Thursday, April 30, 2009

Obama Went On TV Just To Show Off Self Again


He's an attention hogger. No doubt about it. He craves the spotlight. Likes to hear himself saying stuff in public.

What was the critically important reason for interrupting peoples' expected show to babble at them about nothing?

Meh. He just went blahblahblahblah.

Now, here's what he should have admitted a little bit more often when he was begging for votes last year:

"I'm not a miracle worker. We've got a lot of tough choices and hard decisions and hard work ahead of us," Obama said. "I want to warn you, there will be setbacks. It will take time."

Nooooo! But... but... you're The One!!! You're omnipotent! You have magical powers! WTF?! You mean to tell us that you're just a guy in a suit with a teleprompter and an obsessive media kissing your bum just because some rich guy tells them to?

What a dissapointment. He didn't work any miracles. There's no magic. WTF?!

Apparently he's just a man, a mere mortal. He puts his skidmarked-like-everybody-else's Spider-Man Underoos on one leg at a time, too. He has to take a dump just like everyone else. And, yes, it stinks, like everybody else's. Really, he's no better than you and me. He's just lucky to have the coolest job in the history of the world in which he has half of humanity kiss his ass just because they're told they ought to do so. Wouldn't it be cool to have a job like that?


What he is is just an asshole who looks good on TV and on the cover of the Obama-fixated magazine TIME (all the time... yep, all Obama all the time) and every other magazine in the whole gosh-darned world each and every gosh-darned month. He's really just a pompous, arrogant asshole with a great talent for turning teleprompter words into verbal golden diarrhea. And bending over for Islamofascist tyrants and giddily pallin' around with socialist dictators who hate America. And witchhunting Republicans and ideological dissenters as if they were enemies of the state or suspected members of Al Qaeda (somebody should tell him, apparently for the first time ever, that there's a horrible, murderous group out there called Al Qaeda and they killed and are killing lots of people everywhere).


And he's shown his true color:
Socialist-fascist. This cannot be denied, except by those in denial.

What has he accomplished? Anyone? Well, he said (via his Brownshirted Ernst Roehm-type proxy, Janet Napolitano) that anyone who doesn't believe in him is an infidel "Right-Wing Extremist" dog and that jihad must be waged against them.


He (or at least his puppetmaster, the feeling-no-guilt Nazi-collaborator George Soros) wants to impose a declared-as-unconstitutional-by-a-Supreme-Court-Judge "Fairness Doctrine" to shut up dissenters who dare to have a point of view inconvenient to his radically extreme transformational agenda. He couldn't care less about the U.S. Constitution (he knows he's not qualified under it to be President, as he hasn't proven that he was born in America, and, inexplicably, enjoys a frightening conspiracy of silence from the Big Media and even many opponents, who, for some scary unknown reason, keep their mouths shut about wanting to see his REAL birth certificate which would be admissible as proof of actual physical location of place of birth, not simply where said birth was registered).

He's now brought forth legislation to persecute Christians and others (but not Muslims- that's not going to be on the state apparatus's agenda, for Muslims are held above all other groups, without exception, obviously) for their beliefs. He's elevating a whole new class of people over all others (except Muslims, who will, in practice, be allowed to dis howsoever they please, the special folks who now enjoy new special status).

Even as his aides dismissed the hoopla surrounding his 100th day in office as an artificial media construct, the White House used the occasion to seize the bully pulpit and to tout his efforts to reshape the American economy and foreign policy.

Mr. Obama organized a campaign-style town hall meeting in Missouri and then - for the third time since taking office - commandeered an hour of prime time network television for a live news conference to note the occasion.

Here comes one of his Biggest Lies:

"There's no mystery to what we've done," Mr. Obama said. "You may not always agree with me, but ... we're doing what we said we'd do."

Those who have been watching closely and using their own brains, as opposed to those who merely glance at manipulative, partially-dishonest headlines and listen to the likes of the Left-Wing-Extremist CNN, MSNBC and others (who, in unprofessional, adolescent-style, falsely accused a million dissenters of being practitioners of a certain bizarre homoerotic activity to try to discredit them and their message of opposition to the extremist, Obama-Soros agenda)... Well those keen and sharp folks who have resisted the incessant blitzing of the unstoppable, gargantuan, unavoidable Obama-Soros propaganda machine know that it's a Big Lie and that Obama couldn't have run further away from the inconvenient truth.



Note to Left-Wing Extremist Obama worshippers: Hey, shut up! You guys said far, far, far worse stuff about President Bush, so you're in no position to complain about this post!

Division, Discord Rise, Threaten Unity On Eve Of Liberal 'Love'-In

Liberals getting flushed

damn attempt

Same old, same old. Yep. That's the same old Liberal Party of Canada. Going in circles all the time, hoping for some kind of change. Round and round they go...

Infighting. Finger-pointing. Lack of democracy. Lack of interest. What's the point?

Why even bother? What do they hope to accomplish, other than a bunch of photo-ops and some media coverage?


Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Debt-Hobbled Liberals Don't Want New Election Finance Reforms

Story here.

National Newswatch

The bill, introduced Tuesday in the Senate, would bar loans from corporations and unions to political parties, riding associations and candidates. It also limits individual loans to $1,100. Only parties, associations and financial institutions would be permitted to lend more.

“It will fight the perception that wealthy individuals can still buy influence and that the rules can be skirted easily if one still has enough money,” said the Minister of Democratic Reform Steven Fletcher. “Loans were used perhaps as a loophole in the past (to increase contribution limits) and we are closing that loophole.”

Now, doesn't that sound reasonable? I thought so.

The idea of borrowing (as well as receiving huge donations) from corporations and unions and wealthy people (like George Soros in America, who ought to be stopped somehow from having such massively unfairly greater influence over public policy direction than does the average American) to finance an election campaign... well, one doesn't have to take too long to visualize the potential deleterious effects of such arrangements upon government and society.

Special interests and wealthy folks have their own agendas in mind when giving or lending large sums of money to politicians and political parties. They expect something in return, perhaps in terms of public policies they want to see implemented even though the majority of the People may not want such policies. They seek to have unfair say and influence over government, compared to the average individual who cannot afford to purchase future favors, unlike corporations, unions and the wealthy.

Indeed, the restrictions on political loans are obviously designed to level the playing field and give the average person relatively more power/say/influence compared to corporations, unions and the wealthy, who, indubitably, unfairly, hugely disproportionately influence politicians and public policy direction.

The new reforms would strengthen our democracy in that wealthy minority interests will be less likely to hijack the democratic and political process for their own agendas, often at the expense of the will of the majority, and the interests, of the People.

But the Liberals don't want this, so they're raising hell about it, throwing crap at the Conservatives who are only trying to strengthen our democracy and democratic processes for the average Canadian and take the unfairness out of the whole thing so that those with more money don't get a greater voice than those with less money. It's about equality. One person, one vote. The financing reforms do indeed tie into the whole democracy and equality of participation concept.

But the Liberals don't want any part of such a thing, because they obviously find democracy to be inconvenient (leader Michael Ignatieff wasn't elected to be leader, nor will he be, as to go through a leadership contest would, in the eyes of the Liberal elites, be inexpedient). They also obviously see equality to be inconvenient, as they do depend on wealthy elites, greedy, agenda-driven corporations and greedy, agenda-driven unions to help them in many ways to get a lot of votes, which is why they're always kissing those entities' asses (Kiss one ass, and the owner of that ass will tell his guys what a great ass-kisser you are, and then his guys will want to kiss your ass, expecting that you might reciprocate... Oh my, isn't that just gross? Well, them Liberals, you know about 'em... they do like to kiss each others'... Oh, ok. Sorry! Moving on now...).

Also, it's clear that Liberals who still owe money they borrowed to get elected are hoping that they won't have to pay it back...

Loans that can’t be paid can be written off, according to Elections Canada rules. The Conservative bill would force riding associations or the candidate’s party to pay up if a candidate can’t.

We know that a bunch of Liberals who contested past leadership campaigns, including current "leader" Ignatieff, owe, amongst themselves, hundreds of thousands of dollars. And they've been given extensions as they've passed their deadlines without having repaid their loans. So is it any surprise they don't want this reform? Of course not. They're trying to cheat, to weasel out of their responsibilities, run away from their debts. Shame!

The NDP supports the reforms:

“It’s absolutely the right thing to do,” said NDP MP Pat Martin.

Oh, those poor, poor, pitiful Liberals. Well, they shouldn't have borrowed so much (or at all) in the first place, should they?

Besides, donations do look better as financing for election campaigns, don't they? When you give money away, that means you believe in the candidate/party. When you lend money to them, what does that mean, then? Keep that in mind while remembering that the Liberals don't get much in terms of donations and have to borrow money to finance their campaigns. Not a good sign for them, is it? So little confidence, the People have in them!

Dark Clouds Approach From Horizon For Obama Regime

Story here.

ht: Drudge Report

When you're as high as Obama is, it's a long way down.

But beneath this superficial support, Obama’s specific policies run afoul of the very deeply felt convictions of American voters. For example, the most recent Rasmussen Poll asked voters if they wanted an economic system of complete free enterprise or preferred more government involvement in managing the economy. By 77-19, they voted against a government role, up seven points from last month.

And in the Fox News poll — the very same survey that gave Obama a 62 percent approval rating and reported that 68 percent of voters are “satisfied” with his first hundred days — voters, by 50-38, supported a smaller government that offered fewer services over a larger government that provided more.

By 42-8, the Fox News poll (conducted on April 22-23) found that voters felt Obama had expanded government rather than contracted it (42 percent said it was the same size) and, by 46-30, reported believing that big government was more of a danger to the nation than big business. (By 50-23, they said Obama felt big business was more dangerous.)

By 62-20, they said government spending, under Obama, was “out of control.”

I hope he's got a parachute.
He'll need it in four years. If not sooner.

What's Wrong With This Wacko "Judge"?

Story about bizarre "judge" here.

Jailed for 30 days just for merely sending a text message in court. She didn't disrupt anything at all, and there was never any notice or warning of any sort whatsoever, including posted signs or verbal warnings from the judge... whatsoever.

But the judge threw her in jail for a month... just like that.

"The media cannot find a better case of judicial arrogance and incompetence and he should be removed from the bench," Jackson said.

Kind of like "President" Barack Hussein Obama, also incredibly arrogant and incompetent and in need of removal. And like DHS fuhrer Janet Napolitano, who says that anyone not a Leftist is a "Right-Wing Extremist" and a threat to national security, without offering any evidence to back up the incredible claim.


He pointed out that the judge has made similar rulings in the past, once telling a woman in court for having too many dogs after having been cited earlier for the same thing: "She should have taken a gun and shot the other five before she came back to court, if she didn't have any other options … She's going to jail today."

Is this guy insane or what? Fofecksake, he sounds like frigging Hitler! Damn, he could be a Taliban community leader or a Saudi magistrate or an Iranian cleric or a Chinese Communist. Or the Dear Leader of North Korea. This is the kind of guy he is.

He's like a judge character on some bizarre-crap cartoon like The Simpsons or The Family Guy.

It's astonishing that there could be such a crazy-as-hell judge still behind the bench in the real world. But then again, look at all the other astonishingly crazy crap we now have happening in the real world... as they say, truth is stranger than fiction.

And that's not the worst of it. It appears that he's also a radical Left-Wing Extremist Judicial Activist, apparently treating gross-immorality felonies as mere little misdemeanors:

Conversely, in another case, Henriod gave a former teacher probation for having sex nearly 50 times with a 16-year-old boy.

"What is of primary importance to me is that [the boy] is doing well," the judge ruled.

He must be removed immediately and required to undergo psychiatric examination.

Probation for a teacher (in a position of trust and authority) statutorily raping a vulnerable underage student over four dozen times! Probation! That's nothing... he basically told the teacher "Don't do it again, ok? Now go."

Compare that to the astonishingly cruel and unjust punishment he gave the woman who merely sent a text message even though there was never any rule thereagainst. And the crazy attitude he showed with respect to the woman with the dogs.

This Left-Wing Extremist judge definitely has a mental disorder. And, let me tell y'all, folks... there's many more like him.

And Barack Hussein Obama is going to be appointing many, many more like him. Including to the U.S. Supreme Court, pending likely vacancies.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Puppetmaster/Nazi Collaborator Soros Demands Cheney Be Investigated

Ueber-powerful, ueber-rich, ueber-influential Left-Wing Extremist super-overlord George Soros, indicated by red arrow, appears to be directing "President" Obama's actions in photo.

Video here.


Why is this guy so eager to go after Republicans?

Why wouldn't he? He's already witchhunted Christians.

Talk about hate and intolerance. Thy name is George Soros. Seriously.

Did you know that George Soros admittedly was a Nazi collaborator? And that he's proud of it?

The plot thickens...

George Soros is demanding that former Vice-President Cheney be investigated for allegedly having something to do with inhumanity or something.

Who is George Soros to be pointing fingers? He's an admitted Nazi collaborator and he stole from Jews even though he was Jewish himself. He says he doesn't feel guilty about it at all.

From a transcript of a 60 Minutes interview with Soros:

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

KROFT: For example that, ‘I’m Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I should be there.’ None of that?

Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c–I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was–well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in markets–that if I weren’t there–of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would–would–would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the–whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the–I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

He actually convinced himself that he didn't do what he did do.

He rationalizes evil.
In his mind it becomes ok.

He tells himself that what he did wasn't evil, wrong, unethical, immoral... by simply rationalizing the whole thing.

Sound familiar? It's the mental disorder called Leftism. Of course, Leftists call it "progressivism" and call themselves "progressives".

Nothing progressive about evil, however.

Read much, much more about George Soros, the man who may very well be in charge of America and America's future.

And I don't think Dick Cheney has any lessons to take from George Soros, an admitted Nazi collaborator.

If anyone ought to be "investigated" and get into trouble for something he did in the past, it ought to be George Soros. So he's hardly the guy who gets to cast the first stone.


"Commission on Accountability" a Hoax Created By George Soros, Other Left-Wing Extremists

(...) the domain name registration record for the group's website indicates near the bottom that the site was reserved for George Soros. It also indicates it was registered by Blue State Digital, LLC.

A BusinessWeek profile in June of last year identified Soros as a Blue State Digital client since 2006 and called the firm then-candidate Obama's "secret weapon." The firm was described as "a market research-New Media hybrid that has played an instrumental role in fostering Obamamania." Although the Obama campaign refused to discuss the firm for the article, Blue State Digital boasted that "its handiwork and technology can be seen in the more than $200 million Obama has raised online, the 2 million phone calls made on the candidate's behalf, and in's social network of 850,000 users, who have organized 50,000 campaign events."

(More gory details)

Moreover, at least eight of the 19 left-leaning institutional members of the Commission on Accountability are funded by the secretive Soros.

One is Soros's foundation, the Open Society Institute, which has given away more than $5 billion over the years to various left-wing causes. The Open Society Institute has given money to seven of the Commission members. They are the Carter Center ($256,834 in 2000), the Constitution Project ($840,883 since 2001), Human Rights First ($445,000 since 2003), Human Rights Watch ($4,013,690 since 2000), Jewish Council for Public Affairs ($110,000 in 2005), National Institute of Military Justice ($255,000 since 2005), and Physicians for Human Rights ($1,224,153 since 1999).

The creation of the Commission on Accountability dovetailed nicely with President Obama's indication last week that he is open to the possibility of pursuing probes of Bush administration officials for the use of enhanced interrogation techniques.

Read the rest about George Soros's witchhunt against the Republicans of the Bush II Administration.

You see, it all traces directly back to George Soros.

George Soros is in charge of America.

Barack Hussein Obama isn't.

That's right, folks... America is actually now ruled by a former Nazi collaborator who declared he feels no guilt for helping the Nazis carry out the Holocaust.

And he's going after the people who fought against Islamofascists (very similar, and historically closely linked, to Nazis) so as to protect America from them. Why does he want the Republicans to be punished for fighting evildoers and protecting America from them?

Kathy Ireland: Abortion Not About 'Womens' Rights'


Story here.

Kathy Ireland is much more than just a pretty face and hot bod.

She's really, really smart, too!

(...) I learned that at the moment of conception a new life comes into being,” Ireland told Fox. “The complete genetic blueprint is there, the DNA is determined, the blood type is determined, the sex is determined, the unique set of fingerprints that nobody has had or ever will have is already there."


"I called Planned Parenthood and begged them to give me their best argument and all they could come up with that it is really just a clump of cells and if you get it early enough it doesn’t even look like a baby,” Ireland said. “Well, we’re all clumps of cells and the unborn does not look like a baby the same way the baby does not look like a teenager, a teenager does not look like a senior citizen. That unborn baby looks exactly the way human beings are supposed to look at that stage of development. It doesn’t suddenly become a human being at a certain point in time," Ireland argued. "I’ve also asked leading scientists across our country to please show me some shred of evidence that the unborn is not a human being. I didn’t want to be pro-life, but this is not a woman’s rights issue but a human rights issue."

Apparently Kathy Ireland has not allowed the Big Lie of abortion and "womens' right to choose" as propagated by the Extreme Left and the Media of Mass Deception to decide for her what's what.

She used her own brain all by herself, looking for cold, hard scientific facts and not big, sugarcoated, deceptive slogans fabricated and propagated by Left-Wing Extremist pseudointellectuals and propagandists.

In fact, her realization is the same as has been my own, which is that we're obviously, undeniably human from the moment of conception, and no one can prove otherwise, because it's already scientifically proven that a human being exists from the moment of conception. Hey, you know what? The science is sound... the science is settled... the debate is ended. Human life begins at conception, and to commit abortion is to commit murder.

No one
has a "right to choose" to murder another human being. No one.

Inconvenient truth.

How about that... Kathy Ireland thinks like I do. Wow... my kind of woman!

Feds Knew They'd Terrify NYers With Flyover

But they didn't care, and insisted on going ahead just so they could take a cool picture!

So Obama is supposedly "furious"? How does the Big Media know this? Why should we believe what they say? Did they actually see him get that way, away from cameras, or do they just report what they're told by the White House? It doesn't matter if Obama acts mad in front of cameras, as, after all, Left-Wing Extremists are very good at pretending to be mad, shocked, offended, etc. all the time. Left-Wing Extremists pretend to be mad so as to hopefully make others believe that they didn't do anything wrong and that it was the other guy's fault. Hmm... maybe all those "road ragers" are Left-Wing Extremists? Ram somebody's car while violating road rules, then pretend to be mad to make the other guy think it's his fault, that sort of thing, you know... Kind of like when guys like Obama pretend to be "furious" to make us think he had nothing to do with making New Yorkers make a mess in their pants and stuff.

Did Obama know? Why would the Regime go ahead and do something so incredibly daft and symbolic without advising the President?

I find it hard to believe that the President wouldn't have known about it.

Maybe he did, in which case he consented to the dumbassed stunt. If, on the other hand, he didn't know, then something is very wrong with the Regime.

Hell, maybe these Left-Wing Extremists are just having fun at the taxpayers' expense, screwing around, as if to say, "Look at us... we have the power and we can do whatever we want with it!"

At any rate, it's disgusting, reprehensible and embarrassing.

It's astonishing that something so inexplicable would happen. No one would imagine such awesome stupidity and/or insanity would happen in America. But it did.

