Well, some official in Hawaii claims:
"I ... have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen," Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said in a brief statement. "I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago."
Hmm... "original vital records". NOT "original, long-form birth certificate".
Why use those words? Why not say, instead, "Obama's original, long-form birth certificate"? This raises questions and doubt.
Why not specify that she saw the original, long-form birth certificate? Perhaps she saw other stuff and wants to believe they constitute proof. Has she been subject to some kind of intimidation and coerced into lying? Of course it's possible, because, after all, yes, the Obamites can! And they get away with it!
Why must we necessarily believe the Health Director? Government officials lie all the time, either willingly or via coercion/intimidation/being ordered. Not an accusation, but a statement that it's possible, because everyone knows that state apparatchiks have to do as they're told to avoid personal consequences of whatever sort. Yes, it happens. Especially when the most powerful man in the world may have a desperate, personal stake in ensuring, via a lie, that he stay out of trouble.
Sorry, but the fact that Obama refuses to let everyone else see it when he certainly can let them, all the while doing everything in his power to keep it extremely well-guarded under lock and key, paying a legal team hundreds of thousands of dollars to keep it secret and hidden... this is still a problem.
Yes, it's possible that the Health Director is lying or is at least carefully wording her statement to manipulate everyone. Of course it is. People lie. Obama lies. All kinds of officials lie. And they get away with it.
Why the hell won't Obama let everyone else see the birth certificate for themselves? Not the "original vital records", whatever the hell that means, but the original, long-form birth certificate.
What is Obama hiding with such astonishing desperation and huge personal financial cost?
Sorry, not satisfied, even if FOX News seems to be, and seems to be fooled.
Plus...
State law bars the release of a certified birth certificate to anyone who does not have a tangible interest.
The next question, therefore, is that does the Health Director have a "tangible interest"?
Surely the American People have at least as much of a "tangible interest" as does the H.D. (if indeed she does).
Did Obama order that his birth certificate be made available to the H.D. for viewing? We don't know. We don't know, either, whether the B.C. was one of the "original vital records" alluded to by the H.D.
So Congress has declared they're satisfied that Obama was born in America.
This begs the question: What proof did they see? Are they just saying this stuff to shut people up and protect the Exalted One?
Do Americans really have all that much confidence in Congress? Be they Democrats or Republicans? They all seem to be the same these days, and are always behaving in ways that betray Americans' trust and expectations. They're arrogant, entitilist and think they can do anything they want, no matter how wrong. Why trust Congress, then? We know they lie.
And we know that Congressional Representatives infamously don't bother to read legislation before supporting it as if they know what they're supporting. They just rubber-stamp and concur with whatever they're told. Apparently brainlessly and uncaringly! It's morbidly dishonest and unethical! So is it a stretch to suspect they're bullshitting Americans when they claim to have been satisfied (for whatever or even no reason) that Obama's natural-born and therefore the "President"? Why believe these infamously dishonest politicians?
(...) Obama's birth certificate along with birth notices from the two Honolulu newspapers were brought forward even before he took office.
What does this mean? Who brought them forward? And to whom? Details, please, FOX News. Do you actually know what you're talking about, or did someone just tell you that and you chose to believe it?
AND THE QUESTION REMAINS UNANSWERED: WHY WON'T OBAMA GET ON THE PHONE... LIKE SO...
...AND ORDER HAWAII TO RELEASE HIS ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE SO THAT ALL AMERICANS CAN SEE IT FOR THEMSELVES? HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS WANT TO SEE IT. THEY SIGNED A PETITION.
Why the incredible contemptuous attitide on Obama's part towards the American People? Why tell 'em to P.F.O. like he's doing?
A PROPER, ORIGINAL, LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN HAWAII LOOKS LIKE THIS:
AGAIN, INSTEAD OF HIDING BEHIND DUBIOUS, UNSPECIFIC, SUSPICIOUSLY-WORDED CLAIMS BY OFFICIALS, WHY WON'T OBAMA LET US SEE HIS?
