Polish Anti-Communist Hero Walesa: USA Moving Towards Socialism

Do you feel the ground shaking a little, too?   Do you feel that something is happening... something good, rather than bad?  Something that promises to reverse the hitherto-relentless march of the Free World towards socialism?  Then you're like me.

I remember the name Lech Walesa.  Yes, I was just a kid, but somehow the name got through.  Somehow, a LOT of stuff got through.  As if it was meant to.  I remember having, even then, a natural urge to know what's going on in the world, and a desire to understand the who, what, when, where... and how and why... of what was going on.

Lech Walesa.  Anti-Communist, anti-totalitarian, pro-democracy, pro-freedom Solidarity labor leader in Communist-occupied Poland during the Cold War.

Stood up to the Evil Empire and its puppet regime in Poland.

Helped liberate Poland and the Polish People.

Recipient, Nobel Peace Prize.  (He earned and deserves it).

He's back.  He's in America to help.

Just days before the state’s primary elections, Republican gubernatorial candidate Adam Andrzejewski received the endorsement of former Polish President, Solidarity co-founder, and Nobel Laureate Lech Walesa. Speaking through a translator at a gathering of approximately two hundred people at Chicago’s Union League Club on Friday, Walesa compared Poland’s struggle against Soviet Communism to the current economic and political climate in the United States, calling on Illinois to pave the way for values-based leadership in the federal government.

 Stressing values, faith, and transparency in government—all themes of Andrzejewski’s campaign—Walesa called on the United States act on its responsibility as the lone remaining superpower and to once again lead the world morally and politically, as well as economically. The world needs America, he said, to lead the way in organizing the world differently, according to global, cultural values, and then start to build structures out of these shared values. Among the most pressing global issues to be addressed, Walesa said, are “international conflicts, anti-Semitism, and terrorism.”

(...)

Walesa highlighted the role of faith in his political successes. He credits Karol Wojtyla’s 1978 election to the papacy as John Paul II and subsequent visit to his native Poland with turning the world’s attention to the country and inspiring Poles to act on their Catholic faith in defiance of Communist bans on religious expression. In turn, he said, this heartened Poles to act in the face of the overwhelming military might of the Soviet Union. Based strictly on numbers of tanks, guns, and soldiers, Walesa joked, “the Soviets should still be in power.” He then called on Americans to “bet on people of values,” using truth and right works to “build a better world.”
Walesa described himself as having the same beliefs as Andrzejewski, particularly in the importance of “spiritual values.” The twenty-first century, Walesa said, is being defined by globalization, particularly in Europe, resulting in a need to build on freedom and free markets. However, according to the former President, these must “be built on honesty.”

If the Polish People can stand up to the Evil Empire and its military juggernaut and willingness to "make people disappear"...

...then, of course, the American People can stand up to, and defeat, the Forces of Political Correctness.  They've already turned their backs, en masse, to the Big Old Media, which is trying to impose this Political Correctness Fascism onto everyone, trying to intimidate, to coerce, via big lies and fear...  The American People are actually winning the battle for their own minds.  Believe me... I see it happening.  It's blatantly obvious, actually!

He's there for the country who helped his country.

He's now there for America.

See also Walesa being there for America, with hosts from Founding Bloggers.

Ronald Reagan might not be here now, but he's definitely here... in spirit.  And his spirit lives on in us... including in Lech Walesa, who was there back then, too.

Feel the power yet?

Feel the ground moving a little, yet?  Ominously... for those who don't want it to?

Well, guess what?  Mark my words... they can't stop what's already happening!

See, America? 

YOU ARE NOT ALONE.

WE, YOUR FRIENDS, ARE HERE FOR YOU!  CANADA, POLAND, ETC.!

WE ARE UNITED BY OUR SOLIDARITY IN LIBERTY!

As the Polish say...

FOR OUR FREEDOM AND YOURS

IPCC Again Proven Dismissable, Fly-By-Night, Halfassed, Unscientific Propaganda Group

Again the IPCC, which is cited by the Global Warmist-Climate Change, Carbon-Emissions Chicken Littlist bunch as their "proof" and "sound science", has yet again been hit by inconvenient truth about its own utter worthlessness.

This means that the whole propaganda message of emissions-warming-catastrophic climate change is yet further battered as nothing more than a massive, dogmatic ideology.

In other words, this means that Al Gore, the "Inconvenient Truth" guy, is wrong, knows it, and continues to spread the Big Lie, along with many, many others, including the Big Media and even Osama bin Laden(!!!)

In its most recent report, it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming, citing two papers as the source of the information.

However, it can be revealed that one of the sources quoted was a feature article published in a popular magazine for climbers which was based on anecdotal evidence from mountaineers about the changes they were witnessing on the mountainsides around them. 

Anecdotal "evidence" from a mountaineer magazine!  Yeeeehp, that's "sound science"!

Some "scientists".  Some "science".

Dismissed.

Go ahead and turn the (incandescent) lights and heat back on.  Go ahead and drive your monster SUV again.

And... breathe easy, too, again.  After all, now we know that the implied claim that exhaling (emission of carbon!!!) is destroying the planet... is all bunk.

Don't worry; be happy!

The Subversion Of America: A Long-Running KGB Operation

VIA

ED GRIFFIN: Well, you spoke before about "ideological subversion" and that's a phrase that I'm afraid some Americans don't understand. When the Soviets use the phrase "ideological subversion" what do they mean by it?

1. YURI BEZMENOV: Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage.

I know that intelligence gathering looks more romantic.... That's probably why your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond types of films. But in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.

It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generation of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism; American patriotism....

The result? The result you can see ... the people who graduated in the 60's, dropouts or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, and educational systems. You are stuck with them. You can't get through to them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern [alluding to Pavlov]. You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.

In other words [for] these people the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To rid society of these people you need another 15 or 20 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of United States society.

ED: And yet these people who have been programmed and as you say [are] in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept - these are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country?

YURI: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock when they will see in [the] future what the beautiful society of EQUALITY and social justice means in practice, obviously they will revolt. They will be very unhappy [and] frustrated people, and Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. Obviously they will join the [ranks] of dissenters; dissidents. Unlike the present United States there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America. [Now] you can get popular like Daniel Elsburg and filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being a dissident [and] for criticizing your Pentagon. In [the] future these people will simply be [he makes a squishy noise] squashed like cockroaches for criticizing the government. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful [and] noble ideas of EQUALITY. This they don't understand and it will be the greatest shock for them, of course.

The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already for the last 25 years. Actually, it's over fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization.

The next stage is destabilization.... It only takes 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation. This time what matters is essentials; economy, foreign relations, [and] defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some... sensitive areas such as defense and [the] economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.

Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system train another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime. False. United States is in a state of war; undeclared, total war against the basic principles and foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov of course - it's the system. However, ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system, or the world Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot. If you're not scared by now, nothing can scare you.

ED: Okay, so what do we do? What is your recommendation to the American people?

