Tuesday, January 30, 2007

A Victory For Nudist Rights in Spain

Story here.

Well, good for the nudists of Spain. I'm happy for them. I'm happy that they're naked and happy.

Congratulations, Spanish nudists! You can be proud!

Hopefully this will lead to nudist pride weeks, nudist pride parades, , nudist cruises, nudist bars, nudist adoption, nudist marriage...

In related news, a weird guy runs naked around a high school at lunchtime, screaming, arms flailing. Police taser him. Twice.

Freak. Probably had black socks on, too, to add to the whole bizarreness of the stupid moonbat prank...

Geez... the world's full of crazy naked freaks. First we saw the "pride" parades with the waggling weenies & gyrating gonads, then the anti-war parades with ugly, naked, screaming moonbats...

Now we have folks just going around bareassed for absolutely no reason whatsoever...

I suppose that's one of those things the left would call "progressive"...

Ok, so that's a post about nothing. Then again, it's about folks with nothing on...

EXPOSED: NA Union By 'Stealth' Was Planned

Judicial Watch:

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released documents obtained November 2006 under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) from U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM). The documents concern the participation of NORTHCOM Commander, Admiral Timothy Keating, NORTHCOM Political Advisor Deborah Bolton, and Plans, Policy & Strategy Director Major General Mark Volcheff in a meeting of the “North American Forum” at the Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Canada on September 12-14, 2006. A similar request for records concerning forum participation by then-Defense Secretary Rumsfeld and his entourage is still pending with the


The North American Forum presentations discussed immigration and border enforcement; full economic and energy integration including infrastructure and transportation; a North American investment fund; and common customs and duties. The idea of a carbon tax was raised as a means to combat so-called global warming. References to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) occur throughout the documents.

Here's the disturbing part of it all:

The notes for the presentations document the need to overcome popular opposition to North American integration: “To what degree does a concept of North America help/hinder solving problems between the three countries?…While a vision is appealing working on the infrastructure might yield more benefit and bring more people on board (‘evolution by stealth’).”

“It is not encouraging to see the phrase ‘evolution by stealth’ in reference to important policy debates such as North American integration and cooperation,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “These documents provide more information to Americans concerned about the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The more transparency, the better.”

Click here for all the documentary links.

Via World Net Daily, where I first found the above:

At least one attendee of the conference said the meeting was intended to subvert the democratic process. Mel Hurtig, a Canadian author and publisher elected as the leader of the National Party of Canada, told WND last fall the idea of the North American Forum is to move the countries toward integration without public consent or even knowledge.

"What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did not inform the press in any of the three countries," he said. "It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries out of the public eye."

The conference raised more suspicions about plans for the future merger of the U.S., Canada and Mexico – with topics ranging from "A Vision for North America," "Opportunities for Security Cooperation" and "Demographic and Social Dimensions of North American Integration."

I don't like this. Too secretive. Something so big... in free, democratic societies... being plotted in secrecy, hidden from the public...

We've seen the European Union concept in reality already, and, quite frankly, it doesn't appear all that much of a great idea. It's unclear as to whether any benefits, if real rather than merely theoretical, outweigh the obvious disadvantages of such a massive international melding.

Too unwieldy. Too grand.

Too... slippery slope to the unknown.

Monday, January 29, 2007

Stephane Dion Finally Combs His Hair

Here's a picture of Stephane Dion, Liberal Leader, taken as he yells and points rudely in the House of Commons on the first day back after the long Christmas break. Look: he combed his hair today! Good for you, Stephie!
As for the pictures below, they illustrate the mussed-up geeky-professor look he had sported prior to the makeover his handlers gave him in a futile attempt to make him look somewhat more attractive to the Canadian electorate. I'd suggest taking English lessons so he can speak for himself in the language of the majority of Canadians. And admit that he actually wasn't anything of a decent environment minister in Paul Martin's old Cabinet, but was actually a pathetic little feck-up, having done nothing but talk, talk, talk...

Above: Poor Stephie suffering a pognophobic episode (irrational fear of men with beards)

Above: Dion holding his breath? Or letting out a little patootie toot?

Above: Stephanie sharing a giggle with friend Condi

Moonbat Spotlight: Hillary Thinks Evil is Funny

The woman who wants to be president of the United States actually thinks that joking about dealing with evildoers is funny.

I don't.

Dealing with evildoers is no laughing matter. It is a deadly serious business.

And if Hillary Clinton cannot take it seriously any more than did Billy, then she must not become president.

Geez... those moonbats...

Conflict of Interest: Liberal Censors Tory Political Ads

Story here. ht: National Newswatch

See what I've been saying all along? The Liberal Party of Canada places its loyalists wherever it possibly can in order to have things go their way as much as possible.

This is just another smoking gun amongst many others.

Oh, and the CBC is also involved in the whole appalling, corrupt thing.

Ezra Levant, who wrote this article, concludes, reminding us that it's not over; that the conflict of interest is continuing and threatens to harm the democratic process, cheating the electorate out of a fair and equitable election campaign:

Patterson, the big Liberal donor, is getting ready to block Tory ads in the upcoming campaign. He knows thin-skinned Stephane Dion, the new Liberal leader, won't grant permission to the Tories to use footage of him saying foolish things.

So he's trying to set a new rule, a new precedent, to protect Dion.

In a free society, politicians have to live with the consequences of what they say. Patterson, the Telecaster censor, wants to change that. We know the CBC is on side with him. What about the rest of Canada's media?

