Monday, May 03, 2010

Police State Britain


Story here.

“I felt deeply shocked and humiliated that I had been arrested in my own town and treated like a common criminal in front of people I know," he said.

“My freedom was taken away on the hearsay of someone who disliked what I said, and I was charged under a law that doesn't apply.”

Christian campaigners have expressed alarm that the Public Order Act, introduced in 1986 to tackle violent rioters and football hooligans, is being used to curb religious free speech.

So how come the cops never nab Islamic Supremacists for publicly uttering frightening declarations such as "behead those who insult Islam" and so on and so forth?

Why treat Christians as violent criminals for simply mentioning their religiousity in public?  So what if some people don't like it?  Lots of people say offensive stuff in public and publicly act in ways that's offensive to others, but they don't get treated as violent criminals.  But should a Christian happen to publicly affirm a religious belief, he'll be arrested, booked, fingerprinted, have his DNA sampled and archived and be jailed, and released only after it was made clear that it was on the condition that he never again publicly affirm his religiousity.  If this isn't censorship, I don't know what is.  The whole arrest, the charge, etc... it's all clearly bogus, and indicates an aggressively corrupt abuse of the law by state apparatchiks for fascist purposes.

Apparently Britain now has what appears to be a de-facto Gay-Supremacist Gestapo, who apparently go around arresting (Christian) people who dare to declare that they just don't believe in the performance of certain physical activities between members of the same sex, because it goes against their religion...
“Case law has ruled that the orthodox Christian belief that homosexual conduct is sinful is a belief worthy of respect in a democratic society." 

Of course, the Progressive Liberal Left apparently doesn't believe that Christians deserve any respect.  The Progressive Liberal Left wants Christians to change in whatever way the Left deems.  

Or else! 

What's next, British Christians will be required to wear a yellow cross on their clothing?

Yes, apparently, there are those who want to forcefully shut up Christians.  Well, you know, I'd like to see them go after Muslims, too, because Islam also proscribes that specific sort of interpersonal physical contact and activity...  But I doubt that will happen, seeing how much the British state apparatus has, over and over and over again, demonstrated that it is too terrified to treat Muslims as equals, as opposed to how they actually treat them, ie. as specially-exempt-from-many-laws, entitled to special, exclusive "rights", superior-to-all-others citizens...

We see a hierarchy of rights being enforced here...  Let's see... Muslims at the very top, followed by special-sexuality-folks, with Christians effectively on the bottom.

And that's wrong.

Everyone MUST be treated equally under and before the law and enjoy all rights equally, no matter who they are.

14 comments:

marginalizedactiondinosaur said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
marginalizedactiondinosaur said...

equality = hate

Don't you know anything?

/sarc

Balbulican said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Balbulican said...

LOL. Okay, Scenty, you win. You've proved that you really have no interest in discussion. Or you're too stupid to understand it. Not sure which.

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, you're talking about the doublethink of the Progressive Liberal Left, in which, when they find it convenient to say so, equality = "hate".

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, hi, Balbulican. Good night, Balbulican.

Don't let the bedbugs bite...

ZZZZZZZZZ

Canadian Sentinel said...

Oh, and btw, Balbsy, the fact of the matter is that I know better than to waste time letting you try to mess with my head. I've developed an immunity to your sneaky, psychoaffective trickery.

Canuckguy said...

Sentinel, I presume those two deleted comments were Balbul's.

If so, I am disappointed.

Canadian Sentinel said...

CG, actually, Booble self-censored... see, it says it was removed by the author, not by the blog owner, ie. Yours Truly.

One of them was actually Dinosaur's.

But know what? Actually, I know what the deleted posts say, as I get 'em via email. Booble's self-censored post was ruder than the replacement one, actually, and pretty much just said I was "stupid". Guess he was extra grumpy last night... perhaps he "didn't get any", or something...

Canuckguy said...

Removed by author? How does one do that?

Canadian Sentinel said...

See the little picture of the garbage can at the bottom of your comment? ;)

Canuckguy said...

Testing for deletion.
Nope, Sentinel, I don't see any picture of a garbarge can.
nada, nope, non, nay

Canadian Sentinel said...

Does it not appear when you're actually in write-a-comment mode? Until you've entered that mode, it doesn't show. If it doesn't show when you're in that mode, then perhaps you could look at relaxing a security setting for this page that makes the icon disappear. Experiment and see if you can make Oscar's house show up...

Canuckguy said...

Tried and tried, no success Sentinel. Oh well, I can live with that.