CS: AND THIS WAS THE CRITICAL WARNING, MADE SO MANY YEARS AGO, AND, SO FAR, MOSTLY UNHEEDED, AND WE'RE NOW SUFFERING THE CONSEQUENCES FOR OUR IGNORANCE AND CEREBRAL SLUMBER: 

YURI: Well, the immediate thing that comes to mind is, of course, there must be a very strong national effort to educate people in the spirit of REAL patriotism, number one. Number two, to explain [to] them the real danger of socialist, communist, welfare state, Big Brother government.... The moment at least part of [the] United States population is convinced that the danger is real, they have to FORCE their government... to stop aiding Communism.

This is why the "Progressives" fear Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, FOX News, the Tea Party movement and Sarah Palin.  

This is why they constantly, incessantly wage their massive propaganda campaign against anyone who threatens the "progressive" expansion of Communism in the Free World.

This is why I am The Canadian Sentinel.  I know I must join the war.  If I didn't do something, I couldn't look at myself in the mirror, couldn't rest easy at night, so there's my "why this blog" reason.

People sacrificed their lives, en masse, so that we could be free.  Who are we to ignore, to dishonor their sacrifices... why on earth would we let the enemy come back and take it all away from us?    

This is why we must fight!

Most "Progressives", unfortunately, don't know what they're doing.  They don't know that they're being utilized as Communism's Useful Idiots.  They're in denial.  But... one by one, we can reach them... one by one.  We know this.  Many of us were once like them, after all... 

HOPE, however, really does exist.   Right now, it calls itself "The Tea Party".

The subversion of the Free World is NOT "terminal".  It can still be terminated. 

We win wars when we work willingly.

Channeling Great American Charles McCarthy

Beware, "Progressive" Neo-Communists:  

You've been exposed, and your judgement day will soon come...

Judgement day is inevitable.  It's a question of when, not whether.

And it's close.

Let's expose and boot the Neo-Commies in America!

Shine the sunlight upon & hold up the Cross to the Commie Vampires!

COMMIE BLASTER

Looks pretty legit to me... a lot of it, I know already to be accurate, from my own research on Communists and Communism and all that stuff.  The People urgently, critically need to know who's oppressing them in government.

Communism and communists aren't what you might think they are.  Commies are deceptive, manipulative, dishonest, disingenuous, harbor vast hidden agendae, and are hellbent on transforming the Free World into impossible "Utopia", no matter how much suffering, no matter, even, how many people will die because of the Communist Agenda.

Commies are wolves in sheeps' clothing.  They're everywhere... literally.  And there's millions of them, and many don't even realize that they're commies (clueless "Useful Idiots" and "Fellow Travellers", brainwashed, actually, by "legitimate", radical, revolutionary state apparatchiks and agencies into helping push the Agenda).

They take advantage of the rights and liberties guaranteed by the constitutions of the Free World as a means of ultimately taking them away.  In fact, many of us know that this has already been underway for a long time now.  We know that they found ways to deny us the free exercise of our inalienable liberties.  They're, for example, the ACLU and the CHRC (in Canada).  They're even the courts, via Commie judges appointed by Commie politicians (like Sonia Sotomayor).

The site is nothing short of pure nuclear dynamite!  Everything you need to know about The Enemy Within.... is here!

Spread the link, folks!  Don't let the "Progressives" (an actual, deliberate, manipulative, soothing euphemism for Communists, invented by Communists) fool you- after all, Karl Marx was wrong, so those who follow his delusions are wrong, too!

The American People know that The Enemy is currently in charge.  They know they must kick the bums out!

Spread the light!

Discredited IPCC Head Publishes Smutty Book

Sheeeesh.

The whole UN-IPCC-Global-Warming-Carbon-Emissions-Climate-Change thing is really getting, well, think in terms of Bill Clinton, who, I'm very sure, will want to read the book...

Just when you think things can’t get any more bizarre with the IPCC, having just learned that the IPPC 2007 report used magazine articles for references, head of the IPCC, Dr. Rajenda Pachauri, provides comedy gold. According to the UK Telegraph, he’s just released what they describe as a “smutty” romance novel, Return to Almora laced with steamy sex, lots of sex. Oh, and Shirley MacLaine.

Looks like Chicken Little is a dirty-minded, sex-obsessed old dude and wants everybody to know it!

Yep.  We can still take the IPCC seriously, oh yep, suuuuure... after all, they got their "science" out of magazines, just like pisspoor university students putting in half-assed effort to get at least a "C".  And the top guy, well, he's just like Bill Clinton...

And next thing we know, Al Gore will release a really, really hardcore porno movie which he produced, and it'll be narrated by David Suzuki, who'll probably somehow make it sound like an episode about animal reproduction or something.  I just hope Suzuki doesn't have even a bit part in it... you know he's quite the exhibitionist, after all...

Dirty old men... trying to scare the hell out of us all the time.  They ought to be thrown in jail!

"Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage." 

-Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals

Meanwhile, In A Sleeper Cell Somewhere In America

Underwear bombers in training...  New "white" Al Qaeda recruits.

ht: LOL Pix

Dem Caught Lying About Being On ACORN Take, Voting For Higher Taxes

Lie to me, Demmy!

Perhaps America, as has Canada, needs to ban political contributions from corporations and unions, and limit individual political donations as has Canada.

If it works in Canada (Ironically, it was the Chretien Liberal regime that brought in this law to destroy Liberal leadership rival Paul Martin's chances of becoming PM with a majority), as it obviously works (hey, we've gotten rid of the Liberals, those big-money-addicted guys!), then it ought to work in America.

Imagine a future in which there's no need to worry about Leftists taking contributions from the criminally-organized ACORN/SEIU extremist groups.

Imagine a future in which George Soros's ability to impose socialism onto America by throwing his money around is severely restricted.  Imagine if he was only allowed to use about a thousand or two of his own money, just like everyone else.  That way he'd be Puppetmaster no more!  George Soros can't be permitted to have more of a say than Mainstream Americana!

Imagine a future in which it's the American People, as individuals, will finance, up to a certain annual individual limit of, say, $1000-$2000, their candidates' and parties' election efforts.  It'll be more democratic that way.  Then it'll become apparent which party, the Demmies or the GOP, is the more "mainstream" party representing more Americans who actually do care and who are willing to put their money where their mouths are.

The SCOTUS's recent striking down of the McCain-Feingold law that effectively silenced conservative Americans whilst looking the other way on the likes of George Soros, MoveOn.org, ACORN, SEIU, etc., etc. has already allowed for a more fair playing field in America, and has strengthened democratic and free-speech rights for The People.

MSNBC 'Journalist' Schuster Self-Exposes As Biased Extremist With Agenda

Yep.  MSNBC's David Schuster... lying, lying, lying...

Imagine that.  This so-called "journalist" also got crazy with Twitter and accused, without evidence, and despite the fact that no such charge was even laid, someone of commiting a felony and telling them they were going to go to prison.

Funny, but it sounds just like the "progressives" who comment on my site and claim that they're not "leftist" or anything ideological and don't have an agenda.  But I can tell that they do, as they demonstrated it over time, not that they realized it.  I also recognise the phony politeness.  It's apparent beyond visual range! 

