A U.S. Supreme Court Judge has finally agreed to read and review the documentation setting forth the case.
Story here. Emphasis mine.
As WND reported, Taitz is submitting a motion to the Supreme Court for re-hearing of Lightfoot v. Bowen, a case she is working on through her foundation Defend Our Freedoms, alleging some of her documentation may have been withheld from the justices by a court clerk.
She asserts docketing information about her case "was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on January 21st, one day after the inauguration and two days before [the case was to be heard]."
At the lecture in Idaho, Taitz grabbed the attention of Justice Roberts by boldly addressing her allegation that a clerk had buried the case.
(...)
"I said, 'Justice Roberts, my name is Orly Taitz. I'm an attorney from California, and I got up at 3 o'clock in the middle of the night, flew and drove thousands of miles just to ask you a question. So please give me some leeway,'" Taitz told WND. "My question is, do you know there is illegal activity going on in the Supreme Court of the United States?"
According to Taitz, the room was stunned silent as she continued, "I have presented my case to you, and you personally agreed to hear this case in conference. But your clerk refused to forward a supplemental brief to you. He has hidden this brief from you. He refused to put it on the docket. Additionally, my case was erased from the docket one day after the Inauguration, two days before my case was to be heard.
Interesting... it appears that some Hard-Left state apparatchik has tried to sabotage and frustrate the case to get Barack Hussein Obama to prove that he's constitutionally eligible to be President.
To date, Obama has refused to do so, refusing to order the State of Hawaii to realease a PROPER birth certificate, and not that stupid "Certificate of Live Birth" which cannot be considered as proof as to actual location at which birth took place, as the latter is merely a registration and could actually indicate birth as taking place inside Hawaii, when, in fact, it did NOT. This is the bottom line. It is NOT settled. There is NO proof that BHO meets the requirements under the U.S. Constitution to be President.
That the issue is being hushed and kept off Americans' radar screens... ought to be alarming. It's surreal, when one thinks about it.
And... always remember, just because the Big Corporate Media refuses to tell us about it doesn't mean that it isn't happening. After all, the Big Corporate Media doesn't have to report anything it doesn't want to report, no matter how important, just as it can report all kinds of irrelevant, poofy fluff which is of no consequence whatsoever.
It might not be one of the top water-cooler topics, but it's happening and it's not going away.
Just how long can it continue to be quasi-covered-up?
Why wouldn't so many folks want to have it proven that the man in the White House isn't an impostor?
If he IS an impostor... well, that complicates a LOT of stuff...
