This despite the fact that many Liberals oppose Dion's dangerous position.
And despite the fact that killing the anti-terror laws would jeopardize the Air India Inquiry.
And despite the fact that it would be a slap in the face of the victims and victims' families... of 9/11 and other terrorist attacks.
Why is Stephane Dion so determined to make Canada unable to protect her national security from terrorist enemies and attacks?
I recall the recent article by Ezra Levant.
There is only one reason why Dion wants to scrap this law: Because the increasingly powerful Muslim wing of his party demands it.
That wing includes Omar Alghabra, an MP from Mississauga. Before being elected a Liberal MP, Alghabra was a vocal political activist who campaigned against border security.
This wing also includes Mohammed Elmasry, the head of the Canadian Islamic Congress, a radical lobby group. Elmasry made headlines for telling a TV talk
show that every Israeli Jew aged 18 and up was fair game for terrorist attacks.
Far from being shunned for this extreme view, Elmasry was a prominent delegate to the Liberal leadership convention that chose Dion.
Mr. Levant points out that these men claim to have been significant factors in Dion's leadership victory.
And that Dion's determination to kill the anti-terror laws, which he supported just five years ago, is a "payback".
Does Stephane Dion owe Islamic fundamentalists, who obviously want to pave the way for terrorism in Canada, for his becoming Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada?
And what kind of a party would retain someone as extreme and jihad-supporting as Mohammed Elmasry, who, incredibly, got away with his seriously illegal incitement to violence against an identifiable group and continues to head up the CIC?
The Liberal Party of Canada. The very party who, while in government, sent a representative to the evil-friendly United Nations to vote against Israel in biased, unfair, unbalanced resolutions.
The party who knowingly harbors anti-Semites and anti-Israel individuals.
The ultra-extreme, hard, far-left, submissive Dhimmi, Liberal Party of Canada.
Led by a rarely-smiling, stoic man who apparently owes his job to Islamic fundamentalists who don't want Canada to be able to prevent terrorist attacks.
And all that on top of the infamous culture of entitlement, incompetent governance, incredibly wasteful spending, gross corruption, three dozen continuing criminal investigations, owing $40 million to the taxpayers for money not accounted for and suspected to have been funneled into Liberal hands via ADSCAM.
It's inexplicable that the Liberal Party of Canada still continues to this day, despite everything!
Oh, almost forgot!!
Remember Paul Martin, Dion's predecessor? The guy who infamously wined and dined with the Tamil Tigers terrorists?
Well, something else has come to light...
Paul Martin solicited the support of the terrorist International Sikh Youth Federation in his failed bid for the federal Liberal leadership in 1990, The Vancouver Sun has learned.
(...)
At the time of Martin's spring 1990 speech, the ISYF had already been identified as a terrorist group by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service. Four in the group had been convicted in B.C. of the attempted assassination of a visiting Indian politician. Other B.C. members had met with a young would-be assassin who shot newspaper publisher Tara Singh Hayer in 1988.
The Martin speech came two years after then Conservative external affairs minister Joe Clark warned Canadian politicians to steer clear of the federation, the Babbar Khalsa and the World Sikh Organization because of terrorist links. The ISYF was banned in Canada in June 2003 by the Liberal government of Jean Chretien.
How on earth can Canada afford to trust the Liberal Party, who is so obviously clueless as to the dangers posed by terrorists and terrorism? Do Liberals even care? Or is power and money more important than anything else for hardcore Liberals?