This guy claimed to Andrew Breitbart that he "doesn't have a horse in this race".  An obvious lie and a slick, slithery ploy to coax him to come on to MSNBC so he could then entrap him or at least talk so loud and fast and interrupt so much that he might hopefully make him look bad, at least to the "progressive" "wingnuts" who watch MSNBC.

David Schuster, self-proclaimed "real journalist", is no better than a lowly blogger, and an ideologically-extreme, agenda-driven one at that.

But what does one expect of most of the folks in the Big Old Media?  Why does one think that most people have quit watching those networks and watch the fair and balanced FOX News instead?

David Schuster ought to go and post on Stage Left.  They'll looooove him over there!   It's like a club of biased "progressive" people with two faces over there.  They've also got the same cerebral pea-soup fog of conservatophobia.  To their credit, however, they (a tiny bit more frequently, anyway) they're a little more "grownup" (they also love to use the words "grownup" and "adult" to haughtily, snootily self-describe themselves compared to conservatives).

Obama's 'New' Strategy: Keep Lying, Misrepresenting Self

 Um, I'm afraid it's too late.  They built it all fatally-flawed,  and now, well...

Nothing to do but keep on blazin' all the way to late '10 and late '12...

That there thing ain't going anywhere ever again.

Nothing new coming from Obama.  Except he's simply dropped the discredited-by-himself-as-wholly-meaningless "hope" and "change" from his babblery.

Come to think of it, it's almost Groundhog Day, and I'm reminded of the Bill Murray movie of the same name.  Here we go again.  Haven't we been here before?

One of the most paralyzingly hilarious, lauhgable things he's ever said, ie. one of the very biggest lies of all that he's ever told us, he said the other day:

"I am not an ideologue"

Riiiiight, Obama.  I'm sure you're not a crook, either.  Nor a socialist.  Nor a Muslim or atheist.  

Nor were you born in Kenya Hawaii... ok, why not just prove it for once and for all, shut everyone up, and simply, simply, ever-fecking-simply(!!!) let us see your REAL birth certificate, which you've, upon your imposing, powerful orders as current occupier of the White House, got Hawaii guarding, most likely, in the most secure vault in the state, and which no one can credibly confirm to have seen, precisely because you forbade Hawaii from showing it to anyone?  And once again, I'll have to mention, because most people are apparently unaware, that the (declared-fake-by-an-expert-who-also-dismissed-every-other-document-offered-by-"birthers" as fake) COLB your folks uttered online and which they claimed, fraudulently, was your "birth certificate" (some of us aren't stupid enough to be fooled by the Flat Earth Folks):  The "Certification of Live Birth" was, at the time of alleged issue of the one you uttered, actually issued for babies born anywhere in the world, to be merely "registered" in Hawaii for administrative/statistical/whatever purposes, as having occured, wherever on earth it occured.

But I digress, necessarily, of course, to remind you that we haven't "moved on" as you desperately want us to, from that critically important Constitutional crisis issue.

What we've got here is a lying, crooked ideological extremist suddenly pretending that he's someone who is "bipartisan" and all that, telling his opponents to "get onside, work with me".

Well, why should they, when they already tried, and failed, because Obama and the Democrats chose to behave like dictators anyway, as well as demonizing those who were trying to work honestly with them in the spirit of "bipartisanship"?

The "progressives" do this all the time.  They'll say, "let's take the high road", "let's cooperate and be civil and respectful and not smear and demonize one another", etc.  Then they'll do the opposite of what they asked others to do.  Then the others, seeing that being nice to those fecking assholes is useless, they returned fire, with the inconvenient truth being told in a very aggressive way, plus there was also grassroots-organized, Angry-And-Frustrated-Mainstream-American protests against the Obamacrat Regime's fascist, bigoted, intolerant, closed and darkly opaque, dictatorial, arrogant behavior, runaway spending and national-socialist policies and actions, etc.

The Obamacrats were very, very bad towards anyone who attempted to elucidate a different point of view.  They even used the DHS, to smear and target for profiling and persecution, Mainstream Americans as "terrorists" and "potentially violent" "because they disagree with us".


Now, under fire, and desperate as Adolf in the bunker, the Obamacrats are imploring those they love to hatemonger against to: 

"Join with us in bipartisanship, so we can get jobs, etc.".

Translation into honest words: 

"Agree with us and go our way or we'll do what we did before!".

Besides, when Republicans are in power, do the Democrats work together with them and call off their dogs (ACORN, SEIU, CAIR, Code Pink, naked zombies, etc...)?  Oh, no... the Democrats engage in de-facto civil war just because they're not the ones in power!

IPCC Report 'Peer-Reviewed' By Chicken Little's Peers

Someone was bound to look more closely at the exalted, important, supposedly-scrupulous "peer reviewers" of the vaunted, sarcosanct, can't-question-'cause-the-science-is-sound IPCC Report which is cited by those who want to believe and want us to believe that we're destroying earth by simply using energy that gives off carbon dioxide, which is, by the way, a natural atmospherica gas without which there could be no life on earth, ie an essential thing.

Well, Donna LaFramboise took a critical look at these famous "peer reviewers" who signed a piece of paper declaring their agreement with the IPCC's sensational, frightening, oppressive position.

(...)many of those people aren't scientists at all. They're professional activists in the employ of environmental organizations. 

The expert reviewers who had input into just one portion (Working Group III) of the IPCC report are listed in this 8-page PDF. They include three Greenpeace employees, two Friends of the Earth representatives, two Climate Action Network reps, and a person each from activist organizations WWF International, Environmental Defense, and the David Suzuki Foundation.

Well, at least they don't work for "Big Oil", as far as we know.  In that case, they'd then have "zero credibility" because they're "not independent, not impartial, not unbiased, and are obviously motivated by career furtherance prospects".  Right?  Hmm...

Just more damning reason for reasonable doubt and to laugh in the faces of those who tell us, breathlessly, that "The End is Nigh.... Repent Now!".  Now we know where all the lunatics went after the asylum was down.

"Peer reviewed" apparently means "reviewed by people who pee".  Big deal.  Everybody and their dog pees.  Everybody is therefore a "peer" to everybody.  That doesn't mean that they're "unscrupulously scientific professional experts who would never just go along with something for just any reason".

Frankly, they sound like a bunch of co-conspirating conspiracy theorists...

ht: SDA,  which directs us also to where Ms. LaFramboise takes a critical look at a document of the WWF (World Wildlife Fund).

At its heart, the Himalayan glacier scandal that has recently shaken the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) involves a document created by the WWF.

The WWF is an activist organization. Much of its funding comes from public donations. The more successful the WWF is at persuading the public that there's a crisis, the more likely people are to give it money. (In North America, WWF stands for World Wildlife Fund. Elsewhere, it stands for World Wide Fund for Nature.)

Many of those associated with the WWF are lovely human beings. But that doesn't change the fact that the WWF is not a neutral, disinterested party. It has an agenda, an ax to grind, a definite point-of-view. Rather than being a scientific organization, it is a political one. In the UK, the media aptly calls the WWF a "pressure-group."

