Obama: GOP Must Sit In The Back
Story here.
Obama just told Republicans to "sit in the back".
Nice, eh? Anyone who's not a Democrat has to sit in the back of the bus... or be thrown under it.
The Klan is back, apparently, and this time it's "multicultural", communist and hellbent on destroying America to "level the field for the rest of the world".
The following couple is tickled purple to hear it...
Nothing like open expression of extremely hateful bigotry when one figures, what have we got to lose in the election? Let's divide America on partisan, racial and idelogical lines to consolidate certain groups to vote for us. To hell with everyone else.
What does one expect from the guy representing the party responsible for slavery, the KKK, segregation and other horrible things?
Clearly, Obama is a divisive, hateful man. I say Obama's dangerously insane and needs to be impeached ASAP.
posted by Canadian Sentinel at 5:46 AM
17 Comments:
And where does he keep his wel-trained msm: in the front or at the back, since they have taken a 'back seat to OBAMA'S wailing-yet front seat to 'bash' the GOP and Tea Parties?
Not sure if you've seen the original speech but "in the back" refers to a car and not a bus.
I think the lefties made a typo when they called Him the 'post racial President'. They meant to type He's the most racial Precedent.
Bus, car, what difference does it make? "Sit in the back" is something the Democrats used to make Blacks do when riding the bus. Now we have Obama, a Democrat, telling political opponents to "sit in the back". Incredible how Obama can be so insensitive vis-a-vis the racism of his own party, by uttering such nasty slurs. He's suggesting that anyone who's not onside with his agenda is inferior and must be treated as such.
You got that right, Enkidu.
Jen, Obama will keep the MSM wherever he wants them. They almost always comply.
You would understand the difference if you read a transcript of Obama's remarks but the short version is that you can't drive the car from the back seat.
I'm not sure what you mean by "something the Democrats used to make Blacks do when riding the bus." I'm guessing it's a reference to the fact that southern Americans used to vote predominantly Democratic in the fifties and sixties...is that what you mean?
FYI, the Democratic Party is responsible for slavery, the KKK and segregation in America. Racists were Democrats, so it was the Democrats who made Blacks sit in the back of the bus.
I've heard that from partisan Republicans but never from a Canadian...silly stuff IMO.
Do your research, Mikey.
Be aware that it's an inconvenient historical truth that's being covered up.
Silly stuff?
Ok, I'll help you start your research...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bEOiDjdhF4&feature=related
Also: Google for "KKK Democrats".
Do your research. If you dare, and if you care about the truth. If you don't want to know the truth, then you're a racist. ;)
By that logic, the Conservative Party is the Big Government party in Canada due to its involvement in building the first national railroad.
Still silly IMO.
Uh... ok... This time I'm lost.
How so Mr. Mimosa? I just took a cursory peek at Canadian Railroad history. I see rail transport is an integral component of how today's Canada evolved. Not being Canadian I'm sure I've missed the salient point you were making.... so...
What was the conservative party's role in building the first national railroad? ... and ... How does this pertain to the repeated use of 1960's race and civil rights movement imagery by the democratic party in the U.S. today?
I know I'm being a nudge. But it's your comparison and your country's history, so, have a go.
Building the Canadian railroad is indeed a Conservative accomplishment.
It was done by gov't because the private sector wouldn't do it.
So it's about necessary infrastructure.
The Conservatives did their job, period.
If merely doing your basic job as gov't makes you a "big gov't", then what the feck is the Obamacracy?!
And, as Infinity asked, what does that have to do with Obama's dangerously divisive rhetoric?
Hmm, Naked Balbulican Mimosa?
And the Conservatives founded and built Canada.
The Liberals? They just want to exploit Canada and Canadians.
What I'm saying is that political allegiances and political parties change over time. The southern Americans who favoured slavery and opposed integration did predominantly support the Democratic party. That relationship has for the most part broken down as a glance at a political map will demonstrate. The error made is to identify the contemporary Democratic party with the historical one...times change.
Take the Conservative Party of Canada for instance. Can you imagine the tariff loving, Yankee hating, British style Tory Sir John A. MacDonald giving the time of day to today's sad lot of American style Harper conservatives? Parties change, ideologies change, allegiances change...a shared name does not equal a shared commitment to values, particularly spread over a considerable period of time.
I'm afraid the Dems are the same old racist, thuggish, dishonest party as ever. In fact, they still were as recently as the days of MLK Jr. in the '60s, and I don't see how they'd changed in the meantime, other than to pretend to be pro-black-folk while actually pushing policies that keep lots of black folk down and out via fostering dependence on the state, rather than uplifting them into equality. Plus they support "Planned Parenthood" and their continuing racist/genocidal agenda of situating most abortion factories within predominantly-minority neighborhoods. Don't you be fooled, Mikey. Obama and others with the beautiful "tan" in the Dem Party? Uncle Toms who just care about money and themselves and couldn't care less about the plight of poor black folk, so long as they at least get a little check every month. Typical socialists who're happy as long as they themselves are well-off. Much like many of the Aboriginal band politicians in Canada who make a crapload of money and who misuse the funds that're meant to help regular Aboriginal folk rise out of poverty and maybe become part of Canadian society and the larger economy. It's de-facto apartheid, and it's politically correct, unfortunately.
The racist policies of the Left have just become more sophisticated and nuanced, backed up by impressive big-lies propaganda and political correctness oppression.
Nevertheless, "left" and "right" are nothing more than labels of convenience, with, today, "left" meaning racist and pro-communist, whereas "right" means pro-equality and pro-capitalism.
Post a Comment
<< Home