Peter MacKay at home with dog Jack, recovering from being hurt by billionaire Liberal Belinda Stronach. What decent, compassionate human being could fault him for being hurt and angry and maybe making less-than-complimentary remarks as a result?
When a man dumps a woman, people call him all sorts of nasty stuff, like "pig" and take the woman's side. But people don't care about the man when the woman dumps him. Shame! Whatever happened to equality and tolerance? Men have feelings, too! Give Peter a break!
CTV article here.
The MSM, including the CTV/Globe and Mail, are going out of their way to hurt Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay, making hay out of an alleged comment he made about a former girlfriend.
One thing caught my eye:
The Globe and Mail showed a picture of MacKay looking thoughtful as he posed on his property with a dog.
But it was later revealed that the dog did not belong to MacKay.
But I remembered that the dog did, indeed, belong to the MacKay family.
Would CTV care to prove that Peter MacKay rented the dog for the speech/photo op? Can anyone prove that the dog didn't belong to his family?
Crappy reporting. CTV. MSM. Yecch!
And the left has slammed me as a "propagandist"? Well, I'm no worse than the CTV. I try to be factual and try not to make statements that have no basis.
Now they'll have to either provide proof (not Liberal Party accusations) or retract the claim that it was "revealed" that it wasn't his.
Junk reporting. No better than a lowly citizen blogger in his pajamas!
The Vancouver Sun does a proper job of reporting, accepting that the dog is Mr. MacKay's:
MacKay's relationship with his canine companion became famous after they cuddled for reporters in the aftermath of Stronach and MacKay's stormy breakup following her defection to the Liberals in May 2005. At the time, MacKay, stung by what he described as his girlfriend's betrayal, said he would seek comfort in his dog, Jack, because "at least dogs are loyal."
No question about whose dog it is here.
Anyone dare claim that the dog was not Peter's? Got proof? No? Then they're just being partisan and dishonest!
Like the Liebrano$$$ and their hypocrisy on the environment: they slam the Conservative Clean Air Act, which promises to cut greenhouse gas emissions in half between now and 2050, something that could be seen as doable, as compared to what the Kyoto Accord required, which was far, far, far more draconian and economically deleterious in theory (no wonder no one has bothered to reduce emissions since signing Kyoto, including the Liebrano$$$, who themselves presided over subsequently skyrocketing emissions, having done nothing at all other than perhaps put up a few expensive, taxpayer-funded ads with Liberal stooge Rick Mercer sanctimoniously telling us to "Do our part" while the Liebrano$$$ didn't do theirs).
(The Liebrano$$$ could reduce hot air emissions by simply shutting the feck up... and voting for the Clean Air Act!)
I see the Liebrano$$$, the left and the MSM suddenly pulling out the partisan stops and going as far as possible, lying, demagoguing, accusing without basis, against the Conservative government... because the government is doing an excellent job and is clean, certainly so clean that when they find any suspicious stuff they look into it right away and take action, rather than hiding, denying and eventually admitting like the bloody Liebrano criminal-organization-posing-as-government always did!
As for calling Belinda Stronach a "dog", MacKay never uttered that word. He never said "dog". Some Liebrano heckler said "dog".
Besides, men get called "pigs" by women all the time and there's no big-deal, hysterical politically-correct, vast left-wing screechery over it. But make anyone think of dogs when gesturing towards a chair, after some idiot Liebrano makes a stupid remark, and all hell breaks loose.
And don't forget that the Islamofascists call the Jews "pigs, dogs and monkeys" and the left doesn't give a flying crap at all! Hypocrisy, thy name is leftism!
Leftist folks are out of their bloody moonbat minds! Get a life! Why not discuss the merits/demerits of the Clean Air Act instead? Because they can't! All they can do is claim it's "bad" and stuff, without backing up their claims with anything other than hairsplitting smoke and mirror partisan-extremist gobbleddygook!
It's a double standard. The left is sexist. This is male bashing. This is Conservative bashing. This is moonbattery unhinged!
The left and the MSM should be ashamed of themselves!
It's a vast, left-wing conspiracy to attack a man and his dog! Disgusting, reprehensible left-wing moonbat poopheads! Bah!
Oh, for heaven's sake! There's more important stuff to discuss! (Of course, leftist feminazis are going to claim that all of this is "proof" that the taxpayers should be throwing more money at feminazi groups and crapola like that)...
