Friday, October 24, 2008

Post-Election, Lefto-Fascists Resume Aggressive HR Abuse


Ezra Levant, freedom fighter par excellence, tells us about it again. ht: National Newswatch

The Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) kept its head down during the recent federal election. With no less than four ongoing investigations into its conduct, it wisely stayed beneath the radar. But with the election over, it's back at it, with its most egregious violation of our civil rights yet.

(...)

Jim Pankiw, an MP who served from 1997 to 2004, is on trial for sending out flyers criticizing Indian crime in Saskatchewan. If convicted, Pankiw can face massive fines. He could also face other orders, ranging from a forced apology to a lifetime ban on commenting about aboriginal issues. If Pankiw refuses to comply with such an order, he could serve time in jail.

Aboriginal crime was a big issue for Pankiw's constituents. According to Statistics Canada, aboriginals make up only 9% of Saskatchewan's population, but they are 52% of the province's criminally accused.


Again, in Canada, someone, somewhere, is being persecuted, with his rights taken away, for simply exercising them in a way deemed inconvenient to the agenda of the politically-correct fascist elite.

Jim Pankiw will not get a fair trial. There are NO fair trials in the "Human Rights" Commissions. This has already been conclusively established, though hardly anyone knows this, as the mainstream media barely uttered a peep about the whole shocking thing that's been going on for months and months already, with historic firsts in the acquittal of Ezra Levant, Mark Steyn and MacLeans Magazine, the very first persecutees to not be found guilty by the Commissions... only because they fought back very publicly, were broadly supported across the political spectrum, and vowed to take the fight all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, something that apparently strikes terror in the hearts (or at least the empty pockets of space reserved for them) of the evil "Human Rights" fascists.

After all, the Supreme Court has already ruled that the HRCs cannot do what they're doing. Even though they are!

The suit against Pankiw is clearly unconstitutional. In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that human rights commissions could only pursue "hate" cases against Canadians whose messages were pure evil -- they were explicitly forbidden from touching political speech. Whether or not Pankiw's views on Indian crime are "right" should therefore be up to the voters.
Clearly, the "Human Rights" Commissions are criminal organizations. They are going against the ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada and daring to take away peoples' rights.