But don't expect the UN's IPCC to ever, ever, ever admit it, even if they find (or at least are told/pressured to believe) the study to be scientifically sound and correct. For they don't care about Asia- they only want to hurt the Free World by blaming them. The Non-Free World is already getting a pass on the CO2, so why wouldn't they also get a pass on the terrible pollution they spew into the air, which travels across the Pacific Ocean to North America, causing whatever ills and warming they do.
Don't expect the so-called liberal-progressives to care, either.
Report here. h/t: Drudge Report.
Anyway, this study, though not staggeringly massive, looks at least as good as the IPCC's compiled studies on greenhouse gases' perceived effects on temperatures and climate, which are basically data and analysis, little more, upon which a bunch of scientists (the exalted "IPCC" of the corrupted-by-evil "United Nations") were (often reluctantly, judging from statements some have made) peer- and financially-pressured into signing on to a "consensus" as to an inconclusive, yet positive-sounding declaration.
(Pardon me a moment while I rant about the bloody IPCC nonsense...)
A declaration, that is, treated by the so-called liberal-progressives as tantamount to the Word of (forgive me) God Himself (or at least the Word of their exalted guru, the Almighty AlGor, who most liberal-progressives bizarrely seem to consider omniscient and infallible, or the Word of the also-hypocritical-and-sanctimonious supposed "scientist" David "Fruit Fly Guy" Suzuki, if they're Canadian liberal-progressives).
Oh, and of course, also on that IPCC-propaganda frooty-tooty bandwagon is George Monbiot, from whose surname the word "moonbat" is derived to epithetize himself and his fellow travellers and useful idiots. The Moonbat King himself wrote a book, I've noticed, which I spied by accident while looking in vain for some conservative books (Indigo/Chapters is an indubitably liberal-progressive bookstore which I consider to make much less money than they could potentially, as they appear to deliberately refuse to carry even bestselling, in-great-demand conservative books, like Ann Coulter's "Godless" or books by Robert Spencer, a world-renowned expert on Islam who tells the plain truth about that cult and whom the Islamic Fascists wish would shut up).
So why should we let the so-called liberal-progressives get away with only making a stink over CO2, attacking the developed Free World, demanding we shut down our economy, while at the same time playing Three Monkeys when it comes to air pollution from Asia, especially evil, inhuman communist China (now the number one spewer of CO2, by the way), which now is said by scientists to cause as much "global warming" as CO2 is said by some other exalted United Nations-linked scientists who looked at a bunch of data? Why on earth should we take the word of anyone connected with the United Nations? One would necessarily have a mental disorder to believe anything declared by anyone connected to the United Nations!
(For the record, if you didn't already realize it, the United Nations sucks!)
Expect the liberal-progressives to conspire to silence/discredit/ridicule/threaten these scientists for daring to offer something else which they'll find inconvenient to their militant, hard-left agenda!
Heh- this was a fun post to write. I simply loooove using words to thump those liberal-progressive moonbat poopheads!