You see, this is yet another reason why we need to give the Conservatives a solid majority in the next election: to make Canada a free and democratic society once again, uncorrupted by extreme partisan cronyism throughout the entire state apparatus, which is what the Liberals have made a reality... to serve their own interests, rather than the interests of Canada and Canadians.

Oh, and by the way, the Conservatives have already released some TV ads which expose Stephane Dion's weaknesses to the light of day.

Listen to the Liberals claim we're desperate and worried. Nope; 'tis the Liberals who are the desperate, worried ones. They know they have a dud for a "leader" in Stephane Dion!

You can view the ads here. There's three of them. I think they really make the point very effectively. Which is why the Liberals are squealing like big fat pigs being pinched!

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Woman Marries Dog?

You may now lick the bride!

How do we know this won't happen? Remember, the liberals have a hidden agenda!
Hey! I think that's a female doggie... Oh, wait! The Liberals already made that ok...

Winston Churchill On Islam

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property‹either as a child, a wife, or a concubine‹must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen; all know how to die; but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science‹the science against which it had vainly struggled‹the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248 50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899)

Recall that Churchill's contemporaries had initially largely dismissed his astute, and absolutely correct, warnings about Hitler. However, when they saw that he was right after all, they put him into power to lead Britain into battle against the Nazis.

Today many are similarly dismissive of warnings about imminent Islamic jihad, however founded via documentation, via actual jihad attacks, via openly promised word of Islamist leaders or via actions of Islamic jihadists.

This is a grave, historical mistake. And bear in mind that today the enemy has or will soon have nuclear weapons.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Moonbat Spotlight: Andrew Krystal

Andrew Krystal, moonbat nutcase

Well, you just need to read the report to see what makes this guy a stark raving moonbat. Sheesh... he reminds me of folks like Michael Moore.

Just for starters, he told Charles Adler, the grandson of victims of Auschwitz in the Holocaust that he'd "vote for Hitler if he was a Conservative".

More proof of leftism being a mental disorder.


WND's Farrah on Jimmy Carter's Anti-Semitism

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Jimmy Carter

To follow up on the ignored-by-the-MSM writing by former US President Jimmy Carter of the words "Too many Jews", I'd like to direct y'all to this commentary by World Net Daily founder Joseph Farrah, who has some excellent points.

here. Read all of it.


Every time you hear or read the name Jimmy Carter from this day forward, I want you to remember those three words he scrawled in his own handwriting on a memo proposing board members for the Holocaust Memorial Council. That's the real Jimmy Carter. He poses as a reasonable, even-handed fellow when promoting his book on C-SPAN. But if you want to know who he really is, just remember those three words – the three words that define growing anti-Semitism in our world today as well as a growing blame-Israel-first attitude.

"Too many Jews."

That's what Jimmy Carter believes is the problem. That's what Hamas believes is the problem. That's what Hezbollah believes is the problem. That's what Mahmoud Abbas believes is the problem. That's what Syria and Iran believe is the problem. And, of course, that's what Hitler believed was the problem.

I'm astonished that the MSM hasn't picked up on this.

What's even more astonishing is that this hasn't seemed to have inspired much critical blogging about Jimmy Carter at all.

Isn't this a big deal? If it had been Nixon's writing instead of Carter's, you can be sure the MSM would be all over it!

Barrack Obama, the MSM & More Proof of Leftist Mental Disorder

...here. h/t: The Source Daily

Well, you have to read it carefully to understand how the left is so mentally disordered as to be rendered unworthy of being trusted to handle anything having anything to do with the administration of a state and its society.

If you read it carefully but still cannot understand how that adds to the rapidly amassing body of proof that leftism/liberalism is characterized mainly by mental disorder, then you are a leftist/liberal and need to get help.

Muslim Attacks Doctor For Examining Wife

Story here. h/t: The Source Daily

PARIS: A French Muslim who attacked a male gynaecologist for examining his wife just after she had given birth, saying it was against Islam, has been jailed for six months by a Paris court.

Fouad ben Moussa burst into the delivery room at a Paris hospital last November and shoved, slapped and insulted Dr Jean-Francois Oury as he examined the woman after a complicated birth, the prosecution said in court on Wednesday.


"This is a public and secular place," prosecution lawyer Georges Holleaux said of the state hospital where the attack occurred. "This is not the place where one can invoke religion to get different treatment."

Well, I'm glad that the French are beginning to come to their senses and will not allow people to break the law in the name of religion in their country. If they don't allow other religions to break the law, then they must not grant exemptions for Islam, either.

I think justice has been done here. I think the correct message has been sent: that France will not tolerate any Islamic supremacism and will enforce French law and codes of conduct.

I recommend that other countries make it similarly clear that no special exemptions will be granted for those who cite their ideology as an excuse to not obey the laws of a country which all must obey equally.

Hollywood Wrongly Blamed For Muslims' Bad Image

Story here. h/t: New Media Journal

Basically, there's some Muslims out there claiming that Hollywood is perpetuating "negative stereotypes" of Muslims, sometimes showing them as "bad guys".

Well, I'd say that Muslim bad guys themselves, who are merely following the requirements of the Koran, are doing the most excellent job of giving Islam and Muslims a bad image by going around spreading hatred and death throughout the world in the name of their precious "Allah".

Why don't the concerned Muslims, rather than worrying about a few Hollywood movies in which sometimes a bad guy happens to be, lo and behold, a Muslim jihadist.... why don't they go after all the clerics indoctrinating all these Muslims (who keep on getting born in great numbers at an accelerating rate) and make them stop?

