WTF story at WND:
An appeals court has concluded that just being an illegal alien in the United States doesn't necessarily violate the law, so a judge cannot deny probation and require a jail sentence for a convicted drug dealer who is an illegal alien.
WTF? Does this mean that illegal aliens, even when convicted of felonies, cannot be put in jail for their crimes? Think in terms of precedent and in terms of what the left will say ("The courts said illegals aren't illegal, ergo felonious 'undocumented workers' cannot be punished").
Sound like b.s., what I've just written? Well, with all the insanities going on these days (like with the CAIR still being allowed to be a legal entity, despite actually being an illegal terrorism-oriented entity!), it wouldn't surprise me to find that one day, if the "progressives" get their way, illegal aliens are above the law and citizens are subject to it and to harsh prosecution for straying therefrom.
The opinion from the Kansas Court of Appeals came in the Barton County case involving convicted drug dealer Nicholas L. Martinez.
The ruling found that while the laws of the United States make it illegal to enter the United States without authorization, being in the United States after entering illegally is "not necessarily a crime."
Astonishing illogic from the ultra-far left. Being lucky to be a "judge" doesn't mean that whatever one deems is correct. Or even a legal deeming. The "Judge" claimed in his ruling:
(...)while an illegal alien is subject to deportation, that person's ongoing presence in the United States is and of itself is not a crime unless that person had been previously deported and regained illegal entry into this country," the ruling, written by Judge Patrick McAnany, said.
Bullshit. This "judge" is apparently either stupid, insane or he's doing the ultra-far-left's bidding for some reason, breaking the law himself and he ought to be fired and tried for treason against the USA. One thing is for sure: he's a moron and has no business being a judge.
The rational, reasonable person already knows that if one has committed a crime, one is guilty after the commission of the crime, not merely at the moment of its commission. That is why, for example, murderers can be tried and sentenced years and years after the commission of the murder.
If one enters the country illegally, then they are not in the country legally. Therefore their presence is illegal. Duh! Duh! Duh!
Hey, "Judge", you know, if I was a judge, just to teach you a lesson in not being a stupid poophead and not being the power-mad self-deemed god of illogic which you clearly are, I'd render a ruling to the effect that lynch mobs for corrupt judges are not illegal because the lynch mobs are upholding the law and defending the United States from her enemies, foreign and domestic. (Of course, this is purely hypothetical and definitely not intended to suggest anything whatsoever to anyone. But the illogical parallel is equivalent!)