Caught on camera: The anti-Semitic hate crime.On the street.
In "tolerant", "cosmopolitan" Montreal.
In Canada.
Story here.
Police say they have "no evidence" that the attack was motivated by hate?! What the feck?
The boy is clearly dressed in traditional Hasidic religious clothing. He is clearly a devout Jew. The attacker knows this for certain! How on earth can the police so automatically caution that it isn't necessarily a hate crime?
If the victim was a flamboyant, earring-studded, skinny, tight-clothing-wearing, gyrating-while-walking homosexual, a bizarre-looking transsexual, a Muslim in traditional Islamic clothing, the left, the gay organizations, the Muslim organizations... would all be demanding that the assailant be thrown in jail for a very, very long time! The MSM wouldn't be downplaying the attack- they'd be trumpeting it at the top and bottom of the hour! There would be destructive riots in the streets! A movie would be made!
All these incessant calls for extra, special, exclusive protections for Muslims and sexual extremists from hate crimes, both real and imagined... Hey, where's the calls for extra protections for Jewish people? Christian people? There are none coming from the left or the MSM. Am I wrong? Show me, then, all of those calls I've been missing, despite the fact that I watch the MSM like a hawk!
You know, had the victim been a sexual extremist or a Muslim, it wouldn't matter what the alleged motive was. The judicial system would automatically treat it as a hate crime just because of who the victim was and the fact that they were attacked. These days the presumption of the motive of "hate" is automatic. Any suggestion by anyone that it's "not necessarily" a hate crime would lead to loud condemnations of the suggester as a hateful monster and so on. And the suggester may in fact end up before the kangaroo-court, fascistic "Human Rights Tribunal" and automatically being ordered to pay a four-figure fine.... just because!
There better not be a double standard here. If there is a double standard and the attacker isn't sentenced for his clearly proven physically violent attack on this visible minority person, according to the sentencing requirements of hate crimes legislation, then there's possibly going to be some kind of serious social trouble. So justice better be done in this case as well as in other cases!
Plus... as the "suspect" is over 18 years of age, his identity cannot be protected.
Who is the attaker? I want to see his face. I want to know his name. I want to know if he's in any way, shape or form, associated/connected with any kind of extremist group of any kind whatsoever.