You know, I consider those who believe what the IPCC says to us... to be no better than those who believe that professional wrestling is real.  Admittedly I once believed it was, but now I know better, because it's so blatantly obvious in its fakery that one would have to be insane to believe it's for real!

No wonder most "progressives" believe the Big Climate Change Lies.  They want to believe and don't want to look critically at the claimed "evidence" and real-world evidence and ask why they're so incredibly inconsistent.  Of course, "progressive" is a euphemism for "socialist mental disorder".

Well, What Did They Expect?

CBS doesn't have to accept just any/all advertising.

They won't accept "Where's the Birth Certificate" advertising.

Political reasons for that.  And I don't hear the "progressives", nor the gays, saying that it's "discrimination" or "censorship" in that case.

Common sense also tells the reasonable person that Super Bowl fans don't want to see same-sex make-out scenes and would tend to boycott the Super Bowl in the future if that happened.  Doesn't matter if it's two girls or two guys- sorry, but Mainstream Americana just doesn't want to have that imposed upon them, and will retaliate by walking away and taking their pocket money elsewhere.  Sure, let the "progressives", the gays and the Big Old Media call such a response "hateful" or whatever, but, hey, guess what?  Being "hateful" is NOT a crime.  It's a human right.  After all, if it's ok for gays, "progressives" and the Big Old Media to be "hateful" and get away with it, then it must therefore be a human right, right?  No double standards shall be allowed, in the name of equality and fairness! Let people boycott whatever promotes, deliberately or not, things that people don't want to see, don't want to hear about.

In fact, believe it or not, most folks don't even want to see anybody making out, whether homo, hetero or some other preference.  Why do you think that millions of people stopped watching movies following the liberalization of Hollywood productions in the 1960s (I cite "Media Revolution" for that information)?  They don't want to see that stuff in public, even if it's only via two-dimensional images.  Such stuff offends a LOT of people.  Why dare impose it, if it might offend someone?  Why is it bad to offend gay folks, but not regular folks?  Why the double standard?  Are regular folks second-class relative to the first-class gay folks?  Ok to impose extremist stuff on regular folks, but regular folks are expected to kiss gayfolk ass all the time?

Look, we reasonable folks don't have a problem with girls who like to make our with girls, nor with men who like to make out with men.  We really don't care, so long as they do it in private, and keep it out of public (like the ACLU wants to push Christianity evidence out of the public and into the private, all the time).  We don't want it to be evident in public, pushed at us via a big screen when we're trying to enjoy non-ideological stuff.

We should start declaring that there's a "Constitutional principle" of "separation of sexuality and state" and use this big lie to keep commercials with people making out in them from being broadcast, as it violates the principle of sexuality and state.  Yep, it's time to strike back at the dangerously-hateful-bigot JudeoChristianophobes by giving them a taste of their own medicine.  Yeah!  C'mon- if it's ok for them to do it to us, then it's ok for us to do the same.  Of course, they'll say that if we do it, too, then we've "got no 'integrity'".  As if they've got "integrity" up the yin-yang (sometimes impossible, because they sometimes have something else up there!).

Yes, people can just walk out of the Super Bowl and stay away.  But then what???  Would that be the end of the Super Bowl?  Would political correctness have killed the Super Bowl?  Do the folks who put it on to make money want to let political correctness fascism determine the future of their business?

Look what's happened to the Big Old Media.  Always pushing stuff at the People which offends them and which the People know to be nothing but lies and manipulation, plus they're sick and tired of having important information withheld and covered up by the Big Old Media.  This is why they've been, and continue to be, leaving that juggernaut for the internet, FOX News, Rush Limbaugh, etc., etc...  Because they're exercising their rights and using their brains.

If CBS were to accept advertising that would hurt business by offending a lot of its clients, then CBS has a right to refuse to accept it.  It's the same as if they rejected a KKK ad, or an Al Qaeda recruiting ad or a Hamas let's-hate-Israel propaganda ad.  You know people would be so offended to walk out, and many would... right there and then!

Commie China Regime Mad Over US-Taiwan Arms Sales

 

 Top Chinese Communist Party officials.

Don't be fooled by the suits, the ties and the prim-and-proper expressions.

These people are worse morally than snakes, which don't need to have morals.

They oppress.  They tyrannize.  They steal peoples' bodyparts to sell for profit.

They're Satanic Evil Personified.

And, make no mistake, they have force-backed imperialist urges.

Oh?  So Communist-Oppressed China's mad that the US sold some defensive weapons to the sovereign nation of Taiwan?

6.4 billion dollars worth of defensive capability for Taiwan... what's wrong with that?  Isn't every sovereign nation supposed to be entitled to self-defensive capability, as China obviously asserts Iran is?

China's retaliation?  Pathetically meaningless.  One would expect better from a bunch of butcherous, greedy, selfish thugs in suits and military uniforms.  They're like the most powerful mob on earth, pretty much.  A sophisticated mob, mind y'all, at least as portrayed in the Big Old Media, but a mob nevertheless, ie. like, they'll brass-knuckle your face and much worse, if they don't like you for whatever invalid reason (and their reasons are almost always invalid!).

Beijing said it would suspend military exchanges with the US, impose sanctions on companies selling arms, and review co-operation on major issues.

Ah, so what?  Fine.  We'll do the business with Taiwan instead.  And, by the way, you guys better not so much as fart near Taiwan, or else we'll be all over and foot-upside your asses, got that, you filthy, stinking Communist Party bigwigs?

The way to deal with these bullies is to stand up to them and take no crap off of them, and not kiss their bums whenever they petulantly blubber, "You hurt my feelings...".

They need someone superior and with bigger fists to tell them off.  They're not going to try to take on the United States, certainly not all by themselves.

Taiwan's president welcomed the sale, saying it would make his country "more confident and secure".

Beijing has hundreds of missiles pointed at the island and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control if Taiwan moved towards formal independence.

Taiwan and China have been ruled by separate governments since the end of a civil war in 1949. 

The International Socialists ought to be pissed at China for desiring to occupy and enslave Taiwan by force.  Their refusal to give a diddly-diddle in this case is nothing short of a double-standard philosophy with respect to the Israel situation with respect to the lands she rightfully, legally owns but which the reprehensibly, mean-spirirtedly unfair, Judeophobic, Useful-Idiot Israel-haters deny she does.

If the Left can delusionally believe that there's actually a sovereign nation called "Palestine", and that there ever actually has been one, then surely the Left can wholeheartedly accept and embrace Taiwan's perfectly-legitimate nationhood.  After all, if the Chinese Communists could be allowed to take over Mainland China by force and occupy her by the rule of torture and murder, then surely Chinese libertarians/democrats can take over the Island nation of Taiwan.

The Communists have absolutely NO legitimate claim to Taiwan, for they're themselves wholly illegitimate, regardless of being treated as if they were.  PASS IT ON!

The Communists keep demanding "respect".  Well, how about respecting the Falun Gong People, as opposed to waging a macabre, evilly inhuman holocaust against them to try to wipe them out, something that can't and won't happen?  How about respecting the Chinese People in general, too?  How can the Communists demand "respect" when they themselves are NOT respectable, when they don't respect others unless they're bigger and stronger than or at least as big and strong as the Communists?

