"Homophobia" was obviously orignially made up to bash Christians, whom folks like, but not restricted to, ultra-extreme homosexual bigots, loved to hate... just because Christians are different and have a different point of view on specific activities and lifestyles, as do Muslims, not that the homosexual militants would ever dare go after the Muslims!
If it wasn't about Christianophobia and about taking rights away exclusively from Christians, then we'd see Leftists and Muslims persecuted for saying things inconvenient to the radically revolutionary homosupremacist movement.
If the homosexual community doesn't want me to say such inconveniently true things, then they better force the significant proportion of their community, the hateful proportion, to shut up and stop attacking Christians and stop demanding Christians think as the homosexual bigots want them to. Until then, I'll point a broad brush at the entire community for both refusing to be tolerant and for tolerating the hateful intolerance so shockingly endemic to their community.
It's ironic that the homosexual community, at least as portrayed in the dishonest, falsely, disingenuously pro-gay (they're forced to say what they're told or be fired, because of the fascist GLBT journalists' advocacy groups within) Big Old Media, paints all Christians with a broad brush just because there might (I don't know, haven't seen any, really, but I assume that, in all probability, there must be a very, very tiny fringe element who might potentially need some serious, lawful psychiatric-institution detention, psychoanalysis and reformation) be a few, yet they cry bloody murder most foul whenever the inconvenient truth about anyone within their community is exposed, ie. amongst them all there's plenty of Big Old Media-prominent Christianophobic hatemongers (eg. Elton John and Rosie O'Donnel), there's pedophiles (Google is your friend, pal), serial killers (Charles Manson, Jeffrey Dahmer and many, many others), they're that sonofabitchin' douchebag asshole Barney Frank, they're that criminal Liberal who absconded to Costa Rica with his cabana boyfriend, financed with millions of the taxpayer loot derived from the Liberal Party's ADSCAM conspiracy, etc... Clearly the community as a whole, though certainly not homogeneously (no pun intended, but I'm sure the Liberal Fascists at the Star Chamber will deem, absent evidence, that it was intended, just because they say so), needs to be, with respect to the record, and with respect to reality, set straight (no pun intended here either, of course, as I say let 'em eat cake or eclairs or whatever's their cuppa tea[bagging]).
Anyway, let it be known; ie. the inconvenient truth... that Christians are now exercising their equal rights to fight back and defend their people and faith from those, including horrifically hateful homosexual bigots, in terms of hauling the haters before the courts and exposing them via mass communications media. No longer will hateful extremists be protected from prosecutorial, financial and societal consequences just, simply, because of what they do with their genitalia and with whom!
“One of the primary motivations for hate-crimes laws is to send a societal and a governmental message of disapproval of certain beliefs that are held by people,” Stanley told CNSNews.com.
The new hate-crimes law is designed to try to eradicate the belief that homosexuality or transgenderism is abnormal or sinful, Stanley said.The Hard Left will try to claim that the legislation doesn't criminlize thought, belief or speech.
“Now certainly, we would agree that you cannot act on those beliefs in a criminal manner,” he added. “But this would be the very first time that the federal government is sending that message of governmental disapproval of a certain belief that is widely held by a majority of Americans, and a religious belief – that homosexuality behavior is unbiblical or sinful.”
But how, then, do they explain this curious passage slickly stuck thereunto:
“does not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim.”Now, don't forget that, as the Hard Left likes to remind us, that judges "interpret" the law. Therein lies the danger. Who's going to do anything about judges who interpret the law just to unconstitutionally bash members of groups they hate? We know that this happens all the time.
This has already been happening, thanks to the Hard Left, in Canada and elsewhere. Christians have had their rights trampled and revoked just because they're Christian and exercised their right to be openly so, including stating their constitutionally-protected beliefs.
And that must stop!
Intolerance is wrong when directed towards Christians, too!
You want to do weird sex stuff and call it "who you are"? Fine. Go ahead. Just quit teabagging others, please stop shoving it incessantly into peoples' faces, making them protest, and then using that legitimate protest to bash them in the courts and in the Big Old Media to shut them up unconstitutionally! Goodness gracious- what kind of terrible assholes are these militant, criminal homosexual bigots?!
You want to criminalize the thoughts and beliefs of Christians?
