Because the police violated his charter rights.
But I thought it was ok to violate peoples' Charter rights...
Because the "Human Rights" Commissions do it all the time!
So it's ok to take away peoples' rights for simply saying that there's actually a lot of bad Muslims out there, or for republishing Mohammed cartoons.
But, given that, why is it simultaneously wrong to violate the Charter rights of a pervert who sexually molests children?
Maybe the SCOC needs to say something about what the "human rights" commissions are doing, and order them to stop violating peoples' Charter rights!
What the hell is up with all this? Either our Charter rights are inviolable and sacred or they aren't... and for all of us equally, period!
If we can't take rights away from active pedophiles, then we can't take rights away from people who daresay that there's hateful, dangerous Islamofascists all over the place who want to take over the world or who dare to republish Mohammed cartoons...