It's like Charles Manson demanding "respect".  It's like Hitler demanding "respect".  How do you "respect" a proud manifestation of Satanic Evil?  Woe be upon fools who do.

Who do the Communists think they are, Rodney Dangerfield?  At least Mr. Dangerfield deserves respect.

Like, screw the Chinese Communist Occupiers of China.

C'mon... let's start a massive, incessant, punishing anti-Chinese Communist imperialism campaign.  Let's do everything we can to demonize the Communists.  It's ok to demonize demons, after all...

And, fofecksake, bring back those millions of Free World jobs we foolishly allowed to be transferred to Communist China.  They're our jobs, after all, and we want, and deserve them back.  Keeping those jobs in China just keeps the Communists in China.  The money, y'know... money is the source of their power, so we must take the money away.

Oh, and for "progressives" who still think I'm being "unfair" and "bigoted" and "racist" in criticizing Communist China, well, I'd point out to them that the Communists treat gay folks badly... gay folks(!!!)... OMG... homophobic "hatred", the ultimate evil of all... NOW maybe the "progressives" will suddenly hate the Communists for being the horrible monsters they are... like, how dare those horrible monsters shut down the "Mr. Gay China" pageant "for not adhering to proper procedures"?  And how dare those awful Commie bastards have socialized psychiatric programs to cure homosexuality, available to (probably also imposed upon, but, hey, that's ok, right, because, after all, Communists always "mean well", right?) anyone who wants to use them?   Oh, how hateful, eh?!  Time to march ultra-oogly-naked, with bizarrely-inflated scrota and bra-eschewing, ultra-saggy-like-sand-filled-socks mammaries on display, perhaps to offend, perhaps to get attention, perhaps because their flaunters are just flashers who found an opportunity to show off their bits and pieces, carrying signs (which were provided to them by "community organizers" from ACORN et al, who told them that they have to scream hatred against so-and-so, just to prove that they're "open-minded", "sophisticated", "urbane" and "enlightened" and so on and so forth) equating Hu Jintao to Hitler, etc., etc...

Stand Up To Communist China!

Free the Chinese People!

 

If only "Progressive" icon-idol Che Guevara (who was, in fact, a murderously intolerant, bigoted, selfish monster just like the SinoCommie bastards) had said that stuff, then maybe "Progressives" would want to crush Communist China, as they want to crush the Free World, which they've been brainwashed into believing is evil, whereas the likes of Commie China are good.  We can't count on "Progressives", for they've been afflicted with and blinded by the same evil that befell those in the Chinese Communist Party.

A Day In The Life Of Mainstream Venezuela, Chavez-Ruled

These two scenes are frightening in and of themselves.  Note the claw-thingy on the chain being brandished by the stormtrooper at left.  But these pix are two rather tame ones.  For the blood and gore drawn by the, for want of a better word, Schutzstaffel of Hugo Chavez, who hates America out of apparent insane jealousy, go here.

Story...

"We are not going to allow continued shutdowns of media outlets that tell the truth, and we are not going to allow ineptitude and inefficiency to continue," said Nizar El Sakih, a student leader.

Critics of the government say Chavez is responsible for domestic problems ranging from double-digit inflation to violent crime to rolling power blackouts.

The government says RCTV was removed for refusing to comply with a new rule requiring media outlets to televise mandatory programming, including Chavez's speeches.

"The state and the government must impose authority." -Hugo Chavez

No wonder Hugo Chavez gets along so well with the Iranian regime, which treats the Iranian people very, very badly, too, in the name of the imposition of socialism onto people against their will.

Hugo Chavez is a greedy, selfish, brutal socialist dictator.  He says he cares about people.  But he clearly doesn't.

He shuts up anyone who disagrees, anyone who renders any criticism.

Clearly, Hugo Chavez has destroyed human rights in Venezuela and ought to be boycotted completely by the Free World.  He must be treated as an outlaw, a pariah.

But guess what?  Leftists/socialists/neo-communists/"progressives"/"social democrats"... they will NOT say anything critical of this monster!  And much of the Big Old Media won't either, remaining as neutral as they did for... Hitler.  And as they do for... Communist China.

Obama being chummy with Chavez, as Honduran dictator-wannabe Zelaya looks on approvingly.

Obama's been naive and foolish.  As expected and predicted.

If his character content is good, then he'll turn his back on Hugo Chavez.

Surely Obama must believe that human rights, democracy, freedom... they're all more important than socialism?

Harper Booting Neo-Communists Out Of State Apparatus

What would you do if I did the very same stuff that you did that you said was okayyy?
   
Would you go all double-standard on meeee?

Reversing the damage the Liberal-Appointed Neo-Communist state apparatchiks have done in Canada

In the process, as part of the overall reorientation of the Canadian state apparatus, Harper, amongst other things, again stands with Israel and Jewry.

No more of that Hard-Left, Neo-Communist nonsense that's been slowly destroying Canada over the decades.

They're squealing like stuck pigs, the Neo-Communists, but they've got nothing else to offer but complaints without valid foundation.

Well, of course.  After all, the Neo-Communists are nothing but Useful Idiots of Neo-Communism.  With emphasis on the "Idiots".  They're paid to do nothing but push Neo-Communism, imposing it onto us via Liberal Fascism.

It's Judgement Day for the Neo-Communists!  They're getting what they've had coming for so, so, sooooo long!

Surely, the unconstitutional, crooked, fascist kangaroo court star chamber, the Canadian "Human Rights" Commission, will also have to face Judgement Day as well.  Perhaps they already are, and we don't notice it yet.  Like hell those bastards will continue to take our money away so that they can take our rights away, plus even more of our money!

Then there's the CBC, which is, no secret about it, Hard-Left, essentially a pro-Liberal, anti-Conservative, Neo-Communist-ideologue organization which needs to have its choke chain yanked again and again until it stops behaving badly, or else it's one final trip to the vet, with emphasis on final.  Like hell those bastards will continue to take our money away to throw that Neo-Commie B.S. at us anymore!

Those Hard-Left Liberals, you know, for so long they controlled everything, and it showed in Canada's increasingly Neo-Communist orientation.  Well, the Liberals finally shot themselves in the foot with their extremism, corruption, ineptitude and criminality and lost power.

Those who worried that Stephen Harper and the Conservatives might not be conservative after all, should be paying attention to the details, not merely the headlines.

You see, when it's possible to do the right thing, it's clear that the Harper Conservatives are doing the right thing.  And they're not afraid to do it.

And they've chopped funding for unnecessary stuff for which the Liberals can be blamed, such as stuff stemming from the Chretien "Millennium Scholarship Fund".

You see, as the Liberals were able to Hard-Leftify Canada's state apparatus and ideological orientation without folks really noticing (I could tell what was going on by looking at the considerable real-world evidence and making logical deductions, and I now know I was right all along)... the Conservatives are now reversing the damage they wrought.

