Leftists, progressives, communists, useful idiots... you name 'em... that's them. Basically, ignorant, brainwashed, crazy people. With pictures of Che Guevara (the murderer) and banners saying "Communist Party" and "Socialist Worker" and signs defaming the Prime Minister as a "terrorist". One guy dressed as a War of 1812 soldier had a sign saying "There is no terrorism". Wow. Crazy.
They don't have a bloody CLUE what they're talking about. Seriously.
If these are just regular folks who weren't community-organized, then God help Canada.
But apparently they're not regular folks and they were community organized. Likely by George Soros and other foreigner-funded agent entities of subversion. If we know how things work in the real world nowadays, this is apparent to us. Otherwise, expect others to be skeptical about this punditry because they "didn't see it on the 'real' news". As if the "real" news would ever carry something that destroys its assigned narrative.
Or you can go ahead and believe they're regular folks, and be a useful idiot yourself.
And go ahead and make a fool of yourself by saying, oh, this "isn't journalism". Well, if this isn't journalism here, then nothing is.
Story HERE.
Be sure to watch the video and listen to the crazy people saying crazy things. And see the banners and signs they hold up. They're CRAZY. And sometimes potentially dangerous, we must carefully assume, just in case.
They don't have a bloody CLUE what they're talking about. Seriously.
If these are just regular folks who weren't community-organized, then God help Canada.
But apparently they're not regular folks and they were community organized. Likely by George Soros and other foreigner-funded agent entities of subversion. If we know how things work in the real world nowadays, this is apparent to us. Otherwise, expect others to be skeptical about this punditry because they "didn't see it on the 'real' news". As if the "real" news would ever carry something that destroys its assigned narrative.
Or you can go ahead and believe they're regular folks, and be a useful idiot yourself.
And go ahead and make a fool of yourself by saying, oh, this "isn't journalism". Well, if this isn't journalism here, then nothing is.
Story HERE.
Be sure to watch the video and listen to the crazy people saying crazy things. And see the banners and signs they hold up. They're CRAZY. And sometimes potentially dangerous, we must carefully assume, just in case.
18 comments:
One of the folks there looks strikingly familiar, by the way... ;)
Anyone here admit to being there?
I noticed a bunch of people who look sort of like me, but fat old guys with beards and gray hair all tend to look the same. I don't go to demonstrations much, and I didn't go to any of these ones.
And no, this isn't "journalism". This is "editainment", or an "entertorial". It mimics the form of journalism, but its purpose is to make an editorial point (i.e., in this case, "People Who Disagree with C51 are Stupid".)
It's similar to what Michael Moore did, or what Rick Mercer does. It can be funny, but I never find it very illuminating - whether it's being done by Michael Moore or Ezra Levant, it always strikes me as both smug and deeply dishonest. That's because, if you're honest, you know that the people who disagree intelligently, reasonably, or factually, are being cut and left on the edit room floor.
That's not "journalism".
Damn, it looks totally like you... and sounds like you... LOL I know you have to deny stuff sometimes, but, dude... be careful out there... just sayin'. I sure hope it's just your twin and that you wouldn't say that the Parliament Hill terrorist was a "setup"... ;)
And what this is is EVIDENCE that the "protestors" don't know what they're talking about. It's a bullshit, staged, community-organized, COMMUNIST propaganda event. Is what it is. Exposing things with evidence is part of journalism.
But if you want to strictly define journalism in a strict way, then within that frame, you would be right. But only then, within that frame. And I know how you Alinskyst folks love to reframe stuff.
Nope, I wasn't there. I wouldn't deny it if I were - why on earth would I? But I wasn't.
Now, with all respect, you've confirmed a few times that you don't actually know what "Communism" means, but that you use it as a catch-all term for "Stuff You Don't Like". I have to say that if you think shooting a whole bunch of video, taking it back to the edit suite, and selecting the bits that make your opponents look stupid - if you think that's "journalism", well, sorry, but you don't know what "journalism" means either.
Which one did you think was me, by the way? What time mark on the tape?
5 minutes-something. Guy appears to be saying the Ottawa terrorist guy was a "setup".
Funny that that dude looks like your identical twin, eh? ;)
I didn't say I didn't know that communism means. I explained what I've come to see it as being, nowadays, notwithstanding the conventional definition, which is outdated and too narrow to be realistic. I guess you didn't understand. Then again, liberals aren't the most understanding folks around and choose to believe what's most convenient.
The guy at 5:08 with the francophone accent, holding the Canon Minicam? The age is about right, but I have a beard and no accent. Not much of a resemblance. If you're on LinkedIn, I've got a profile picture up.
In other words, you have a definition of "communism" that doesn't mean what the word means when other people are having serious discussions about politics or economics. Yes, I do understand that. And I also understand that you use as a blanket term for all the different forces out there that you view as mysteriously linked and conspiring against you. I get that too. I'm just saying - the term has no definable meaning when you use it, except to yourself and other folks who "debate" political issues at a similar level.
That's the best you can do? Beards can be shaved and accents faked... and I've seen many pix of you... I'm extremely good with facial features... but I'll take your denial at face value just to be polite . :) And because, well, this all I got, so... But you must admit it's funny... ;) Guy who looks just like you, calling the terrorist attack a "setup"... boy, how inconvenient for you, eh? LOL
And "communism" is really a huge umbrella with many different somehow-connected-ideologically-and-otherwise entities thereunder. This is the way it is. Go ahead and try to claim differently. This is my analysis, borne of years of carefully observing and analysing all sorts of evidence, contemporary, current-event, historical and other. I will stand by it no matter what you say. :)
Are you really being serious here? Do you actually think that was me?
As for your "analysis" of "communism", I have no intention of changing your mind; there really isn't a definition there to change, beyond the vague concept of "Bad Guys". That's occasionally confusing (such as the time you tried to argue that the military junta killing rural Mayans in El Salvador were "communists" - remember that?). But I have no interest in provoking another flood of adjectives.
I really could not care less what you think, Mr. Rudden The Lefty. You are entitled to your opinion, so... opinion rendered. Thank you. Next! ;)
I look forward to the day you actually attempt to define what you mean by a "communist". It'll be illuminating, I have no doubt.
Post a Comment