Sunday, February 11, 2007

More Evidence Climate Change Alarmism is A Hoax

(LINK FIXED)

Here we go. Do you have an open mind? Are you prepared to accept reasonable doubt? Or are you submitting to a monstrous lie?

I'll give you a taste with some excerpts, but you must read it all. All emphasis mine.

Dr. Christopher Landsea, a leading expert in the field of hurricanes and tropical storms, resigned as an author of the IPCC 2007 report, released earlier this month stating the IPCC was "motivated by pre-conceived agendas" and was "scientifically unsound."

Read about what happened to Dr. Landsea for yourself.

He makes the following revealing statement about his scientific peers:

"To my knowledge, none of the participants in that press conference had performed any research on hurricane variability. ... All previous and current research in the area of hurricane variability has shown no reliable, long-term trend up in the frequency or intensity of tropical cyclones, either in the Atlantic or any other basin."

There's more:

Two other renowned scientists said their work was misrepresented by those who wrote the 2001 IPCC summary, including MIT physicist Dr. Richard Lindzen.

Also ignored has been Dr. Frederick Seitz, past-president of the National Academy of Sciences and president emeritus of Rockefeller University, who wrote in June 1996, with regard to the 1995 IPCC report:

"I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report."

He continued: "This report is not what it appears to be -- it is not the version approved by the contributing scientists listed on the title page."


Hmm. We have more and more scientists involved in the whole thing who refuse to endorse the UN's IPCC "report".

It appears more and more likely, as time progresses, that the whole thing was falsified... whatever research there was appears to have been exaggerated, embellished, etc. in order to fit a political agenda.

It reminds me of the apparent hoax of genetic predetermination of sexual preference which was conspiratorially perpetrated in a similar manner. It also looks to me like the blatantly dishonest left-wing conspiracy that led to the advent of SSM in Canada.


Expect more. What you think is true just because you're told it's true appears to be untrue.

Doubt is healthy.

Brainless submission to political correctness is not.

Allowing massive propaganda efforts such as is happening with the alarmist "climate change" hoax to shape your perceptions of the world is not.

Some will dismiss my opinion as a mere "conspiracy theory", but I'm undeterred.

Evidence is coming in. I'm hungry and motivated. I'm a blogger. I'm The Canadian Sentinel.

I'm on the case.