Why not stop Muslims and Islam itself from being bad, then show that fact to the world? That would go far further than simple state censorship of the entertainment industry forbidding any portrayal whatsoever, ever, of any Muslims as "bad".

Besides, Hollywood already makes Christians, Jews, conservatives, Americans, Israelis, men and many others look bad... and we don't see the state apparatus cracking down on this "negative stereotyping". Probably because it'd be "unconstitutional" to restrict such a "human right" as "freedom of expression". But just watch them censor any movies portraying any Muslim characters at all as anything less than angelic! Oh, yeah, right... all Muslims are as harmless as a cute little kitten, puppy or baby bunny. Sure... Osama bin Laden is harmless, hates no one, never told anyone to kill anyone... Muqtada al-Sadr never killed, nor told anyone to kill anyone, out of Islamic supremacism, jihad and imperialism?

Perspective and understanding reality, not censorship, are needed.

Remember, when one looks at the statistics, when it comes to terrorism in the world, most of the time it is committed by Muslims in the name of Islam and Allah. Of this there can be no doubt. Hell, I think, in fact, that most beheadings are conducted by Muslims in the name of Islam and Allah. Who else uses beheading rather than simply shooting people? I mean, come on...

So what's the matter with having Hollywood reflecting reality, that, yes, in addition to all other kinds of folks in the world, there are some Muslims who are bad and who do really bad things? Why should Islam be granted a special privilege of exemption from being portrayed fairly? Is the truth not fair? Isn't it true to say that there are members from all groups in the world who do bad stuff?

Isn't it true that there are indeed millions of Muslims in the world who believe in Islamic supremacy, Koranic-required intolerance, violence, jihad and imperialism and often actually put these beliefs into action? Oh, yes; it is true. And there are Muslims out there who want to silence those who speak the truth, like those calling for the censorship of the entertainment industry.

Friday, January 26, 2007

BREAKING NEWS: Jimmy Carter Wrote, Initialled Note: "Too Many Jews"

Jimmy Carter mugs for cameras with Yasser Arafat

Story here.

Also reporting...

And... the evidence is given by a "self-proclaimed liberal".

TEL AVIV – Former President Jimmy Carter once complained there were "too many Jews" on the government's Holocaust Memorial Council, Monroe Freedman, the council's former executive director, told WND in an exclusive interview.

Freedman, who served on the council during Carter's term as president, also revealed a noted Holocaust scholar who was a Presbyterian Christian was rejected from the
council's board by Carter's office because the scholar's name "sounded too Jewish."


He told WND he sent a memo to Carter's office containing recommendations for council board members.

He said his memo was returned with a note on the upper right hand corner that stated, "Too many Jews."

The note was written in Carter's own handwriting and was initialled by Carter.

The NY Sun has the note.
The question now is:
Will the mainstream media do its job and tell the people about this?
Or will the MSM cover it up, protecting one of its fellow leftist-liberals?

Thursday, January 25, 2007

True Conservative Announces Run For Presidency

Real Conservative Republican Duncan Hunter
Story here.
Wow... this seems to be precisely the kind of person I've been saying needs to be the next Republican president.
He wants to continue the Reagan Revolution.
He strongly opposes illegal immigration.
He was with the Army Rangers in Vietnam.
His son has served in Operation Iraqi Freedom.
I may be Canadian, but I like what I see so far about this guy. I just found out about him for the very first time right now... and he sounds like the right man to lead America right now.
I hope Americans will take a good look at this guy.

Man Threatened To Bomb Christian Churches in Florida

... and police found explosives & homemade bombs in his home.

Read the report here.

He claimed to be from Al Qaeda.

Barf Time: Billary For President

Hmm... she has man hands, see? (h/t: Canada Free Press)
Below: With those hands she does pee...

Oh, please, nooooo! This is just too extreme, too freaky!

Man Charged With Drug Trafficking Endorsed Stephane Dion

Crime, corruption, greed...
In the Liberal Party of Canada.
When will they ever learn?
When will they ever truly oppose crime, corruption and greed in their own party?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Just on the heels of Stephane Dion hastily backtracking on seemingly implying his acceptance of the reinstatement/return of an ADSCAM participant who was banned for life from the Party...
We hear of this. Click and read about the whole sordid thing.
Hmm.... drugs and Liberals again. I recall Gomery Inquiry testimony from Olympic Gold Medalist Myriam Bedard that there were drugs involved in the ADSCAM scandal.
Here's a taste:
NATIONAL NEWSWATCH INSIDER - It appears that a B.C. Union leader whose endorsement letter was featured on Stephane Dion's Liberal leadership campaign Website has been charged in the U.S. with possession of $4.3 million of cocaine with intent to distribute...
Oooh... oooh... oooh!
Poor, poor, pitiful Liberals!

Trojan.Peacomm: I Was Right About Sinister Emails

Remember this post, in which I warned of suspicious-looking emails with the fascinating headlines and .exe attachments to be clicked?

Symantec (Norton Internet Security) has advised me of the following.

Symantec Security Response raised the risk level of Trojan.Peacomm from a category 2 out of 5, to a category 3 threat, due to the speed and volume in which it is being aggressively spammed across the Internet. The Trojan, which was first spotted January 17, 2007 has been raised to a higher category following a sustained increase in new versions of the attack which appeared over the weekend as the malware author responded to improvements in protection made by security companies by adjusting his tactics.

