"Oops, my bad. Tee-hee!"
Now the terrorists know where to go to steal some fissile material for nuclear weapons.
Thanks to the cavalier negligence and incompetence of the Obama Regime.
If this happened under the Bush adminstration, you just know that the New York Times would be spinning it in a much more serious light and that it'd be treated as a real big deal throughout Elite Media reports and that Democrat opponents and talking-head propagandists would be screaming and blasting the Bush administration for endangering America's national security and for being so stupid, stupid, stupid. They'd be calling for heads to roll and for criminal charges and the impeachment of Bush.
But for the Obama Regime? Oh, just a little "accident". No biggie; people aren't perfect; it happens all the time... now let's go back to excitedly gushing like ditzy poopheads about how the wonderful Obama (to placate angry "gay" militants and propagandists miffed that he's not kissing their asses as much as he promised to) suddenly, unexpectedly named June to be "GLBT Month". And let's watch this little clip of Mrs. Obama and the girls taking the doggie for a poopie on the sidewalk... oooooh... how cute.... awwww!
The federal government mistakenly made public a 266-page report, its pages marked “highly confidential,” that gives detailed information about hundreds of the nation’s civilian nuclear sites and programs, including maps showing the precise locations of stockpiles of fuel for nuclear weapons.
"The federal government". Hmm. Not "The Obama administration". 'Course not. Don't want to be too specific about Obama and his people. Can't be makin' 'em look bad!
"Mistakenly". What, no innuendo about someone deliberately leaking, in a possibly maliciously criminal fashion, so as to make Obama's whole regime look bad, like they'd certainly have tried to make the whole Bush administration look bad?
Kid gloves, eh? Way to go to downplay the extraordinary seriousness of a leak of national-security-serious information on locations of fissile material which could now be stolen by terrorists looking for stuff to shove into missiles or to add to bombs for far more deadly effect.
Several nuclear experts argued that any dangers from the disclosure were minimal, given that the general outlines of the most sensitive information were already known publicly.
“These screw-ups happen,” said John M. Deutch, a former Director of Central Intelligence and Deputy Secretary of Defense who is now at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “It’s going further than I would have gone but doesn’t look like a serious breach.”Must be Democrats who say that. "Not a serious breach". Oh, of course not, not as long as it's under a Democratic regime. Therefore the dangers of the disclosure are "minimal". Sure. Gotta be, 'cause, hey, Obama's in power and he'd never let serious stuff happen, after all, right?
But David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, a private group in Washington that tracks nuclear proliferation, said information that shows where nuclear fuels are stored “can provide thieves or terrorists inside information that can help them seize the material, which is why that kind of data is not given out. It can become a physical security threat.”
Told you so. Yet you hear from obvious Democratic Obamite zombies that it's "no big deal, move on... oh, this just in... Mrs. Obama ate beans and farted! Hahaha!".
President Obama sent the document to Congress on May 5 for Congressional review and possible revision, and the Government Printing Office subsequently posted the draft declaration on its web site.
Hey, if Bush had sent the document, then Democrats and the Elite Media would be accusing him of personally screwing up or suggesting that perhaps he deliberately made it so that the document would be released. But Obama? Nothing to see here. Oh, hey, White House Press Gallery sheeple, let's all laugh at the guy who asked the question so as to make him look crazy!
The report details the locations of hundreds of nuclear sites and activities. Each page is marked across the top “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SAFEGUARDS SENSITIVE,” with the exception of pages that detailed additional information such as site maps. In his transmittal letter, Mr. Obama said the cautionary language was a classification category of the I.A.E.A.’s inspectors.(Emphasis mine)
Obama himself, in his attached transmittal letter, using classic Left-Wing cunninglinguistic NUANCE, appears to have implied that it wasn't his regime's own caution/classification, by indicating it was the IAEA's. This sounds like code, in which some folks might deduce that Obama's, in other words, hinting to them that "it's no big deal". Yep, I know from experience interacting with them, how Leftists think and how they communicate and interpret messages... with NUANCE.
If it was my own administration, I'd have actually reminded the recipient that the classification obviously meant that the document was classified, sensisitve, and obviously not meant to be published so that everyone, including threats to national security, could see it.
But this regime, who's paranoid that anyone who opposes abortion, anyone who believes in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and in the separation of state and federal jurisdictions, and anyone who believes that America has enemies, is a potential national security threat or terrorist, incredibly, however, doesn't think that letting everyone in the world know where to steal fissile nuclear weapons-ready material is a national security problem? Doesn't Obama himself understand this?
How could anyone not see that they're not supposed to go to the trouble to post the document online? They must be STUPID or CRIMINAL. They must be LEFTIST! Of course, they can probably be excused, as they were obviously interpreting Obama's orders as Leftists are used to interpreting one another's coded, NUANCED LANGUAGE, seeing as Obama said, well, the scary language about "classified", well, it's 'theirs', hint, hint, wink, wink...".
It's beginning to look like a pattern of behavior to undermine America's security and standing in the world. The Regime actually wanted to release pictures that would harm the CIA, before deciding, after the outcry, not to do it after all. But they wanted to do it, and that shows their disturbingly dangerous mentality. Including Obama's own.
And who could forget the Vice-President's also-downplayed, "not-serious, not a big deal", disclosure of a top-secret safe bunker location? Is the guy really that stupid, or does he just have a mental disorder? Whichever it is, he's hardly any more fit to be VP than Obama is to be President. After all, it doesn't matter what's a flub and what's a deliberate wrong; if they're doing it all the time, then that's all we need to know that they're the wrong men for the job.
It's astonishing that Regime officials and their propaganda mouthpiece the NYT and the rest of the Elite Media are downplaying the breach, but it's really not surprising, as we know that the Extreme Left wants to "make America more open to the world and show she doesn't have any hidden agenda or anything like that".