Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Liberal Hypocrisy on Judicial Appointments

Story here.

The federal Liberals suddenly think it's somehow a bad thing to appoint fellow party members/supporters to judicial positions, making much hot air out of the fact that some of the new Conservative government's judicial appointments happen to be Tories themselves, ignoring the fact that some are actually Liberals, too.

Huh...

I can't believe even the Liberals would be so daft as to demonstrate such appalling hypocrisy about judicial appointments. They're infamous for appointing not just Liberals but radical left-wing activists to the bench. How else did they manage to effect such radical social reengineering without lifting a finger, if not for reliance on their strategic appointees who so often simply rule as they see fit regardless of actual laws and even the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Many Canadians know precisely what I'm talking about. Those who don't aren't paying attention to our country's workings... or they just don't care... or they're brainwashed leftists.

I reject the Liberals' pretending to suddenly care. They have nothing to go on at all, so they try to make hay out of nothing.

If the Liberals really cared, they'd be calling for legislation to have judges either elected by the people or be forced to be accountable, with some kind of continuously randomized selection from amongst the citizenry to be "super jurors" to scrutinize the behavior and rulings of judges who appear to have done wrong in the course of their duties and have been accused of impropriety.

Indeed, it is wrong that judges, certainly at the level of the Supreme Court of Canada, have absolute final authority to make whatever rulings they desire, without any accountability whatsoever. This, as I've indicated previously on this blog, amounts to a "dictatorship of the judiciary", which many Canadians believe, with excellent reason, to have been slyly and slickly utilized by the previous Liberal regime for the purpose of effecting radical social reengineering as desired by the ultra-far left, which, in turn, supported that party for so many years, helping it win elections.

Oh, and let's not forget about the kangaroo-court "Human Rights Tribunal" and "Human Rights Commission", but these are another story, to be examined another day, held up to honest, critical scrutiny... to ensure that they're not merely trojan horses for radical left-wing social reengineering and agents of intimidation on behalf of fascistic, unconstitutional "political correctness".