Trojan.Peacomm is one of a number of spamming Trojan horse programs Symantec has seen lately that appear to originate from Russia and are clearly aimed at making money for the author by pumping up penny stocks. The victim is enticed through social engineering techniques to open an attachment, which typically appears to be a video clip on a recent, newsworthy event.

The trojan horse arrives as an attachment to an email purporting to contain a video of one of several different recent news stories. The email itself will have no message body, but will have one of several subject lines such as "A killer at 11, he's free at 21 and kill again!," "Fidel Castro Dead," "Re: Your Text." For a complete list of subject lines, please click here.

Well, one of the spams I got claimed to have a video proving that Saddam Hussein was actually alive today! Those Russkies must think that we're stupid and guillible enough to fall for such an obvious scam!

Guess I wasn't specifically targeted after all. It's a widely-distributed trojan horse.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Muslim Declares Islam MUST Reform, Eradicate Own Inherent Evilness

Video here.

h/t: America's Truth Forum

Muslim Cleric: Beating Women is "Wondrous"

Infuriating, damning video here.

The cleric reminds his listeners that the Koran requires that Muslim men beat their wives.

He calls that particular verse "wondrous" and declares as "ignorant" Westerners who find it abhorrent that Muslim men beat women.

Islam appears to always escape unscathed every time the damning truth about that ideology leaks out as it has in this and many, many other videos.

I wonder if the left and feminists in particular will look the other way, out of submissive Dhimmitude, when faced with such shocking truth?

How frequently do we hear the left, feminists, homosexuals, the MSM, etc. condemning Islam for its brutal intolerance of all kinds of people? Not very!

And bear in mind that this isn't an isolated incident. But the left will tend to automatically dismiss this cleric as one of a very, very tiny minority within the ideology. But they will not offer any proof to back up this dismissal.

They'll also ignore the fact that the Koran says such a thing. They don't want to deal with it.

They prefer instead to attack, for example, Christianity, Judaism and all kinds of non-leftist people with false accusations!

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Alert: Email Viruses Posing As Big Breaking News

I've just checked my "bulk" email folder, which catches spam emails.

I've noticed a sudden upsurge of spam today, involving several emails with subject lines like headlines such as "Russian Missile Hits US Sub" and "Saddam Alive", which include an attachment of approximately 40 kb in size, with the .exe extension.

These are clearly viruses. I recognized them immediately and deleted the emails.

Do NOT open anything like that.

I suspect that I was targeted by hostiles familiar with my blogging who wanted to attack my computer somehow.

Well, if this is the case, they failed. Amateur idiot(s)!

The Canadian Sentinel stands on guard against cyberattacks, too!

Has anyone else noticed similar spams with malicious .exe attachments?

Moonbat Spotlight: French Socialist Prez Hopeful Ségolène Royal

Story here. h/t: National Newswatch

What's the matter with the French, anyway? First De Gaulle uttered his infamous "Vive le Quebec libre". Now we have French Socialist Presidential hopeful Ségolène Royal saying pretty much the same, rudely butting into Canada's sovereign internal affairs.

Despite Prime Minister Harper's rebuke, the socialist poophead arrogantly defended her interference, denying any interference at all. Idiot.

I'd like to give the following message to French presidents and presidential hopefuls: "CHUT!"

That means "shut up" in French, if I remember correctly from high school French class.

Granted, Madame Royal may be far, far cuter than De Gaulle was, but she's just as big a TROU DE CUL!

("Trou" meaning "hole"; "cul" meaning "ass"... get it?)

Hmm... rather like a cuter, French version of Nancy Pelosi, I think...

Bah! Cheese-eating surrender monkey! Too chicken to offend the Islamic fascists, but to offend Canada? Pas d'un problem! Nous sommes francais! Tu es rien! Ou est la fromage?!

Oh, dear... I'm so ashamed of myself... part of me feels like cursing her nosy moonbattery, but another part of me can't stop looking at her picture...

Perhaps I should say a few Hail Marys or something? And then move on and look at a picture of Rona Ambrose instead... who's way cuter and nicer! And way smarter, too!

Maybe I have a thing for brunettes...

Seriously, though, I just hope the French elect as president the conservative guy . He sounds much smarter, though he ain't no hot babe himself...

Reader Tips & Stupid Liberal Tricks

Above: John Kerry at a clinic, seeking help. Below, same guy, needing help! And he's considering going for the Democratic Presidential nomination again! Holy crap!

Above: Democratic spin doctor James Carville's kitty

Below: Nancy Pelosi and pal Rosie O'Donnel having a good time

Above: Al Gore in the Army? Looks a lot like him!

Monday, January 22, 2007

Keith Ellison Demanded Terrorists' Release

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

First-ever Muslim Congressman, "former" Nation of Islam member, CAIR-associated Keith Hakim Mohammed Ellison in 2000 called for the realease of terrorists.

(Emphasis mine):

When House Speaker Nancy Pelosi joined Minnesota freshman Rep. Keith Ellison for his recent swearing-in ceremony, the controversy over his taking the oath of office on the Quran overshadowed his earlier role in supporting a terrorist whose group tried to kill policemen and allegedly twice tried to murder Pelosi's fellow San Francisco lawmaker Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

On Feb.12, 2000, Ellison joined Bernadine Dohrn, one of the founders of the 1960s radical group the Weather Underground, and several other speakers at a fundraiser for recently arrested Kathleen Soliah, a.k.a. Sara Jane Olson.


