Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Time To Stop Warming/Climate-Change Big Lies: REAL Scientist

Story here.

Apollo 7 astronaut Walter Cunningham knows a lot about science and the importance of getting it right. Walt has earned undergraduate and graduate degrees in physics. He has also completed all coursework for a doctorate in that discipline, but those studies were interrupted by other commitments before completing thesis requirements. In addition, he is a graduate of the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program.

Walt put his science and technology background into real action as a Marine Corps fighter pilot and Apollo Lunar Module pilot. He has logged more than 4,500 hours of flying time of including more than 3,400 in jet aircraft, and more than 263 hours in space. (I’m not sure how many hours he has logged flying closer to Earth over Texas highways in his Corvette.) Walt was called upon to further apply his mission training and flight experiences as Chief of NASA’s Skylab Branch of the Astronaut Office.

Col. Cunningham, like many other scientifically and technologically experienced space program professionals, is an outspoken critic of pseudo-scientific climate alarmist claims. In this interview he explains why.

 Read the interview HERE.

I come from a background where responsible science and technology are the difference between life and death. The Apollo Program relied on quality data and objective interpretation to advance knowledge in areas of science and technology that had never before been explored. All of us had complete trust in the competence, integrity and accountability of those we worked with to create the systems and hardware we depended on in the most extreme environment.
The biggest problems I see with the sorry state of “climate science,” as the public comes to know it through the media, are the alarmist claims, unsupported by data and history, being presented as facts. When these claims cannot be validated by empirical data, they attempt to justify them by equally dishonest claims of proof by “consensus”. These alarmist claims create unwarranted fear in order to promote their political and profiteering agendas, while establishing regulatory policies that kill business and grow government – all at a terrific cost to taxpayers and energy consumers.

Without the science to back up their wild forecasts and claims, and the overwhelming evidence for natural temperature variation, alarmists try to exploit this unwarranted fear by resorting to the precautionary argument: “We must do something just in case we are responsible, because the consequences are too terrible if we are to blame and do nothing.”

Those of us who challenge alarmist claims of accepted theory and “consensus” are referred to as “skeptics”, as if that’s a bad thing. Responsible scientists are supposed to be skeptical.

Those who aren’t qualify as demagogues. In the days of Apollo, astronauts, engineers, flight controllers and managers were skeptical of anything that might impact landing a man on the Moon. That attitude led to success in one of the biggest challenges in history.

If you buy a phony conclusion, as Al Gore obviously did, the consequences can be terribly costly.

UPDATE:  To the Troll who persists in bothering to leave little stinky turds as comments despite knowing he's never, ever getting published out of moderation again:  Give it up already, old fart agent provocateur-covert influencer-propagandist.  You've done me a favor the sort of which you don't realize... you have no idea what you created in having bullshat with me lo those many years with your useless time-wasting bafflegab.  Thus, I know what you are.  And, incidentally, I suspect that your little business there, the one you barely tend to due to obsessing over li'l ole moi,  that "business" may be a communist front (don't worry, I don't really think you're Chinese, for I know you don't even look like you could be).  It just doesn't make any sense, the propaganda/special-communications entity you run, when one thinks of it.  I suspect it to be a propaganda-activism stooge entity for the communist movement, and its sources of income would have to be via some form of laundering, some of which may well come from the pockets of former Nazi collaborator George Soros.  Just thinkin', y'know.  Could be wrong, but, hey, the quest for the truth is motivated by questioning the questionable...

No comments: