Here we have another moonbat professor going around claiming to have done a study making a conclusion which would give some artificial comfort and legitimacy to the left.
What else is new? Will he next be pushing a claim to have studied a bunch of cadavers, claiming to have found differences in the brains of leftists and conservatives?
I don't understand why the MSM treats this complete BS from a leftist "academic" hellbent on getting attention and accolades from the brainless left by making wild, silly claims like this.
Hellbent, fullashit leftist "academics" are nothing new. Think Noam Chomsky, Ward Churchill and on and on...
If there was any such study, and it's entirely possible it's a hoax, well, it's only one and the numbers are statistically insignificant.
Why bother to do a study if it won't stand up to scrutiny? Par for the course for the left!
The professor just wants to stir things up a bit with his own wishful, biased "thinking" and give comfort to the very blatantly obviously whiny left.
Tell me: how is it that, as he claims, liberals develop from calm, self-assured infants yet are as adults the whiny ones? How is it that, as he claims, conservatives come from whiny infants yet as we know from years of observation, are the calm, rational, logical, realistic ones?
I dismiss and declare the "study" at the link to be more worthless ultra-extreme leftist junk science. No wonder the leftist Toronto Star is giving it such attention.
And the left and MSM wonder why fewer and fewer people are bothering to pay them any attention. Perhaps because the left and MSM are so damn whiny and all that?
h/t: nealenews.com
