On page 786, the authors wrote that one way to discourage illegitimate childbearing "might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption – especially those born to minors who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone."
Alternatively, the authors suggested unwed mothers might place their babies up for adoption, writing: "If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it."
While observing that government-imposed coercive measures should be considered "only if milder measures fail completely," the authors acknowledged extreme ecological situations could justify governmental intervention with coercive population control measures,
"It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society," they write.
Obama thinks this dangerous lunatic is ok?
Well, he's appointed a whole bunch of other dangerous lunatics to be "czars", so it's obvious, his barely-hidden agenda. He wants a fascist communist nation to replace America as we know her.
What kind of man would appoint so many dangerous lunatics like this?
A dangerous lunatic, or at least a brainless puppet of one.
The Big, Old Approved NewsMedia is still blowing it. They ignored the shocking disclosures about czar Van Jones, and only mentioned him after he forcibly resigned.
They're pretty much ignoring the ACORN child-prostitution scandal.
So no wonder they're not talking about the dangerous lunacy of John Holdren, the Obamacrat Regime's "Science Czar".
See? The Big Old Approved NewsMedia isn't free, nor independent. It's obviously become a mouthpiece of the fascist state apparatus.
Not in America... impossible, you say?
But... it's happening right before our very eyes... shake off your peer-pressure-programmed denial response!
There those "progressives" go again, treating the symptoms instead of the societal causation factors, which are rooted in "progressive" ideology.
Rather than admit that their ideology is primarily responsible for the problems of America, for America's decline, they'll punish the People for being guillible victims of the society which they, the "well-meaning", brand-new-"rights"-inventing-and-promoting "progressives", created, with the real agenda of merely fostering dependence and winning votes to stay in power for their own selfish, hedonistic, exclusive, elite enrichment, funded with the confiscated wages of the de-facto slaves who serve them. Yup. The elites get paid lots of money, have lots of luxurious perks, have dachas in the countryside, etc... and get to shove the lowly, dependent masses around as if livestock.
The "progressives" are the ones who de-stigmatized, glamorized, promoted and financially rewarded single motherhood in the first place, and single motherhood, due to its unfortunate inferior childrearing ability compared to the traditional married-mom-and-dad childrearing team, has been proven to be the prime cause of so many of society's ills. Ann Coulter, in her book, "Guilty", proves the case with fully-footnoted statistics.
Offensive? Hurtful? To say that? But it's the inconvenient truth. Don't blame me for telling it; blame those who are responsible for glamorizing that which caused the societal problems in the first place (and the "ecological" problems to which Czar Holdren alludes).
The "progressives" are both the cause of America's problems and the medicine that's even worse than the malady.
It's time to go back to a society that works. Stop rewarding personally-and-socially-destructive behaviors that cause all these problems at the individual and societal levels and the behaviors and the problems will begin to reverse.