And the fact that it did happen is frightening. Who's in charge of America now? Look at who. And resolve never again to vote for anyone even slightly leaning to the Left ever again. If a Republican (like, say, McCain or Specter, who's actually now a frickin' Demmie!) leans Left, then vote Independent! C'mon, somebody draft Lou Dobbs!

One thing's for sure, and that's that Barack Hussein Obama is not in charge. He's merely the guy who reads stuff off the teleprompter and who bows to Islamic slavemasters and stuff.

Clearly, Obama doesn't have control of the Regime. It's out of his hands, obviously.

If he was in charge, no one would have dared to pull such a stunt. But they did. Obviously they're not worried about Obama. Maybe someone else told them to do it. Wonder who? Definitely some old, white, billionaire man or men who care more about money and power than about anything else... and screw around like this for the hell of it and a laugh. Who knows?

ht: Drudge Report

Obama Doing Al Qaeda A Huge Favor


Story here. Do read it all to get all the facts.

Oh, shee-it, shee-it, shee-it!

What effect, then, will the release of new and damning photos have? The Chicago Tribune reported last week even Obama administration “Defense Department officials would not say exactly what is contained in the photos but said they are concerned the release could incite a Mideast backlash.”

Sen. John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, admitted, “I do think it will be used as a propaganda tool and have some damaging impact.” Even The Huffington Post noted Kerry “did concede that the pictures ‘will be used as a tool... as were the other photos [from Abu Ghraib].’”

In other words, leftists understand and expect that this will harm America’s safety and increase jihadist activity – and they’re plowing ahead, anyway. But Teresa’s better half cited the Left’s all-important rationale: “But this didn't happen under Obama; it happened under Bush, and everyone understands that.”


Taken together, it becomes clear Obama seeks to elevate his image by turning the Bush administration into a moral pariah. However, his decisions are undoing the edifice that protected this nation for seven years – and even his administration publicly fears his latest move alone will supercharge al-Qaeda recruitment. As a whole, his Homeland Security policy is either a stunning series of unmitigated naivete, megalomania, spite for President Bush, or hatred of his own country.

Then again, one day when he's asked why he did all the stupid, harmful things he did as President, I predict that Barack Hussein Obama will simply shrug and say...

"I was only following orders".


Monday, April 27, 2009

Obama Nominee Wants To Control Internet Like Talk Radio


Just like in Communist China again.

(Oops- forgot to provide the link... just did, right above. -CS)

The Left-Wing Extremist agenda of the Obama-Soros Regime, as I say all the time, becomes more and more apparent every single day. Indeed, there IS "change". And we're learning each day exactly what it means. Why the hell didn't voters ask before voting? Stupid voters! What the feck have they done? It's like when the Germans elected another charismatic socialist... boy, did he ever surprise them, and the world, with the "change" he imposed. Now look at what we've got in America...

WASHINGTON – Barack Obama's nominee for "regulatory czar" has advocated a "Fairness Doctrine" for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period.

The revelations about Cass Sunstein, Obama's friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in a new book by Brad O'Leary, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech." OIRA will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.
Sunstein also has argued in his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.
The internet is "anti-democratic"??? You mean... As opposed to simply being told what to think and believe by a dishonest, manipulative Media of Mass Deception, which wouldn't be subject to state control because it already submissively, automatically toes the party line of the Extreme Left!

What the Obama-Soros Regime really wants to do is to control what its political/ideological opponents and dissidents can and cannot say. This is an example of what I meant when I warned, over and over again, that Obama and the Democrats have a hidden agenda of which they weren't telling American voters. Precisely like Hitler didn't tell the German voters what he had in store for Germany and the world.

And get a load of this darkly ominous statement (which I'll emphasize):

"A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government," he wrote. "Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's name."
-Thus spake Cass Sunstein, old friend of Obama and nominee to lead the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (Might as well call it the Department of Propaganda and Dissent Control).

If this isn't fascism and the primacy of the state over the individual... if this isn't taking away our freedoms, then what is?

Yes... the Obama-Soros Regime is... FASCIST!

I did this post this morning. Worth checking out, too.

Israel To 'Palestine': Recognize Jewish Israel Or No Deal

Story here.

"The Palestinians cannot negotiate for a two-state solution where one is Palestinian and the other is Palestinian-to-be," he said. "This is essential; it is the choice between ending the conflict or failing to end the conflict."

A ministry statement said that "recognizing Israel as the sovereign state of the Jewish people is a crucial and necessary stage in the historical reconciliation process between Israelis and the Palestinians. The sooner the Palestinians internalize this basic fact, the sooner the peace between our nations will progress."

Refusal on the part of "Palestine" to accept and formally recognize Israel as a sovereign Jewish State will be nothing short of, and nothing else but, final, concrete proof that "Palestine" is nothing but xenophobically anti-Semitic, precisely like the Nazis. Why should the International Community then give "Palestine" the time of day, if it wouldn't do it for neo-Nazis from Germany or anywhere else?

Also, anyone who sides with "Palestine" against Israel must realize that they're siding with anti-Semites. And that they might as well side with neo-Nazis while they're at it. Not much difference, really, for anti-Semitism is anti-Semitism, regardless of who's practicing it.

FOX Says No To O


Talk about ballsy!

Way to go, FOX! Stickin' it to the man!

And... this is priceless... instead of broadcasting BHO's big-yawn, prime-time blah-blah-yadda-yadda, FOX will air an episode of Lie To Me. Lie To Me!!!

While there's a purely made-up show about lying being broadcast on FOX, the other networks comprising the Left-Wing Extremist Media of Mass Deception will be broadcasting real-life lies!

A message, perhaps? Well, you know the saying... the Lord works in mysterious ways...

ht: Drudge Report

Boneheaded Presidential Plane Stunt Terrifies New York

Deja vu for New Yorkers: Air Force One flies low over New York, followed by an F-16, prompting mass evacuations and fears of the next 9/11. Good job, Obama Regime! Y'all scared the living daylights out of New York... again!
Osama bin Laden must be laughing his ass off.

Photo h/t

h/t for video: Barb Lamont in the comments


ht: Drudge Report

"Had I known about it I would have called them right away and asked them not to," he said. "The good news is it was nothing more than an ill considered, badly conceived, insensitive photo op - with the taxpayers' money."

Strange that Mayor Bloomberg wasn't advised of the photo-op. One would think he, of all people, ought to be advised!

Thousands flooded the streets downtown as buildings called evacuations.


After hearing it was all planned, many of those in the streets complained New Yorkers should have been warned.

What the hell was the Obama-Soros Regime thinking?

Oh, wait... that's right. They, those left-wing extremists, don't think... period. Bumbling bunch of boorish bumholes!

I daresay... they outdo Mr. Bean!