Last week, Ellison was named to the House Judiciary Committee, which has oversight over civil liberties, immigration and the courts. He said he would like to see a ban on racial profiling and will work to restore civil liberties he says have been rolled back by the Bush administration, Associated Press reported.

Jon Opsahl, son of the woman killed by the SLA, told WND: "It does seem to confirm that, unfortunately, intelligence and integrity are not prerequisites for political office in this country in general and in Minnesota in particular."

America is in grave danger.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

US Soldier Comforts Iraqi Baby Orphaned By "Insurgents"

(Click on the image to enlarge, or click on the link below)

Why haven't we seen this photograph in the news in America? This was sent in to StrangeMilitary.com from Australia.

More Lawlessness and State Fascism in "Native"- Occupied Caledonia

Story here.

I say Ontario is merely postponing the inevitable. Whatever that is, it won't be pretty. And it's likely to be deadly. But Ontario under Dalton McGuinty's Liberals don't care, so they allow the situation to continue, favoring one race over all others, fostering growing, seething resentment and tension that's sure to one day erupt...

100 "Natives" versus only 50 non-"Natives".

Riot police standing by...

The whole thing is all the "Natives'" fault. Their own people, in addition to the illegal occupation itself, have committed serious crimes during it and aren't being arrested for them. The OPP won't go after them because of their claimed racial/ancestral heritage.

Yet Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner (formerly Toronto Police Chief) Julian Fantino blames the victims:

OPP Commissioner Julian Fantino said the non-aboriginals, mainly there from outside the area, were there "to cause nothing but trouble."

Hello, you daft little freak? The "Natives" are the cause of all the trouble. You would have the non-"Native" victims simply submit, say and do nothing? My, how unrealistic, how racist. You definitely are doing your part to help make Canada a better place to live... for everyone. Oh, definitely!

"All of this is so counterproductive . . . we wish they would just stay home,'' Fantino said at a nearby command post.

Indeed, it is. The whole illegal, racist occupation by these thugs, criminals and terrorists is wholly counterproductive. And so are you. Why don't you also say you wish that the "Natives" just "stay home" and shut up, too? Asshole. Lawless cop. Politician's lapdog.

Lawless? You betcha. The OPP and the Ontario government are ignoring a Supreme Court of Canada ruling:

"The Supreme Court ruled in 1993 that we have the right to put flags up on those hydro poles down there," he said. "The OPP knows this, Fantino admitted it, but yet they'll arrest us if we try to do that."

The SCOC has already declared that the residents of Caledonia have every right to put up Canadian flags. Yet the OPP will arrest them should they do so, despite the fact that the "Natives" have put up that and other flags and weren't bothered by the OPP.

Therefore, we now know that the Supreme Court of Canada's rulings are irrelevant and don't have to be obeyed by the state, nor the police. Why should citizens obey its rulings, too? Why? The state which they pay for with their own money to serve their interests isn't!

Imagine the far-reaching implications of this precedent. No longer can the left credibly say, "the courts say so, therefore it must be so".

Oh, here we have an exalted "Native" accusing the victims of being "racist":

Some aboriginals said the protests are racially motivated. "There's a lot of racial discriminatory things being said and it's unfortunate," said Hazel Hill.

Is she for real?! It is her own people who are the racists! The Natives are the ones who are racially motivated!

Racist is as racist does. The "Natives" do racism. The victims are merely standing up to them, refusing to submit to the state-sanctioned racism and lawlessness!

Liberal: Martin Lied, Shuffled Me Aside For Star Candidate

Story here. h/t: National Newswatch

Onetime Liberal MP Sarkis Assadourian says he never did a day's work after being appointed a special adviser to former prime minister Paul Martin.

Shortly before the 2004 election, Assadourian agreed to step aside in his Brampton riding so that a star recruit, Ruby Dhalla, could run for the Liberals in his stead. In return, Martin gave him a job as a special foreign policy adviser.

"They put out a press release and he said to the media and the nation with a straight face I was working with him as (his) adviser on the south Caucasus and Middle East," Assadourian said in an interview.

"The whole thing was a lie . . . I never a single day worked in his office. I was never paid a single penny."

Well, read it all.

Draw your own conclusion.

My conclusion is that this is yet more proof that Liberals lie, and lie a lot. It's part of Liberal culture.

And it's destroying the Liberal Party of Canada.

So be it.

Why would anyone in their right mind ever vote Liberal, considering how terrible their record has been as government and their incredible, unprecedented-in-scope-and-intensity corruption and dishonesty?

It's like knowingly hiring a convicted serial kleptomaniac to work in a jewellery store!

Friday, January 19, 2007

So-called "Fairness" Doctrine Would Be 'Dealt With' By Bush: WND

Story here. Read it all.

The Democrats want to try to eradicate conservative television and radio shows. Oh, yes, they do. Why do I say this? Here's why (emphasis mine):
"Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Congressman Maurice Hinchy of New York have just introduced companion bills called the 'Media Ownership Reform Act,' which are an attempt to revive the 'fairness' doctrine' for TV and radio with no such government control proposed for newspapers, magazines or wire services..."

Hmm. I'm thinking about the success of FOX News and of Rush Limbaugh's radio talk show. Apparently, conservatives do well on TV and radio, therefore the Democrats will target these forms of media with their so-called "fairness" bullshit. Oh, yes. And where's proof of intent on the part of the extremist Democrats? Here we go:
(...)"President Kennedy's Assistant Secretary of Commerce, Bill Ruder, said, 'We had a massive strategy to use the 'fairness doctrine' to challenge and harass the right-wing broadcasters and hoped the challenge would be so costly to them that they would be inhibited and decide it was too expensive to continue...."

