Click on the image to enlarge the quotation of then new First Lady, who, infamously, now only likes America just because her hubby Barry is the President.I recently blogged about what some have called "Obama Youth", but it didn't get any mainstream media attention, nor did the Republicans bother to say anything about this ominous, scary sounding thing.
Now there's renewed attacks on this massive, hugely expensive, virtually mandatory/very hard to say no to, hidden-agenda program of Obama's.
"If we're going to create some kind of national police force as big, powerful and well-funded as our combined U.S. military forces, isn't this rather a big deal?" Farah wrote. "I thought Democrats generally believed the U.S. spent too much on the military. How is it possible their candidate is seeking to create some kind of massive but secret national police force that will be even bigger than the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put together?
"Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? If not, why did he say it? What did he mean?" Farah wrote.
The Blue Collar Muse blog commented, "The questions are legion and the implications of such an organization are staggering! What would it do? According to the title, it's a civilian force so how would it go about discharging 'national security' issues? What are the Constitutional implications for such a group? How is this to be paid. … The statement was made in the context of youth service. Is this an organization for just the youth or are adults going to participate? How does one get away from the specter of other such 'youth' organizations from Nazi Germany and the former Soviet Union when talking about it?"
Michael Kinsley also commented generally on plans for enlisting America's youth in voluntary versus required volunteerism on Time's website: "Problem number one with grand schemes for universal voluntary public service is that they can't be both universal and voluntary. If everybody has to do it, then it's not voluntary, is it? And if it's truly up to the individual, then it won't be universal."
It sounds to me like a scheme to indoctrinate/brainwash youth against their and their parents' wishes and against their rights. It, even worse, raises the specter of the possibility that such a staggeringly massive "civilian defence" force of brainwashed "progressive" national socialists (yes, national socialists!) could overthrow a future (Republican) US government somehow, a la the Bolshevist Revolution led by Vladimir Lenin that led to the creation of the USSR and the murders of millions and millions of innocent "inconvenients".
I said that Barack Hussein Obama has a hidden agenda and I stand by this contention.
You don't have to agree right now. But you probably will, eventually, when you see the agenda being implemented in a hurry, likely well before the midterm elections in a couple of years.
And the cost is simply staggering. How will it be paid for? I can't imagine. Higher taxes, gutting the US Forces, getting rid of Social Security, what? All these questions leave the reasonable person with a feeling of foreboding, apprehension, dread... because we don't know exactly what Obama's hidden agenda is.
I sincerely believe that the rights of Americans are now endangered by the election of President Obama. Because I've already seen the Left trampling all over Americans' rights in the Leftist-dominated courts and in Leftist-dominated jurisdictional governing bodies, which apparently have been directing police to disregard the rights of Americans when following politicians' ideologically-motivated orders. I've blogged about this extensively, after all... and I'm far, far, far from alone.