Well, then, guess what? If you do that (and you have), then Christians have been given, by none other than the hateful extremists amongst you and by corrupt politicians, every right to criminalize YOUR THOUGHTS, TOO!
Beware. Before you know it, if you're openly gay and ever say anything that "offends" just one Christian, then you can say bye-bye to YOUR RIGHTS, TOO!
And that applies to the currently-exempt Islamic Supremacists. They, too, will follow, and will find their thoughts and spoken words criminalized, too, because they frequently incite... terrorism, murder, etc.
Fair is fair. Equality is equality.
Of course, the Hard Left will always dismiss these perfectly valid, backed-by-real-world-evidence, concerns. But when the concerns are, and they will be, because that's the Hard Left's agenda, proven valid in real life, then the Hard Left will change its tone and become more and more aggressive, as they do when cornered and demonstrated to be wrong. They don't want to lose, so they'll seek to suppress public debate about these unconstitutional laws, calling such debate "hateful" and otherwise intimidating anyone daring to raise the issue.
The Nazis (it's an historical documentation, complete with proper footnoting, examining homosexuality amongst Nazis, including Hitler)... are back in the form of the Hard Left. Right now they're in a sort of sophisticated, nuanced brownshirt stage.
History never repeats itself. Man always does. -Voltaire
(...) From the ashes of Nazi Germany, the homo-fascist Phoenix has arisen again -- this time in the United States.Hmm. The Phoenix. Like the one which carries the swastika???
The most famous incident in the history of the modern American Nazi Party resulted from its 1977 demand to stage a march through the largely Jewish neighborhood of Skokie, Illinois, a Chicago suburb and the home of many Holocaust survivors. This plan was devised by Frank Collin, who often appeared with his followers ``in full Nazi regalia: brown shirts, black boots, and armbands with swastikas'' and who ``advocated that all African-Americans, Jews and Latinos be forcibly deported'' (Johansson:129). Civil authorities effectively blocked the march at first, but the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) rose to Collin's aid. The Nazis won the ``right'' to march but a settlement was reached in which the City of Chicago and not Skokie became the site. The subsequent event drew international media attention. Homosexualists Johansson and Percy, in Outing: Shattering the Conspiracy of Silence, have finally revealed, more than fifteen years later, that Collin was a homosexual pederast. In 1979 Collin was arrested ``for taking indecent liberties with boys between ages 10 and 14'' and was sentenced to seven years in prison (Johansson and Percy:130).Ah. "sexual freedom". Codespeak, of course.
Another branch of the American Nazi movement, the National Socialist League, is openly homosexual:
Founded in 1974 by defecting members of the National Socialist White People's Party, this San Diego-based NSL is unique in restricting its members to homosexual Nazis. Led by veteran anti-Semite Russell Veh, the group distributes membership applications declaring NSL's ``determination to seek sexual, social and political freedom'' (Newton:46).
And, of course, we know full well that these folks have become, more recently, more "sophisticated" and "nuanced" ("hate crimes" laws exemplify this "sophistication" and "nuance"). No kidding. But they're still the same, beneath the surface, and behind the scenes. They can fool us for only so long.
Note that the ACLU (which is aggressively attacking Christianity, getting crosses and Ten Commandments monuments removed from public evidence wherever they can) helped these Nazis, defended their "civil liberties" to preach such hatred. Wonder what the ACLU will do to protect Christians' civil liberties vis-a-vis their freedom of expression, not that it's anything like what the Nazis, gay and otherwise, today, are saying?
And they'll get more aggressive. Watch out for Christ-allnacht...
If I'm lying, then show me the evidence that the Muslims get persecuted for their thoughts and for their expression thereof... against homosexuals. Show me. I doubt this will happen, because, after all, it's no secret that the Muslim Brotherhood sent many Muslims to serve as Nazi soldiers. And it's a semi-secret that many Islamic supremacists, such as Yasser Arafat, have been gay. Loose lips lead to inconvenient truth.
Can't? Well, I can show you lots of Muslims who've said nasty things about homosexuality and gotten away with it... because the Left won't do anything in their case... only in the case of Christians.
Hey, if there's nothing wrong with homosexuality, and we should leave 'em alone, then why not also frequently say the same about Christians? What do the Christianophobes really fear???