MacLean's scribe Paul Wells understands, too:

Multiply these few decisions by all the appointments and funding choices a government makes. Understand that almost none of them are reviewed by Parliament and almost none will be noticed by most voters or even most journalists. A government stands or falls on bigger, simpler questions. But having stood and not fallen, it gets to shift these hundreds of levers: not to reward cronies, but to change a society. This is why Harper likes his job, and why simply hanging on to it is at the heart of his game.

Of course.  Harper knows how things work.  Now, my fellow conservative Canadians, especially those in the West who feel disaffected:  Pay attention, see what's really going on, and hang in there, because we're in it for the long haul.  The Harper Conservatives ARE doing the job!  Don't expect the Big Old Media to tell you about it, because they're too dumb to see what's going on, too dumb to understand the complexities of the multitude of little things that add up.  It's up to you and me, my fellow conservative Canadians, to watch for ourselves to see the REAL performance indicators of the Harper Conservatives, in addition to the big, well-reported economic stuff, etc.

Rome wasn't built in a day.

Canada won't be rebuilt in a day, either.

Note to the Useful-Idiot Hard Left:  Go ahead and be scared.  Go ahead and equate H* to H*, and you know what I mean, for you're going to do it even though you don't want to be seen doing it.   It's time for you to learn that you can't have everything you want, and that you have to accept the Power of the People, as opposed to the Power of the Elites.

Besides, hey, you guys don't seem to have a problem witnessing the Obamacrats down south imposing Neo-Communism (just look at all those horrible Neo-Communist revolutionary "Czars", none of whom have an apparent moderate/normal bone in their entire being) upon America as if there were no tomorrow, and as if they had already rewritten the Constitution they love to hate and ignore.

Cold War Back On?

A couple of things came to light today...

Obama to spend more on nuclear weapons than Bush Of course, given Obama's record of delivering on anything at all, one must necessarily take this with a grain of salt. What if the money's diverted to, say, ACORN, SEIU, etc., to help the Democrats' and Obama's re-election war efforts?

Russia tests F-22 rival (though it looks to me like they just added a lot of Fast 'n' Furious-style boy-racer plastic to an existing Sukhoi engine/airframe platform to try to pretend that they're building something similar)

And don't forget about this, either...

Not to mention this...

Of course, it's also possible and plausible to say that the Cold War never really ended.  I'd say it took a pause at the time of the collapse of the Evil Empire, followed by a period of the Free World being really nice to Russia, helping her get back onto her feet, but now that we've got the Putin-Medvedev regime there, well, unfortunately, it's obvious that it's back on.

And this time things are even worse.

China is now a grave, grave, grave threat.

Iran is about to acquire nuclear weapons.  No doubt hellbent on offensive use, unless, of course, benefactors Russia/China twist their arms hard enough to force them to refrain.

And don't forget about the rapid-Islamization threat, plus the imminent threat of homegrown terror attacks.

Today, a Perfect Storm of Evil faces the Free World, as never before in History.

You know it's that serious when even Barack Hussein Obama is forced to make even George W. Bush look, inexplicably, surrealistically, like a wimp when it comes to the nuclear arms race.

Now, Mr. Prime Minister, can we restart our own defence industry?  Resurrect Avro, for starters...  Yep, make the Evil Empire copy our cutting-edge,   world-leading technology again!

Bin Laden Pushing Climate Change Nonsense Too

What a gift... this is priceless... as a blogger, I can't resist...

Now Osama doesn't sound like an Islamist anymore.

He just sounds like another prominent, Hard-Left puppet of George Soros and/or the Axis of Evil, much like Osama Obama does sometimes.

Now it's going to be real, real hard to tell the difference between these two guys.

In the tape, broadcast in part on Al-Jazeera television, bin Laden warned of the dangers of climate change and says that the way to stop it is to bring "the wheels of the American economy" to a halt.

He blamed Western industrialized nations for hunger, desertification and floods across the globe, and called for "drastic solutions" to global warming, and "not solutions that partially reduce the effect of climate change."

Sheesh.  Even Osama Feckin' Gosh-Darn bin Laden is one of those wacko Chicken Littles trying to oppress us with big lies, fear, and blaming us for everything he thinks is bad in the world.  Of course, isn't that part of what terrorism is all about?  Or is it more likely just part of the international socialist movement to crush the Free World and usher in a new era of tyranny and oppression?

Osama also said, sounding for all the world like nothing but another Hard-Left propagandist:

"We should stop dealings with the dollar and get rid of it as soon as possible," he said. "I know that this has great consequences and grave ramifications, but it is the only means to liberate humanity from slavery and dependence on America."

What, was he reading crap that was fed to him via a teleprompter from Beijing or Moscow or Tehran?  Or from, admittedly far, far less likely, someone in the Soros Empire?

This is surreal.  Whatever happened to Islam?  Suddenly Osama's not so obsessed with it anymore.   Is Osama not really a Muslim, but rather a stooge of the Axis of Evil, as Yasser Arafat was himself an atheist, Marxist KGB stooge?

Ah, I betcha the socialists will now engage in conspiracy theorism here... betcha they'll allege that this is really a hoax, that there's a conspiracy afoot to discredit and defame and demonize Osama bin Laden, and they'll probably use words like "hate" and "Islamophobia", as usual...

It must be inconvenient for the likes of Al Gore, David Suzuki and the UN-IPCC to have Osama bin Laden of Al Qaeda on their side...

Nothing To See Here

 

 "Silver-grey, big-as-an-18-wheeler:

 A 9000-km-in-range new M51 test-fired from the French sub le Terrible?

Non-story here.   Shhh!  We're not supposed to know anything.  But that's ok, I think, in this case...

Hmm.  Probably just testing of nuclear-capable new ICBMs/cruise missiles.  Y'know, it's the whole Mutually-Assured-Destruction concept at work, most likely.   Absolutely we've got to continue to practice the doctrine of M.A.D. to remind the Axis of Evil that we sure as shee-it ain't no sitting ducks!

"The firing was completed by the [Direction Générale pour l'Armement], Jan. 27, 2010 at 9:27 a.m. from the Bay of Audierne, Finisterre, from the submarine Le Terrible," the ministry said in a statement. The launch went as planned, the ministry said.

(...)

"This test marks an important step in the modernization and adaptation of France's deterrence within the strict respect of its international engagements," the ministry said.

The M51 is due to enter service this year on Le Terrible, the last of the four new-generation ballistic missile submarines (SSBN) of the Le Triomphant class in the French Navy's strategic oceanic force.

The M51 has a range of 9,000 kilometers, half again more than the M45 weapon it replaces.

Besides, the Axis has itself been testing newer and newer missile tech, including nuclear-capable.  Let's see, for example, there's, of course, New Soviet Putinistan (Russia) and there's Iran... no doubt the SinoCommies are up to the same, too.

Ah.  French submarines.  Yep, they'll be carrying the M51.

No cold war anymore, really?  Well, dunno 'bout you, but I do feel a little chilly...

Just punditin' around, eh!

Oh!  And here's a cool video of the M51...

And, via a DEW Line station somewhere...

"Hey, what's that?  It looks like a big..."

