Story here.
Clearly, considering the horrendousness of this Islamofascistic hate crime, these monsters got a mere slap on the wrist. I mean, shit, in the Islamic World, they actually hang homosexuals for simply being like that.
The prison sentences are a start, but the Islamic World still has an extraordinarily long way to go in order to become acceptable and non-threatening to non-Muslims and Muslim minority groups everywhere.
Unfortunately, it appears that there's going to be more Muslim-caused anti-Christian murderous violence in the coming days, as it tends to happen a lot during the Christmas season.
You know, many Muslims living in the Free World are taking for granted the fact that they are protected from such hate-inspired violence in the Free World. And many still plot to Islamize the Free World anyway. And this is unacceptable. We need to tell them so. If they are not thankful for being free while living in the Free World... Well, the Islamic World might make them happier, then.
Wednesday, December 05, 2007
Conservatives Unhurt By Schreiber B.S.: Poll
Poor Liberals. They just can't make a dent, can they? Like I've said, their attempt to milk the Schreiber matter for what it might've been worth isn't working. Seems also that they now want to fuggeddaboutit, from what was said at the conclusion of yesterday's questioning of that shady character.
It may now appear that the Liberals are realizing that fingers will actually be pointed as much (or more) at their own people and own former regime re. Schreiber as at Mulroney and a few others.
Seems the Liberals are still shit out of luck. Their corner break's over. Time to return to the middle of the ring to get pounded again!
It may now appear that the Liberals are realizing that fingers will actually be pointed as much (or more) at their own people and own former regime re. Schreiber as at Mulroney and a few others.
Seems the Liberals are still shit out of luck. Their corner break's over. Time to return to the middle of the ring to get pounded again!
British Senior Ordered To Take Farts Outside
Story here. h/t: NationalNewswatch.com
Oh, heh-heh-heh! Just click the link and read it. It's quite amusing!
Heh- them British. Funny people! He can join the other chaps outside smoking their fags.
Oh, heh-heh-heh! Just click the link and read it. It's quite amusing!
Mr Fox, a club regular for 20 years, said: "I am happy to oblige them, there is no problem. I do get a bit windy - I am an old fart now."
(...)
In its letter to the retired bus driver, the club said: "After several complaints regarding your continual breaking of wind (farting) while in the club, would you please consider that your actions are considered disgusting to fellow members and visitors.
"You sit close to the front door, so would you please go outside when required. So please take heed of this request."
(...)
"I think someone has complained about the noise. I am a loud farter, but there is no smell.
Heh- them British. Funny people! He can join the other chaps outside smoking their fags.
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
CAIR A 'Turnstile' For Terrorist Suspects: FBI
CAIR's ties to terrorism, extremism far more extensive than first believed
Story here.
Although CAIR is a nonprofit organization, it does not disclose complete directories of its staff or advisory boards, and even refuses to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public.
But a review of federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that Washington-based CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations.
"Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters," said one FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials.
As previously reported, three CAIR officials have been linked to terrorism. But WND has learned that at least 11 other CAIR officials have been caught up in terror investigations, bringing the total to 14.
(...)
"Groups like CAIR have a proven record of senior officials being indicted and either imprisoned or deported from the United States," said U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., co-founder of the House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus.
Monday, December 03, 2007
Russia's Putin Wins in 'Unfair, Dirty" Election
Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin: 64% support in the election?! Of course he cheated, but we always knew that. What a dirty, dirty, power-mad little man!Really, does the reasonable person believe that the Russian election was fair?
Well, what do you expect from a corrupt dictator like Vlad Putin, who prefers the company of the Axis of Evil to the company of the Free World?
He's also even dirtier than that little piece of evil Communist crap, Venezuelan iron-fist ruler Hugo Chavez. Of course, Hugo's a relative lightweight compared to Vlad when it comes to dirty tricks and brazen cheating. Fat little Hugo has a lot to learn. Expect him to invite Vlad over soon for a few beers and some pointers on how to be an even bigger asshole.
B.C. Ferry Bomb Threat Leads To Arrest
Story here.
h/t: National Terror Alert (see their news ticker in my sidebar)
I hope they sue the crap out of that stupid asshat. Really, pretending to be a terrorist isn't funny at all, plus such a prank could potentially get the prankster killed by enraged passengers who rightly conclude, in legal, legitimate, preemptive self-defensive thinking, that he's going to kill them.
On the other hand, it's also possible that actual terrorists are going around perpetuating behavior that can only be, most safely, interpreted as actual terrorism, even if they aren't actually planning to carry through... that time. Assuming that what appears most likely to be an impending deadly action by some kind of hostile(s) is a prank or a dry run is not an option. The prankster, like actual terrorists, can expect to be tackled and wrestled brutally into submission at the very, very least.
