Monday, March 19, 2007

Where's Osama and Why We Didn't Get Him

It isn't as simple as we've been led to believe. Nor anywhere near as easy.

Read the analysis by terrorism expert Paul L. Williams.



Really. Think about it. It isn't that simple at all.

Not even for the United States of America. Unless she were to take the one easy way: nuke the whole friggin' area or areas most likely to hold the flea-bitten son of a bitch, if you'll pardon my French.

It's noted that bounty-hunting mercenaries have tried and failed, with deadly results, to hunt and capture bin Laden. The problem is one thing: undying, dogmatic loyalty by Muslims towards bin Laden.

Osama bin Laden isn't the problem. Indeed, he is a problem, but not the problem.

The problem is Islam.

It is Islam we must deal with. Osama bin Laden is expendable; there's other Islamic supremacists/imperialists to take his place should he finally expire.

Simply taking care of bin Laden won't do a bloody bit of good, I've come to realize. Sure, it'd feel great to finally exact vengeance for 9/11 (and other atrocities) and display the mangy old bugger's severed head on a stick for the whole world to see, but then what? Would Islam simply surrender? Hell, no!

See the problem facing humanity? It's not about one man, two men, millions of Islamic fascist men and women and a bunch of linked jihadist organizations. It's about the entire evil ideology of Islam.

If Islam isn't reformed very soon to eradicate its inherent, and wholly intolerable, evil, then the only solution is to destroy Islam, otherwise it will bring about hell on earth.

I know that to say such a thing will be seen as politically incorrect, shocking, unacceptable and so on... but can anyone disprove it?

Islam itself is the problem.