Hey, Putin, Ahmadinejad, Little Kim, Chavez and Hu...  How'd you guys like one of those up yer...?

Govt/Union 'Incestuous' Ties Screw Taxpayers

Well, duh.  Tell us about it, eh!

So let the public-service unions get mad over this pointing-out of the blatantly obvious.  Like I'm impressed with their phony/entitlist/elitist anger.

They're extraordinarily well-off as it is compared to the average person.  Really, it feels as if they're ten times better-off than I, personally, so when unionists get mad at me for saying anything uncomplimentary about unions, I realize that they've been being nice to me only as long as they've made the assumption that I agree with their selfish, hateful I'm-better-than-you-therefore-I-deserve-much-more-than-you ideology.

They're so astonishingly, undeservedly, incredibly better-off by a huge margin compared to much-harder-working-and-suffering folks... yet they still strike for more, strike to take more away from us Poor Little Less-Fortunate People.   I honestly see public-sector unions as crooks, as well as seeing some private-sector unions (auto) as slowly killing the Free World automobile industry and shrinking the economy overall.

Hurtful-to-their-feelings to say this?  Well, they're hurtful to mine, and to those of millions of others who pay their salaries, their benefits, their incredible number of sick and family days (often, half the office will be off, taking one or the other, and stuff gets screwed up and can't be dealt with until they get back, I've noticed when temping in the public service).

• Leo Troy, a Rutgers economics professor who has studied unions for years, notes "the collaboration between the nominal public employer -- elected officials -- and unionism suggests that taxpayer comes out on the short end."
•  
• "Collective bargaining," adds James Sherk of the Heritage Foundation, "gives government employees the power to tell voters how to spend their tax dollars instead of the other way around; that is why early labor leaders rejected it as undemocratic."

As did policymakers.  Until the laws began to be changed in the 1960s, Sherk says, federal, state and local governments did not allow public employees to collectively bargain with taxpayers.

The wise move would be to return to those restrictive policies.  But the unions aren't about to let that happen.  Nor would lawmakers, with whom the unions have developed what Troy calls an "incestuous" relationship.

After all, unionized public employees are a natural voting bloc for lawmakers who keep handing them raises.  It is the kind of relationship that is crushing California and will eventually devour Oregon and other governments, says IBD.

NOW WE KNOW WHO ARE "THE MOB".  AND IT ISN'T THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHOM THE SOCIALISTS HATEFULLY PEJORATE AS "TEABAGGERS".  NOW WE KNOW WHO THE REAL "EXTREMISTS" ARE.

NOW WE KNOW WHO'S STEALING OUR HARD-EARNED-AND-EASILY-CONFISCATED-TAX-DOLLARS TO ENRICH THEMSELVES TO BE BETTER OFF THAN WE ARE WHILST WORKING LESS THAN WE DO.

THAT'S PART OF WHAT SOCIALISM IS ALL ABOUT.  THAT'S WHY THE UNIONISTS ARE PREDOMINANTLY SOCIALIST AND WHY UNION MEMBERS WHO AREN'T SOCIALIST AND WHO DON'T BELIEVE IN UNIONS AND THE POLITICAL ACTIVISM THEY ENGAGE IN... FEEL LIKE BARELY-TOLERATED OUTCASTS.

It's time to stop appeasing the unions.  They're bankrupting the Free World.

They ought to be abolished in the public sector.

Especially in the socialized medicine system, where they frequently strike and hold the sick, injured, suffering and dying hostage for more money, ensuring the continuing, and worsening, problem of declining supply in the face of increasing demand, forcing increased patient suffering and deadly rationing to be the "norm".

If the Canadian People had the balls as do the American People, we wouldn't have this deadly, inhumanely sadistic at times, purely socialized medicine and would instead have a balanced system that responds to the needs of all Canadians, regardless of means, and wouldn't ration, period.  And we wouldn't find ourselves, when in hospital, or needing to go to hospital, being abused by selfish socialist extremists in a hateful ransom negotiation which the unions incredibly sell to us as "a matter of fairness".  Holding the most vulnerable, ie. people who need medical assistance very urgently, hostage for ransom is NOT FAIR AT ALL!  It's inhumane, evil, selfish and hateful.

We're supposed to brainlessly, worshippingly submit to the socialised medicine system and the unions just because "the care is free"???

No- it's NOT "free".  It's very, very expensive, as we've seen from the way it makes our paychecks and other income sources shrink, and to actually access quality, timely healthcare... well, you're lucky if you win the draw... in time.

It's as if we're healtcare Dhimmis and the socialized system is the Islamo-theocratic regime.

It's all about socialism, not about people.  It's about greed and elitism.

Hypocrisy From SEIU: Senators "Terrorists"

  The above is how many feel about the SEIU.

Damning information about the SEIU is available HERE.

Can you believe it?  The SEIU is calling US Senators "terrorists".

The SEIU!  I mean, we're talking about one of the most extreme left-wing "labor" union organizations, infamous for its violent intimidation tactics, including its attacks against Tea Party folks.

Of course, the Big Old Media isn't going to make a stink over the SEIU's latest stinkblast.

According to Discover the Networks: A Guide to the Political Left, the SEIU has long-running, extensive Communist ties and connections.

They're very, very, VERY EXTREME.  They're the Hard Left Personified.

The current President of SEIU is the former New Leftist Andrew Stern, who advanced to the Union's top post in 1996 when his predecessor, John Sweeney, became President of the AFL-CIO.  At the outset of his tenure with SEIU, Stern told his members that he expected "every leader at every level of this union -- from the international President to the rank-and-file member -- to devote five working days this year to political action."

In effect, this was a mandate for those union leaders to work in support of the Democratic Party. Stern sits on the Executive Committee of America Coming Together, a Democratic Party auxiliary funded by George Soros. Moreover, SEIU is a major component of the so-called "Shadow Democratic Party," a nationwide network of more than five-dozen unions, nonprofit activist groups, and think tanks whose agendas are ideologically to the left, and which are engaged in campaigning for the Democrats. Designated as a "527 organization" (so named in reference to Section 527 of the U.S. tax code), SEIU is not required to register as a "political organization" with the Federal Election Commission, and consequently may collect as much  "soft money" as it wishes, with no limits on how much it may receive from individuals or corporations. This money, in turn, is funneled to Democratic candidates, political action committees, and other "527" groups pursuing similar agendas. 

(...)

SEIU has extensive ties to the community organization ACORN. Between 2005 and 2008, the union spent $9 million on ACORN training programs and organizing services. Moreover, SEIU hired ACORN founder Wade Rathke to lead the union's national organizing programs.

I don't think we need to take the SEIU Bigwig seriously when he goes around calling everyone who disagrees with him a "terrorist".  He's too extreme to be believed.  Communism, after all, sucks, and is anathema to human rights and freedoms, and he's fine with that!

What an ass.

Canadian "Human Rights" Kangaroo Court In The Crosshairs Again

Here we go again with Big Leftist Lies.

