Birthers! Astroturfers! Mobsters! Conspiracy theorists! Teabaggers! Poopheads! Moonbats!
That's the New York Times, folks. They're nuts. Cranks. Laugh at 'em. They deserve it.
I'd rather see military action taken against Iran. At least Iran is a believable, credible, demonstrable threat.
Climate change will pose profound challenges to the United States in the coming decades, raising the prospect of military intervention to deal with its effects, The New York Times reported, citing military and intelligence analysts.
Crises such as drought, violent storms, mass migration and pandemics could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions.
The Times reported that for the first time, intelligence agencies and the Pentagon are taking a hard look at the possible security implications resulting from climate change.In particular, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could call for U.S. military response.
Yeah, right. Suuuuure.
Much more likely than a war. Much more likely than terrorism. Suuuuure.
Let's just dismiss it. It's, after all, all coming out of the Obama Regime. They're all loony birds in there, y'know...
After all, hey, there's NO global warming. Everyone knows that. Nothing to worry about. Just a bunch of crazies going around trying to scare folks. Betcha they're racists, too. Just sayin', 'cause everybody knows that today's crazies are racists, according to the Obamites.
Hey, anybody believe this crap?