Again the New York Times comes to the defense of radical Islamic candidate Keith Ellison, in a slobbery puff piece that does not even mention his links to CAIR, and blithely brushes past his history with the Nation of Islam as if it didn’t matter.
See the double standard? If a Republican happens to be a devout Christian or if a Republican had once had anything to do with a "White" organization, the New York Times and pretty much all the MSM would be making a big deal out of it, as if it mattered.
But they don't bother to address Keith Ellison's ties to the NOI and the CAIR, giving him the automatic benefit of the doubt which they never grant Christians and/or conservatives.
Keep in mind that the NOI is racist, only accepting Black Muslims. And that the CAIR is a front organization of Hamas and supporter of terrorism.
In the post-9-11 era, this is unacceptable. Yet the left continues to keep its head firmly lodged up inside its hiney hole. We have an Islamofascist in Congress in the United States of America.
But what does the Islamic world care? Will they now allow a Christian or a Jew or an Atheist to be part of the government of one of their theocracies? Like hell they would... they'd most likely just, summarily, behead the candidate. As is the will of some imaginary dude named "Allah".
The Islamic world sees this development as a sign from Allah, most likely. They see it as another big step on their imperialist road, another step towards the Islamification of the Free World. Thanks to those who voted for Ellison, the Islamofascists will be emboldened and motivated all the more.
The NYT is so biased. It will be a pleasure to watch them slowly slip towards bankruptcy.