That was an explanation of what the Democrats were trying to do with the so-called "fairness" fascism: eliminate conservative voices by making it "too expensive to continue..." straight from the donkey's mouth!

Apparently, as we see from the article at the link, the Democrats are always trying to reimpose this so-called "fairness" pigpoop. They're hellbent on trying to shut up conservative voices. They want to monopolize public discourse to their political and social agendae's advantage. This is a desire on their part to have a state-apparatus propaganda system in place for whatever they want. Hmm... rather like the Nazi propaganda machine, the Soviet propaganda machine, the Chinese propaganda machine, Saddam's propaganda machine, etc., etc...

Silence the dissenting voices... that's the "liberal" way.

Tell us all what we may and may not say.

WND says that the problem with this so-called "fairness" doctrine, and I agree, is essentially:
(...) such a doctrine is impossible to enforce, since "fairness" would mean "that each broadcaster must offer air time to anyone with a controversial view. Since it is impossible for every station to be monitored constantly, FCC regulators would arbitrarily determine what 'fair access' is, and who is entitled to it, through selective enforcement."

We don't want the state telling us what's what. I thought the liberal-left wanted the state to not interfere with peoples' liberties. But that is what the Democrats and liberal-left always go out of their way to try to do.

I reject the left's arrogance in purporting to be the sole determinor of what is and what isn't "fair". Who do they think they are? How dare they? Where do they get off (don't answer that one; we don't need to go there)?

Did the left deify itself? Does the left think that they, as a collective, constitute God? If they do, then they're seriously delusional!

The people should be left free to say whatever they want and not be forced by the state via state agencies and apparatchiks to say what the state deems they must. Fascist is as fascist does!

Oh, and actually, with the doctrine in place, even the Republicans in the past (but not since the doctrine was abolished by Reagan, thank goodness!) have used it to restrict political opposition, according to WND.

So, with that in mind, does the liberal-left really want this to be the way things work? When in power, they stifle opposition conservatives and say they have a right to do so under the law whereas when the Republicans are in power and do it, they call them "Nazis" and "Fascists"?

See, the liberal-left Democrats want to have it both ways! Ok for them to silence opposition, but not for their opposition to do the same!

How about this: Neither side be allowed to silence dissent? Bush hasn't silenced the horrible, treasonous, threatening "dissent" we've seen and heard coming from the liberal-left, has he? No- he simply reminds everyone that they can do it because of the freedom of expression that the U.S. Constitution guarantees.

Don't tolerate any move back into the dark ages of iron-fisted statist control of what we say.

FLQ Terrorist Cell Active?

Well, if they are, I sure hope these guys won't be appeased like other terrorists are being appeased.

We've been through this before. At least Trudeau, commie peacenik he may have been, had the balls to crack down on them.

But I fear that today, in Canada, as with the appeasement of the Aboriginal terrorists occupying Caledonia, the three levels of government might just let the FLQ, if reactivated, get away with whatever it may have planned. I fear that the worthless strategy of simply talking to the violent public enemies will be repeated.

I say that whatever kind of terrorism, by whomever, requires quick and effective police/military force to end it immediately.

If we respond to terrorists by talking to them and kissing their asses, then there'll be more and more terrorists in the future.

Let's not be stupid. Let's treat terrorists with the iron fist they're asking for. Otherwise, they'll take their iron fists to more and more innocent people.

The state's job is to protect the innocent, not those who harm them!

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Dems to Impose on Conservative Broadcasters

Nancy Pelosi, Supreme Leftist Overlord of the House of Representatives of the U.S.A.

Freedom of expression and the freedom of the press are now in danger of being seriously eroded under Nazi Pelosi's leftwing tyranny.

Story here.

h/t: The Source Daily

Nancy Pelosi wants to bring back state control of the media. Ronald Reagan had ended state interference in the media, and rightly so. As a result, the left was unable to monopolize the public discourse, owing to the advent and great success of conservative media such as FOX News and radio personality Rush Limbaugh. That is how America has come to enjoy a balanced dialogue. Meida outlets are allowed today to present whatever point of view they want. Viewers are able to patronize whatever outlet they wish. This is part of what freedom is about! But Democrats and leftists hate freedom, as we can see!

Pelosi wants to go back to the dark ages of state interference, command and control.

In order to silence her conservative opposition.

Could this be a first step to even more iron fisted control of Americans' liberties? Will Pelosi eventually get away with ignoring the Constitution? Will she eventually deny Americans their rights?

What is Pelosi's true agenda? Only she knows, but she won't tell us.

I strongly reject the Democrats' rationalization for their planned legislation. They want to force all media to present both conservative and liberal points of view. This is unnecessary. Wholly so. Why? Because there's already presentation of both sides. The MSM presents the liberal viewpoint while conservative media outlets present the conservative viewpoint. What's the point in forcing all media to present points of view which they don't really care to put forth? This is contrary to the Constitution's freedom of expression guarantee.

How dare this Nancy Pelosi tell Americans that they must, by law, communicate points of view with which they disagree? That's stupid! Hell, how on earth will the state be able to know that a media outlet's presentation of the opposite side's viewpoint is accurate? Stupid Democrats... don't they realize that media outlets will simply make up stuff, making it appear that the other side is saying stuff it really doesn't mean to say? Oh, of course... the state would say that media outlets would have to have persons of the opposite viewpoint presenting their viewpoint. But there's a way around this: simply have folks on to pretend to be the other side and make fools of themselves or whatever. Come on; it's stupid. More statist stupidity and insanity.

