Another liberal judge.
Again, evil gets a slap on the wrist.
Excerpts:
One victim, who was 13 when the crimes began, told the court how she was held as a "sex slave" by the couple for several months.
She said the man, now 34, threatened to get members of a Winnipeg street gang and the Hells Angels to come after her family if she didn't comply with his demands.
The girl said that on at least two occasions, she was tied to a bed after being given pills and alcohol, then raped by the husband while his wife looked on.
(...)
She also claimed the man proudly showed her to his criminal friends, saying "this is the one" as he kept her in a locked room for nearly four consecutive days.
The woman was let off... just like that, despite being convicted. She raped the girls, too, yet was let off without punishment. The liberal judge illogically reasoned that time spent in custody awaiting trial was punishment enough.
The man got a mere seven years (we know he'll get out in a fraction of that!) and left the courtroom... grinning. Only an evil person would be grinning.
The more this happens, the more and more people will feel as if it's not such a bad thing to do the sort of thing that these two people did. The pitifully inadequate "liberal" consequences are obviously of no consequence to those who live for risk, like to live dangerously and get their jollies by tormenting and ruining the lives of others.
I guess forcibly confining and raping children is now considered by liberals as a "sexual orientation" and will someday be "written in" to the Charter by a future Liberal government or by the "courts" themselves as a protected class or something. Apparently pedophilia is a human right in the minds of liberals (they don't dare say it just yet), and, considering that children don't seem to be allowed many rights at all relative to adults, then the left will someday reason that it's a "human right" for adults to do whatever they want to children. It's conceivable. It's the slippery slope. After all, liberals don't even think unborn humans are even human at all and have no rights at all, so is it such a stretch to assert this?
After all, in society, it's ok to hit children to "correct" them, but it would violate the rights of adult criminals to do it to them to correct them. I have a problem with that in that it's illogical and inconsistent with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It's discrimination against children on the basis of age. Plus, the schools are now forcibly indoctrinating children in unnecessary and wholly inappropriate things like "gay" anal sex (while refusing to even mention abstinence) and in being a Muslim (while refusing to allow mention of Jesus or God)... against the wishes of their parents!
Society is spiralling downwards, downwards... into an abyss of evil immorality, clearly, willingly condoned by the left.
They ruined the lives of these children... permanently harmed them. And a liberal judge treats these evildoers... liberally.
In Canada.
I didn't make this up.
Choose your Canada.
Reject evil. Reject liberalism.
