ht: Drudge Report
Looks like there's something wrong with the District Attorney who went on a jihad against Dick Cheney, successfully having him indicted on charges of supposedly being a bad boy just because he had an investment in something that had allegedly had some bad stuff going on.
He yelled at the judge yesterday, for one thing.
Also, he's crooked himself, making it seem odd that he'd be allowed to indict the Vice-President of the United States (but then again, what else is new in the weird, wacky, brave new "progressive" America where anything goes and nothing's too bizarre, nor insane, inexplicable, unexpected, nor even ominously dangerous):
Guerra lost his bid for re-election in the March primary and will leave office in January. He was indicted last year on charges he extorted money from a bail bond company and used his office for personal business, but the charges were dismissed last month.
He also, on par with Leftist Mental Disorder and that wonderful liberals' culture of entitlism, demanded the judge not order him around and ask him nicely instead:
Guerra first said "I will not obey that order," but then agreed to stay if the judge asked him respectfully.
Cheney and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales were indicted in connection with privately run federal detention centers in Willacy. In particular, it alleges that Cheney's personal investment in the Vanguard Group, which invests in private prison companies, gives him culpability in alleged prisoner abuse.
Guerra also indicted judges and special prosecutors who played a role in the investigation of him.
I'm not the only one who sees something unusual and inappropriate with what's going on with that unhinged D.A.:
"You can't have district attorneys across the country bringing charges against federal officials," Treece said. And even in a federal probe, Cheney and Gonzales have a "qualified privilege" that would protect them so long as they were acting within their jobs, Treece said.
Given that statement, one cannot help but wonder, then, what the hell is going on.
I'd also suggest taking a closer look at those who successfully witchhunted Conrad Black and had him convicted without evidence (since when is seeing a guy carrying some boxes evidence of a crime, particularly when no one knows what was in the boxes besides Mr. Black?) of any wrongdoing, but were nevertheless somehow able to manipulate the apparently stupid jury into thinking Mr. Black had done something wrong. I followed that case and looked for evidence of wrongdoing but saw none whatsoever. Dammit, can you imagine the Clintons getting prosecuted for the same stuff as Mr. Black and Mr. Cheney? Me neither. Leftist prosecutors and judges, after all, aren't exactly wont to give a hoot about Leftists who have lots of money and do weird stuff. I'm still waiting for the felony case against Hillary Clinton to continue, though... and I have seen and blogged about the evidence of her fraud, as have many others, though, of course, most folks are unaware of it because the Leftist mainstream media has been engaged in a conspiracy of silence on that to protect the distaff Clinton. It's doubly bizarre that they're silent on this big deal, since Spiderman creator Stan Lee is part of the evidence of Hillary's fraud and lying. Dammit, but one would expect such a sensational case to be big news. Certainly it's bigger news than Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Angelina Jolie, Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston and so on... we're talking about someone who ran for the Demmie Nomination and who appears set to be appointed Secretary of State. Does anyone believe that if Sarah Palin had the very same case proceeding against her, involving a celebrity witness, that the MSM wouldn't be all over the whole thing?