THE FOLLOWING IS NOT HIS REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE, EVEN THOUGH HIS MINIONS LIED AND SAID IT WAS WHEN THEY RELEASED IT (THIS DOCUMENT WAS ISSUED FOR BOTH AMERICAN AND FOREIGN BIRTHS, THEREFORE IT'S NOT PROOF OF PLACE OF BIRTH):
Why the incredible contemptuous attitide on Obama's part towards the American People? Why tell 'em to P.F.O. like he's doing?
A PROPER, ORIGINAL, LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE IN HAWAII LOOKS LIKE THIS:
AGAIN, INSTEAD OF HIDING BEHIND DUBIOUS, UNSPECIFIC, SUSPICIOUSLY-WORDED CLAIMS BY OFFICIALS, WHY WON'T OBAMA LET US SEE HIS?
THE FOLLOWING IS NOT HIS REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE, EVEN THOUGH HIS MINIONS LIED AND SAID IT WAS WHEN THEY RELEASED IT (THIS DOCUMENT WAS ISSUED FOR BOTH AMERICAN AND FOREIGN BIRTHS, THEREFORE IT'S NOT PROOF OF PLACE OF BIRTH):
I'M AFRAID THE CLAIM BY THE HAWAII HEALTH DIRECTOR IS INSUFFICIENT AND CANNOT BE CONSIDERED SATISFACTORY AS PROOF THAT OBAMA WAS BORN IN AMERICA.
AGAIN, THE REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE MUST BE MADE VIEWABLE BY AMERICANS WHO WANT TO SEE IT. THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO, UNLESS IT ACTUALLY PROVES THAT OBAMA WAS NOT BORN ON US SOIL.
YES, IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THERE'S A COVERUP GOING ON. BECAUSE COVERUPS HAPPEN ALL THE TIME.
ONLY THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE'S RELEASE BY OBAMA HIMSELF WILL BE CONSIDERED VALID PROOF THAT HE'S CONSTITUTIONALLY THE PRESIDENT.
NOT A VAGUE, SUSPICIOUS STATEMENT BY SOME STATE APPARATCHIK WHO COULD HAVE BEEN, WELL, "GOTTEN TO" AND MADE TO ISSUE A VAGUE, SUSPICIOUSLY UNSPECIFIC STATEMENT TO MAKE THE ISSUE GO AWAY.
THE RATIONAL PERSON REALIZES THAT OBAMA IS HIDING SOMETHING IN HIS INCREDIBLE, IRRATIONAL, UNCALLED-FOR REFUSAL TO LET US SEE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR OURSELVES. HE HAS AN OBLIGATION TO DO SO, LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY. I DON'T CARE WHO'S PROTECTING HIM BY UTTERING POSSIBLY FALSE CLAIMS; OBAMA'S RESPONSIBLE AND MUST RELEASE IT.
EVERYONE ELSE MUST SHOW THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES, BUT OBAMA DOESN'T HAVE TO TO BE PRESIDENT. AND SINCE HE'S THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN AMERICA, A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY, HE HAS TO SHOW IT TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED HIM AND TO THOSE WHO WANT PROOF THAT HE'S NOT AN IMPOSTOR. THEY WON'T TRUST POLITICIANS AND STATE APPARATCHIKS AND WANT TO HAVE PROOF BEFORE THEIR VERY EYES.
WHAT IS OBAMA HIDING? FORGET ABOUT THE OTHER PLAYERS. WHAT IS OBAMA HIMSELF HIDING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? WHAT DOES THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SAY THAT HE'S DESPERATELY HIDING FROM THEM?
Hey, you know, the people who worship and protect Obama at all costs, they're the same people who accused George Bush of the most horrific crimes of all. So what's wrong with accusing Obama of hiding something that could prove personally destructive should he fail to hide it?
Fair's fair. They wouldn't have accepted anything but the release of Bush's real birth certificate if the shoe was on his foot.
Besides, there's as much "evidence" that Obama's foreign-born as there is "evidence" so far that he's natural-born. Lots of hearsay and so on and so forth on both sides.
