shut your big, idiotic yap before you earn yourself a free trip to the loonie bin!

In a perfect world, we'd have centers for the detention of unhinged moonbats as a deterrent against such behavior and against saying the most ludicrous, appalling things possible. After all, leftism is a mental disorder, isn't it?

Besides, no "Liberal" can criticize the Conservatives' plan for choice in childcare, which allows parents to choose either to raise the kids at home or place them into "daycare" or whatever, as the "Liberals", despite having thirteen years of opportunity to implement their incessantly-promised childcare system, including year after year of ballooning budget surpluses, never even got started. In thirteen years. Last election's promise? Who knows what would've become of it had they inexplicably won? If they had won, Canada would have been thrust into a national unity crisis the likes of which it hadn't previously experienced... all due to the "Liberals".

Thank goodness Canadians came to their senses just in the nick of time to avert a national crisis! Thank goodness that the rampant social reengineering experiment that was the "Liberal" regime is over!

Gomery Report Was Whitewash

Story here.

h/t: Maz2

"Gomery's mandate was to avoid questions that would weigh on criminal proceedings."

-Judge Fraser Martin

In other words, in the opinion of Maz2, who alerted me to this report in the comments, it was a "fix". It means that the questions allowed by the Liberal government of the day were limited to findings that were of no bearing in terms of criminal responsibility. Obviously, someone was trying to fix the whole thing to protect...

But of course! Too bad the MSM didn't understand that. We know there was criminality involved. And there were Liberal fingerprints found all over the crime scene.

And don't forget about the fact that longtime Paul Martin loyalist and financial facilitator Raymond Garneau was in charge of the "recommendations" report of the Inquiry.

I'm still astonished that hardly anyone else seems to have a problem or even is aware of the Raymond Garneau issue! It's a clear conflict of interest!

Those bloody Librano$!

Liberals Threaten to Block Budget in Senate, Defeat Gov't

Story here.

Hahaha! How about their laughable chutzpah!

The Tories are in majority territory in polling, plus they're now on top in vote-rich Quebec, poised to take as many as a third of the seats in the province. They can only go way up in seat numbers now. No way on earth will Canadians vote against the government right now!

Okay, I'll humor the Libranos: you think the people, as stupid and fickle as you even now think they are, are going to forget the criminality and horrible administration of your old dictatorship? Okay, fine. Then force an election. We Conservatives couldn't get luckier under such a situation!

Go ahead, Libranos... make our day!

Hahahaaha! Those silly old Libranos!