Remember those six Islamic clerics who, in an airport and then on a plane, deliberately exhibited a series of behaviors, which, taken together, appear consistent with that of actual Islamic terrorists? Well, it is believed that they were doing the same thing, to perpetuate a "get the Infidels to cry wolf" campaign against us so as to desensitize us and make us drop our guard out of prank/dry run fatigue in the long run.
No matter who it is, each and every one who dares to exhibit behavior that can only, for safety's sake, be interpreted as potentially deadly, must be treated accordingly. And if they cry "racial profiling", so be it. Just being/looking like a Muslim and/or Arab while behaving like a potential terrorist is still as wrong as when anyone else exhibits the same threatening behavior. And I look down with disdain on those who sue for "profiling, discrimination, etc." after being apprehended for threatening behavior. Surely Muslims and Arabs have greater self-esteem than that?
Like hell we're ever going to submissively look the other way when five Middle Eastern-looking men brandishing box cutters suddenly stand up simultaneously in a plane... nay, we're gonna roll immediately! We'll disarm them with extreme prejudice, of bloody course, and tie 'em up 'till Homeland Security or whoever comes to take 'em away to Gitmo or wherever. We will always be ready to fight... fast and ferociously... should anyone try to hijack our plane... like hell we'll worry for even a split second about later being hauled before the "human rights" kangaroo courts afterward... being alive and later fighting an illegitimate kangaroo court is better than being dead, after all. Is that so hard for the politically correct, brainless asshats and fascists of the Far Left to understand?
So I'd warn potential hoaxsters as well as actual terrorists, etc., that they will be placing themselves in potential grave danger if they choose to behave in a manner that causes the reasonable person to believe that their own lives are imminently endangered by that person.
And if they emerge from their stupid, dangerous act alive, as will be the case most often, if not always, then they can expect the full force of the law to fall upon them. Hopefully the justice system will be merciless in penalty application, as is needed to send a message to everyone that they will never, never get away with threatening people like that, that they'll pay dearly.
Let no court dare take away our right to self-defence.
Yes, powerful words I speak above, but we must take this issue seriously and send a message to potential hoaxsters, dry-runners and terrorists that we will not treat them leniently should they break the laws against such behavior. It's that serious.
By the way, I read in a law text once, that ignorance of the law isn't a defence.
h/t: National Terror Alert (see their news ticker in my sidebar)
Police evacuated the B.C. Ferries terminal at Tsawwassen
yesterday and arrested a 32-year-old foot-passenger who was overheard saying
that he was going to set off a bomb on the Spirit of Vancouver.
Bomb-sniffing dogs from the Delta police and RCMP swept
the terminal, but failed to locate any explosives. Ferry service resumed after a
brief delay.
It's the third time this year that B.C. Ferries has been
the target of a threat, and the company is threatening possible legal action in
the latest incident.
"When we have bomb threats like this, we take them all
very seriously," B.C. Ferries spokesman Mark Stefanson said. "If they turn out
to be hoaxes, then we may have to proceed with lawsuits, because people need to
realize that making threats is very serious and it causes major problems to the
travelling public."
(...)
"Obviously, any time there's a delay it can frustrate the
travelling public," Stefanson said. "Trying to be humorous, funny or just acting
stupid can result in serious consequences whether it's a hoax or
not."
I hope they sue the crap out of that stupid asshat. Really, pretending to be a terrorist isn't funny at all, plus such a prank could potentially get the prankster killed by enraged passengers who rightly conclude, in legal, legitimate, preemptive self-defensive thinking, that he's going to kill them.
On the other hand, it's also possible that actual terrorists are going around perpetuating behavior that can only be, most safely, interpreted as actual terrorism, even if they aren't actually planning to carry through... that time. Assuming that what appears most likely to be an impending deadly action by some kind of hostile(s) is a prank or a dry run is not an option. The prankster, like actual terrorists, can expect to be tackled and wrestled brutally into submission at the very, very least.
Remember those six Islamic clerics who, in an airport and then on a plane, deliberately exhibited a series of behaviors, which, taken together, appear consistent with that of actual Islamic terrorists? Well, it is believed that they were doing the same thing, to perpetuate a "get the Infidels to cry wolf" campaign against us so as to desensitize us and make us drop our guard out of prank/dry run fatigue in the long run.
No matter who it is, each and every one who dares to exhibit behavior that can only, for safety's sake, be interpreted as potentially deadly, must be treated accordingly. And if they cry "racial profiling", so be it. Just being/looking like a Muslim and/or Arab while behaving like a potential terrorist is still as wrong as when anyone else exhibits the same threatening behavior. And I look down with disdain on those who sue for "profiling, discrimination, etc." after being apprehended for threatening behavior. Surely Muslims and Arabs have greater self-esteem than that?