Under the Obama-Soros Regime, it's one stupid stunt after another.


What next?

An Inconvenient Truth: The Obama Deception

ht: The Obambi Blog

Hmm... you know, "The Obama Deception". Kind of sounds like a Robert Ludlum novel/movie, doesn't it?

Amid Imminent Pandemic, What Does Obama Do?

He plays golf. Golf, fofecksake!

ht: Drudge Report

Well, at least he's not doing something even more useless, like...


...while Americans worry about catching pig flu.

Of course, if he's not going to worry about the terrorists and about Iran's nuclear weapons program and about bankrupting America, why would he worry about people catching deadly pig flu?

What he worry, eh?

Ignatieff Book 'Slim & Disappointing'

Kinda like Iggy himself, eh?

(...) a slim and disappointing brochure intended to advertise the author's apparently incontestable Canadian pedigree.

Blah, eh?

Sounds like a boring read by a pretentious pseudo-intellectual eager to babble about how impressive he and his ancestors are. As if doing so will impress many voters.

Hardly something that'd inspire folks to vote for the guy.

Come to think of it, Obama is also slim and dissapointing. Maybe Iggy's just copying his massively-overrated, terribly inept, blatantly inexperienced and clueless idol. Copying Obama seems to be all he's capable of doing. Obama wrote books about himself, too, you know...

That considered, Canada doesn't want a devoid-of-substance, left-wing extremist, Obama-copycat Prime Minister. Hell, no!

Talk Show Hosts Hold Private Summit Re. Govt Control Threat

The left-wing extremist Obama Regime and local governments are seeking to put conservative talk show hosts under the iron thumb of far-left state apparatus control and censorship.

They really, despite the bureaucratese nonsense they spew to sugarcoat the scary truth, want to blunt and render ineffective the messaging of their political and ideological opponents who broadcast messages of inconvenient-to-the-Regime opinion and opposition to the left-wing regimes' agendas.

Really, do you think their intention is to be fair and balanced here? It isn't. Because leftists use laws, not to be fair and balanced, but rather to restrict the rights and liberties of their political and ideological opposition. In the Free World, yes.

Astute observers and analysts will have no doubt that that's what the left-wing extremist Obama Regime's agenda really is. And the agenda of the many far-left municipal governments run by their federal comrade's fellow travellers.

Should the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" be imposed against the First Amendment rights of America's communicators, the real problem is that it will NOT be "fair". This is because it won't be enforced against media who toe the Obama-Democrat-Soros party line as they're expected to. Rather, it will be enforced against political-ideological dissidents.

Believe it or not, they can and will, if the People let them. They do stuff like this all the time, act unfairly against all kinds of dissidents, not just against dissident broadcasters.

And why wouldn't they? They know already that they can get away with such unfairness and lack of balance and violation of the equality rights of dissidents. Therefore they will do this. If the People let them.

Understanding this, the nation's dissident communicators have held an emergency summit about the threat.

A daylong discussion today focused on what was described as the "imminent threat" of so-called "localism" requirements that will subject radio programming to the review by panels of community activists who will evaluate station content. These panels will be empowered to make recommendations for programming changes and challenge at the Federal Communications Commission the licenses renewals of stations that don't heed their advice.

"Community activists". You know that means left-wing extremists (masquerading as "responsible" "moderates" who claim to only want to enforce "fairness", "diversity" and "tolerance") whose true agenda is to strictly restrict and intimidate dissident communicators who dare to say things inconvenient to the extreme-left's agenda, regardless of whether it's plain factual reporting or opinion thereabout. The "community activists" will naturally, as always, be subjective and unfair, for that's the essence of left-wing extremists who want to impose upon others and will not tolerate dissent. You know, these "community activists", they ought to be called "Brownshirts", for that's what they are, just like the Nazi Sturmabteilungen, who used to go around intimidating political and ideological opponents to help Hitler unfairly and illegitimately (like Obama, incidentally) become Chancellor, notwithstanding the election that put him there, with brainwashed voters voting as they'd been manipulated via propaganda into voting, motivated by misinformation and lies (again like Obama).

Last month, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., submitted an amendment to the D.C. Voting Bill which would require the FCC to "encourage and promote diversity in ... media ownership" and reaffirm FCC authority to mandate the presentation "of opposing points of view on issues of public importance."

My... such fancypantsy, gobbleddygooky, ambiguous, imprecise, ominous language. What a masterful way of hiding the real agenda, behind a charade of doing things that sound good, reasonable, fair, balanced and just. Really, the Bill would NOT "promote diversity", but would rather be a weapon for the Obama-Soros-controlled FCC to "mandate the presentation of opposing points of view on issues of public importance". In other words, the true intent is to intimidate dissident communicators into toeing the party line. Don't be fooled by the lies about nice-sounding agendas, because that's what it really is, lies. The truth is hidden behind dishonest, manipulative words. Remember, today's totalitarian China isn't the "Peoples' Republic". It's actually what ought to be dubbed the Communist Party's Imperialist Republic. Same thing with "Fairness Doctrine"... it's a clever, nice-sounding Big Lie.

Also of concern to the hosts and producers gathered in the nation's capital was a decision last week by Clear Channel, the nation's largest owner of radio stations, to mandate the creation of local advisory boards by June at all of its properties. The move was seen as pre-emptive as the industry anticipates an FCC stacked with Barack Obama appointees will soon require stations to answer to panels of community activists.

Uh-oh... the owners already have fallen victim to the intimidation they're feeling coming from the Regime. The control has already begun. I wonder what the Regime did, unknown to us, to make this so. Brownshirts getting in peoples' faces here and there and issuing threats and causing embarrassment? It's not unprecedented- they did it in the Nineties (with de-facto "protection rackets" in which they promised to go away if they got what they demanded) with the banks, to intimidate their executives into making them lend billions and billions to people who couldn't repay the loans. This, we know, or ought to, is the cause of the current global recession (see how destructive these left-wing extremist "community activists" actually are?).

The FCC is currently composed of two Democrat and two Republican commissioners. Obama has nominated a new chairman, Julius Genachowski, which would give Democrats a 3-2 majority once he is confirmed.
Ah. The far left will have a majority on the FCC. Guaranteed the majority will do what The... Man... Behind... the... Curtain... wants. (Go ahead... click on each of the highlighted words to get the Big Picture here).

As WND previously reported, Genachowski advocates creating new media ownership rules that promote a diversity of voices on the airwaves. In fact, Genachowski is credited with helping craft the Obama technology agenda, which states: "Encourage diversity in the ownership of broadcast media, promote the development of new media outlets for expression of diverse viewpoints, and clarify the public interest obligations of broadcasters who occupy the nation's spectrum."


