"There have been quite a few cases in the past where perpetrators have received milder sentencing because they came from a different cultural background, but this verdict truly tops everything I've seen," Schwarzer told ABC News. "It undermines German jurisdiction and is yet another proof of the ongoing Islamisation here in Europe."
What happened?
German divorce court judge Christa Datz-Winter saw fit to reject an application for a speedy divorce by referring to a passage of the Koran.
In a letter to the wife's lawyer, Barbara Becker-Rojczyk, who had applied for such a speedy divorce to be granted to her client Najat L., the judge pointed out that the couple came from a Moroccan cultural background in which is not uncommon for husbands to beat their wives.
The woman wanted a divorce because her husband was beating her.
But the judge chose Dhimmitude over German law. The judge chose Sharia Law, without having any business whatsoever to do so.
Another example of rampant judicial activism. This judge is corrupt.
Fortunately, the judge was removed and the ruling overruled.
But it's a real-world example of the reality of the mental disorder of leftism which affects all kinds of people, including judges. We see the danger of judicial activism and the spread of Islam, not just via the "sword", but via intimidation.
An aside: the article cites unnamed "Muslim leaders" and quotes one as implying that Mohammed never hit a woman, therefore Muslim men don't hit women. But we know that this quotation is yet another example of Taqiyya, Islamic lying. Clearly, Muslims are lying about Islam. The Koran clearly actually prescribes that men beat women for various reasons. Although I'm unaware as to whether Mohammed ever "struck" a woman, that's irrelevant, as the Koran says Muslim men should do so. Besides, Mohammed was a murderous barbarian and probably did hit and kill women as well as others.
Don't be fooled by what "Muslim leaders" claim. They cannot be trusted to tell us "Kaffirs" the truth about Islam, precisely because lying in the interest of Islam is Islamic.
It seems also that we must be wary of the judges. Because of rulings we know to be wrong, it's becoming increasingly clear that judges cannot be trusted any further than they can be thrown. Like politicians.
It's better to be wary of what we see as being a mess rather than ignore reality and delude ourselves into thinking that everything's fine, that Islam is peaceful, tolerant, non-supremacistic, non-imperialist, honesty-based... and that judges are to be trusted unconditionally. For the reality isn't as the left wants us to believe. Many things the left tells us are outright lies. Never forget that.
