Thursday, April 16, 2009

Obama Admin Ignored Rights Concerns Over Anti-Conservative DHS Propaganda

This is scary. Very, very scary.

The American government, led by the most hard-left-wing-extremist regime in the nation's history, is fearful and loatheful of those who beg to differ from the regime's party line.

The Obama regime has issued directives to police everywhere via the so-called Department of "Homeland Security" to be on the lookout for anyone evidencing any hint of independent thought (in other words, "conservative" or "non-progressive", or as far as Obama, his puppetmasters and minions are concerned, "extreme right") and to be suspicious of such people as if they have sinister intentions threatening national security.

Astonishing, just simply astonishing.

It sounds like what the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) does to discourage dissent against the Party.

The CCP accuses, without evidence, and fully knowing it's lying, politically-inconvenient Chinese citizens of being "terrorists" or "threats to national security" and so on and so forth, to falsely justify arrest, detention, torture, even murder, sometimes with the organs harvested for profit. And this happens all the time, regularly.

And the Obama regime in America is beginning to resemble their comrades, the CCP.

The CCP doesn't care about human rights, doesn't care about making a case for its policies, and will impose whatever policy they want against anyone, any identifiable group, no matter how much it may infringe upon and violate peoples' human rights.

It appears that this is also what the Obama regime is doing.

Imagine if Bush had had the DHS view the "progressives" in a similarly prejudicial, stereotypical, suspicious light.

Imagine if Bush had had the DHS view all Muslims and Arabs as potential terrorists. In other words, "racially profiling" them.

What's the difference between racial/faith-based profiling and political opinion profiling?

The difference is political correctness fascism, as practiced by the Obama regime.

In other words, it's unacceptable/illegal/unconstitutional to profile and target minorities like Muslims and Arabs, no matter how logical it may be to do so, but it's perfectly acceptable to raise prejudices, stereotypes and suspicions against one's political opponents.

Reminds me of when the Democratic Party imposed the Ku Klux Klan upon America to not only persecute and lynch Black Americans but also Republicans of whatever color. Yes, it's true, folks... they did indeed do so... just Google it and do your remedial history research.

They're doing it again.

And will probably get away with it, unfortunately, thanks to the way things are these days, which is totally in favor of the Extreme Left.

WASHINGTON – Civil liberties officials at the Homeland Security Department flagged language in a controversial report on right-wing extremists, but the agency issued the report anyway.

The intelligence assessment issued to law enforcement last week said some military veterans could be susceptible to extremist recruiters or commit lone acts of violence. That prompted angry reactions from some lawmakers and veterans' groups.

Does the DHS have any documentation warning about extreme Islamists recruiting Muslims to become dangerous and threats to national security? I'd like to see it if so, please. Not holding my breath, though, as I'm sure the Muslim Brotherhood saw to it that there would be no such documentation.

Does the DHS have any documentation warning about folks like William Ayers, Obama's good buddy and a known domestic terrorist/left-wing extremist who continues to harbor the same views as he did when actively committing terrorism inside America? Again, I'd like to see it, please.

Homeland Security spokeswoman Amy Kudwa said the report was issued before officials resolved problems raised by the agency's civil rights division about analysts' definition of right-wing extremism.

Sounds like the Obama regime was in a hurry to get the report out, uncaring about the civil rights of his political opponents and disagreeors.

In a footnote in the report, right-wing extremism was defined as hate-motivated groups and movements, such as hatred of certain religions, racial or ethnic groups. It went on to say, "It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration."

Again the word "hate". It's a natural human emotion, and it's deemed by the left to be bad, even though, ironically, leftists are very, very hateful folks. What about the left's hatred of JudeoChristians? Of Caucasians? Of folks who aren't leftists? Of folks who believe in American independence and sovereignty and who oppose "global governance" (which is obviously on the agenda under Obama-Soros)?

I see it also says that people who oppose abortion are bad and a threat to national security, as well as those who "oppose immigration" (what they really mean is opposition to illegal immigration). So as I oppose the torture and murder of totally innocent human beings deemed inconvenient by the hateful left, I'm therefore a "right-wing extremist" and as much a national-security threat as the likes of Timothy McVeigh and Mohammed Atta and William Ayers. Boy, doesn't that just blow your mind? Holy Shiite- I have an opinion the left doesn't like, and they therefore see me as another of those folks who's plotting to blow stuff up somewhere? Where's the logic in that?

I think the Obama regime is paranoid. They think the Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is out to get them, out to take over America. Funny, but, you know, in psychiatric terms, that's called "projection".

This cannot stand.

While I'm not American, I'd expect the left in Canada to do something similar, for the left knows no borders, as their hatred and evil are omnipresent in the world.