Only one thing, the birth certificate, will ever constitute real evidence.
Why is Obama so apparently contemptuous of the American People?
We know I'm right. And we know that there's no "conspiracy theory" at all. After all, a "conspiracy" requires more than one person. And the only one "conspiring" is Obama himself. This is the only player who matters; the others are irrelevant. Focus, therefore, on Obama only, the only one who can resolve this continuing, legitimate, critically-important Constitutional issue.
It's all about one man, Obama. All eyes on Obama, please. He MUST release his real, original, complete birth certificate so everyone can see it. Never mind all the diversionary hearsay and suspicious claims and non-proof documents such as the COLB and irrelevant newspaper ads.
It's all about Obama.
AGAIN, THE REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE MUST BE MADE VIEWABLE BY AMERICANS WHO WANT TO SEE IT. THERE IS NO REASON NOT TO, UNLESS IT ACTUALLY PROVES THAT OBAMA WAS NOT BORN ON US SOIL.
YES, IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THERE'S A COVERUP GOING ON. BECAUSE COVERUPS HAPPEN ALL THE TIME.
ONLY THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE'S RELEASE BY OBAMA HIMSELF WILL BE CONSIDERED VALID PROOF THAT HE'S CONSTITUTIONALLY THE PRESIDENT.
NOT A VAGUE, SUSPICIOUS STATEMENT BY SOME STATE APPARATCHIK WHO COULD HAVE BEEN, WELL, "GOTTEN TO" AND MADE TO ISSUE A VAGUE, SUSPICIOUSLY UNSPECIFIC STATEMENT TO MAKE THE ISSUE GO AWAY.
THE RATIONAL PERSON REALIZES THAT OBAMA IS HIDING SOMETHING IN HIS INCREDIBLE, IRRATIONAL, UNCALLED-FOR REFUSAL TO LET US SEE THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR OURSELVES. HE HAS AN OBLIGATION TO DO SO, LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY. I DON'T CARE WHO'S PROTECTING HIM BY UTTERING POSSIBLY FALSE CLAIMS; OBAMA'S RESPONSIBLE AND MUST RELEASE IT.
EVERYONE ELSE MUST SHOW THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES, BUT OBAMA DOESN'T HAVE TO TO BE PRESIDENT. AND SINCE HE'S THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN AMERICA, A DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY, HE HAS TO SHOW IT TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED HIM AND TO THOSE WHO WANT PROOF THAT HE'S NOT AN IMPOSTOR. THEY WON'T TRUST POLITICIANS AND STATE APPARATCHIKS AND WANT TO HAVE PROOF BEFORE THEIR VERY EYES.
WHAT IS OBAMA HIDING? FORGET ABOUT THE OTHER PLAYERS. WHAT IS OBAMA HIMSELF HIDING FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? WHAT DOES THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE SAY THAT HE'S DESPERATELY HIDING FROM THEM?
Hey, you know, the people who worship and protect Obama at all costs, they're the same people who accused George Bush of the most horrific crimes of all. So what's wrong with accusing Obama of hiding something that could prove personally destructive should he fail to hide it?
Fair's fair. They wouldn't have accepted anything but the release of Bush's real birth certificate if the shoe was on his foot.
Besides, there's as much "evidence" that Obama's foreign-born as there is "evidence" so far that he's natural-born. Lots of hearsay and so on and so forth on both sides.
Only one thing, the birth certificate, will ever constitute real evidence.
Why is Obama so apparently contemptuous of the American People?
We know I'm right. And we know that there's no "conspiracy theory" at all. After all, a "conspiracy" requires more than one person. And the only one "conspiring" is Obama himself. This is the only player who matters; the others are irrelevant. Focus, therefore, on Obama only, the only one who can resolve this continuing, legitimate, critically-important Constitutional issue.
It's all about one man, Obama. All eyes on Obama, please. He MUST release his real, original, complete birth certificate so everyone can see it. Never mind all the diversionary hearsay and suspicious claims and non-proof documents such as the COLB and irrelevant newspaper ads.
It's all about Obama.