Hedgecock, also a WND columnist, called for the creation of a national "tea party-style" grass-roots movement to subvert plans he and the other participants agreed were direct, frontal assaults on First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Can't let the left-wing extremist bastards have their way, for their intentions are NOT good, even if they think they are.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

"Palestinians" Attack Christian Mayor Of Bethlehem With Gunfire, Molotov Cocktails

Story here.

It's not just about Israel and not just about Jewish folks. It's also about Christians and anyone else non-Muslim. The "Palestinians" are xenophobic and intolerant, are supremacistic and want to get rid of all people who are different. Just like the Nazis of the Third Reich (significantly, there were many Muslims within the ranks of the Nazi armed forces, voluntarily fighting against the Allies and voluntarily helping to murder Jews and others).

This is just the latest, most high-profile attack against Christians inside "Palestine".

JERUSALEM – A Molotov cocktail and gunshots targeted the car of Bethlehem's Christian mayor yesterday, as local leaders there quietly fingered Islamists for attempting to intimidate Christians in one of the most important cities for Christianity.

"It's in retaliation for the Passover festivities we held two weeks ago," claimed one Bethlehem Christian leader, speaking to WND on condition of anonymity out of fear for his life.

"We had very loud and public Christian displays," he said. "Now they (Islamists) want to send us a message not to get too comfortable."


Christians previously comprised the vast majority of the city, but most fled after PA Leader Yasser Arafat took control of the territory. Still, according to the city's bylaws, Bethlehem's mayor must be a Christian.

Imagine that. The murderously hateful "Palestinians" have long been trying to drive all of the Christians out of the City of Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus Christ. How tolerant and peaceful of those Muslims, eh?

And it appears that the Muslims there are carrying out Nazi-like activities against Christians in Bethlehem...

Christian leaders, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity, said they face an atmosphere of regular hostility and intimidation by Muslims. They said Palestinian armed groups stir tension by holding militant demonstrations and marches in the streets. They spokes of instances in which Christian shopkeepers' stores were recently ransacked and Christian homes attacked.

"Brownshirt" Muslim Nazis. Sturmabteilungen-type intimidation.

The "Muslim Mafia" is also stealing land away from the Christians. Ironic, isn't it, the same people who claim that they had land stolen from them by Jews are actually stealing land from Christians, as if stealing land from people is ok as far as they're concerned. Why should we listen to those Muslims, then, when they spread Big Lies against Israel and Jews, whilst they themselves are everything bad that they accuse others of being? Screw the "Palestinians", because they're not innocent victims at all, and they're the aggressors in the first place, because they're Muslim Supremacists hellbent on eradicating non-Muslims from areas they falsely claim as belonging to them as well as from areas they legitimately claim as theirs.

Of course, since the Big Politically Correct Media, being brainlessly pro-"Palestine", isn't talking about this, Leftists therefore say it isn't happening. Therefore Leftists, who generally hate Christians, don't care.

Read it all.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Obama Regime Filled With 'Far-Left Extremists'

Left Wing Extremists wreak havoc somewhere in the world as police look on: Photo
Barack Hussein Obama's Cabinet appointees largely share their extreme ideologies.

Story here.

Throughout the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama presented himself to the American people as a change-oriented centrist, slightly to the left of the middle of the road. The way he has governed over his first 100 days, however, shows him to be anything but the image he projected, particularly where many of his appointments are concerned. And it is these appointments that will determine the direction of policy in his administration over the next four years.

(Names and shameful realities, such as tax evasion and shocking, extreme ideologies and statements, follow)

Almost everywhere you look in the Obama administration you can find appointees whose beliefs are clearly outside the mainstream, who are, in a word, extremists.

(More appointees' names and shocking behavior and statements)

Rather than an administration of centrists, the Obama presidency is shaping up to be one in which the dominant voice is that of the American far-left. Right before our eyes, based on the appointments thus far, we are seeing “Changing we can believe in” being transformed into “Change we can’t believe.”

You can tell a lot about a regime's true agenda by analyzing his appointees to policy positions.

There can, once understanding the ideological orientation of his Cabinet apointees, be no rational, logical doubt that Barack Hussein Obama's agenda is one of left-wing extremism.

Obama-Democrat Regime Hurting CIA, National Security

Story here.

ht: SDA (more discussion in comments there)

A disturbing epidemic of amnesia seems to be plaguing my former colleagues on Capitol Hill. After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, members of the committees charged with overseeing our nation's intelligence services had no higher priority than stopping al-Qaeda. In the fall of 2002, while I was chairman of the House intelligence committee, senior members of Congress were briefed on the CIA's "High Value Terrorist Program," including the development of "enhanced interrogation techniques" and what those techniques were. This was not a one-time briefing but an ongoing subject with lots of back and forth between those members and the briefers.

Today, I am slack-jawed to read that members claim to have not understood that the techniques on which they were briefed were to actually be employed; or that specific techniques such as "waterboarding" were never mentioned. It must be hard for most Americans of common sense to imagine how a member of Congress can forget being told about the interrogations of Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed. In that case, though, perhaps it is not amnesia but political expedience.


I do not recall a single objection from my colleagues. They did not vote to stop authorizing CIA funding. And for those who now reveal filed "memorandums for the record" suggesting concern, real concern should have been expressed immediately -- to the committee chairs, the briefers, the House speaker or minority leader, the CIA director or the president's national security adviser -- and not quietly filed away in case the day came when the political winds shifted. And shifted they have.

Circuses are not new in Washington, and I can see preparations being made for tents from the Capitol straight down Pennsylvania Avenue. The CIA has been pulled into the center ring before. The result this time will be the same: a hollowed-out service of diminished capabilities. After Sept. 11, the general outcry was, "Why don't we have better overseas capabilities?" I fear that in the years to come this refrain will be heard again: once a threat -- or God forbid, another successful attack -- captures our attention and sends the pendulum swinging back. There is only one person who can shut down this dangerous show: President Obama.

This is also what I have been thinking. Politics and a radically extreme left-wing agenda getting in the way of national security.

It's likely part of Obama's hidden agenda to impose Global Socialism and Global Governance by dropping America's guard for evil regimes who want to change America to be like them so they can then easily participate in the Global Government for whatever their selfish, greedy purposes may be. The implication of this includes erosion/loss of rights and freedoms for all of humanity, weakening of the rule of democratically-originated law, the rendering useless of national constitutions and so on and so forth. But who sees this coming? It's so far-fetched that to just openly muse about its possibility will get one labelled whatever the small-minded myopics will say.