I hope Americans fight this move fiercely. Americans must make it very clear to Nancy Pelosi that they will not tolerate such command, control, state interference and fascism!

Who are the Democrats to tell Americans what they're allowed to say? Who are the Democrats to force people to speak for folks with whom they disagree?

Fascist, she is! Down with Nancy Pelosi!

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Fascist dictator Mussolini: Pelosi's inspiration?

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Saddam in Hell

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Islam Uncensored on and on Candid Camera

Here we go... proof. Watch the videos for yourself. It's undercover footage taken at a mosque in Britain.

Of Islamic supremacism, intolerance, imperialism.

Hatred of non-Muslims.

Disdain and brutal discrimination against women.

Incitement to murder homosexuals.

And much more...

Religion of tolerance and peace. Yeah, sure.

They just want to be left alone? Oh, really?

If you want to see the worst of the worst, here's a link. Warning! Extremely horrible graphic, inhuman images! Viewer discretion very strongly advised!!! If you are faint of heart, this link is NOT RECOMMENDED!

Another Liberal Defects to Conservatives

Mark Persaud, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Wajid Khan

Hmm... where was the MSM on this? Why didn't they trumpet this? Isn't this good for the Tories and devastating for the Liberals? How come I didn't notice anything significant in the MSM about this? I actually had to go to the Conservative Party website to realize what just happened. Poor job the MSM has done of reporting the news! So I'll fill the void they left in all their anti-Conservative bias.

Liberals have been defecting to the Conservatives in droves, including high-profile ones. Yet the MSM isn't really enthusiastic about reporting about it, unless there's something that appears somehow potentially negative to put up to plant artificial seeds in the minds of the MSM's audience that perhaps the defectors aren't all that wonderful, or something...

Nevertheless, this latest defection is significant. Here's some excerpts from the Party's site:

MISSISSAUGA – Appearing at an event with new Conservative MP Wajid Khan today, Prime Minister Stephen Harper announced that another prominent former Liberal, Mark Persaud, who chaired the Liberal Party of Canada's Standing Committee on Multiculturalism until last year, has also decided to join the Conservative Party.

"Since the formation of the new Conservative Party of Canada, the party has been growing," said Prime Minister Harper. "Accomplished people like Mark Persaud are recognizing that all Canadians have a home and a future in the Conservative Party."

Mr. Persaud fled turmoil in his native Guyana in 1983 and settled in Canada. He obtained a law degree from Osgoode Hall Law School and is now President and CEO of the Canadian International Peace Project. Renowned as a civic leader for his volunteer work on a wide range of social issues, Mark Persaud served as chair of the Liberal Party’s Standing Committee on Multiculturalism from 2002 to 2006. Last year he was nominated for the prestigious Seoul Peace Prize.

Apparently a very significant, accomplished, distinguished man, Mr. Persaud is. And he has chosen the Conservative Party, abandoning the Liberal Party.

That is big news.

But somehow the news didn't get through to me despite my scans of the online MSM sites. Hmm. Interesting!

Notorious US Ninth Circuit Court Reverses Ressam Conviction

What the hell is the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco up to now? That court keeps on making the most insane leftist rulings of all... and just won't stop with its activism.

They've reversed one of Ahmed Ressam's convictions and turned the whole thing back to the lower court.

Remember Ressam? Millennium Bomber guy? Plotted to blow up LAX in the U.S. while abusing the Canadian immigration system with impunity. Caught at the border with a trunkful of explosives.

Why has the 9th done this?

Dang... I'm unable to open the link to the PDF document with the details of the court's decision...

Anyway, I just had to say something... this is a definite "WTF?!" thing as far as I'm concerned. What the hell is up with the 9th Circuit Court? What the hell is up with San Francisco, the home of that particular court? Why's the 9th doing this for Ressam? Do they want to have him go free somehow?

The 9th is the one court I keep reading about when I read about bizarre, extreme-leftwing court rulings. Why is this? What's so bloody special about the 9th? Has it been hijacked by leftwing extremist judges?

They keep on popping up whenever some insane, radical leftwing ruling has been made and reported on.

Just a few quick musings.... anyone got any input on this?

h/t: National Newswatch

Monday, January 15, 2007

Defend Your Faith Against Islam: Catholic Ex-Muslim

Daniel Ali, co-author with Jihad Watch founder Robert Spencer, of Inside Islam: A Guide for Catholics:

At a time when Islam is gaining strength worldwide, Ali told fellow Catholics in attendance that the "first line of defense is to know to your faith."

Catholics must be willing to speak up when their faith is under assault, Ali said.

When Christians engage Muslims, they must avoid the temptation to equivocate in their beliefs in order to appease or keep the peace.

"You cannot flush out Jesus for the sake of getting along with Muslims," Ali said. "They do not like wishy-washy people. They are much more respectful of those who stand by their convictions."

Do not back down. Do not appease. Do not submit to intimidation, nor threats. Defend your faith.

Remember: Muslims are brought up to be disdainful of weakness. Weakness will ensure you will not be respected by Muslims. Therefore, the more strongly you stand up for yourself and your faith, the more you'll be respected.