Like hell we're ever going to submissively look the other way when five Middle Eastern-looking men brandishing box cutters suddenly stand up simultaneously in a plane... nay, we're gonna roll immediately! We'll disarm them with extreme prejudice, of bloody course, and tie 'em up 'till Homeland Security or whoever comes to take 'em away to Gitmo or wherever. We will always be ready to fight... fast and ferociously... should anyone try to hijack our plane... like hell we'll worry for even a split second about later being hauled before the "human rights" kangaroo courts afterward... being alive and later fighting an illegitimate kangaroo court is better than being dead, after all. Is that so hard for the politically correct, brainless asshats and fascists of the Far Left to understand?
So I'd warn potential hoaxsters as well as actual terrorists, etc., that they will be placing themselves in potential grave danger if they choose to behave in a manner that causes the reasonable person to believe that their own lives are imminently endangered by that person.
And if they emerge from their stupid, dangerous act alive, as will be the case most often, if not always, then they can expect the full force of the law to fall upon them. Hopefully the justice system will be merciless in penalty application, as is needed to send a message to everyone that they will never, never get away with threatening people like that, that they'll pay dearly.
Let no court dare take away our right to self-defence.
Yes, powerful words I speak above, but we must take this issue seriously and send a message to potential hoaxsters, dry-runners and terrorists that we will not treat them leniently should they break the laws against such behavior. It's that serious.
By the way, I read in a law text once, that ignorance of the law isn't a defence.
Liberal Platform Leftist: Globe & Mail
The Globe and Mail, a relatively Left-leaning paper, is calling the Liberal Party platform "left-leaning".
This is how a Leftist paper interprets the Liberal platform. As "left-leaning".
So there you have it: the MSM is declaring the Liberal Party to be leftist, bolstering my own longstanding indication to the same effect.
This means that now, there are three national Leftist parties (four in Quebec) with serious enough support more or less evenly divided amongst themselves to split the Leftist vote even worse in the next election.
The Liberals therefore cannot credibly call themselves "moderate" or "centrist". Not that they've really been able to credibly make this claim for a long time anyway.
Conservatism is the new moderate centrism, and Canadians apparently agree.
From now on, the Liberals of Stephane "Mr. Bean" Dion shall be referred to being in the same grouping of Leftist political parties as the communistic New Democrats of "Taliban Jack" Layton, the enviro-extremist Green Party of "Climate change equals Nazism" Elizabeth May and the softly-supremacistic, separatist Bloc Quebecois of somber undertaker-looking Gilles Duceppe.
MONTREAL — Stéphane Dion signalled yesterday that he will
take a left-leaning platform of social programs into the next election, as he
vowed to run a campaign that will create a "collision" between Liberal and
Conservative visions of Canada.
This is how a Leftist paper interprets the Liberal platform. As "left-leaning".
So there you have it: the MSM is declaring the Liberal Party to be leftist, bolstering my own longstanding indication to the same effect.
This means that now, there are three national Leftist parties (four in Quebec) with serious enough support more or less evenly divided amongst themselves to split the Leftist vote even worse in the next election.
The Liberals therefore cannot credibly call themselves "moderate" or "centrist". Not that they've really been able to credibly make this claim for a long time anyway.
Conservatism is the new moderate centrism, and Canadians apparently agree.
From now on, the Liberals of Stephane "Mr. Bean" Dion shall be referred to being in the same grouping of Leftist political parties as the communistic New Democrats of "Taliban Jack" Layton, the enviro-extremist Green Party of "Climate change equals Nazism" Elizabeth May and the softly-supremacistic, separatist Bloc Quebecois of somber undertaker-looking Gilles Duceppe.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
Georgia Takes Away Free Speech Rights to Protect Racist Abortion Industry
Story here.
Expect the Left to have no problem with what the state apparatus did to take away the pro-lifers' constitutional rights in order to protect the greedy abortionists who were targeting the Black community.
I guess the Left thinks that "a woman's right to choose" (but obviously only if she chooses to murder a baby) is more important than stopping racism.
Oh, yes. When faced with a choice between stopping racism/genocide on the one hand and protecting the obscenely profitable abortion industry on the other (sugarcoating it all for Machiavellian propaganda purposes by claiming that they're protecting "choice"), the Left will naturally side with the greedy abortionists.
For the Left, abortion is a greater sacred cow than is ensuring equality regardless of skin color.
The state of Georgia apparently has a problem with free speech, especially when that speech involves opposition to an abortion industry that appears to target black families, according to officials with The Life Education And Resource Network.
That organization, which in conjunction with an effort called Black Genocide works to "reveal the disproportionate number of black babies exterminated by the abortion industry in America," came to the conclusion after a recent impoundment of a truck in an Atlanta suburb.
Officials for LEARN are holding a conference on abortion's impact on the black community, and the event was to be highlighted by the presentation of a "Truth Truck" to the LEARN chapter from Durham, N.C., which is led by Bishop Donald Fozzard.
However, as WND has reported, the "Truth Truck" in question was impounded, then damaged, in a dispute in an Atlanta suburb.
(...)
"The leading abortion providers have chosen to exploit blacks by locating 94 percent of their abortuaries in urban neighborhoods with high black populations," the group said. "This high rate of abortion has decimated the black family and destroyed black neighborhoods to the detriment of society at large."
(...)
"Officers ransacked the back of the Truth Truck without a warrant and ordered Roethlisberger to change or remove the signs. When he refused, he was arrested and incarcerated for three days before being released on $1,000 bond," Operation Rescue said.
Expect the Left to have no problem with what the state apparatus did to take away the pro-lifers' constitutional rights in order to protect the greedy abortionists who were targeting the Black community.
I guess the Left thinks that "a woman's right to choose" (but obviously only if she chooses to murder a baby) is more important than stopping racism.
Oh, yes. When faced with a choice between stopping racism/genocide on the one hand and protecting the obscenely profitable abortion industry on the other (sugarcoating it all for Machiavellian propaganda purposes by claiming that they're protecting "choice"), the Left will naturally side with the greedy abortionists.
For the Left, abortion is a greater sacred cow than is ensuring equality regardless of skin color.
Saturday, December 01, 2007
Michael Savage Goes After CAIR In Lawsuit

...and he's mad as hell at those bastards. I hope he demolishes that organization in court and makes an example of them to serve as a warning to all other supremacist-imperialist Islamofascists everywhere, a warning to kuffarphobic and kalifascist Muslims to back off or else.
Trend-setting radio talk show host Michael Savage has
filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Council on American-Islamic
Relations, and has accused the organization of being a "political vehicle of
international terrorism" that seeks to do "material harm to those voices who
speak against the violent agenda of CAIR's clients."
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in California,
seeks damages equal to the ongoing donations from CAIR supporters "who expect
CAIR to act in this manner in exchange for continuing financial support" as well
as "actual damages according to proof."
(...)
The focal point of the lawsuit is a series of audio clips CAIR has been using
in its promotions and fundraising efforts.
(...)lawsuit maintains such comments, taken in context,
are Savage's verbal expression of the feelings of many Americans.
"The audience of 'The Savage Nation' expects this type of
from-the-heart outrage and when it is directed at a murderer such as Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad and his ilk, the piece is far more understandable and far more
American mainstream. While the strength of the outrage is remarkable and a
hallmark of 'The Savage Nation,' the sentiment is shared by a huge number of
Americans," the lawsuit said.
"The copyright material properly viewed is a scream of
outrage on behalf of the American public against beheadings, hangings of
homosexuals, mutilation of women, the torture of rape victims and the thought
that CAIR and other groups are trying to import these atrocities into American
life," the lawsuit said.
Of course, the CAIR could care less about context. The CAIR opposes any and all criticism, no matter how legitimate, truthful and justifiable, of Islam and Islamists and defames, sues and otherwise intimidates and bullies people who dare to speak out against the supremacist-imperialist ideology of the CAIR, which is an offshoot of the horrendously, inhumanely hateful and violent Hamas, which itself is an offshoot of the monstrously violent, hateful and infinitely evil Muslim Brotherhood.
Power to Mr. Savage. Kick, in court, their asses real hard, brother!
We must stop the global march of supremacist-imperialist Islam before it takes away our lives.
The message must be delivered loudly and clearly to the entire world that the Free World will NOT tolerate Islamofascism, period, and that Islamic fascist-imperialists must abandon their horrendous agenda of world domination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.
How about that CAIR, defending its incredibly evil ideology? Defending its perceived "right" to be violently, heinously intolerant of those deemed "un-Islamic"? Isn't that the same thing as a front organization for Hitler's Nazi regime defending its perceived "right" to kill people it deems "inferior"? Yes, it's the same thing. And this is why such radical, revolutionary, deadly ideologues must necessarily be fought and thoroughly defeated.
The radical Leftists (like folks like the man who calls himself "Balbulican") who have been following my blog on a daily basis for a long time know full well that my words above are wholly justified. They know full well that I've already presented them with all the proof they're ever going to need to understand how horrible fascist Islam and its supremacism and imperialism really are and the danger it poses to all of us, particularly to the selfishly, hedonistically decadent Leftists themselves, who will be the first to go should the Free World ever fall to the kalifascists. Isn't it astonishing that the Far Left is welcoming and facilitating their potential slavemasters, torturers and executioners? Are they ignorant as to what state-mandated horrors go on in nations ruled by fundamentalist Islam?
And, of course, a necessary disclaimer to remind Leftists not to overreact: I do not refer in this post to all Muslims. Certainly not! I only refer specifically to those who are Islamic fascists. So don't even think to twist my words into something they aren't. Harry Reid learned the hard way not to do that to Rush Limbaugh.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