Global Socialism/Global Governance will only lead to horrendous catastrophe the likes of which will make Al Gore's "climate change" Big Lies look like a mere forecast for scattered light showers. After all, the Axis of Evil is composed of an explosively unstable mismatch of neo-Communists and Islamofascists, which ultimately cannot last and will only lead to a world-you-know-what... again, and this time both sides will have nukes. But then again, I'm just a nut, right? Imagine if I had predicted 9/11 before it happened; wouldn't you think I was nuts then, too? Of course, for that's the way you're expected to be thinking! The Axis of Evil and their Useful Idiots (The Extreme Left as a whole) are counting on your Media of Mass Deception (MMD)-programmed tendency to exercise knee-jerk disbelief at such awesome "right-wing extremist" predictions (of course, on the other hand, as for such awesome left-wing extremist predictions as we've seen the IPCC and Al Gore make... it's expected that you're going to automatically believe what the Extreme Left tells you is so).

Obama Steering US Towards Disaster

Story here. The Big Media won't tell it like it is, so World Net Daily will. There's an audio embed for your listening convenience.

As President Obama approaches his first 100 days in office, America's fiscal health is "not good and deteriorating," according to David Walker, former U.S. comptroller general and former drector of the Government Accountability Office.


"What we've got to do is put our own financial house in order. Once we start turning the corner on the economy, we need to do what we've asked G.M., Chrysler and others to do," he says.

"We need a transformation and restructuring plan, because this country has been living beyond its means for too long."

Obama and the Democrats show no signs of doing this, or of even thinking of it. They're going in the opposite direction. They don't care about the future consequences of breaking the bank, of bankrupting America. One therefore wonders if this is a core component of their hidden agenda, which includes Global Socialism and Global Governance and their imposition without the consent and without the consultation of the American People.

Of course, they're just puppets of wealthy, powerful, obsessive figures like George Soros, who, in turn, I suspect, is a puppet of foreign neo-Communist totalitarian regimes who hate America and the way she is and want to change her to be like their own awful regimes so they won't have to be made to look bad to their populations anymore and won't have to worry about pressure to democratize, end corruption and respect human rights and the rule of law.

Our enemies, the neo-Communists and Islamofascists, hate America because America, as is also Canada, who is very, very similar in pretty much every way, is superior to their awful, totalitarian regimes and makes them look bad to their populations, which makes it increasingly difficult to control them, for when the People see something better (like America and Canada), they realize that they can have (yes we can!) something better, then they'll begin to demand it. No wonder such regimes are so brutally intolerant of dissent and seek to brainwash everyone to believe Party Doctrine only and forbid, backed with threat of torture, imprisonment and death, any other belief and value system. Also, it's no wonder that the Obama Regime looks a lot like those regimes do, seeing as how the Obamanian DHS has targeted political and ideological dissenters for surveillance and potential persecution and has had its comrades in the Media of Mass Deception (MMD) ignore, lie about and utter infantile vulgarities about the million-strong, cross-partisan, pan-American Tea Party Protests against the Obama-Democrat Regime. And that's just the beginning...

But back to the fiscal matter at hand. The Democrats and Obama are just spending like drunken left-wing extremists, rewarding their cronies everywhere under cover of "stimulus" spending in the trillions of dollars, much of which appears set to be permanent.

Harper Was Right About Stock Bargains

Reader Orville writes:

We all recall how Harper was criticized, and the object of much derision by Liberals, and many in the media, when he suggested last November that there were some good buys in the stock market - you recall that I am sure.

Today there are dozens upon dozens of stocks that have increased 30% and higher - pretty nice return. There are piles more of stocks that are up 10% and higher - wonderful return for a 6 month investment.

Where are the political pundits hiding now that were so quick to criticize Harper for his statement then and now don't have the courage and honesty to say and write that Harper was right - there were a lot and I mean a lot of good buys (this is now a proven fact) in the market last November. The turn around might have happened even earlier if it wasn't for all the doom and gloom that was spread around by politicians and the media which didn't give the investor any confidence - it certainly didn't help.

Of course, when stocks are way down and undervalued due to some kind of shock and panic selling, it's a good time to buy a bunch of diverse stocks, for, after all, stock of sound companies that flucutates one way will fluctuate the other way, generally. That's all Harper really meant to point out. It was dumb of his Left-Wing Extremist political opponets to throw all that crap at him, and that goes double for the Big Leftist Media.

The pundits of the Big Leftist Media, instead of issuing mea culpas and praising Harper for his economic acumen, which continues to this day, aside from the temporary deficit-spending budget which the Left demanded and blackmailed him into bringing forth, though he's not getting any credit for his continuing relatively (compared to pretty much the rest of the world and compared to how the Liberals would do it if they were in power) sound management of the government and economy.

It's not reasonable to expect perfection of PM Harper. After all, the Left and the Big Leftist Media don't expect it of President Obama, do they? Hell no- they forgive Obama's every screwup, flub, flipflop, broken promise, offensive slur, breach of protocol, arrogance, dictatorial style, closed-mindedness and all-around ineptness. They're not being fair. Why is it that leftists can do everything wrong and get away with it while conservatives do most things as well as they can given circumstances but get blasted as if they were doing as badly as the leftists are?

Separated At Birth Shocker


Left: 9/11 chief plotter Khalik Sheikh Mohammed. Right: Naughty movie star Ron Jeremy. Hey, aren't naughty movies forbidden under Islam?

WSJ Book Review: Expose Of ACLU Bias


Review here.

When the American Civil Liberties Union comes under attack, the salvos are often launched from the right. The ACLU, after all, is as enthusiastic about protecting the interests of feminists, gays, abortionist-rights campaigners and immigrants, legal or illegal, as it is uninterested in preventing the abuse of anti-abortion protesters, the censorship of media conservatives and the bullying of college evangelical groups for their opposition to homosexuality. On the right, the phrase "card-carrying member of the ACLU" is an insult; on the left, it is a credential.

But now comes an anti-ACLU barrage from an unusual source: a prominent liberal. Wendy Kaminer, a lawyer, astute social critic and contributor to the Nation magazine and National Public Radio, is also a former member of the ACLU national board. She left the organization in disgust in 2006 and has recorded her grievances in "Worst Instincts: Cowardice, Conformity, and the ACLU." It is a short, vehement book. Even the cover photo is vehement: It shows a densely packed herd of sheep -- stand-ins for the "easily herded" board members and donors who, Ms. Kaminer says, have allowed the ACLU to unravel under the leadership of Anthony Romero. The board and donors, she says, have willfully overlooked the "skullduggery" that has beset the national office since Mr. Romero's installation as executive director in 2002.