This means that we must not continue to allow Christianity (and Judaism) to be trod upon by Islamists, (nor by liberals/leftists, either!) for to submit to their hostility and violence only makes them more hateful and violent towards us. Therefore, the best course of action is to stand one's ground, never capitulate, never submit, and fight if necessary. How much we fight depends on the Islamists- if they're continuously killing our people no matter what, then a Crusade will be necessary. Eventually, the time may well come again where we've no choice anymore.

The Left Killed Feminism: Levant

Ezra Levant says feminism is dead following the sexist and racist slurs directed at United States Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice by a leftist Democrat Senator, one Barbara Boxer from California, the land of scream-and-jump-up-and-down-naked-with-black-socks-on lefty radicals.

Read it all.

It is noted in Levant's piece that there's a double standard at play here.

I agree wholly.

I would say, much as does Levant, that Boxer got away with her incendiary, intolerant, insensitive attacks against Dr. Rice because she's a leftist and a Democrat, meaning she's protected by the leftist state apparatus, which includes the MSM, from charges of sexism and racism. It is noted, rightly, by Levant, that if Boxer was a Republican, all hell would've broken loose and the whole thing would be water-cooler talk, radio-talk-show excitement, front-page fodder and Boxer would've had to resign. Hell, leftist-minded women and Blacks would be on TV saying how this "...is just the latest in a longstanding pattern of such slurs and demonstrates what kind of party it is..."

Apparently it's ok to attack a person on the basis of sex, race, and absolutely anything at all... if you're a big-time liberal/leftist imbecile who submissively, brainlessly worships the false deity of double-standard political correctness fascism!

Levant closes by writing:

They prove the obvious: Political correctness only applies to conservatives. Next time leftists talk about standing up for women, or blacks, remember Boxer's insult.

Well, I remember every time a leftist uttered intolerant slurs against people and groups. And it has happened so many times, so frequently, that I've lost count!

For example: Former Quebec separatist premier Lucien Bouchard once said Quebec "needs more white babies", but he got away with it. The MSM pretended it wasn't a racist comment because he was a leftist Quebecer and a separatist. Amazing. But true.

Former Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien said to CBC reporter Christina Lawand something to the effect of: "I see you're getting old, madame. Go and have babies now, so you can benefit from my social program..." He got away with it. Because he's a leftist Liberal.

And how about all the hateful/defamatory slurs uttered by countless liberal/leftist asshats against, very frequently, Christians, Jews, Americans, Albertans, Israelis, men... really, I needn't list the specific speakers and their slurs. Anyone who's had their eyes and ears open on a daily basis for what's happening in our society knows exactly what I'm talking about! Leftists will, however, pretend to never have heard of any such thing... which is impossible to believe, unless one realizes that delusion, denial and mental disorder are key traits of liberalism/leftism.

One simply cannot believe a thing liberals/leftists say anymore. They have totally demolished whatever little credibility and integrity they may have once possessed, if any.

Dion To Announce Shadow Cab? So What?

Liberal leader Stephane Dion, above, enjoying an embrace from a friend. He certainly looks happy and content, doesn't he? I think he likes teddy bears. In fact, I think he carries the famous, if silly, napsack around with him to hide his companion teddy bear. After all, it'd be bad optics to be seen carrying a teddy bear around everywhere he went... who wants as Prime Minister a grown man addicted to a plush toy?
So Liberal leader Stephane Dion is about to announce his "Shadow Cabinet"?
So what? Of what relevance is this? None. All it means is he's decided which of his crooked Liebrano cronies will yell at which of the government's ministers. Big, fat, hairy deal.
In the spirit of irrelevance, I'll post the following funny picture:

Above: an orangutan with a lollipop. Sure, this picture is irrelevant, but at least, unlike Stephane Dion's upcoming "big, important announcement", I know that folks would actually like to see funny pictures of monkeys. Irrelevant but pleasantly smile-provoking, at least. Dion's announcement, in contrast, will merely elicit big yawns.

Stephane Dion really doesn't have much to say, does he? Real inspiring, simply announcing the names of a bunch of ultra-extreme leftwing crooks, isn't it?

In a nutshell, Stephane Dion will never be Prime Minister. Sorry, but he just doesn't have what it takes.

Sunday, January 14, 2007

GM Bringing Back Electric Car?

Above and below; Chevy Volt Concept Car. Nice-looking, isn't she? She's Electric.

Story here.
150 mpg?!
A 1-liter turbocharged engine provides electricity generation to a 400-pound lithium-ion battery, which, at the moment, isn't yet ready for production. The battery provides energy for the electric motor which actually propels the vehicle. It can also be charged via an outlet.
Even better for the greenies amongst us:
One particularly clever feature about the Volt is its E-Flex System, which is an architecture that's designed to accommodate different types of engines. The three-cylinder installed in this show car can run on gasoline or E85, which is a mixture of 85 percent ethanol and 15 percent gasoline. But instead, a diesel could be fitted. Even one that runs on bio-diesel. Or a hydrogen-powered fuel cell. Or pretty much anything (except, maybe, a jet engine. That would be hard to fit.) Expect to see different
variants of the Volt at future car shows.
Now, we're looking at something good.
In other environmental news, Prime Minister Harper invites Arnold to come up here and discuss environmental issues.
Gee, I'm a bit jealous here... Stephen gets to be PM and one of the perks is he also gets to meet Arnold!
Oh, btw, here's a pic of Arnie the Governator with an electric Tesla sportscar:

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

"Now, look... zat iz vhat I vant to driwe. Maybe Maria'll let me buy one...."