Those Canadian "Human Rights" Commission fascists don't just love taking some peoples' rights away, as well as their money.  They also love taking EVERYBODY'S money away.  And lying about it as if they were ADSCAM Librano$.

Now we know where to swing the Axe of Abolition come Budget Time.

New/Old Front On Liberal-Left-Big-Media Attack On Tories

 Hmm... something's different about Michael Ignatieff.

What is it?  Has he been given facemaking lessons to look less evil and frightening?

Has he been trained to look more grandfatherly, more wise?

  Softer,  cuddlier?

Is the objective to fool more women, via visual and tonal manipulation, into voting Iggy-Lib?  

Definitely Peter Donolo and his minions have been hard at work attempting to reshape his image, repackage him differently, tell him what to say, as opposed to saying what he really thinks?

Oh, and the half-moon, grampa-spectacles are a nice touch, too...

And, thankfully, he tossed that   dreadful   red   sweater...

So the Big Old Media, the Hard Left and the Liberal Party and Michael Ignatieff want Canadians to believe that they know what women want.  Or that they know what women need, ie. they know, whereas women themselves don't, for themselves.

Par for the course, for the Left, when they start talking about "women", as if they understand women.  Do they?  Do they understand each individual woman in Canada better than she understands herself?  Do they believe that women need to be directed and controlled by the state, that they and their children need to become wards of the state, forever dependent on government programs and taxpayer monies?

Isn't it true that the Liberals want to make women dependent on government, so that the Liberals will again be able to fearmonger and lie about "those mean-spirited Reform-Conservatives who want to take things away from you!", to scare women into voting Liberal.

This is such an OLD propaganda tactic (oh, of course... Chretienist Minister of Propaganda Peter Donolo is in charge of "communications" for the Liberals again).  Again the Liberals target a specific demographic group to paint a picture for its membership, a picture in which the Tories look like a bunch Chauvinist, sexist, knuckle-dragging, scary Neanderthals and so on and so forth, who "want to take away womens' rights".   Am I lying that the Left says such stuff?

Ok, here we go...

Ignatieff, who is vowing to restore all the cuts to women’s programs that Harper has made over the past four years, says his skepticism about Harper’s new declared priority is based on his record.

“As we look at the Prime Minister saying that he wants to do something about maternal and child health, we say ‘hooray, that’s great,’” Ignatieff told reporters. “But show us the record that backs up that commitment…. Show us where you were when we needed you.”

Ooooooh.  We Conservatives are soooo a-shakin' in our cowboy boots, sooooo a-poopin' in our pants... them outlaws has shore done us in good!

Heh.  Oh, sure.  They've waved their Magic Liberal-Brand Wand and magically transformed reality just like that, without explaining what the hell they're talking about, without giving us anything resembling specifcs, let alone logic.  But, boy, do the words they use, boy, do they ever...

But who's going to be manipulated by irritating vagueness and subtle dreadmongering?

Hmm.  Ok, let's get analytical and toss the REAL questions back at the Liberals.  Make their propagandists sweat smelly bullets and create brand-new pantystreaks...

Which "womens' programs" were cut?  What did they do for ALL women, as opposed to merely providing a hefty paycheck for doing nothing to a very small radical fringe of anti-mainstream, Hard-Left, neo-Communist, "progressive"-extremist  activist "womyn", such as we'd find in something like ACORN or some femiNazi militant group?

Were they programs available to materially assist ALL needy women?  Or were they just "progressive" propaganda thinktanks operating on the taxpayers' hard-earned dime, for the purpose of developing communications strategies for bashing Conservatives and pushing Hard-Left, neo-Communist, socially-revolutionary agendae?

Ignatieff, whose party is holding a special day of hearings on women’s issues today on Parliament Hill, pointed out that Harper has made cuts to the status of women and equality programs, while salary gaps between men and women are increasing in Canada.

Ah... "The Status of Women".  An "advocacy group".  Yup.  I knew it!  And I see that Ignatieff and the Liberals are believers in some conspiracy theory that there's some mean-spirited right-wingers out there who seek to ensure that women will make ever-less than men do...  don't you just loooove those wacky conspiracy theorists?

And what are these "equality programs" of which they speak?  What good is it to say, "The bad men cut these 'equality programs', and, look, some women make less than some men!"?  Frankly, I can't recall, can't think of any.  That's weird, as I've been obsessively following current events and politics for years, including the last four years, and these words, "equality programs", they don't ring even a kitty bell for me.  Something tells me that these folks are just throwing these words around, giving zero specifics, to screw with our minds.

If we went around simply, vaguely saying that "the Liberals cut programs", we'd look like assholes, because only assholes go around, subtly dreadmongering, saying that "that mean, bad guy cut programs", without saying which programs and explaining whether the programs actually did any substantial good for anyone directly, materially.

Oh, here's one of those "activists" now...

“What we heard from the women very vocally this morning was the profound impact of the loss of advocacy dollars,” said Anita Neville, the party’s critic for the status of women. “This government has cut all dollars for advocacy for any of these women’s groups out there and they are struggling to promote their concerns.”

Oh?  Un, Ms. Neville, could you please tell me which women you "heard from very vocally this morning"?  How about, for example, Jen, one of my most loyal readers and commentors?  Did she tell you what she thought, too?  Jen?  Were you there?  What would you say to Ms. Neville with respect to "advocacy dollars"?  Y'know, those very dollars the bastards in Ottawa keep taking away from you, a woman, for the purpose of arrogantly, dogmatically telling you what's what about you?  How about you, Kez?  How about you, "Watcher"?  How about...?

I'd like to know what the women I know have to say to someone like you, Ms. Neville.  I suspect you won't like it, because it won't fit with your particular theories about women and the world.

Oh, and, by the way, Ms. Neville, what, specifically are their "concerns"?

How does the existence or non-existence of your "advocacy group" (y'know, that sounds like ACORN, eh, heh!) specifically affect any randomly pointed-out woman?  Would it necessarily affect her in any way, shape or form whatsoever?  If your answer is yes, then please make the case with real evidence, not grand sloganeering that'd make folks like the Obamacracy propaganda specialists proud?

Why should I consent to having my money taken away so your and your comrades can do what, go around babbling without saying anything, pretending to "care about women", as a front for your true agenda, which, I suspect, is socialism?

Do the "concerns" of the women with whom you claim you spoke this morning include high taxes, national security, dealing with criminals, etc.?  Hmm.  In such a case, you'd be talking to Mainstream-Canadiana women.  I'd like to see this for myself, would love to see you do a televised townhall with real women asking whatever they really want and saying what they really think, but I'm afraid I've got no choice but to take your word for it that you "heard from women".  I don't even know whether the whole thing you're talking about was made up or not!

Or is it really about spreading the wealth, promoting infanticide and the usual neo-communist, "progressive" stuff?  The women you claim to have heard from this morning, are they not just more of your fellow travellers?

Why should we believe a thing you folks say, Iggy and Neville?  You give us nothing other than vague words and subtle dreadmongering, subtle demonization of the Conservatives based on nothing we can see at all...

It's propaganda, pure and simple.  Manipulative propaganda.  It's about politicians and extremists talking without actually saying anything!