Only at the end of the book, in a section that seems almost tacked on, does Ms. Kaminer get to the core of the problem: that the many troubling decisions and strange moves undertaken during Mr. Romero's tenure actually reflect a decisive shift in the ACLU's sense of mission. "The ACLU," she writes, "began describing itself as a 'social justice organization,' and its non-partisan commitment to civil liberty shrank -- especially its commitment to free speech -- while its vision of equality expanded."

New organizations with a stronger commitment to free speech and freedom of assembly now do the jobs that the ACLU declines to do. These groups include the Alliance Defense Fund and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Ms. Kaminer sums it up: "The ACLU is becoming just anther liberal human-rights, social- justice advocate that reliably defends the rights of liberal speakers." The trajectory is a common one, affecting once-neutral organizations, including the Sierra Club, the Ford and MacArthur Foundations, the Modern Language Association, Amnesty International and, now, the ACLU.


Photo: Anti-ACLU protest, circa 2005. Of course, they're just a small bunch of teabagging redneck Republican party nuts... nothing to see here. Move along quickly. You're not supposed to hear what they have to say because Dark Lord Soros doesn't want you to. You're only supposed to hear what's approved by the Peoples' Ministry for the Enforcement of Political Correctness and properly propagated by Approved Media.

Inconvenient Truth For Ignatieff Liberals

The inconvenient truth in question is that the Harper Conservative government has been doing an admirable job, not a bad job, of managing the nation's finances, certainly at least in contrast to what the Ignatieff Liberals and the awfully pro-Liberal Big Media have been accusing.

For the month of February, the Department of Finance said it recorded a surplus of $823 million, down from the $3 billion posted in the year-ago period -- but much better than the $37-million surplus in January.

Of course, this doesn't mean all things fiscal and econimic are rosy. Not at all, obviously.

We can expect a significant deficit over the coming months, of course, owing to the recession, caused by the Left-Wing Extremists (first brought forth under Clinton, then allowed to continue under Bush, who didn't defuse the ticking financial-economic time bomb) in the United States, with their misguided, stupid, communistic policies regarding forcing financial institutions to lend money to people who couldn't afford to repay it.

And then there's the "stimulus" deficit spending that the Canadian Left-Wing Extremists (the Liberals, NDP, Bloc Quebecois) demanded, or else they'd overthrow the government in a coup against the wishes of Canadians. If I was Prime Minister, I'd have stood my ground against the "Coalition" of Left-Wing Extremists and ridden a tidal wave of popularity of anti-coup sentiment, wherever it ended up. Yes, I'd have played chicken with those socialist bastards. If they backed down, I'd then deal with the economic problems in a sane, safe-over-the-long-run way, stimulating without going too far and panicking, like the Obama Dems in the U.S. with their multi-trilliondollar, largely-permanent deficit spending spree on mostly pork and global socialism that threatens (or, as I actually believe probable, is deliberately designed) to break America. If the socialist bastards had actually usurped my government, then they would be in serious trouble with the Canadian People who made it extremely, loudly clear to them they didn't want them to do that, and, in the next election, I would ride an unprecedented wave of popularity to a strong majority victory. Yep, that's what I'd have done.

You know, the recession is not the Harper Conservatives' fault. Nor is the imminent deficit. It's stupid to blame them, for it's beyond their control. But still, there's plenty of wasteful spending yet to be slashed, and slash it we must.

Ignatieff says we'll have to raise taxes once the recession is over. Bullshit. When the recession is over, then we turn off the temporary deficit "stimulus" spending, of course. That, plus rising revenues due to economic recovery, plus cutting wasteful spending by billions, will take care of the deficit. There will be no need to raise taxes. Stupid Ignatieff. What, is Mo Strong puppeteering him, as George Soros puppeteers Obama? (Of course, Strong and Soros are themselves willing, greedy puppets of foreign, evil neo-Communist totalitarian regimes, who are pretty much richly compensating them to be traitors to their own countries and to destroy the Western World in favor of international socialism (dictatorship by the few, with limited, if any, rights and limited, if any, democracy for the many), obviously, at least in my own view, anyway, for which I'll naturally be derided, but, hey, you know, Winston Churchill was derided, too, when he warned about the hidden-in-plain-sight Nazi agenda, though not for too long, as we well know!).

The Liberals only want to raise taxes because they want to grow the size of the Nanny State; they want to follow in Obama's international-socialistic footsteps and so on and so forth. We don't want any of that crap, none of the national gestapo, none of the censorship, none of the unconstitutionally-coercive fascism, none of the appeasement of our mortal enemies, none of the turning-of-our-backs-on-our-friend-Israel, none of the bowing in submission to evil slavemaster kings, none of the insulting Special Olympians, none of the persecution of political dissenters, none of the so on and so forth that's happening in Obamerica now, which the Liberals want to impose on Canada and must NOT be allowed to, meaning we must NOT vote for those crooked, corrupt, international-socialist bastards!

As for the Big, Liberal-Protecting, Conservative-Bashing Media, well, what can I say? They're hard at work trying to screw with the "news"-consumers' heads to create the perception that Harper and the Conservatives are somehow bad, inept, lame-duck, about to split up and all that bullcrap... haven't you noticed all the negative-sounding stories they've been pushing out of their hineys so fast and furious as if there's no tomorrow? Simultaneously, they do stories that attempt to screw with "news"-consumers' minds to forge the illusion of greatness and approval for Ignatieff and the Liberals. All this stuff the Big Media's spewing, it's all crap! And it's working, as now the Liberals are tied with the Conservatives in the polls, proving that the psychological/perceptual manipulation and misinformation campaign is working. Goebbels would approve.

Just like in the U.S. with the Big Media's incessant slobbering over Obama no matter how badly he fecks up every damn day, plus their demonization of, not just the GOP, but also of the American People, with one shameful example in the
CNN's barely-closeted, flamingly-homosexual Anderson Cooper, a biased Left-Wing Extremist, very obviously, accusing them all, with his unprofessionally, unacceptably foul pottymouth, of a really silly, bizarre "sex" act most commonly practiced by guys like him. And who could forget that stubbornly-biased CNN chick who dismissed the million-strong protestors as just a bunch of Republican activists or whatever and actually made them mad at her right where and when she said it? Well, the CNN wants us to forget that that happened. Anyway, the Big Media's reaction, both in the U.S. and in Canada, to the big-news Tea Parties across America to protest Obama's Regime, well, it proved for once and for all, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the Old Big Media is extremely biased and cannot be trusted!